A pseudomeningocele, or a collection of cerebrospinal fluid, typically presents as a postoperative complication, and can be asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously, though some present with headaches, low back pain, or radicular symptoms.
The best management of spinal pseudomeningocele is debated, but important considerations include nerve root involvement, pseudomeningocele size and location.
Revision surgery and dural tear repair may be an important option in symptomatic patients. In patients who are asymptomatic, nonsurgical management can result in spontaneous resolution of the pseudomeningocele with scar formation over time.
Case
The aim of this case is to highlight the importance of radiographic determination of the presence of a pseudomeningocele and the subsequent constellation of symptoms. A pseudomeningocele, or a collection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), typically presents as a postoperative complication [1]. Spinal pseudomeningoceles can be asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously, though some present with headaches, low back pain, or radicular symptoms [2]. These are the radiographic findings of a female with chronic low back pain status post multiple spinal surgeries, most recently an L4–L5 revision laminectomy complicated by a CSF leak. She presented with paresthesia’s, subjective weakness, and an occipital headache. An MRI revealed a 4.5 × 4.8 × 11.4-cm CSF collection communicating with a 2.8 × 11.7 × 14-cm subcutaneous soft tissue fluid collection (Fig 1a, b). A small defect at the level of L5–S1 connecting the spinal canal to a posterior fluid collection was determined.
Fig. 1
a A T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance image demonstrating the extent of the pseudomeningocele. A cranio-caudal measurement of the subfascial component of the pseudomeningocele is included. b A T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance image demonstrating the extent of the pseudomeningocele. A cranio-caudal measurement of the subcutaneous component of the pseudomeningocele is included
×
Anzeige
The best management of spinal pseudomeningocele is debated, but important considerations include nerve root involvement, pseudomeningocele size and location. Revision surgery and dural tear repair may be an important option in symptomatic patients. In patients who are asymptomatic, nonsurgical management can result in spontaneous resolution of the pseudomeningocele with scar formation over time [3, 4]. Informed consent for publication was obtained from the participant.
Acknowledgements
Funding
No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Disclosures
Sindhuja Surapaneni, Jamal Hasoon, Vwaire Orhurhu, Omar Viswanath, Cyrus Yazdi, Aner Musa, and Ivan Urits have nothing to disclose. Alan D. Kaye is a member of the journal’s editorial board.
Anzeige
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Informed consent for publication was obtained from the participant.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
