Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01.12.2019 | Research article

Prevalence and predictors of depression among hemodialysis patients: a prospective follow-up study

verfasst von: Amjad Khan, Amer Hayat Khan, Azreen Syazril Adnan, Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman, Saima Mushtaq

Erschienen in: BMC Public Health | Ausgabe 1/2019

Abstract

Background

Even though depression is one of the most common psychiatric disorders, it is under-recognized in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Existing literature does not provide enough information on evaluation of predictors of depression among HD patients. The objective of the current study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of depression among HD patients.

Methods

A multicenter prospective follow-up study. All eligible confirmed hypertensive HD patients who were consecutively enrolled for treatment at the study sites were included in the current study. HADS questionnaire was used to assess the depression level among study participants. Patients with physical and/or cognitive limitations that prevent them from being able to answer questions were excluded.

Results

Two hundred twenty patients were judged eligible and completed questionnaire at the baseline visit. Subsequently, 216 and 213 patients completed questionnaire on second and final follow up respectively. The prevalence of depression among patients at baseline, 2nd visit and final visit was 71.3, 78.2 and 84.9% respectively. The results of regression analysis showed that treatment given to patients at non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) running HD centers (OR = 0.347, p-value = 0.039) had statistically significant association with prevalence of depression at final visit.

Conclusions

Depression was prevalent in the current study participants. Negative association observed between depression and hemodialysis therapy at NGO’s running centers signifies patients’ satisfaction and better depression management practices at these centers.
Abkürzungen
ADNAN
Advanced Dialysis Nephrology Application Network
BDI
Beck’s Depression Inventory
CKD
Chronic kidney disease
ESRD
End stage renal disease
HADS
Hospital anxiety and depression scale
HD
Hemodialysis
HRQoL
Health related quality of life
HUSM
Hospital University Sains Malaysia
NGOs
Non-governmental organizations
PD
Peritoneal dialysis
QOL
Quality of life
WHO
World health organization

Background

According to the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO), “depression is a common mental disorder, characterized by sadness, loss of interest or pleasure, feelings of guilt or low self-worth, disturbed sleep or appetite, feelings of tiredness and poor concentration” [1]. Among end stage renal disease (ESRD) patient’s depression is one of the most common psychiatric disorders [2]. The prevalence of depression is known to be much higher in HD patients as compared to other individuals of normal population [3]. Like in other chronic disease conditions and in general population, evidence does exist that depression in patients on hemodialysis is associated with mortality [4, 5]. It is under-recognized in HD patients because healthcare providers giving facilities, treatment and routinely work with these patients cannot give attention to control depression due to the nature of their illness [2]. There is a need of regular implementation of screening of depression among this population. Depression and anxiety both are strongly associated with patient’s quality of life (QOL). One study suggests that depression among divorced and widowed women strongly affected patient’s QOL [6].
Different questionnaires have been compiled and tested to investigate and measure the problems of ‘anxiety and depression’ commonly found in ESRD patients, including to those of “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)” and “Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI)”, both being properly validated in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients [7]. The former questionnaire (HADS) was developed with the objective to investigate anxiety and depression associated fresh cases in an adult population. The later (HADS) one is different than the former one as it was developed to address the symptomatic position with respect to anxiety and depression. It is known that HD patients have higher rates of depression prevalence in contrast to the PD patients. The possible reasons are because HD patients usually stay connected with the machine during dialysis procedure which directly affects their daily activities and independence. It has also been reported that among the HD patients suicide rates are much higher. Moreover, it is found that due to the give flexibility and because of limited restrictions in their diet and social activities PD patients live with better quality of life [810].
To identify the factors associated with depression and anxiety, there is need of to conduct appropriate longitudinal studies. The instant research work was carried out to determine the contributing action of such factors in causing depression among HD population. Moreover, the expected outcomes of this study will give a comparative information on better management practices of depression at different dialysis facilities.

Methods

HADS questionnaire

HADS has been used for numerous studies among HD patients and showed acceptable reliability and validity [7]. Zigmond and Snaith are the original developers of HADS [11]. This scale cannot be used as a clinical diagnostic tool [12]. HADS has many advantages in terms of its interpretability (the results are very easy to interpret), in terms of its acceptability (widely accepted and can be used in a number of populations), in terms of its feasibility (the patients can complete the questionnaire within few minutes, no need of specialized training as the patients themselves can easily completed the questionnaire).
In the current study, we used the official validated Malay version of HADS provided by the original authors of the published Malay version of HADS from the department of psychiatry, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) [13].

