Background
Teeth play an important physiological role in human, which affect chewing, swallowing, speaking, facial aesthetics, and social interactions [
1]. Tooth loss represents a major health problem, particularly for elderly [
1]. The prevalence of edentulism increases with age and varies among countries [
2,
3]. The global age-standardized prevalence of edentulism in 2010 was 2.4% [
2]. Although a decline in tooth loss and edentulism has been observed in the past decade [
2], the World Health Organization goal of retaining at least 20 teeth at the age of 80 years has not yet been met in most countries [
4].
A number of prospective studies have found an association between tooth loss and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular and cancer mortality [
5‐
11]. Wearing dentures may reduce the mortality in older adults [
7,
12,
13]. Tooth loss and denture use may affect mortality through inflammation, nutrition, masticatory function, facial appearance, and social engagement [
14‐
18]. Despite a fair amount of previous research, many questions remain unclear. First, the shape of the association between teeth number and mortality, and the minimum teeth number that have no additional mortality risk were still unclear. Second, the associations with potential interactions, such as age and sex, were controversial in previous studies [
19,
20]. Third, tooth loss and denture use are closely related, but the potential interaction between tooth loss and denture use, in relation to mortality, have not been comprehensively evaluated. Forth, many important confounders, like economic status, were not adjusted in most previous studies [
5‐
13]. Fifth, previous studies evaluating denture use and mortality showed inconsistent results [
13,
21]. Lastly, tooth loss and the denture use may change over time, but no previous studies have considered the variability over time in evaluating the effect. We carried out this study was to prospectively evaluate the associations of the number of natural teeth and/or denture use with mortality using the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) datasets.
Discussion
This cohort study of 36,283 Chinese older adults suggested there was likely to be a hockey stick-shaped association between the number of natural teeth and all-cause mortality. The mortality risk decreased with increment of number of natural teeth, and those who had 24 teeth or less were associated with significantly increased risk of mortality. This finding suggested that 25 teeth is the minimum number of natural teeth to avoid extra risk of death. Denture use was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality that tended to wane with age. The absolute benefit of wearing dentures was large and varied with age. In order to prevent one death in 5 years, approximately 6 to 7 older people aged 56–79 need to wear dentures, compared with 37 to 42 people for those aged 95 and over. The benefit of wearing dentures was similar among different degrees of tooth loss. The primary results were robust as shown in a series of sensitivity analyses.
Our findings are consistent with previous analyses in older populations [
7‐
9,
12]. In a cohort study of 21,730 individuals, the number of natural teeth was inversely associated with mortality [
7]. A retrospective cohort study of 55,651 old adults suggested that the HRs of all-cause mortality in the participants with no teeth, 1–9 teeth, and 10–19 teeth were 1.36, 1.24, and 1.19, respectively, which were similar to our estimates [
8]. In the Golestan Cohort Study, wearing dentures reduced all-cause mortality by 10% [
12]. The effect was smaller than our estimate (19%), possibly due to the difference in ethnicity and age.
Previous studies yielded mixed results about the interaction of age and sex on the association between teeth number and mortality. A cohort study suggested that number of natural teeth was inversely associated with all-cause mortality among the individuals aged 40–64 years but not among those aged 65–79 years [
5]; However, an association was shown among adults aged 65 and older in another cohort study [
7]. In a cohort study of 1282 subjects aged 80 years, tooth loss was a predictor of mortality in women but not in men [
9]; However, in a 10-year cohort study of 118 subjects aged 80 years or over, an association between number of natural teeth and survival rate was shown in men but not in women [
10]. A possible explanation is that the sample sizes in subgroups in these studies were too small. Our subgroup analyses by age did show between-group differences, but the association persisted in most subgroups.
Our subgroup analysis suggested that the protective effect of denture use decreased with age. The younger elders (65–79 years) had the highest risk of death due to tooth loss in our study; This more severely affected group may therefore have been more readily able to demonstrate a protective effect of wearing dentures. Our subgroup analysis by sex suggested that the effect of wearing dentures tended to be greater in men than in women. A possible explanation is that men tend to have a poorer nutritional status than women [
30], while wearing dentures could effectively improve nutritional intake [
31]; Therefore men are likely to have more benefits from denture use. Additionally, previous studies have shown that men are less active in social participation than women [
32], while wearing dentures can encourage social participation [
33]; Thus, it is expected that men will benefit more from denture placement. Only one prior study investigated denture use and mortality by sex. In this study, denture use was associated with lower mortality in women but not in men in individuals with less than 10 teeth; there were no major differences of mortality rates between subjects with 10 or more teeth with and without dentures or based on sex [
34]. The sample size in this subgroup might be too small to test the difference.
Based on additive cox regression, we found that the risk of mortality decreased with increment of numbers of natural teeth. The risk was parallel to the severity of tooth loss and a statistically significant increased risk was observed at 24 or less teeth. This may be because more tooth loss could have a more severe influence on the masticatory function and nutritional status, which in turn, be linked to overall morality. The elderly with 24 or less teeth had ≥5% increased risk. For the elderly with 25 or more teeth, there was no sufficient evidence of increased risk, and if any, the risk would be less than 3%.
In addition to the burden of inflammation, another possible mechanism underlying the association of tooth loss and mortality could be nutrition. Fewer teeth are associated with impaired masticatory function and nutritional status [
14,
15], which in turn, increases the risk of mortality [
35,
36]. This was consistent with our analysis of baseline characteristics, which suggested that the individuals with fewer teeth had lower BMI. Denture may reduce mortality by improving masticatory function, bite force, and nutritional state [
16]. Use of dentures may also benefit older adults through preventing foreign body asphyxiation, enhancing phonetics, improving facial appearance, and facilitating social engagement [
17,
18].
The use of dentures in older adults could be influenced by the cost. Cost for dentures varies greatly depending on type of dentures, type of materials used, additional necessary equipment, and region. For example, the cost for one replacement tooth in China ranged from approximately 60 USD to 1500 USD [
37]. In China, a variety of dentures are available for older adults, adapted to their income. The overall denture use rate, particularly in those with no or few remaining teeth, was relatively low in this study as compared with the older adults from Western Europe or Japan. This is because denture use rate is closely related to economic status, while China is a developing country and 60.6% of the included participants were from rural area with low income.
The strengths of this study included the large sample size, the prospective cohort study design, investigation of the optimal teeth number and the shape of association, and evaluation of the interaction between teeth number and denture use. In addition, we used a time-dependent Cox proportional model which could not only control the baseline number of natural teeth/denture use, but also control the change in these exposures during follow-up. Furthermore, our sensitivity analyses were robust, which could reduce potential bias from additional confounders (such as marital status), participants with extreme short or long survival, and different methods for handling censored data. Lastly, this study also found solid evidence that the protective effect of denture use was modified by age and sex.
Our study has several limitations. First, residual confounding by other unmeasured or unknown factors remains possible. Second, we cannot investigate the type of dentures, cause of death, time of tooth loss and denture use, dental symptoms, and dental care/utilization, as these data were not collected. Third, our study included a sample with very old age (median age: 90 years). The participants are older than the general elder population in China. The main study findings, including the evaluation for the optimal number of natural teeth, may not be applicable to other population. Fourth, the primary results may be influenced by the exclusion of 6642 participants whose survival status was unknown as they might have different characteristics. However, our subgroup analyses suggested that the primary effects were not modified by most baseline characteristics. The sensitivity analysis by considering the older adults with unknown survival status censored at the median of follow-up (3 years) suggested that the primary results were robust. Fifth, According to the 4th National Oral Health Survey, the mean remaining teeth was 22.5 ± 8.7 and denture use rate was 34.0% in the 65 to 74 age group in 2015–2016 in China (data for the elderly aged 75 and over was not collected) [
38]. The mean remaining teeth (17.6 ± 10.6) and denture use rate (29.9%) in this age group were relatively lower in our study. This was because our data was collected much earlier than this national survey and there was a continuous improvement in oral health of Chinese elderly in the past decades. This may influence the generalizability of our conclusion. Sixth, there is a threat that some older adults whom died soon after recruitment may not be due to tooth loss or denture use. We undertook sensitivity analysis by excluding participants with an observation time of < 3 years and the result showed no major differences as compared to the primary results. Therefore, we did not include an induction period in the primary results as most previous studies. Last, the quality of evidence is low due to the observational study design.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.