nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.08.2012 | Original Article

Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with GI cancer: 8-week follow-up and processes associated with change

verfasst von: Laura S. Porter, Francis J. Keefe, Donald H. Baucom, Herbert Hurwitz, Barry Moser, Emily Patterson, Hong Jin Kim

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 8/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We recently reported that a partner-assisted emotional disclosure intervention for gastrointestinal cancer led to improvements in relationship quality and intimacy for couples in which the patient initially reported higher levels of holding back from discussing cancer-related concerns. The purposes of the present study were to examine outcomes at 8-week follow-up and process variables that may influence treatment effects.

Methods

One hundred thirty couples were randomly assigned to either partner-assisted emotional disclosure or an education/support control condition. Participants completed measures of relationship quality, intimacy, and psychological distress before randomization, post-treatment, and 8 weeks later. Patients in the disclosure intervention completed measures of negative affect immediately following each treatment session, and their level of expressiveness during the sessions was rated by trained observers. Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling.

Results

Among couples in which the patient initially reported higher levels of holding back, the disclosure intervention led to improvements in relationship quality and intimacy that were maintained at 8-weeks follow-up. High levels of patient expressiveness during the disclosure sessions were associated with improvements in relationship quality and intimacy, and high levels of patient negative affect immediately following the sessions were associated with reductions in psychological distress at the post-test assessment.

Conclusions

For couples in which the patient tends to hold back from discussing concerns, partner-assisted emotional disclosure is a beneficial intervention leading to improvements in relationship functioning that maintain over time. Future research is needed to examine methods of enhancing intervention effects, including encouraging patient expressiveness and negative affect during the sessions.

Pennebaker J (1997) Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychol Sci 8:162–166CrossRef

Chelune GJ, Waring EM, Vosk BN, Sultan FE, Ogden JK (1984) Self-disclosure and its relationship to marital intimacy. J Clin Psychol 40:216–219PubMedCrossRef

Prager KJ (1995) The psychology of intimacy. Guilford Press, New York

Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Baucom DH, Hurwitz H, Moser B, Patterson E, Kim HJ (2009) Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with gastrointestinal cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 115:4326–4338PubMedCrossRef

Kazdin AE (2007) Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 3:1–27PubMedCrossRef

Baucom DH, Sayers SL, Sher TG (1990) Supplementing behavioral marital therapy with cognitive restructuring and emotional expressiveness training: an outcome investigation. J Consult Clin Psychol 58:636–645PubMedCrossRef

Smyth JM (1998) Written emotional expression: effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. J Consult Clin Psychol 66:174–184PubMedCrossRef

Pennebaker JW, Beall SK (1986) Confronting a traumatic event: toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. J Abnorm Psychol 95:274–281PubMedCrossRef

Foa EB, Kozak MJ (1986) Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information. Psychol Bull 99:20–35PubMedCrossRef

10.

Lang PJ (1985) The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion: fear and anxiety. In: Tuma AH, Maser J (eds) Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 131–170

11.

Greenberg LS, Safran JD (1987) Emotion in psychotherapy: affect, cognition, and the process of change. Guilford, New York

12.

Kelley JE, Lumley MA, Leisen JC (1997) Health effects of emotional disclosure in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Heal Psychol 16:331–340CrossRef

13.

Norton R (1983) Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependent variable. J Marriage Fam 45:141–151CrossRef

14.

Heyman RE, Sayers SL, Bellack AS (1994) Global marital satisfaction versus marital adjustment: an empirical comparison of three measures. J Fam Psychol 8:432–446CrossRef

15.

Miller RS, Lefcourt HM (1982) The assessment of social intimacy. J Pers Assess 46:514–518PubMedCrossRef

16.

Miller RS, Lefcourt HM (2000) Miller Social Intimacy Scale. In: Corcoran K, Fischer J (eds) Measures for clinical practice: a sourcebook, 3rd edn. Free Press, New York

17.

McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF (1992) EdIts manual: profile of mood states. In: EDITS manual: profile of mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego

18.

Anderson B (1992) Psychological interventions for cancer patients to enhance quality of life. J Consult Clin Psychol 60:552–568CrossRef

19.

Antoni M, Lehman J, Kilbourn K, Boyers A, Culver J, Alferi S, Yount S, McGregor B, Arena P, Harris S, Price A, Carver C (2001) Cognitive behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Heal Psychol 20:20–32CrossRef

20.

Pistrang N, Barker C (1995) The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 40:789–797PubMedCrossRef

21.

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Personal Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070CrossRef

22.

Stover L, Guerney BG Jr, Ginsberg B, Schlein S (1977) The Self-Feeling Awarness Scale (SFAS). In: Guerney BG (ed) Relationship enhancement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 371–377

23.

Burry-Stock JA, Shaw DG, Laurie C, Chisson BS (1996) Rater agreement indexes for performance assessment. Educ Psychol Meas 56:251–262CrossRef

24.

Porter LS, Baucom DH, Patterson ES, Keefe FJ (in press) Reactions to a partner-assisted emotional disclosure for Gi cancer: direct observation of patient and partner communication journal of marital and family therapy

25.

Kenny D, Kashy D, Cook W (2006) Dyadic data analysis. Guilford, New York

26.

Atkins D (2005) Using multilevel models to analyze couple and family treatment data: basic and advanced issues. J Fam Psychol 19:98–110PubMedCrossRef

27.

Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ (2006) Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. J Educ Behav Stat 31:437–448CrossRef

28.

Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA (2000) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284:2476–2482PubMedCrossRef

29.

Kazdin AE (2006) Mechanisms of change in psychotherapy: advances, breakthroughs and cutting-edge research (do not yet exist). In: Bootzin RR, McKnight PE (eds) Strengthening research methodology: psychological measurement and evaluation. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 77–102CrossRef

30.

Kraemer HC, Wilson GT, Fairburn CG, Agras WS (2002) Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:877–883PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with GI cancer: 8-week follow-up and processes associated with change
verfasst von: Laura S. Porter
Francis J. Keefe
Donald H. Baucom
Herbert Hurwitz
Barry Moser
Emily Patterson
Hong Jin Kim
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 8/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1272-z

Springer Medizin

Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with GI cancer: 8-week follow-up and processes associated with change