Administration of the HADS

The total time required to complete the questionnaire is 2–5 min. Some cautions should be taken into consideration, for instance, the patients should be literate to read it. It can be a reasonable practice for the administrators of the HADS to ask patients first to read it once loudly and then fill it accordingly. HADS is comprised of 14 questions and have two domains: Anxiety (7 items) and depression (7 items). For Anxiety (HADS-A) this gave a specificity and sensitivity of 0.78 and 0.9 respectively. For depression (HADS-D) it gave a specificity and sensitivity of 0.79 and 0.83 respectively [14].

Study design and setting

This was a prospective follow-up study among HD patients conducted at HUSM and its affiliated dialysis centers. All eligible (> 18 years of age, literate and able to understand Malay) confirmed hypertensive HD patients who were consecutively enrolled for treatment at the study sites from 1st April 2017 to 31st December 2017 were included in the study. Patients with physical and/or cognitive limitations that prevent them from being able to answer questions were excluded.

Data collection

During the study period, all eligible HD patients who agreed to participate in the study by giving a written consent were asked to self-complete HADS questionnaire at three-time points: i) at baseline visit (initial evaluation), ii) after 3 months’ interval (second follow up) and iii) at 6 months’ interval (third follow up). Enrolled subjects who were unable to participate at the second follow up were not asked to take the questionnaire on third follow up. Using a standardized data collection form, socio-demographic and clinical data were collected from the regularly updated Advanced Dialysis Nephrology Application Network (ADNAN) at study sites. Height, weight and blood pressure were measured during a physical examination. Patient’s interview and data abstraction tool designed by principal investigator based on an input from advisory committee, extensive literature review, hypothetical possible association and nephrologist’s suggestions. At each interview session, the data collector evaluated the questionnaire for completion and asked the subject to provide missing response unless it was intentionally left unchecked.

Scoring

Grading on HADS questionnaire score sheet was used for scoring of questionnaires. Each question has 4 options; i) yes definitely (3), ii) yes sometimes (2), iii) No, not much (1), iv) No, not at all (0). For items 7 & 10 the scoring is reversed. Scores ranging on HADS from 0 to 7 are considered as non-case, score ranging from 8 to 10 is considered as borderline case and a score of > 11 points were considered as case according to grading system of HADS. For the sake of analysis, we excluded borderline cases and only considered cases and non-cases.

Statistical analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 21) was used for data analysis. Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables, whereas categorical variable are presented as frequencies and percentages. Chi-squared test was used to observe significance between categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with the Wald statistical criteria was used to obtain a final model. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Relevant variables with a p-value < 0.25 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis [15]. We confirmed the correlations among variables entered in the multivariate analysis. The results of multivariate analysis were presented as beta, standard error, P-value, adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. The fit of the model was assessed by Hosmer Lemeshow and overall classification percentage.

Results

During the study recruitment period, a total of 272 HD patients were enrolled for the treatment at the study sites. Fifty-two patients did not meet the eligibility criteria and were excluded. 220 patients were judged eligible and completed questionnaire at the baseline visit. Subsequently, 216 and 213 patients completed questionnaire on second and final follow up respectively (Fig. 1).

