Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 9/2008

01.09.2008 | Editorial

NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal

Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective

verfasst von: Julia Earnshaw, Gavin Lewis

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 9/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

With rising demands on healthcare expenditure, the UK NHS is increasingly looking to consider value when deciding which medicines to use. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is the key body in England responsible for the appraisal of medical interventions on behalf of the NHS and its patients. Thus, when considering patients’ access to new medicines, the principles and application of NICE’s Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal[1] remain highly influential. One of the challenges and key considerations in updating this guide was producing guidance that balanced quality and robustness with both the need of the NHS for guidance as early as possible and the need of patients for access to new technologies. Ensuring that the recommended methods were appropriate in terms of reflecting the value of new medicines to patients was also important to ensure that the NHS obtains value for money while meeting the clinical needs of patients and that the industry receives a reasonable return on its investment. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE, 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jul 30] National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE, 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​media/​B52/​A7/​TAMethodsGuideUp​datedJune2008.​pdf [Accessed 2008 Jul 30]
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brazier J. Valuing health states for use in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 769–779PubMedCrossRef Brazier J. Valuing health states for use in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 769–779PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Claxton K. Exploring uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 781–798PubMedCrossRef Claxton K. Exploring uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 781–798PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McCabe C, Claxton K, Culyer AJ. The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 733–744PubMedCrossRef McCabe C, Claxton K, Culyer AJ. The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 733–744PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Miners A. Estimating ‘costs’ for cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 745–751PubMedCrossRef Miners A. Estimating ‘costs’ for cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 745–751PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sculpher M. Subgroups and heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 799–806PubMedCrossRef Sculpher M. Subgroups and heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 799–806PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton A, Ades AE, Cooper N, et al, on behalf of the NICE Decision Support Unit. Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 753–767PubMedCrossRef Sutton A, Ades AE, Cooper N, et al, on behalf of the NICE Decision Support Unit. Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (9): 753–767PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Social value judgements: principles for the development of NICE guidance. 2nd ed [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/media/998/50/SVJ2forpublicconsultation.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jul 30] National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Social value judgements: principles for the development of NICE guidance. 2nd ed [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​media/​998/​50/​SVJ2forpubliccon​sultation.​pdf [Accessed 2008 Jul 30]
Metadaten
Titel
NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal
Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective
verfasst von
Julia Earnshaw
Gavin Lewis
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2008
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 9/2008
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826090-00002

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2008

PharmacoEconomics 9/2008 Zur Ausgabe