The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-155) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
OH developed the concept for data analysis, performed the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. SB participated in the concept for data analyses, participated in performing the statistical analyses, and helped to draft the manuscript. EH developed the concept for data analysis, performed the statistical analyses, and helped to draft the manuscript. RS developed the concept for data analysis, performed the statistical analyses, and helped to draft the manuscript. KD developed the concept for data analysis, performed the statistical analyses, and helped to draft the manuscript. NDB participated in the study design and coordination, the rationale for the data analyses, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
In chest pain, physicians are confronted with numerous interrelationships between symptoms and with evidence for or against classifying a patient into different diagnostic categories. The aim of our study was to find natural groups of patients on the basis of risk factors, history and clinical examination data which should then be validated with patients' final diagnoses.
We conducted a cross-sectional diagnostic study in 74 primary care practices to establish the validity of symptoms and findings for the diagnosis of coronary heart disease. A total of 1199 patients above age 35 presenting with chest pain were included in the study. General practitioners took a standardized history and performed a physical examination. They also recorded their preliminary diagnoses, investigations and management related to the patient's chest pain. We used multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) to examine associations on variable level, and multidimensional scaling (MDS), k-means and fuzzy cluster analyses to search for subgroups on patient level. We further used heatmaps to graphically illustrate the results.
A multiple correspondence analysis supported our data collection strategy on variable level. Six factors emerged from this analysis: „chest wall syndrome“, „vital threat“, „stomach and bowel pain“, „angina pectoris“, „chest infection syndrome“, and „ self-limiting chest pain“. MDS, k-means and fuzzy cluster analysis on patient level were not able to find distinct groups. The resulting cluster solutions were not interpretable and had insufficient statistical quality criteria.
Chest pain is a heterogeneous clinical category with no coherent associations between signs and symptoms on patient level.
Authors’ original file for figure 112874_2011_663_MOESM1_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 212874_2011_663_MOESM2_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 312874_2011_663_MOESM3_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 412874_2011_663_MOESM4_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 512874_2011_663_MOESM5_ESM.jpeg
Bösner S, Becker A, Abu Hani M, Keller H, Sonnichsen AC, Haasenritter J, Karatolios K, Schaefer JR, Baum E, Donner-Banzhoff N: Accuracy of symptoms and signs for coronary heart disease assessed in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2010, 60 (575): 246-257. 10.3399/bjgp10X502137. CrossRef
Bosner S, Becker A, Abu Hani M, Keller H, Sonnichsen AC, Haasenritter J, Karatolios K, Schaefer JR, Baum E, Donner-Banzhoff N: Accuracy of symptoms and signs for coronary heart disease assessed in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2010, 60 (575): 246-257. 10.3399/bjgp10X502137. CrossRef
Bosner S, Haasenritter J, Becker A, Karatolios K, Vaucher P, Gencer B, Herzig L, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Schaefer JR, Abu Hani M, et al: Ruling out coronary artery disease in primary care: development and validation of a simple prediction rule. CMAJ. 2010, 182 (12): 1295-1300. 10.1503/cmaj.100212. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ: Finding groups in data. An introduction to cluster analysis. 2005, Hoboken: Wiley
Greenacre M, Blasius J: Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. 2006, London: Chapman & Hall CrossRef
Blasius J: Korrespondenzanalyse.[Correspondence analysis]. 2001, Munich: Oldenbourg
Cox TF, Cox MAA: Multidimensional Scaling. 2001, London: Chapman and Hall
Bacher J, Pöge A, Wenzig K: Clusteranalyse. Anwendungsorientierte Einführung in Klassifikationsverfahren [Cluster analysis. Practical introduction in classification measures]. 2010, Munich: Oldenbourg
Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M: Cluster analysis. 2001, London: Arnold
Schendera CFG: Clusteranalyse mit SPSS: Mit Faktorenanalyse. [Cluster analysis with SPSS: Including factor analysis]. 2009, Munich: Oldenbourg
Romesburg CH: Cluster analysis for researchers. 2004, North Carolina: Lulu Press
Hintze JL: NCSS User's guide IV. 2007, Kaysville, Utah: NCSS
Jaccard J, Becker MA: Statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2009, Belmont: Wadsworth
Salem ABM: Case based reasoning technology for medical diagnosis. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2007, 31: 9-13.
Gigerenzer G, Todd P, Group TAR: Simple heuristics that make us smart. 1999, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Multivariate modeling to identify patterns in clinical data: the example of chest pain
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet AINS
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS
Mail Icon II