nach oben

European Journal of Ageing

Erschienen in:

20.02.2020 | Original Investigation

Positive and negative aspects of social relations and low-grade inflammation in Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank

verfasst von: Charlotte Juul Nilsson, Signe Nørgaard, Else Foverskov, Helle Bruunsgaard, Per Kragh Andersen, Rikke Lund

Erschienen in: European Journal of Ageing | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The association between social relations and health outcomes is well described, but pathways are relatively poorly understood. Inflammation has been suggested as a potential physiological pathway, linking social relations to adverse health outcomes. However, previous studies have shown ambiguous results and have for the vast majority been based on studies small in sample size. The aim of the present study is to examine the association between comprehensive measures of structural and positive as well as negative functional aspects of social relations, across four relational domains—partner/spouse, children, other family and friends, and the level of systemic low-grade inflammation in a large population-based middle-aged cohort and to examine variation by gender and socioeconomic position in these associations. The study comprised of 5576 participants in the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank. The inflammatory biomarkers collected in late midlife included C-reactive protein, Interleukin-6, and TNF-alpha. Multiple linear regression models were implemented to explore associations between social relations and inflammatory measures controlling for gender, age, socioeconomic position, marital status, early major lifeevents and morbidity. Results show weak and ambiguous associations in all analyses. There were no strong indications of interaction with socioeconomic position. Concluding cautiously, men appear to be more vulnerable toward living alone and low contact frequency with family compared to women as regards high level of low-grade inflammation. In conclusion, this large-scale population-based study among middle-aged men and women showed no association between social relations and low-grade inflammation.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aartsen M, Veenstra M, Hansen T (2017) Social pathways to health: on the mediating role of the social network in the relation between socio-economic position and health. SSM Popul. Health 3:419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.006CrossRef

Avlund K et al (2014) Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank (CAMB): an introduction. J Aging Health 26(1):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264313509277CrossRef

Bajaj A, John-Henderson NA, Cundiff JM, Marsland AL, Manuck SB, Kamarck TW (2016) Daily social interactions, close relationships, and systemic inflammation in two samples: healthy middle-aged and older adults. Brain Behav. Immun. 58:152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.06.004CrossRef

Brown EG, Gallagher S, Creaven AM (2018) Loneliness and acute stress reactivity: a systematic review of psychophysiological studies. Psychophysiology 55(5):e13031. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13031CrossRef

Bruunsgaard H, Pedersen M, Pedersen BK (2001) Aging and proinflammatory cytokines. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 8(3):131–136CrossRef

Cerhan JR, Wallace RB (1993) Predictors of decline in social relationships in the rural elderly. Am. J. Epidemiol. 137(8):870–880CrossRef

Cevenini E, Monti D, Franceschi C (2013) Inflamm-ageing. Clin. Nutr. Metabol. Care 16(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e32835ada13CrossRef

Chiang JJ, Eisenberger NI, Seeman TE, Taylor SE (2012) Negative and competitive social interactions are related to heightened proinflammatory cytokine activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(6):1878–1882. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120972109CrossRef

Christensen U et al (2014) Addressing social inequality in aging by the Danish occupational social class measurement. J. Aging Health 26(1):106–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314522894CrossRef

Dich N et al (2015) Early life adversity potentiates the effects of later life stress on cumulative physiological dysregulation. Anxiety Stress Coping 28(4):372–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.969720CrossRef

Donoho CJ, Crimmins EM, Seeman TE (2013) Marital quality, gender, and markers of inflammation in the MIDUS Cohort. J. Marriage Fam. 75(1):127–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01023.xCrossRef

Due P, Holstein B, Lund R, Modvig J, Avlund K (1999) Social relations: network, support and relational strain. Soc. Sci. Med. 48(5):661–673CrossRef

Eisenberger NI, Moieni M, Inagaki TK, Muscatell KA, Irwin MR (2017) In sickness and in health: the co-regulation of inflammation and social behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 42(1):242–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.141CrossRef

Ekmann A, Avlund K, Osler M, Lund R (2012) Do negative aspects of social relations influence fatigue? A cross-sectional study on a non-clinical sample of middle-aged Danish men. J. Psychosom. Res. 73(4):277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.08.005CrossRef

