Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health 1/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Paper

Perceived Neighborhood Quality and Cancer Screening Behavior: Evidence from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin

verfasst von: Kirsten M. M. Beyer, Kristen M. Malecki, Kelly A. Hoormann, Aniko Szabo, Ann B. Nattinger

Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Socioeconomic disparities in colorectal and breast cancer screening persist, partially accounting for disparities in cancer outcomes. Some neighborhood characteristics—particularly area level socioeconomic factors—have been linked to cancer screening behavior, but few studies have examined the relationship between perceived neighborhood quality and screening behavior, which may provide more insight into the ways in which neighborhood environments shape cancer related behaviors. This study examines the relationship between several aspects of the perceived neighborhood environment and breast and colorectal cancer screening behavior among a population-based sample of Wisconsin residents. A sub-goal was to compare the relevance of different perceived neighborhood factors for different screening tests. This is a cross-sectional study of 2008–2012 data from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin, a population-based annual survey of Wisconsin residents. An average risk sample of Black, Hispanic and White women age 50 and older (n = 1265) were selected. Survey regression analyses examined predictors of screening, as well as adherence to screening guidelines. Models controlled for individual socio-demographic information and insurance status. Perceptions of social and physical disorder, including fear of crime and visible garbage, were associated with screening rates. Findings emphasize the particular importance of these factors for colorectal cancer screening, indicating the necessity of improving screening rates in areas characterized by social disorganization, crime, and physical disorder. Additional work should be done to further investigate the pathways that explain the linkage between neighborhood conditions, perceived neighborhood risks and cancer screening behavior.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2013). Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 63(1), 11–30. Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2013). Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 63(1), 11–30.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2013). Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 62(44), 881–888. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2013). Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 62(44), 881–888.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2012). Cancer screening—United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(3), 41–45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2012). Cancer screening—United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(3), 41–45.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Beyer, K. M., Comstock, S., Seagren, R., & Rushton, G. (2011). Explaining place-based colorectal cancer health disparities: Evidence from a rural context. Social Science and Medicine, 72(3), 373–382.PubMedCrossRef Beyer, K. M., Comstock, S., Seagren, R., & Rushton, G. (2011). Explaining place-based colorectal cancer health disparities: Evidence from a rural context. Social Science and Medicine, 72(3), 373–382.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Meissner, H. I., Klabunde, C. N., Breen, N., & Zapka, J. M. (2012). Breast and colorectal cancer screening: US primary care physicians’ reports of barriers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(6), 584–589.PubMedCrossRef Meissner, H. I., Klabunde, C. N., Breen, N., & Zapka, J. M. (2012). Breast and colorectal cancer screening: US primary care physicians’ reports of barriers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(6), 584–589.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat McCaffery, K., Wardle, J., Nadel, M., & Atkin, W. (2002). Socioeconomic variation in participation in colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Medical Screening, 9(3), 104–108.PubMedCrossRef McCaffery, K., Wardle, J., Nadel, M., & Atkin, W. (2002). Socioeconomic variation in participation in colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Medical Screening, 9(3), 104–108.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Daley, E., Alio, A., Anstey, E. H., Chandler, R., Dyer, K., & Helmy, H. (2011). Examining barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment in florida through a socio-ecological lens. Journal of Community Health, 36(1), 121–131.PubMedCrossRef Daley, E., Alio, A., Anstey, E. H., Chandler, R., Dyer, K., & Helmy, H. (2011). Examining barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment in florida through a socio-ecological lens. Journal of Community Health, 36(1), 121–131.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pruitt, S. L., Shim, M. J., Mullen, P. D., Vernon, S. W., & Amick, B. C., I. I. I. (2009). Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 18(10), 2579–2599.CrossRef Pruitt, S. L., Shim, M. J., Mullen, P. D., Vernon, S. W., & Amick, B. C., I. I. I. (2009). Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 18(10), 2579–2599.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Weitzman, E. R., Zapka, J., Estabrook, B., & Goins, K. V. (2001). Risk and reluctance: Understanding impediments to colorectal cancer screening. Preventive Medicine, 32(6), 502–513.PubMedCrossRef Weitzman, E. R., Zapka, J., Estabrook, B., & Goins, K. V. (2001). Risk and reluctance: Understanding impediments to colorectal cancer screening. Preventive Medicine, 32(6), 502–513.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieto, F. J., Peppard, P. E., Engelman, C. D., et al. (2010). The survey of the health of wisconsin (SHOW), a novel infrastructure for population health research: Rationale and methods. BMC Public Health, 10, 785.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nieto, F. J., Peppard, P. E., Engelman, C. D., et al. (2010). The survey of the health of wisconsin (SHOW), a novel infrastructure for population health research: Rationale and methods. BMC Public Health, 10, 785.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, R. A., Brooks, D., Cokkinides, V., Saslow, D., & Brawley, O. W. (2013). Cancer screening in the United States, 2013. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 63(2), 87–105. Smith, R. A., Brooks, D., Cokkinides, V., Saslow, D., & Brawley, O. W. (2013). Cancer screening in the United States, 2013. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 63(2), 87–105.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chida, Y., Hamer, M., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2008). Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival? Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 5(8), 466–475.PubMedCrossRef Chida, Y., Hamer, M., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2008). Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival? Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 5(8), 466–475.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat von Wagner, C., Good, A., Whitaker, K. L., & Wardle, J. (2011). Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: A conceptual framework. Epidemiologic Reviews, 33(1), 135–147.CrossRef von Wagner, C., Good, A., Whitaker, K. L., & Wardle, J. (2011). Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: A conceptual framework. Epidemiologic Reviews, 33(1), 135–147.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Salant, T., & Gehlert, S. (2008). Collective memory, candidacy, and victimisation: Community epidemiologies of breast cancer risk. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(4), 599–615.CrossRef Salant, T., & Gehlert, S. (2008). Collective memory, candidacy, and victimisation: Community epidemiologies of breast cancer risk. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(4), 599–615.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Perceived Neighborhood Quality and Cancer Screening Behavior: Evidence from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin
verfasst von
Kirsten M. M. Beyer
Kristen M. Malecki
Kelly A. Hoormann
Aniko Szabo
Ann B. Nattinger
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Community Health / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-015-0078-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Journal of Community Health 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe