Background
Methods
Protocol and registration
Selection criteria
Information sources, search protocol and search strategy
-
1. ((Adolescents [MeSH]) OR (teenagers) OR (adolescence)) AND ((oral health [MeSH]) OR (mouth diseases [MeSH]) OR (oral health determinants)) AND ((quality of life [MeSH]) OR (OHQoL) AND ((systematic review).
Selection of studies and calibration of evaluators
Selection of studies and data extraction
Result
Characteristics and methodological quality of eligible studies
AMSTAR 2 question lists | Dimberg et al., 2014 [26] | Lopez et al., 2019 [27] | Zaror et al., 2018 [31] | Malele-Kolisa et al., 2019 [32] | Aimée Nicole et al., 2019 [36] | Barasuol et al., 2020 [37] | Lattanzi et al., 2019 [38] | Javidi et al., 2017 [39] |
1.Did the research questions and inclusion criteria for the review include PICO components? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
2. Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol? | + | ? | - | ? | ? | ? | ? | - |
3. Did the review authors explain their selection of the study designs for inclusion in the review? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
4. Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
5. Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
6. Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
7. Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
8. Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate details? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
9. Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review? | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
10. Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review? | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
11. If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results? | ? | - | - | + | + | + | ? | + |
12. If meta-analysis was performed, did the review authors assess the potential impact of RoB in individual studies on the results of the meta-analysis or other evidence synthesis? | ? | - | - | + | + | + | ? | + |
13. Did the review authors account for RoB in individual studies when interpreting/ discussing the results of the review? | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | + |
14. Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review? | ? | - | - | + | + | + | + | + |
15. If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review? | + | - | - | - | - | - | ? | - |
16. Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Review quality | Critically Low | Low quality | Critically Low | Low quality | Low quality | Low quality | Moderate | Critically Low |
AMSTAR 2 question lists | Alrashed et al., 2020 [40] | Zhou1 et al., 2014 [28] | Silva Rodrigues et al., 2018 [45] | Mandava et al., 2021 [41] | Yactayo-Alburquerque et al., 2021 [9] | Milani et al., 2021 [46] | Bezerra et al., 2019 [33] | Kumar et al., 2014 [42] |
1.Did the research questions and inclusion criteria for the review include PICO components? | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | - |
2. Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol? | - | ? | - | ? | - | - | ? | - |
3. Did the review authors explain their selection of the study designs for inclusion in the review? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ? |
4. Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
5. Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
6. Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
7. Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions? | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + |
8. Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate details? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
9. Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review? | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + |
10. Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review? | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
11. If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results? | + | ? | ? | ? | ? | + | + | ? |
12. If meta-analysis was performed, did the review authors assess the potential impact of RoB in individual studies on the results of the meta-analysis or other evidence synthesis? | + | ? | ? | ? | ? | + | + | ? |
13. Did the review authors account for RoB in individual studies when interpreting/ discussing the results of the review? | + | - | + | - | - | + | + | + |
14. Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review? | + | - | + | - | - | + | + | + |
15. If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review? | - | ? | ? | ? | ? | + | - | ? |
16. Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Review quality | Critically Low | Critically Low | Low quality | Low quality | Critically Low | Low quality | Low quality | Low quality |
AMSTAR 2 question lists | Kragt et al., 2015 [43] | Ferrando-Magraner et al., 2019 [29] | Liu et al., 2009 [44] | Oliveira et al., 2013 [25] | Antunes et al., 2020 [34] | Moghaddam et al., 2020 [30] | ||
1.Did the research questions and inclusion criteria for the review include PICO components? | - | - | - | + | + | + | ||
2. Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol? | - | - | - | ? | - | + | ||
3. Did the review authors explain their selection of the study designs for inclusion in the review? | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
4. Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy? | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
5. Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate? | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
6. Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate? | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
7. Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions? | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
8. Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate details? | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
9. Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review? | + | + | - | - | + | + | ||
10. Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review? | - | - | - | - | - | + | ||
11. If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results? | + | ? | ? | ? | + | + | ||
12. If meta-analysis was performed, did the review authors assess the potential impact of RoB in individual studies on the results of the meta-analysis or other evidence synthesis? | + | ? | ? | ? | + | + | ||
13. Did the review authors account for RoB in individual studies when interpreting/ discussing the results of the review? | + | + | - | - | + | ? | ||
14. Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review? | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
15. If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review? | - | ? | ? | ? | - | + | ||
16. Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review | - | - | - | - | - | + | ||
Review quality | Critically Low | Low quality | Critically Low | Critically Low | Critically Low | Moderate/high |
Referene | Article | Year Publication | Magazine | Country | Quality Analyses | Independent Variable | Nº of articles found in databases | Nº of articles incluides | Index Outcome | Maximum – Minimum variation Sample Size the studies | Maximum – Minimum variation Age Range | Conclusion | Metanálise |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kragt et al., 2015 [43] | The impact of malocclusions on oral health-related quality of life in children—a systematic review and meta-analysis | 2015 | Clin Oral Invest | Netherland | PRISMA | Malocclusion | 3837 | 40 | ECOHIS, CPQ 8–10, CPQ11-14, OHIP-14, COHIP, CS-OIDP, OASIS | 121—5445 | Mean 3.5 -14.9 | There is association between malocclusion with OHRQOL. Age of children and their cultural environment influence OHRQOL | No |
Liu et al., 2009 [44] | The Impact of Malocclusion/Orthodontic Treatment Need on the Quality of Life | 2009 | Angle orthod | China | Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine/ | Orthodontic Treatment | 135 | 23 | WHOQOL-BREF, SF-36, psychologic scales, CPQ 11–14, OHIP 14, Oral Aesthetic Subjective Impact, Scale, PIDAQ, Child OIDP, OIDP, SOHSI, orthognathic quality of life questionnaire | 89—1675 | 8–30 Adult | Association modest between malocclusion/orthodontic treatment need and QHRQoL | No |
Oliveira et al., 2013 [25] | Reported Impact of Oral Alterations on the Quality of Life of Adolescents: A Systematic Review | 2013 | Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integ | Brazil | GRADE AXIS | Oral conditions | 593 | 13 | OIDP, COQ11-14, ISF16, OHIP | 204—1745 | 10—19 | Studies showed negative impact OHRQoL with influence malocclusion, dental caries and traumatic dental | Yes |
Antunes et al., 2020 [34] | Does traumatic dental injury impact oral health-related to quality of life of children and adolescents? Systematic review and meta-analysis | 2018 | Int J Dent Hygiene | Brazil | Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine | Traumatic dental | 689 | 11 | ECOHIS and CPQ11-14 | 192—1632 | 10–14 | Children under age 10 was significant in the symptom domain. Adolescent under age 11 to 14 was significant in the every domain | No |
Lattanzi et al., 2019 [38] | Efects of oral health promotion programmes on adolescents’ oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review | 2019 | Int J Dent Hygiene | Brazil | PRISMA | oral health promotion programmes (OHPP) | 2343 | 4 | Child-OIDP | 50 -1906 | 10—19 | Studies showed positive effects of OHPP on adolescentes OHRQoL with low methodological quality | No |
Liu et al., 2009 [44] | The Impact of Malocclusion/Orthodontic Treatment Need on the Quality of Life | 2009 | Angle orthod | - | Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine | Malocclusion\orthodontic | 135 | 23 | CPQ 11–14, COHIP, Child-OIDP, WHOQOL-BREF, SF-36, psychologic scale, orthognathic quality of life questionnaire OIDP, PIDAQ, OIDP, OHIP-14, Oral aesthetic subjective impact scale | - | 8-adult | Association modest between malocclusionqorthodontic treatment need and OHRQoL | No |
Magraner et al., 2019 [29] | Oral health-related quality of life of adolescents after orthodontic treatment. A systematic review | 2019 | J Clin Exp Dent | Spain | PRISMA | Orthodontic Treatment | 817 | 10 | OHIP-14 and CPQ 11–14 | 27—374 | 11–25 | There is a positive association between end treatment and OHRQoL | Yes |
Alrashed et al., 2020 [40] | The relationship between malocclusion and oral health-related quality of life among adolescents: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis | 2020 | Eur J Orthod | Saudi Arabia | GRADE/AXIS | Malocclusion | 530 | 11 | OHIP-14, CPQ 11–14, CPQ 8–10, COHIP SF-19, ISF 16 | 248—1206 | 11–18 | Adolescent with severe maocclusiom have worst levels OHRQoL. Effects malocclusion influence by age, culture andenvironment in the OHRQoL | Yes |
Kumar et al., 2014 [42] | A systematic review of the impact of parental socio-economic status and home environment characteristics on children’s oral health related quality of life | 2014 | Health Qual Life Outcomes | Australia | PRISMA | -Status socioeconômico parental -Ambiente familiar -Status socioeconômico -Renda -Ocupação dos pais -Nível de educação dos pais -Idade dos pais -Local de origem dos pais -Status matrimonial dos pais -Relacionamento Cuidador – criança -Estrutura familiar -Número de habitantes por moradia -Número de irmãos -Uso de álcool e droga -Nível de conhecimento parental sobre saúde oral -Ansiedade ao atendimento odontológico | 5646 | 36 | Child-OIDP, OIDP by interviewing children, OHIP-14, Modified OHIP-SP | 95 -1412 | 2—21 | Children from families with high income, parental educa- tion and family economy had better OHRQoL | Yes |
Milani et al., 2021 [46] | Impact of traumatic dental injury treatment on the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of children, adolescents, and their family: Systematic review and meta-analysis | 2020 | Dent Traumatol | - | GRADE | Traumatic dental | 414 | 6 | ECOHIS, FIS 8-10 s, cpq8-10, CPQ 11–14, SOHO, P-CPQ 8–10, CPQ 11–14 | - | 2–20 | Treatment of traumatic dental injuries reduces the impact on the OHRQoL with low evidence | Yes |
Bezerra et al., 2019 2019 [42] | Does bruxism impact the quality of life of children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis | 2019 | J Public Health | Brazil | GRADE | Bruxism | 130 | 3 | Oidp, coq11-14, ISF16, Ohip, AUQUEI, PedsQL4.0, ECOHIS, CSHQ | 21—462 | 3–14 | Bruxism does not impact quality of life in children and adolescentes | Yes |
Zhou et al., 2014 [28] | The impact of orthodontic treatment on the quality of life a systematic review | 2014 | Bmc Oral Health | China | Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine | Orthodontic Treatment | 204 | 11 | OHQoL-UK, cs-OIDP, OHIP14, CPQ11-14 | 118- 1675 | 7–33 | There is association modest between orthodontic treatment and quality of life | No |
Mandava et al., 2021 [41] | Impact of self-esteem on the relationship between orthodontic treatment and the oral health-related quality of life in patients after orthodontic treatment – a systematic review | 2021 | Med. Pharm. Rep | Índia | Cochrane risk of bias tool/ Newcastle ottawa scale modificada | Orthodontic Treatment | 7688 | 28 | OIDP and OHIP-14, PIDAQ, CPQ8-10, 11–14, | 27–1675 | 11–25 | OHRQoL and SE in children. OHRQoL also increased in adolescents and adults. However, there is a weak correlation between SE and OHRQoL. More evidence-based studies are needed to analyze the relationship | |
Javidi et al., 2017 [39] | Does orthodontic treatment before the age of 18 years improve oral health-related quality of life? a systematic review and meta-analysis | 2017 | Ajo-Do | United Kingdon | Cochrane collaboration's | Orthodontic Treatment | 3359 | 6 | CPQ11-14, OHIP14, OIDP | 27–374 | 11–30 | Orthodontic treatment during child- hood or adolescence leads to moderate improvements in the emotional and social well-being dimensions of OHRQoL, although the evidence is of low and moderate quality | |
Rodrigues et al., 2018 [45] | Does dental agenesis have an impact on ohrqol of children, adolescents and young adults? a systematic review | 2018 | Acta Odontol. Scand | Brazil | PRISMA | Agenesia Dental | 178 | 3 | CPQ 11–14, OIDP, P CPQ,CS OIDP | 116–163 | 11–17 | No articles were found that had evaluated children and adolescent. Only one was found to have a greater impact in the adolescent agenesis group with statistical diferences | No |
Yactayo-Alburquerque et al., 2021 [9] | Impact of oral diseases on oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review of studies conducted in latin america and the caribbean | 2021 | Plos One | France | PRISMA | Oral conditioms Malocclusion Dental traumatic Periodontal disease Temporo mandibular dysfunction, salivar gland pathology, cleft lip and palate, tooth decay | 3310 | 40 | CPQ 11–14, ECOHIS and B-ECOHIS | 100–1614 | 1–64 | Studies in LAC report a negative impact of diseases on OHRQoL: tooth decay, malocclusion, xerostomy. muscle disorder, severe periodontal disease | No |
Moghaddam et al., 2020 [30] | The Association of Oral Health Status, demographic characteristics na socioeconomic determinants with Oral health-related quality of life among children: a systematic review and Meta-analysis | 2020 | BMC Pediatrics | Iran | PRISMA—The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) | Oral health promotion strategies | 4254 | 11 | - | 103–1134 | 3–12 | Oral health promotion strategies to improve children’s OHRQoL should consider the social and environmental where they live as well their oral health status | |
Dimberg et al., 2014 [26] | The impact of malocclusion on the quality of life among children and adolescents: a systematic review of quantitative studies | 2014 | Eur J Orthod | Maloclusão | GRADE | Malocclusion | 1156 | 6 | CPQ, OHIP, OIDP | 1204–225 | 8–15 | There is strong association between malocclusions and OHRQOL, predominantly in the dimensions of emotional and social wellbeing | No |
Lopez et al., 2019 [27] | Impact of uncomplicated traumatic dental injuries on the quality of life of children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis | 2019 | BMC Oral Health | PRISMA | Traumatic Dental | 712 | 26 | SOHO, ECOHIS, OIDP, CPQ11-14, CPQ8-10, OHIP | 192- 7328 | 1–14 | Uncomplicated TDIs do not have a negative impact on the OHRQoL of children and adolescents | Yes | |
Zaror et al., 2017 [31] | Impact of traumatic dental injuries on quality of life in preschoolers and schoolchildren: a systematic review and meta-analysis | 2017 | Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol | Spain and Chile | PRISMA | Traumatic Dental | 237 | 26 | SOHO, ECOHIS, CHILD OIDP, CPQ11-14, CPQ8-10, OHIP E OIDP, ISF10, ISF16 | 1–15 | 50–1528 | Traumatic dental injuries have a negative impact on OHRQoL of both preschoolers and schoolchildren | Yes |
Aimée et al., 2019 [36] | Responsiveness of oral health-related quality of life questionnaires to dental caries interventions: systematic review and meta-analysis | 2018 | Caries res | Brazil | GRADE | Dental Caries | 3643 | 14 | COHQoL P-CPQ and FIS, e OHIS, SOHO, CHILD OIDP, CPQ 8–10 e CPQ 11–14 | 32–335 | 3–50,8 | There is low evidence that the OHRQoL of children and adolescents improved following caries inter- vention procedures | No |
Barasuol et al., 2020 [37] | Association between dental pain and oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: asystematic review and meta-analysis | 2019 | Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol | Brazil | The fowkes and fulton checklist | Dental pain | 3474 | 14 | SOHO-5, B-ECOHIS and Child- OIDP | 132–1052 | children and adolescents up to 19 years of age | There is low evidence that dental pain has a negative impact on OHRQoL | Yes |
Malele-Kolisa et al., 2019 [32] | Systematic review of factors influencing oral health-related quality of life in children in africa | 2019 | Afr. J. Prim. Health Care Fam. Med | South Africa | Checklist for cross-sectional, random controlled trials and cohort studies, by the joanna briggs institute | Oral condition, dental caries, socioeconomic status, contextual social determinant | 337 | 15 | ECOHIS, OIDP, CPQ 8–10 E 11–14 | 92–2678 | 6 month-21 years old | There is association between individual factors such as children’s psyche and oral problems. Dental caries was not impacto in OHRQoL | No |