Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Das Thema chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen wird im Live-Webinar am 7. Mai von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr aus internistischer, gynäkologischer und psychologisch-neurowissenschaftlicher Perspektive beleuchtet. Besprochen werden krankheitsbedingte Ursachen, Mechanismen der kognitiven Schmerzmodulation sowie mögliche Therapieoptionen. Die Fortbildung ist mit 2 CME-Punkten zertifiziert. Melden Sie sich jetzt an!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine 1/2011

01.03.2011 | PRACTICE AND PUBLIC HEALTH POLICIES

Nudging best practice: the HITECH act and behavioral medicine

verfasst von: Bradford William Hesse, PhD, David K Ahern, PhD, Susan S Woods, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In February 2009, the US Congress passed the Health Information Technology for Economic and Consumer Health (HITECH) Act in order to stimulate the “meaningful use” of health information technology within medical practice. Economists have noted that other sectors in the economy have demonstrated substantive productivity improvements from investments in information technology but that the health sector lags behind. The “meaningful use” stipulation of the HITECH Act focuses systems redesign within the health sector on user’s behavior, a provision that opens a window of contribution from specialists in behavioral medicine. There are several ways for behavioral medicine to become involved in the redesign. One is to help craft a health services environment that optimizes communication between providers and patients, between primary care and specialist care providers, and between patients and their caregivers. Another is to help practitioners and policy-makers create new “decisional architectures” for “nudging” behavior in positive ways through better incentives, understandable instructions, healthy defaults, instructive feedback, back-ups for error, and structured decision-making. New funding opportunities in research, implementation, and training may facilitate the involvement of behavioral medicine—an involvement that is crucial for ensuring the success of reform efforts in the long run.
Literatur
1.
Adler, N. E., Page, A., & National Institute of Medicine (U.S.). (2008). Committee on Psychosocial Services to Cancer Patients/Families in a Community Setting. Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington: National Academies.
2.
Ahern, D. K., Patrick, K., Phalen, J. M., & Neiley, J. D. (2006). An introduction to methodological challenges in the evaluation of eHealth research: perspectives from the Health e-Technologies initiative. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(4), 386–389.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Ahern, D., Phalen, J., & Eaton, C. (2007). The role of eHealth in patient engagement and quality improvement. In M. C. Gibbons (Ed.), eHealth solutions for healthcare disparities (pp. 75–92). New York: Springer.
4.
Ahern, D., Buckel, L., Aberger, E. W., & Follick, M. J. (2009). eHealth for employee health and wellness: optimizing plan design and incentive management. In N. P. Pronko (Ed.), ACSM’s worksite health handbook: a guide to building healthy and productive companies (pp. 248–258). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
5.
6.
American Cancer Society (2008) Cancer facts & figures: 2008. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
7.
American Psychological Association. (2004). Behavior matters: how research improves our lives. Washington: American Psychological Association.
8.
Baron, R. J. (2010). Meaningful use of health information technology is managing information. JAMA, 304(1), 89–90.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Beckjord, E. B., Finney Rutten, L. J., Squiers, L., et al. (2007). Use of the Internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(3), e20.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Blumenthal, D. (2010). Guiding the health information technology agenda. Interviewed by David J. Brailer. Health Affairs (Millwood), 29(4), 586–595.CrossRef
11.
Brailer, D. J. (2009). Presidential leadership and health information technology. Health Affairs (Millwood), 28(2), w392–w398.CrossRef
12.
Buntin, M. B., Jain, S. H., & Blumenthal, D. (2010). Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Affairs (Millwood), 29(6), 1214–1219.CrossRef
13.
Cancer Center Directors Working Group. (2006). Accelerating successes against cancer. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services.
14.
Center for Advancing Health. (2010). A snapshot of people’s engagement in their health care. Washington: Center for Advancing Health.
15.
Chen, C., Garrido, T., Chock, D., Okawa, G., & Liang, L. (2009). The Kaiser Permanente electronic health record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Affairs (Millwood), 28(2), 323–333.CrossRef
16.
Culliton, B. J. (2006). Extracting knowledge from science: a conversation with Elias Zerhouni. Health Affairs (Millwood), 25, w94–w103.CrossRef
17.
Cutler, D. M., Davis, K., & Stremikis, K. (2009). Why health reform will bend the cost curve. Issue Brief - Commonwealth Fund, 72, 1–16.PubMed
18.
Cutler, D. M., Davis, K., & Stremikis, K. (2010). The impact of health reform on health system spending. Issue Brief - Commonwealth Fund, 88, 1–14.PubMed
19.
Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program; proposed rule. Federal Register, 75(8), 1844–2011.
20.
Dixon, R. F. (2010). Enhancing primary care through online communication. Health Affairs (Millwood), 29(7), 1364–1369.CrossRef
21.
Epstein, R., & Street, R. J. (2007). Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute.
22.
Department of Health and Human Services (2010). Establishment of the temporary certification program for health information technology. Final rule. Fed Regist 75(121):36157–36209
23.