Elliot AJ, Heffner KL, Mooney CJ, Moynihan JA, Chapman BP (2018) Social relationships and inflammatory markers in the Midus cohort: the role of age and gender differences. J. Aging Health 30(6):904–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264317698551CrossRef

Ershler WB, Keller ET (2000) Age-associated increased interleukin-6 gene expression, late-life diseases, and frailty. Ann. Rev. Med. 51:245–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.51.1.245CrossRef

Fagundes CP, Bennett JM, Derry HM, Kiecolt-Glaser JK (2011) Relationships and inflammation across the lifespan: social developmental pathways to disease. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 5(11):891–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00392.xCrossRef

Ford ES, Loucks EB, Berkman LF (2006) Social integration and concentrations of C-reactive protein among US adults. Ann. Epidemiol. 16(2):78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.08.005CrossRef

Ford J et al (2019) Social integration and quality of social relationships as protective factors for inflammation in a nationally representative sample of black women. J. Urb. Health Bull. New York Acad. Med. 96(Suppl 1):35–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-00337-xCrossRef

Friedman EM, Herd P (2010) Income, education, and inflammation: differential associations in a national probability sample (The MIDUS study). Psychosom. Med. 72(3):290–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181cfe4c2CrossRef

Glei DA, Goldman N, Ryff CD, Lin YH, Weinstein M (2012) Social relationships and inflammatory markers: an analysis of Taiwan and the US. Soc. Sci. Med. 74(12):1891–1899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.020CrossRef

Heap J, Fors S, Lennartsson C (2017) Coexisting disadvantages in later life: demographic and socio-economic inequalities. J. Popul. Ageing 10(3):247–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-016-9158-yCrossRef

Holt-Lunstad J (2018) Why social relationships are important for physical health: a systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 69:437–458. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902CrossRef

Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB (2010) Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoSMed 7(7):e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316CrossRef

Kamiya Y, Whelan B, Timonen V, Kenny RA (2010) The differential impact of subjective and objective aspects of social engagement on cardiovascular risk factors. BMC Geriatr. 10:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-81CrossRef

Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Gouin JP, Hantsoo L (2010) Close relationships, inflammation, and health. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35(1):33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.09.003CrossRef

Kim DA, Benjamin EJ, Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2016) Social connectedness is associated with fibrinogen level in a human social network. In: Proceedings biological sciences, vol 283(1837), https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0958

Krause N, Borawski-Clark E (1995) Social class differences in social support among older adults. Gerontologist 35(4):498–508CrossRef

Lara J et al (2015) A proposed panel of biomarkers of healthy aging. BMC Med. 13:222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0470-9CrossRef

Liu RS et al (2017) Socioeconomic status in childhood and C reactive protein in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 71(8):817–826. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208646CrossRef

Loucks EB, Berkman LF, Gruenewald TL, Seeman TE (2006a) Relation of social integration to inflammatory marker concentrations in men and women 70 to 79 years. Am. J. Cardiol. 97(7):1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.10.043CrossRef

Loucks EB, Sullivan LM, D’Agostino RB Sr, Larson MG, Berkman LF, Benjamin EJ (2006b) Social networks and inflammatory markers in the Framingham Heart Study. J. Biosoc. Sci. 38(6):835–842. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932005001203CrossRef

Loucks EB et al (2006c) Association of educational level with inflammatory markers in the Framingham Offspring Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 163(7):622–628. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj076CrossRef

Lund R, Rod NH, Christensen U (2010) Are negative aspects of social relations predictive of angina pectoris? A 6-year follow-up study of middle-aged Danish women and men. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.106153CrossRef

Lund R, Nielsen LS, Henriksen PW, Schmidt L, Avlund K, Christensen U (2013) Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen Social Relations Questionnaire (CSRQ). J. Aging Health 26(1):128–150CrossRef

Lund R, Christensen U, Nilsson CJ, Kriegbaum M, Hulvej Rod N (2014a) Stressful social relations and mortality: a prospective cohort study. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 68(8):720–727. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-203675CrossRef

Lund R, Rod NH, Thielen K, Nilsson CJ, Christensen U (2014b) Negative aspects of close social relations and 10-year incident ischaemic heart disease hospitalization among middle-aged Danes. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 21(10):1249–1256. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487313486041CrossRef

Lund R et al (2015) Cohort profile: the Copenhagen aging and midlife Biobank (CAMB). Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv149CrossRef

McDade TW, Lindau ST, Wroblewski K (2011) Predictors of C-reactive protein in the national social life, health, and aging project. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 66(1):129–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq008CrossRef

Mezuk B, Diez Roux AV, Seeman T (2010) Evaluating the buffering vs direct effects hypotheses of emotional social support on inflammatory markers: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Brain Behav. Immun. 24(8):1294–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2010.06.006CrossRef

Nakata A, Irie M, Takahashi M (2014) Source-specific social support and circulating inflammatory markers among white-collar employees. Ann. Behav. Med. Publ. Soc. Behav. Med. 47(3):335–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9555-xCrossRef

Nersesian PV et al (2018) Loneliness in middle age and biomarkers of systemic inflammation: findings from Midlife in the United States. Soc. Sci. Med. 209:174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.007CrossRef

Pedersen JM et al (2016) Late midlife C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in middle aged danish men in relation to body size history within and across generations. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md) 24(2):461–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21311CrossRef

Puustinen PJ, Koponen H, Kautiainen H, Mantyselka P, Vanhala M (2011) Psychological distress and C-reactive protein: do health behaviours and pathophysiological factors modify the association? Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 261(4):277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-010-0134-xCrossRef

Rook KS (2015) Social networks in later life: weighing positive and negative effects on health and well-being. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414551364CrossRef

Stepanikova I, Bateman LB, Oates GR (2017) Systemic inflammation in midlife: race, socioeconomic status, and perceived discrimination. Am. J. Prev. Med. 52(1s1):S63–S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.026CrossRef

Uchino BN et al (2016) Ethnic/racial differences in the association between social support and levels of C-reactive proteins in the North Texas Heart Study. Psychophysiology 53(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12499CrossRef

Uchino BN, Trettevik R, Kent de Grey RG, Cronan S, Hogan J, Baucom BRW (2018) Social support, social integration, and inflammatory cytokines: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. Off. J. Div. Health Psychol. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 37(5):462–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000594CrossRef

Walen HR, Lachman ME (2000) Social support and strain from partner, family, and friends: costs and benefits for men and women in adulthood. J. Soc. Pers. Relationsh. 17(1):5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500171001CrossRef

Wang X et al (2013) Inflammatory markers and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 36(1):166–175. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0702CrossRef

Weddell-Neergaard et al (2018) Cardiorespiratory fitness and the metabolic syndrome: roles of inflammation and abdominal obesity. PLoS One 13(3):e0194991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194991CrossRef

Weyers S et al (2008) Low socio-economic position is associated with poor social networks and social support: results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Int. J. Equity Health 7:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-7-13CrossRef

Wilson RS, Boyle PA, James BD, Leurgans SE, Buchman AS, Bennett DA (2015) Negative social interactions and risk of mild cognitive impairment in old age. Neuropsychology 29(4):561–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000154CrossRef

Yang YC, McClintock MK, Kozloski M, Li T (2013) Social isolation and adult mortality: the role of chronic inflammation and sex differences. J. Health Soc. Behav. 54(2):183–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513485244CrossRef

Yang YC, Schorpp K, Harris KM (2014) Social support, social strain and inflammation: evidence from a national longitudinal study of U.S. adults. Soc. Sci. Med. 107:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.013CrossRef

Yang YC, Boen C, Gerken K, Li T, Schorpp K, Harris KM (2016) Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(3):578–583. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511085112CrossRef

Titel: Positive and negative aspects of social relations and low-grade inflammation in Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank
verfasst von: Charlotte Juul Nilsson
Signe Nørgaard
Else Foverskov
Helle Bruunsgaard
Per Kragh Andersen
Rikke Lund
Publikationsdatum: 20.02.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: European Journal of Ageing / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1613-9372
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9380
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00561-y

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Correction to: An exploration of subjective age, actual age, age awareness, and engagement in everyday behaviors

The uniqueness of subjective ageing: convergent and discriminant validity

Views on aging: older adults’ self-perceptions of age and of health

Physical activity and subjective age across adulthood in four samples

Young people feel wise and older people feel energetic: comparing age stereotypes and self-evaluations across adulthood

Views on ageing: a lifespan perspective