nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.10.2014

Mixture modelling analysis of one-month disability after stroke: stroke outcomes study (SOS1)

verfasst von: Theresa Munyombwe, Kate M. Hill, Peter Knapp, Robert M. West

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding the heterogeneity in disability after stroke is important to guide treatment and rehabilitation planning. We explored mixture modelling analysis to identify subgroups of stroke disability and factors associated with disability subgroups.

Method

Analyses were performed using secondary data from a cohort of 448 stroke patients who participated in a 2-year study of stroke outcomes. Mixture modelling approach was used to determine subgroups of early disability following stroke based on the Barthel Index, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), Frenchay Activities Index and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale.

Results

Five distinct disability groups were identified. Nineteen (4.2 %) patients were classified as having very severe disability, 58 (12.9 %) severe disability, 133 (29.7 %) moderate disability, 198 (44.2 %) mild disability and 40 (8.9 %) a mood disorder. Compared to the mild group, patients in the “very severe” group were more likely to be elderly and to have had a previous stroke, and less likely to live alone and had a greater risk of mortality 2 years after stroke. Patients in the mood disorder group showed greater dependency in activities of daily living were younger compared to the other groups and had a greater risk of having mood symptoms 2 years after stroke.

Conclusion

Mixture modelling of 1-month disability after stroke using a broad range of outcome measures has identified clinically meaningful groups relating to long-term outcomes.

Kent, T. A., Soukup, V. M., & Fabian, R. H. (2001). Heterogeneity affecting outcome from acute stroke therapy: Making reperfusion worse. Stroke, 32(10), 2318–2327.PubMedCrossRef

Statistics report: http://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/Stroke%20statistics.pdf. Accessed on 9 October 2013.

World Health Organization, International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease (Geneva, 1980).

Kelly-Hayes, M., Robertson, T. J., Broderick, J. P., Duncan, W. P., Hershey, A. L., Roth, J. E., et al. (1998). The American heart association stroke outcome classification: Executive summary. Circulation, 97(24), 2474–2478.PubMedCrossRef

Brott, T., Adams, H. P, Jr, Olinger, C. P., Marler, J. R., Barsan, W. G., Biller, J., et al. (1989). Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke, 20(7), 864–870.PubMedCrossRef

Rankin, J. (1957). Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scottish Medical Journal, 2(5), 200–215.PubMed

Mahoney, F., & Barthel, D. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.PubMed

Nouri, F. M., & Lincoln, N. B. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 301–305.CrossRef

Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12, 166–170.PubMedCrossRef

10.

McLachlan, G. J. (1992). Cluster analysis and related techniques in medical research. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1(1), 27–48.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Mulroy, S., Gronley, J., Weiss, W., Newsam, C., & Perry, J. (2003). Use of cluster analysis for gait pattern classification of patients in the early and late recovery phases following stroke. Gait Posture, 18(1), 114–125.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 37–44.

13.

Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 8–47.CrossRef

14.

Muthén, B. O. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. Marcoulides & R. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

15.

Muthén, B. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

16.

McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.CrossRef

17.

Pickles, A., & Croudace, T. (2010). Latent mixture models for multivariate and longitudinal outcomes. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 19(3), 271–289.PubMedCrossRef

18.

West, R. M., Hill, M. K., Hewison, J., Knapp, P., & House, A. (2010). Psychological disorders after stroke are an important influence on functional outcomes. A prospective cohort study. Stroke, 41(8), 1723–1727.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Mirbagheri, M. M., & Rymer, W. Z. (2009). Prediction of Reflex recovery after stroke using quantitative Assessments of motor impairment at 1 month. In: Conference proceedings of IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc pp. 7252–7255.

20.

Mayo, N. E., Bronstein, D., Scott, S. C., Finch, L. E., & Miller, S. (2014). Necessary and sufficient causes of participation post-stroke: Practical and philosophical perspectives. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 39–47.

21.

House, A., Knapp, P., Bamford, J., & Vail, A. (2001). Mortality at 12 and 24 months after stroke may be associated with depressive symptoms at 1 month. Stroke, 32(3), 696–701.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Goldberg, D. P., & Hiller, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the general health questionnaire 1992. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139–145.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39(1), 1–38.

24.

Enders, C. K. (2005). Estimation by maximum likelihood. In B. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavioral statistics (pp. 1164–1170). West Sussex: Wiley.

25.

Mutheń, L., & Mutheń, B. (2005). MPlus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

26.

Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.CrossRef

27.

Lo, Y., Mendall, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.CrossRef

28.

Marsh, H. W., Ludke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centred approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(2), 191–225.CrossRef

29.

StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

30.

Wing, J., Cooper, J., & Sartorius, N. (1974). The measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Toschke, A. M., Tilling, K., Cox, A. M., Rudd, A. G., Heuschmann, P. U., & Wolfe, C. D. E. (2010). Patient-specific recovery patterns over time measured by dependence in activities of daily living after stroke and post-stroke care: The South London Stroke Register (SLSR). European Journal of Neurology, 17(2), 219–225.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Tilling, K., Sterne, J. A., & Wolfe, C. D. (2001). Multilevel growth curve models with covariate effects: Application to recovery after stroke. Statistics in Medicine, 20(5), 685–704.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Bagg, S., Pombo, A. P., & Hopman, W. (2002). Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 33, 179–185.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Maree, L., Hackett, M. A., Yapa, C., Parag, V., & Anderson, C. S. (2005). Frequency of depression after stroke a systematic review of observational studies. Stroke, 36, 1330–1340.CrossRef

35.

Bergersen, H., Schanke, A. K., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2013). Predictors of emotional distress and well of emotional distress and well being 2–5 years after stroke. Volume 2013, Hidawi Publishing Corporation. ISRN stroke.

36.

Wade, D. T., Legh-Smith, J., & Hewer, R. A. (1987). Depressed mood after stroke. A community study of its frequency. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 200.

37.

Brown, C., Hasson, H., Thyselius, V., & Almborg, A. H. (2012). Post-stroke depression and functional independence: A conundrum. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 126(1), 45–51.PubMedCrossRef

38.

White, J. H., Magin, P., Attia, J., Pollack, M. R., Sturm, J., & Levi, C. R. (2008). Exploring post stroke mood changes in community-dwelling stroke survivors: A qualitative study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(9), 1701–1707.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Daniel, K., Wolfe, C. D., Busch, M. A., & McKevitt, C. (2009). What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke, 40(6), e431–e440.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Duncan, W. P., Jorgensen, H. S., & Wade, D. (2000). Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke, 31(6), 1420–1438.CrossRef

41.

Hackett, M. I., Anderson, C. S., House, A., & Halten, C. (2008). Interventions for preventing depression after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 16(3). doi:10.1002/14651858.

42.

Williams, L. S., Kroenkek, K., Bakas, T., Plue, L. D., et al. (2007). Care management of: Post stroke depression: A randomised controlled trial. Stroke, 38, 998–1003.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Watkins, C. I., Auston, M. F., Deans, C. F., Dickinson, H. A., Jack, C. I., et al. (2007). Motivational interviewing early after stroke, a randomised controlled trial. Stroke, 38, 1004–1009.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Mixture modelling analysis of one-month disability after stroke: stroke outcomes study (SOS1)
verfasst von: Theresa Munyombwe
Kate M. Hill
Peter Knapp
Robert M. West
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2014
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0681-0

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

Improving the mapping of condition-specific health-related quality of life onto SF-6D score

Assessing quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments

Patient education, upper-limb symptom perception, and quality of life among Japanese breast cancer survivors

Physical activity in relation to quality of life in newly diagnosed colon cancer patients: a 24-month follow-up

Modelling utility weights for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D

Exploring psychometric properties of the SF-6D, a preference-based health-related quality of life measure, in the context of spinal cord injury