Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 2/2016

17.03.2016 | ACL Update: Objective Measures on Knee Instability (V Musahl, Section Editor)

Objective measures on knee instability: dynamic tests: a review of devices for assessment of dynamic knee laxity through utilization of the pivot shift test

Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Current reconstructive methods used after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury do not entirely restore native knee kinematics. Evaluation of dynamic knee laxity is important to accurately diagnose ACL deficiency, to evaluate reconstructive techniques, and to construct treatment algorithms for patients with ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to present recent progress in evaluation of dynamic knee laxity through utilization of the pivot shift test. A thorough electronic search was performed and relevant studies were assessed. Certain dynamic knee laxity measurement methods have been present for over 10 years (Navigation system, Electromagnetic sensor system) while other methods (Inertial sensor, Image analysis system) have been introduced recently. Methods to evaluate dynamic knee laxity through the pivot shift test are already potent. However, further refinement is warranted. In addition, to correctly quantify the pivot shift test, the involved forces need to be controlled through either standardization or mechanization of the pivot shift test.
Literatur
1.
Bull AM et al. Incidence and mechanism of the pivot shift. An in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:219–31.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V. Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. 1976;4(2):84–93.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Galway HR, MacIntosh DL. The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;147:45–50.PubMed
4.
Prins M. The Lachman test is the most sensitive and the pivot shift the most specific test for the diagnosis of ACL rupture. Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(1):66.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Galway RD, McIntosh DL. Pivot shift: a clinical sign of symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54-B:763–4.
6.
Bull AM et al. Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(7):1075–81.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Kocher MS et al. Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(3):629–34.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Leitze Z et al. Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:229–36.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Ayeni OR et al. Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):767–77.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J. Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5-9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(5):594–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Peeler J, Leiter J, MacDonald P. Accuracy and reliability of anterior cruciate ligament clinical examination in a multidisciplinary sports medicine setting. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20(2):80–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Kuroda R et al. Similarities and differences of diagnostic manual tests for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a global survey and kinematics assessment. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(1):91–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Kitamura N et al. Biomechanical characteristics of 3 pivot-shift maneuvers for the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee: in vivo evaluation with an electromagnetic sensor system. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(11):2500–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Musahl V et al. The pivot shift: a global user guide. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):724–31.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Hoshino Y et al. Standardized pivot shift test improves measurement accuracy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):732–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Citak M et al. A mechanized and standardized pivot shifter: technical description and first evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(5):707–11.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Musahl V et al. Mechanized pivot shift test achieves greater accuracy than manual pivot shift test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(9):1208–13.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lorbach O et al. Reliability testing of a new device to measure tibial rotation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(8):920–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kothari A et al. Evaluating rotational kinematics of the knee in ACL reconstructed patients using 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Knee. 2012;19(5):648–51.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Moewis P et al. Towards understanding knee joint laxity: errors in non-invasive assessment of joint rotation can be corrected. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36(7):889–95.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Lefevre N et al. Validity of GNRB(R) arthrometer compared to Telos in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(2):285–90.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Bignozzi S et al. Clinical relevance of static and dynamic tests after anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(1):37–42.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Hoshino Y et al. Optimal measurement of clinical rotational test for evaluating anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(7):1323–30.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Dessenne V et al. Computer-assisted knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: first clinical tests. J Image Guid Surg. 1995;1(1):59–64.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Koh J. Computer-assisted navigation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: accuracy and outcomes. Orthopedics. 2005;28(10 Suppl):s1283–7.PubMed
27.
Lane CG et al. In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(5):487–92.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Hoshino Y et al. In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1098–104.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Maeyama A et al. Evaluation of rotational instability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using triaxial accelerometer: a biomechanical model in porcine knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(8):1233–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Lopomo N et al. Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):713–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zaffagnini S et al. Inertial sensors to quantify the pivot shift test in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Joints. 2014;2(3):124–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Borgstrom PH et al. Use of a gyroscope sensor to quantify tibial motions during a pivot shift test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(9):2064–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.•
Borgstrom PH et al. Use of inertial sensors to predict pivot-shift grade and diagnose an ACL injury during preoperative testing. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):857–64. A recent publication presenting a novel device consisting of two different inertial sensors (gyroscope and accelerometer). Impressive levels of accuracy were presented for both diagnosis of ACL rupture and correlation to clinical grading of the pivot shift test.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Hoshino Y et al. An image analysis method to quantify the lateral pivot shift test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):703–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Desai N et al. Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(5):1009–23.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Bjornsson H et al. Is double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction superior to single-bundle? A comprehensive systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(3):696–739.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Musahl V et al. Rotatory knee laxity tests and the pivot shift as tools for ACL treatment algorithm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):793–800.CrossRefPubMed
38.•
