Physical inactivity, and its association with hypertension among employees in the district of Colombo

Physical inactivity is a leading cause of death and, therefore, a major public health problem [1]. There is compelling evidence that physical inactivity is responsible for a large proportion of coronary heart disease and type II diabetes, and hypertension [2]. Physical inactivity led to 9% of premature deaths (5·3 million deaths) in 2008 [3, 4]. Additionally, there are socioeconomic variations observed in physical inactivity [5]. The recently published WHO recommendations on physical activity state that all adults (18- 64 years) should engage in 150–300 min of moderate-intensity, or 75–150 min of vigorous-intensity physical activity, or an equivalent combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity throughout the week [6, 7]. There is epidemiological evidence that suggests a dose-dependent relationship between physical activity and hypertension [8].

Social determinants of health (SDH) are non-medical factors that influence health-related outcomes and can be altered through informed science [9]. According to WHO, the SDH are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live and work, through which complex pathways act and health-related outcomes are shaped. The SDH consists of various factors and includes education, income, working life conditions, socioeconomic position/ status/ gradient, public policies, health services, access, transport, and built environment [9, 10]. The SDHs account for 30–55% of the health outcomes and are responsible for health inequalities. The lower socioeconomic position leads to lower health outcomes [9]. Socioeconomic position/status refers to an individual’s or a group’s location in society’s social structure and is influenced by social and economic factors [11]. The social position/ status, defined by socioeconomic factors, can be proxied using various indicators. One such indicator is the job category which reflects the occupational hierarchy within a specific working population and is used in the Whitehall studies. Evidence suggests a strong and consistent relationship between these socioeconomic factors, such as job category, and physical health outcomes such as NCDs{Lago - Peñas, 2020 #1175} [10]. Moreover, socioeconomic position/status is also associated with NCD risk factors such as physical inactivity [10]. For example, evidence suggests that White-collar workers are 84% more likely to be physically inactive [12].

When assessing physical activity (PA), there are four main dimensions that are of interest; the type of, the frequency, the duration, and the intensity of the PA [13]. The type of PA is referred to the different types of activities the subjects are engaged in. The frequency of PA activity refers to the number of sessions of physical activity per unit of time. The duration is the length of time spent in each activity session. Additionally, there are four main types of daily physical activity: occupation-related, transport-related, household-related, and leisure time-related [13, 14]. The occupational activity involves activity at work and commuting to work. An occupational activity represents the greatest portion of daily time for most adults who are employed before retirement. Commuting to work is defined as regular travel between one’s residence and place of work [15]. It is believed that sedentary behavior associated with long-distance commuting hinders physical activity and ill health [15].

The development of questionnaire-based methods for assessing PA has paved the way to assess PA’s amount and patterns and determine the relationship between PA and health-related outcomes. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed in Geneva in 1998 [13, 14]. This is a widely used questionnaire in assessing physical activity in adults [16, 17]. Two IPAQ versions are available (a long version and a short version), and both versions are available in self-administered or interviewer-administered forms. The reliability and validity of the IPAQ were established across 12 countries in 2000, including Sri Lanka [14]. The IPAQ assesses the PA in the last seven days. The compendium was developed based on adult activities and can correctly estimate the employed population’s physical activities [14]. IPAQ assesses the energy expenditure of adults using a compendium of physical activities to estimate energy expenditure.

Metabolic equivalent of task (MET) expresses the energy expenditure (or calories) of physical activities. The total volume of physical activity can be quantified in MET-hours per day per week [18, 19]. This is the total of all different activities performed during the assessment period expressed in MET equivalent and multiplied by all time spent in all activities. Considering the MET values, the type, and the frequency of the PA, the total volume can be categorized into insufficient/low, sufficient/ moderate, or vigorous/highly activity [18, 19].