Friedberg, M. W., Coltin, K. L., Safran, D. G., Dresser, M., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Schneider, E. C. (2009). Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(7), 456–463.PubMed
24.
Ghaferi, A. A. (2010). Bending the cost curve in the United States: the role of comparative effectiveness research. Critical Care, 14(3), 168.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Gibbons, M. C. (2008). Populomics. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 137, 265–268.PubMed
26.
Halamka, J. D., Mandl, K. D., & Tang, P. C. (2008). Early experiences with personal health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(1), 1–7.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Hesse, B. W. (2005). Harnessing the power of an intelligent health environment in cancer control. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 118, 159–176.PubMed
28.
Hesse, B. W. (2008). Enhancing consumer involvement in health care. In J. C. Parker & E. Thornson (Eds.), Health communication in the new media landscape (pp. 119–149). New York: Springer.
29.
Hesse, B. W., & Shneiderman, B. (2007). eHealth research from the user’s perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(5 Suppl), S97–S103.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Hesse, B. W., Hanna, C., Massett, H. A., & Hesse, N. K. (2010). Outside the box: will information technology be a viable intervention to improve the quality of cancer care? Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2010(40), 81–89.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Hiatt, R. A., & Rimer, B. K. (1999). A new strategy for cancer control research. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 8(11), 957–964.
32.
HITECH Act (2009) 42 USC 139w-4(0)(2)
33.
Hogan, S. O., & Kissam, S. M. (2010). Measuring meaningful use. Health Affairs (Millwood), 29(4), 601–606.CrossRef
34.
Institute of Medicine (U.S.). (2001). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academies.
35.
McClellan, M. B., & Institute of Medicine (U.S.). (2008). Evidence-based medicine and the changing nature of health care: 2007 IOM annual meeting summary. Meeting (37th: Washington, D.C.). Washington: National Academies.
36.
Kahn, J. S., Aulakh, V., & Bosworth, A. (2009). What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Affairs (Millwood), 28(2), 369–376.CrossRef
37.
Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. S. (2000). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington: National Academies.
38.
Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the conduct of research on the Internet. The American Psychologist, 59(2), 105–117.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Lewis, D. (2005). Consumer health informatics: informing consumers and improving health care. New York: Springer.
40.
Nazi KM, Woods SS (2008) MyHealtheVet PHR: a description of users and patient portal use. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008:1182
41.
Olsen, L., Aisner, D., McGinnis, J. M., & Institute of Medicine (U.S.). (2007). Roundtable on evidence-based medicine. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. Washington: National Academies.
42.
Reid, P. P., Compton, W. D., Grossman, J. H., et al. (2005). Building a better delivery system: a new engineering/health care partnership. Washington: National Academies.
43.
44.
Stead, W. W., & Lin, H. S. (Eds.). (2009). Computational technology for effective health care: immediate steps and strategic directions. Washington: National Academies.
45.
Taplin, S. H., & Rodgers, A. B. (2010). Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2010(40), 3–10.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Taplin, S. H., Rollason, D., Camp, A., di Donato, K., & Maggenheimer, E. (2010). Imagining an electronic medical record for turning cancer screening knowledge into practice. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(1), 89–97.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (revised and expanded edition). New York: Penguin.
48.
Vest, J. R., & Jasperson, J. (2010). What should we measure? Conceptualizing usage in health information exchange. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(3), 302–307.PubMed
49.
Vicente, K. J. (2003). The human factor: revolutionizing the way people live with technology (1st ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.
50.
Zheng, K., Padman, R., Johnson, M. P., & Diamond, H. S. (2009). An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(2), 228–237.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zhou, Y. Y., Kanter, M. H., Wang, J. J., & Garrido, T. (2010). Improved quality at Kaiser Permanente through e-mail between physicians and patients. Health Affairs (Millwood), 29(7), 1370–1375.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Nudging best practice: the HITECH act and behavioral medicine
verfasst von
Bradford William Hesse, PhD
David K Ahern, PhD
Susan S Woods, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Translational Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1869-6716
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9860
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-010-0001-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Translational Behavioral Medicine 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

EditorialNotes

Translational Behavioral Medicine: a pathway to better health

OriginalPaper

True translational research: bridging the three phases of translation through data and behavior

OriginalPaper

CALM technology-supported intervention: synopsis of evidence for an emerging class of practice tool

News

News from NIH: column no. 1

OriginalPaper

Adapting research-tested computerized tailored interventions for broader dissemination and implementation

OriginalPaper

Potential benefits of health information technology for integrating physical and behavioral health care: perinatal depression as a case-in-point