Kuroda R et al. Quantitative measurement of the pivot shift, reliability, and clinical applications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):686–91. Recent expert opinion focused on summarizing progress in dynamic laxity measurement using electromagnetic devices.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Araki D et al. Biomechanical analysis of the knee with partial anterior cruciate ligament disruption: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(6):1053–62.CrossRefPubMed
40.•
Matsushita T et al. Differences in knee kinematics between awake and anesthetized patients during the Lachman and pivot-shift tests for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013;1(1):2325967113487855. Publication that further elucidates that magnitude of quantified dynamic knee laxity is dependent on the state of consciousness.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Nakajima H et al. Insufficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament. Review of our 118 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979;95(4):233–40.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Hughston JC et al. Classification of knee ligament instabilities. Part I. The medial compartment and cruciate ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(2):159–72.PubMed
43.
Nagai K et al. Quantitative comparison of the pivot shift test results before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using the three-dimensional electromagnetic measurement system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(10):2876–81.CrossRefPubMed
44.•
Lopomo N et al. An original clinical methodology for non-invasive assessment of pivot-shift test. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2012;15(12):1323–8. The first publication to introduce dynamic laxity assessment using the KiRA accelerometer, a device that has been utilized and evaluated in various studies since.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Bedi A et al. Lateral compartment translation predicts the grade of pivot shift: a cadaveric and clinical analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(9):1269–76.CrossRefPubMed
46.•
Berruto M et al. Is triaxial accelerometer reliable in the evaluation and grading of knee pivot-shift phenomenon? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(4):981–5. An important contribution exposing how experience of the utilized device, in this case an accelerometer, affects the accuracy of a specific method.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Kopf S et al. A new quantitative method for pivot shift grading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):718–23.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Suykens JK et al. A support vector machine formulation to PCA analysis and its kernel version. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2003;14(2):447–50.CrossRefPubMed
49.•
Labbe DR et al. Quantitative pivot shift assessment using combined inertial and magnetic sensing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(8):2330–8. Through utilization of a micro-electromechanical system sensor, the authors of this publication were capable of correlating measured dynamic laxity of the device to clinical grading.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Ishibashi Y et al. Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the posterolateral bundle more important? Arthroscopy. 2009;25(5):488–95.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zaffagnini S et al. New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(9):811–6.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zaffagnini S, Klos TV, Bignozzi S. Computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evidence-based approach of the first 15 years. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(4):546–54.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Eggerding V et al. Computer-assisted surgery for knee ligament reconstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:Cd007601.PubMed
54.
Colombet P et al. Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:59–65.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Lopomo N et al. Reliability of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of antero-posterior knee joint laxity. Comput Biol Med. 2009;39(3):280–5.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Pearle AD et al. Reliability of navigated knee stability examination: a cadaveric evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(8):1315–20.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Ishibashi Y et al. Stability evaluation of single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction during navigated ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2008;16(2):77–83.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Lopomo N et al. Pivot-shift test: analysis and quantification of knee laxity parameters using a navigation system. J Orthop Res. 2010;28(2):164–9.PubMed
59.
Klos TV. Computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Four generations of development and usage. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2014;22(4):229–36.PubMed
60.
Zaffagnini S et al. Anatomic double-bundle and over-the-top single-bundle with additional extra-articular tenodesis: an in vivo quantitative assessment of knee laxity in two different ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(1):153–9.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Imbert, P., C. Belvedere, and A. Leardini, Knee laxity modifications after ACL rupture and surgical intra- and extra-articular reconstructions: intra-operative measures in reconstructed and healthy knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015.
62.
Monaco E et al. Extra-articular ACL reconstruction and pivot shift: in vivo dynamic evaluation with navigation. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1669–74.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Imbert P, Belvedere C, Leardini A. Human knee laxity in ACL-deficient and physiological contralateral joints: intra-operative measurements using a navigation system. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.•
Porter MD, Shadbolt B. “Anatomic” single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces both anterior translation and internal rotation during the pivot shift. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(12):2948–54. To our knowledge, this particular publication is the first to evaluate the reliability of a non-invasive computer navigation system.CrossRefPubMed
65.
66.•
Hoshino Y et al. Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift by image analysis using the iPad. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(4):975–80. This publication introduces a non-invasive image analysis system using an iPad application to quantify dynamic knee laxity.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Nakamura, K., et al. Evaluation of pivot shift phenomenon while awake and under anaesthesia by different manoeuvres using triaxial accelerometer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-015-3740-3.
68.
Martelli S et al. Description and validation of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of knee laxity. Comput Aided Surg. 2007;12(3):181–8.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Martelli S et al. Validation of a new protocol for navigated intraoperative assessment of knee kinematics. Comput Biol Med. 2007;37(6):872–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Objective measures on knee instability: dynamic tests: a review of devices for assessment of dynamic knee laxity through utilization of the pivot shift test
Publikationsdatum
17.03.2016
Erschienen in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2016
Elektronische ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9338-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Elbow Soft Tissue Surgery (L Oh, Section Editor)

Distal biceps ruptures: open and endoscopic techniques

Elbow Soft Tissue Surgery (L Oh, Section Editor)

Distal humerus fractures: a review of current therapy concepts

ELBOW SOFT TISSUE SURGERY (L OH, SECTION EDITOR)

Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow

ACL Update: Objective Measures on Knee Instability (V Musahl, Section Editor)

Functional knee assessment with advanced imaging

ACL Update: Objective Measures on Knee Instability (V Musahl, Section Editor)

Knee instability scores for ACL reconstruction

Elbow Soft Tissue Surgery (L Oh, Section Editor)

The posttraumatic stiff elbow: an update

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise