Skip to main content
main-content

01.09.2009 | Original Article | Ausgabe 9/2009

Osteoporosis International 9/2009

Osteoporosis management among residents living in long-term care

Zeitschrift:
Osteoporosis International > Ausgabe 9/2009
Autoren:
L. M. Giangregorio, M. Jantzi, A. Papaioannou, J. Hirdes, C. J. Maxwell, J. W. Poss

Abstract

Summary

Fractures in long-term care (LTC) residents have substantial economic and human costs. Osteoporosis management in residents with fractures or osteoporosis is low, and certain subgroups are less likely to receive therapy, e.g., those with >5 comorbidities, dementia, and wheelchair use. Many LTC residents who are at risk of fracture are not receiving optimal osteoporosis management.

Introduction

The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis management among LTC residents with osteoporosis or fractures.

Methods

In a retrospective study, LTC residents of 17 facilities in Ontario and Manitoba, Canada were investigated. The participants were 65+ years old with osteoporosis, history of hip fracture, or recent fracture. Comprehensive assessments were conducted by trained nurse assessors between June 2005 and June 2006 using a standardized instrument, known as the Resident Assessment Instrument 2.0.

Results

Among residents (n = 525) with osteoporosis or fractures, 177 (34%) had had a recent fall. Bisphosphonate use was reported in 199 (38%) residents, calcitonin use in six (1%), and raloxifene use in six (1%). Calcium and vitamin D supplementation were reported in 140 (27%) residents. Fifty-four (10.3%) residents were on a bisphosphonate but were not taking vitamin D or multivitamin. Variables negatively associated with osteoporosis therapy [OR (95% CI)]: six or more comorbidities [0.46 (0.28–0.77), p = 0.028], wheelchair use [0.62 (0.40–0.95), p = 0.003], cognitive impairment [0.71 (0.55–0.92), p = 0.009], depression [0.54 (0.34–0.87), p = 0.01], swallowing difficulties [0.99 (0.988–0.999), p = 0.034] or Manitoba residence [0.47 (0.28–0.78), p = 0.004]. Prescription of 10+ medications was positively associated with therapy [3.34 (2.32–4.84), p < 0.001].

Conclusion

Osteoporosis management is not optimal among residents at risk of future fracture. Identifying at-risk subgroups of residents that are not receiving therapy may facilitate closing the osteoporosis care gap.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Bis zum 22.10. bestellen und 100 € sparen!

Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2009

Osteoporosis International 9/2009Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

 

 

 
 

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise