nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

01.09.2014 | Review Article

Nanobiotechnology and bone regeneration: a mini-review

verfasst von: Nadomir Gusić, Alan Ivković, John VaFaye, Andreja Vukasović, Jana Ivković, Damir Hudetz, Saša Janković

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 9/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review current developments in bone tissue engineering, with special focus on the promising role of nanobiotechnology. This unique fusion between nanotechnology and biotechnology offers unprecedented possibilities in studying and modulating biological processes on a molecular and atomic scale. First we discuss the multiscale hierarchical structure of bone and its implication on the design of new scaffolds and delivery systems. Then we briefly present different types of nanostructured scaffolds, and finally we conclude with nanoparticle delivery systems and their potential use in promoting bone regeneration. This review is not meant to be exhaustive and comprehensive, but aims to highlight concepts and key advances in the field of nanobiotechnology and bone regeneration.

Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulus H, Tsiridis E (2005) Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 36:S20–S27PubMedCrossRef

Wheeler DL, Enneking WF (2005) Allograft bone decreases in strength in vivo over time. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:36–42PubMedCrossRef

Yang Y (2009) Skeletal morphogenesis during embryonic development. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 19(3):197–218PubMedCrossRef

Ivkovic A, Marijanovic I, Hudetz D, Porter RM, Pecina M, Evans CH (2011) Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering in orthopaedic surgery. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 3:923–944

Hernigou P, Pariat J, Queinnec S, Homma Y, Lachaniette CH, Chevallier N et al (2014) Supercharging irradiated allografts with mesenchymal stem cells improves acetabular bone grafting in revision arthroplasty. Int Orthop

Wang X, Wang Y, Gou W, Lu Q, Peng J, Lu S (2013) Role of mesenchymal stem cells in bone regeneration and fracture repair: a review. Int Orthop 37(12):2491–2498PubMedCrossRef

Vukicevic S, Oppermann H, Verbanac D, Jankolija M, Popek I, Curak J et al (2014) The clinical use of bone morphogenetic proteins revisited: a novel biocompatible carrier device OSTEOGROW for bone healing. Int Orthop 38(3):635–647PubMedCrossRef

Emerich DF, Thanos CG (2003) Nanotechnology and medicine. Expert Opin Biol Ther 3:655–663PubMedCrossRef

What is nanotechnology? National Nanotechnology Initiative. http://nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/definition. Accessed 5 Apr 2014

10.

Fakruddin M, Hossain Z, Afroz H (2012) Prospects and applications of nanobiotechnology: a medical perspective. J Nanobiotechnology 10:31PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

11.

Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC (2005) Nanomedicine: current status and future prospects. FASEB J 19:311–330PubMedCrossRef

12.

Aizenberg J, Weaver JC, Thanawala MS, Sundar VC, Morse DE, Fratzl P (2005) Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: structural hierarchy from the nanoscale to the macroscale. Science 309(5732):275–278PubMedCrossRef

13.

Fantner GE, Hassenkam T, Kindt JH, Weaver JC, Birkedal H, Pechenik L et al (2005) Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture. Nat Mater 4(8):612–616PubMedCrossRef

14.

Chen PY, Lin AY, Lin YS, Seki Y, Stokes AG, Peyras J et al (2008) Structure and mechanical properties of selected biological materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1(3):208–226PubMedCrossRef

15.

Hang F, Barber AH (2011) Nano-mechanical properties of individual mineralized collagen fibrils from bone tissue. J R Soc Interface 8(57):500–505PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

16.

Landis WJ, Silver FH (2009) Mineral deposition in the extracellular matrices of vertebrate tissues: identification of possible apatite nucleation sites on type I collagen. Cells Tissues Organs 189(1–4):20–24PubMedCrossRef

17.

Wiesmann HP, Meyer U, Plate U, Höhling HJ (2005) Aspects of collagen mineralization in hard tissue formation. Int Rev Cytol 242:121–156PubMedCrossRef

18.

Gupta HS, Wagermaier W, Zickler GA, Raz-Ben Aroush D, Funari SS, Roschger P et al (2005) Nanoscale deformation mechanisms in bone. Nano Lett 5(10):2108–2111PubMedCrossRef

19.

Garg T, Singh O, Arora S, Murthy R (2012) Scaffold: a novel carrier for cell and drug delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 29(1):1–63PubMedCrossRef

20.

Ikeda R, Fujioka H, Nagura I, Kokubu T, Toyokawa N, Inui A et al (2009) The effect of porosity and mechanical property of a synthetic polymer scaffold on repair of osteochondral defects. Int Orthop 33(3):821–828PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

21.

Zimmerman EA, Barth HD, Ritchie RO (2012) On the multiscale origins of fracture resistance in human bone and its biological degradation. JOM 64:486–493CrossRef

22.

Dzenis Y (2008) Materials science. Structural nanocomposites. Science 319(5862):419–420PubMedCrossRef

23.

Launey ME, Munch E, Alsem DH, Barth HB, Saiz E, Tomsia AP et al (2009) Designing highly toughened hybrid composites through nature-inspired hierarchical complexity. Acta Mater 57:2919–2932CrossRef

24.

Ritchie RO (2008) The quest for stronger, tougher materials. Science 320:448PubMedCrossRef

25.

Saiz E, Zimmermann EA, Lee JS, Wegst UG, Tomsia AP (2013) Perspectives on the role of nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering. Dent Mater 29(1):103–115PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

26.

Chevalier J, Gremillard L, Deville S (2007) Low-temperature degradation of zirconia and implications for biomedical implants. Annu Rev Mater Res 37:1–32CrossRef

27.

Zhang ZG, Li ZH, Mao XZ, Wang WC (2011) Advances in bone repair with nanobiomaterials: mini-review. Cytotechnology 63(5):437–443PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

28.

Ma PX, Zhang R, Xiao G, Franceschi R (2001) Engineering new bone tissue in vitro on highly porous poly(alpha-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 54(2):284–293PubMedCrossRef

29.

Qian J, Xu W, Yong X, Jin X, Zhang W (2014) Fabrication and in vitro biocompatibility of biomorphic PLGA/nHA composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 36:95–101PubMedCrossRef

30.

Karp JM, Langer R (2007) Development and therapeutic applications of advanced biomaterials. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18(5):454–459PubMedCrossRef

31.

Le X, Poinern GE, Ali N, Berry CM, Fawcett D (2013) Engineering a biocompatible scaffold with either micrometre or nanometre scale surface topography for promoting protein adsorption and cellular response. Int J Biomater 2013:782549. doi:10.1155/2013/782549 PubMedCentralPubMed

32.

Curtis AS, Gadegaard N, Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Wilkinson CD, Aitchison G (2004) Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 3(1):61–65CrossRef

33.

Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, McMurray RJ, Affrossman S, Wilkinson CD et al (2009) Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. J Biomed Mater Res A 91(1):195–208PubMedCrossRef

34.

Sniadecki NJ, Desai RA, Ruiz SA, Chen CS (2006) Nanotechnology for cell-substrate interactions. Ann Biomed Eng 34(1):59–74PubMedCrossRef

35.

Nielson R, Kaehr B, Shear JB (2009) Microreplication and design of biological architectures using dynamic-mask multiphoton lithography. Small 5(1):120–125PubMedCrossRef

36.

Hu X, Park SH, Gil ES, Xia XX, Weiss AS, Kaplan DL (2011) The influence of elasticity and surface roughness on myogenic and osteogenic differentiation of cells on silk-elastin. Biomaterials 32(34):8979–8989PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

37.

Lamers E, Walboomers XF, Domanski M, Prodanov L, Melis J, Luttge R et al (2012) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the inflammatory response to nanoscale grooved substrates. Nanomedicine 8(3):308–317PubMedCrossRef

38.

Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU (2004) Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 25(19):4731–4739PubMedCrossRef

39.

Tran N, Webster TJ (2009) Nanotechnology for bone materials. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1(3):336–351PubMedCrossRef

40.

Wang J, Yu X (2010) Preparation, characterization and in vitro analysis of novel structured nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 6(8):3004–3012PubMedCrossRef

41.

Hao W, Dong J, Jiang M, Wu J, Cui F, Zhou D (2010) Enhanced bone formation in large segmental radial defects by combining adipose-derived stem cells expressing bone morphogenetic protein 2 with nHA/RHLC/PLA scaffold. Int Orthop 34(8):1341–1349PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

42.

Khang D, Carpenter J, Chun YW, Pareta R, Webster TJ (2010) Nanotechnology for regenerative medicine. Biomed Microdevices 12(4):575–587PubMedCrossRef

43.

Laurencin CT, Kumbar SG, Nukavarapu SP (2009) Nanotechnology and orthopedics: a personal perspective. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1(1):6–10PubMedCrossRef

44.

Mafi P, Hindocha S, Mafi R, Khan WS (2012) Evaluation of biological protein-based collagen scaffolds in cartilage and musculoskeletal tissue engineering–a systematic review of the literature. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 7(4):302–309PubMedCrossRef

45.

Li WJ, Cooper JA Jr, Mauck RL, Tuan RS (2006) Fabrication and characterization of six electrospun poly(alpha-hydroxy ester)-based fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 2(4):377–385PubMedCrossRef

46.

Venugopal JR, Low S, Choon AT, Kumar AB, Ramakrishna S (2008) Nanobioengineered electrospun composite nanofibers and osteoblasts for bone regeneration. Artif Organs 32(5):388–397PubMedCrossRef

47.

Xiao X, Liu R, Huang Q (2008) Preparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer composite scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19(11):3429–3435PubMedCrossRef

48.

Price RL, Ellison K, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ (2004) Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J Biomed Mater Res A 70(1):129–138PubMedCrossRef

49.

Bhattacharya M, Wutticharoenmongkol-Thitiwongsawet P, Hamamoto DT, Lee D, Cui T, Prasad HS, Ahmad M (2011) Bone formation on carbon nanotube composite. J Biomed Mater Res A 96(1):75–82PubMedCrossRef

50.

Horii A, Wang X, Gelain F, Zhang S (2007) Biological designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds significantly enhance osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and 3-D migration. PLoS One 2(2):e190PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

51.

Marí-Buyé N, Luque T, Navajas D, Semino CE (2013) Development of a three-dimensional bone-like construct in a soft self-assembling peptide matrix. Tissue Eng Part A 19(7–8):870–881PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

52.

Misawa H, Kobayashi N, Soto-Gutierrez A, Chen Y, Yoshida A, Rivas-Carrillo JD et al (2006) PuraMatrix facilitates bone regeneration in bone defects of calvaria in mice. Cell Transplant 15(10):903–910PubMedCrossRef

53.

Gu W, Wu C, Chen J, Xiao Y (2013) Nanotechnology in the targeted drug delivery for bone diseases and bone regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine 8:2305–2317PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

54.

Zhang S, Uludağ H (2009) Nanoparticulate systems for growth factor delivery. Pharm Res 26:1561–1580PubMedCrossRef

55.

Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Khademhosseini A, Kobayashi H (2007) Bone regeneration through controlled release of bone morphogenetic protein-2 from 3-D tissue engineered nano-scaffold. J Control Release 117(3):380–386PubMedCrossRef

56.

Tabata T, Takei Y (2004) Morphogens, their identification and regulation. Development 131(4):703–712PubMedCrossRef

57.

Phillippi JA, Miller E, Weiss L, Huard J, Waggoner A, Campbell P (2008) Microenvironments engineered by inkjet bioprinting spatially direct adult stem cells toward muscle- and bone-like subpopulations. Stem Cells 26(1):127–134PubMedCrossRef

58.

Cooper GM, Miller ED, Decesare GE, Usas A, Lensie EL, Bykowski MR et al (2010) Inkjet-based biopatterning of bone morphogenetic protein-2 to spatially control calvarial bone formation. Tissue Eng Part A 16(5):1749–1759PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

59.

Domachuk P, Tsioris K, Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL (2010) Bio-microfluidics: biomaterials and biomimetic designs. Adv Mater 22(2):249–260PubMedCrossRef

60.

Wang X, Wenk E, Zhang X, Meinel L, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL (2009) Growth factor gradients via microsphere delivery in biopolymer scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. J Control Release 134(2):81–90PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

61.

Pavlukhina S, Sukhishvili S (2011) Polymer assemblies for controlled delivery of bioactive molecules from surfaces. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63(9):822–836PubMedCrossRef

62.

Shah NJ, Macdonald ML, Beben YM, Padera RF, Samuel RE, Hammond PT (2011) Tunable dual growth factor delivery from polyelectrolyte multilayer films. Biomaterials 32(26):6183–6193PubMedCentralPubMed

Titel: Nanobiotechnology and bone regeneration: a mini-review
verfasst von: Nadomir Gusić
Alan Ivković
John VaFaye
Andreja Vukasović
Jana Ivković
Damir Hudetz
Saša Janković
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2412-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2014

Autologous osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of knee lesions: results and limitations at two years’ follow-up

Regenerative orthopaedics: in vitro, in vivo … in silico

From pericytes to perivascular tumours: correlation between pathology, stem cell biology, and tissue engineering

Nonviral gene transfer to human meniscal cells. Part I: transfection analyses and cell transplantation to meniscus explants

Induction of osteoclast progenitors in inflammatory conditions: key to bone destruction in arthritis