Socioeconomic variations in health conditions and related risk factors can vary between different population groups [20]. Global Action Plan on Physical activity 2018–2030 adopted a new global target to reduce physical inactivity globally by 15% by 2030 [6]. To achieve this, it is essential to assess and be aware of the disparities of health-related conditions in different groups to guide policy decisions. Given the importance of understanding variations, this study aimed to assess socioeconomic variations in physical activity and measure the association between physical inactivity and hypertension among government officials in Sri Lanka. By exploring the socioeconomic variations in physical inactivity among the study population, we aim to fill the knowledge gap related to variations in physical inactivity between SOs and MAs, enabling policymakers and healthcare providers to make better evidence-informed decisions and develop an equitable delivery of interventions, especially at the workplace.

Of the 275 SOs invited for the study, 272 responded. Therefore, the response rate of SOs was 98.9%. Of the 760 MAs invited, 739 responded; hence, the response rate for MAs was 97.2%. Selected sociodemographic and occupational characteristics of SOs and MAs are given in Table 1. The mean ages were 44.1 (SD ± 9.0) and 42.1 (SD ±8.7) years for SOs and MAs, respectively. The majority were Sinhalese in both categories. A majority of the respondents among SOs (39.7%; n = 108) and MAs (43.3%; n = 320) were between 30 and 39 years.

The main commuting method for SOs (59%) was private transport and MAs (64%) public transport. Thirty-nine-percent(n = 106) SOs and 25.8%(n = 191) MAs reported a commuting distance between 11 and 20 Km. The median distance from the current residence to the current workplace was 15 Km(range 0.25–130 Km) and 20 km(range of 0.2–131 Km) for SOs and MAs, respectively.

As shown in Fig. 2, socioeconomic variations in PA levels were observed as 54.4%(n = 148) senior-officers were involved in inadequate PA, whereas among the managerial assistants, only 30.0%(n = 222) were in the above category. Of the 1011 respondents, 37% (n = 370), 56.8%(n = 574), and 6.6%(n = 67) were involved in low, moderate, and high PA levels based on MET scores calculated using MET mins per week.

Considering the total physical activity levels, the mean MET/mins/week was 2739.5 (SEM 159.2) and 3343.9 (SEM128) for SOs and MAs, respectively (Table 2).

Among SOs and MAs, 68%(n = 69) and 59.9%(n = 132) of the hypertensives reported a commuting distance of ≤20 Km, respectively. Furthermore, the commuting distance was positively correlated(p < 0.05) with total transport MET among SOs and MAs.

The study revealed that the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension was almost equal among SOs (32.9%; 95% CI = 27.4, 38.6) and MAs (33.01%; 95% CI = 29.6, 36.4) (p > 0.05) (Table 3). Of the diagnosed hypertensives, 47.5% (n = 145), were physically inactive/ less active and considering non-hypertensives, 34.7%(n = 245) were physically inactive/ less active.

Among the SOs diagnosed with hypertension, more than half (59.1%; n = 52) were physically inactive, while among MAs, 65.9% (n = 143) with hypertension were physically inactive. After adjusting for potential confounding factors being physically inactive was associated with a higher risk of hypertension among SOs [OR = 2.08 [95% CI; 1.07, 4.6] and MAs [OR = 2.8 [95% CI; 1.8, 4.6] (Table 4). After adjusting for potential confounding factors (age, sex, monthly income, education level, body mass index, and BMI), commuting distance of > 20 km was found to lower the odds of hypertension among SOs and MAs(OR = 0.713; 95% CI 0.4 to1.3; and OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.87).

This study mainly investigated the association between physical inactivity and hypertension and explored socioeconomic variations in physical activity in government officials in Sri Lanka. The interrelationship between physical inactivity and health is not a new concept. A crucial determinant of behavioral risk factors such as physical inactivity is adults’ socioeconomic status (SES), which is indicated by their educational attainment, income, and occupational category [29, 30]. The Whitehall Study involving a cohort 18,000 of male civil servants aged 20–64 years has reported that the social status of employees based on their seniority/ occupation affects morbidity and mortality in a wide range of diseases [31]. The current SES was proxied to the job category, which depicts the individual’s position in the social structure.

The study found that 54.4%(n = 148) SOs and 30.0%(n = 222) were physically inactive. Of the 1011 respondents, 37% (n = 370), 56.8%(n = 574), and 6.6%(n = 67) were involved in low, moderate, and high PA levels based on MET scores calculated using MET mins per week. It should be noted that reported physical inactivity levels are likely to underestimate the actual burden attributable to inactive lifestyles.

The current study showed domestic activity was the main mode, followed by transport-related activity among SOs and MAs. This finding is supported by another study conducted in Sri Lanka in which they reported that the main mode of energy expenditure is domestic work [32]. Domestic activities involve housework, household maintenance, yard work, and caring for the family. Increasing active travel leads to increase physical activity. The mode of traveling to work and the health benefits are not much researched, especially in Sri Lanka. Commuting to work is defined as regular travel between place of residence and work. Sedentary behaviour associated with sedentary commuting hinders physical activity and thereby leads to ill health. Commuting distance was positively correlated(p < 0.05) with total transport MET among SOs and MAs, meaning active travel was involved. These findings are supported by a cross-sectional study done in India [33]. Creating low-traffic neighborhoods (LTN) is also essential in this context to improve walking and cycling [34]. This study revealed that the mode of transportation depended on the SES. However, if LTN’s are implemented, this would increase active travel and the related public health benefits for all irrespective of their socioeconomic status.

Considering physical activity based on SES strata, it is evident that across all subgroups, there were significant differences between physical activity. Educational attainment and occupational category are indicators of an individual’s socioeconomic status, a key determinant of health, [35, 36] and help explain senior officers’ and managerial assistants’ physical activity patterns. The SOS and MAs differed in educational level and monthly family income (p < 0.05). The MAs reported lower physical inactivity (30%) than the SOs (54%). The mean MET/mins/week was 2739.5 (SEM 159.2) and 3343.9 (SEM128) for SOs and MAs, respectively, and the observed difference was significant (p = 0.003). These findings are consistent with those of other studies, showing variations in physical inactivity across socioeconomic status (SES) strata [37]. A study conducted in Sri Lanka which reports that high levels of education and older males have less physical activity supports the findings of the current study [17]. However, this study revealed that MAs, as opposed to SOs, reported significantly (p < 0.005) higher MET-based activity levels related to work, transport, and domestic activities. Senior officers travel in private vehicles, are more involved with meetings and paperwork, and work long working hours, leading to a sedentary lifestyle. The observed inverse relationship between age and physical inactivity is consistent with studies conducted elsewhere [38]. A possible explanation for this finding is that younger people opt for healthy habits and that with increasing age, employees become more sedentary.

Interestingly leisure and sports-related MET was higher among the SOs (p > 0.05). It could be that perceived lack of activity prompts the SOs to engage in sports-related activity when free. However, compared to other domains, leisure-time physical activity was low among both SOs (315 (SEM 846)) and MAs (241 (SEM 733)) MET/mins/week, and this is similar to studies done elsewhere [37, 39]. The Mexico City Diabetes Study, a cohort study, reported low levels of leisure-time physical activity levels (336 MET/ mins/ week) [39]. Despite the current knowledge of physical activity promoting an individual’s health, the practices among sedentary workers are obviously different. The rapid socioeconomic development is leading to a more sedentary type of lifestyle.

The present study carried out among administrators (SOs and MAs) confirms previously reported trends in the prevalence of hypertension and physical inactivity in Sri Lanka. The age and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension among 30–60 years SOs and MAs attached to the above offices were 32.9 per hundred population with a 95% CI of 27.4 to 38.6 and 33.01 per hundred population with a 95% CI of 29.6 to 36.4 respectively. The observed differences between the two percentages among SOs and MAs were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Of the SOs 63.6% (n = 173) were normotensives and 4.0% (n = 11) were pre-hypertensives while 21.3% (n = 58), 1.5% (n = 4), and 0.7% (n = 2) were in the hypertension stage I, stage II and in the isolated systolic categories respectively. Considering MAs 63.5% (n = 469) were normotensives and 7.2% (n = 53) were pre-hypertensives, while 19.9% (n = 147), 1% (n = 7), and 1.9% (n = 14) were in the hypertension stage I, stage II and in the isolated systolic categories respectively. Of the hypertensive SOs and MAs, 52.3% (n = 46) and 35% (n = 76) were unaware they had hypertension, respectively. Of the patients diagnosed and on treatment for hypertension, 68.6% (n = 24) of SOs and 43% (n = 49) of MAs had controlled hypertension.

After adjusting for potential confounding factors (age, sex, monthly income, body mass index, commuting distance, high BMI, and alcohol intake), physically inactive participants had a greater odds of having hypertension than the physically active participants. This is similar to the findings from a cohort study involving 2282 participants, who were followed for 20 years, which reported accumulating < 1 MET/min/week of occupational moderate to vigorous physical activity was associated with a 47% higher risk of hypertension (HR 1.47, CI 95% 1.13, 1.90) and accumulating < 1 MET/min/week of leisure moderate to vigorous physical activity was associated with 29% higher risk of hypertension 1.29 (1.01, 1.66). Physical activity reduces the risk of hypertension by reducing body weight, reducing psychological stress, improving insulin sensitivity, and reducing sympathetic activity [40]. There can be several plausible pathways through which commuting distance lowers the odds of hypertension. In countries like Sri Lanka, long-distance commuting may involve active transport. Studies elsewhere have reported that active commuting was associated with lower BMI, especially if the commuting distance is> 20 km [41, 42]. Although the study showed that a longer commuting distance lowered the odds of hypertension, it was not a significant association (OR = 0.713; 95% CI 0.4 to1.3). This may be due to the small sample size of SOs (n = 272) compared to MAs (n = 739) and because most of the SOs used a private vehicle for transportation. Considering the total transport MET, a positive correlation of total transport MET, and the association between long-distance travel and hypertension, our results support promoting active transportation methods for employees.

The study is not without limitations. As this study was conducted in the government administration offices in the Colombo district, the results may not apply to all administrative employees in the country, which is considered a limitation. Physical activity was based on self-reports which required a 7-day recall. This might not necessarily reflect accurate physical activity levels across lifespan. Recall bias and reporting socially desirable practice may have played a role in bias towards null.

Additionally, although we controlled for all the known confounders, the residual confounders may exist. Finally, the study identified physical inactivity as a correlate of hypertension through a cross-sectional comparative study design. This precluded the assessment of the temporal relationship between hypertension and inactivity.

Our findings suggest that physical inactivity in employees is alarmingly high. Physical inactivity was prevalent among the hypertensive individuals compared to non-hypertensive participants. Physical inactivity is an important independent contributor to hypertension among employees. The present study adds to the evidence of wider influencing factors related to physical inactivity as socioeconomic variations in PA levels existed. The socioeconomic variations observed in physical activity levels highlight the importance of considering social differences to ensure the successful and equitable implementation of programs to prevent hypertension. Higher commuting distance is positively correlated with total transport MET, and long commuting distance (> 20 km) lowered the odds of hypertension among SOs and MAs. This may imply that active travel increases physical activity and thereby results in lowering the odds of hypertension. Further studies are necessary to explore the association of hypertension, physical inactivity, and commuting distance. Policies and environment to promote and at least the recommended amounts of physical activity among employees necessary to avert premature deaths due to chronic illnesses such as hypertension should be prioritized. Screening and diagnosis need to be coupled with treatment to achieve good control of diseases such as hypertension. Implement well-integrated worksite health promotion activities, which include regular periodic screening, surveillance, and provision of healthy opportunities at the workplace like a healthy diet, physical activity, mental health & well-being, coupled with policy commitment. The actions should be continued with inbuilt monitoring and evaluation.