Socio-demographic characteristics of patients evaluated for depression level

The mean patient age was 56.58 ± 11.09 years. The majority of the patients were male (55.5%), 41–60 years old (59.1%), of a normal BMI (67.3%), on dialysis for more than 5 years (36.4%) and suffering from hypertension (91.8%) “Table 1”.
Table 1
Sociodemographics and clinical characteristics of patients (N = 220)
Variables
No. (%)
Gender
 Female
98 (45.5)
 Male
122 (55.5)
Age mean (±SD)
56.58 (± 11.09)
Age group (years)
  < 40
17 (7.7)
 41–60
130 (59.1)
  > 60
73 (33.2)
BMI mean (±SD)
23.57 (± 4.31)
BMI Classification
 Underweight
12 (5.5)
 Normal
148 (67.3)
 Overweight
46 (20.9)
 Obese
14 (6.4)
Socioeconomic Status
 Low
39 (17.7)
 Middle
155 (70.5)
 High
26 (11.8)
Education Level
 Uneducated
74 (33.6)
 Educated
146 (66.4)
Marital Status
 Single
18 (8.2)
 Married
202 (91.8)
Race
 Malay
212 (96.4)
 Others
8 (3.6)
Smoking Status
 Current Smoker
73 (33.2)
 Non-Smoker
147 (66.8)
Alcohol
 Current drinker
18 (8.2)
 Non-drinker
202 (91.8)
Drug Addiction
 Current Drug Addiction
35 (15.9)
 No Drug Addiction
185 (84.1)
Employment
 Unemployed
120 (54.5)
 Employed
100 (45.5)
Dialysis Years
 1 year
62 (28.2)
 2–4 years
78 (35.5)
  > 5 years
80 (36.4)
Hemodialysis Centers
 Private
129 (58.6)
 NGO
33 (15)
 Governmental
58 (26.4)
Vascular access
 Fistula
204 (92.7)
 Others
16 (7.3)
Hypertension
 No
18 (8.2)
 Yes
202 (91.8)
Diabetes Mellitus
 No
81 (36.8)
 Yes
139 (63.2)
Cardiovascular Diseases
 No
185 (84.1)
 Yes
35 (15.9)
Other Comorbidities including: Blood clots, depression, asthma, osteoarthritis, pregnancy losses/birth defects and osteoporosis. Low socioeconomic status (≤ RM 2300 or 531 USD), Middle socioeconomic status (RM 2301–5600 or 531–1294 USD) and High socioeconomic status (> RM 5600 or 1294 USD)
SD Standard deviation, BMI Body Mass Index

Predictors of prevalence of depression among hemodialysis patients at baseline visit

Table 2 shows that patients gender (OR = 0.690, p-value = 0.224), socioeconomic status (high) (OR = 0.500, p-value = 0.182), patients receiving treatment at NGO running HD centers (OR = 0.508, p-value = 0.105), patients receiving treatment at governmental HD centers (OR = 0.475, p-value = 0.030) and multitherapy (OR = 0.659, p-value = 0.164) are the variables with p-value < 0.25 and will be included in the multivariate analysis.
Table 2
Predictors of prevalence of depression among hemodialysis patients at baseline visit (n = 220)
Variables
Prevalence of Depression (No. %)
Univariate analysis OR (95% CI)
P-value
Multivariate analysis OR (95% CI)
P-value
No
Yes
Gender
 Female
23 (23.4)
75 (76.6)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 Male
40 (32.8)
82 (67.2)
0.690 (0.380–1.254)
0.224
0.742 (0.399–1.383)
0.348
Age (years)
  < 40
4 (23.5)
13 (76.5)
Referent
   
 41–60
40 (30.8)
90 (69.2)
0.692 (0.213–2.255)
0.542
  
  > 60
19 (26)
54 (74)
0.874 (0.254–3.012)
0.832
  
BMI
 Underweight
4 (33.3)
8 (66.7)
Referent
   
 Normal
41 (27.7)
107 (72.3)
1.305 (0.373–4.568)
0.677
  
 Overweight
11 (23.9)
35 (76.1)
1.591 (0.401–6.313)
0.509
  
 Obese
7 (50)
7 (50)
0.500 (0.102–2.460)
0.394
  
Socioeconomic Status
 Low
13 (33.3)
26 (66.7)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 Middle
37 (23.9)
118 (76.1)
1.595 (0.745–3.414)
0.230
1.826 (0.816–4.086)
0.143
 High
13 (50)
13 (50)
0.500 (0.181–1.382)
0.182
0.570 (0.194–1.677)
0.307
Marital Status
 Single
4 (22.2)
14 (77.8)
Referent
   
 Married
59 (29.2)
143 (70.8)
0.692 (0.219–2.191)
0.532
  
Race
 Malay
62 (29.2)
150 (70.8)
Referent
   
 Others
1 (12.5)
7 (87.5)
2.893 (0.349–24.011)
0.325
  
Smoking status
 Current Smoker
21 (28.8)
52 (71.2)
Referent
   
 Non-Smoker
42 (28.6)
105 (71.4)
1.010 (0.543–1.877)
0.976
  
Alcohol
 Current drinker
6 (33.3)
12 (66.7)
Referent
   
 Non-drinker
57 (28.2)
145 (71.8)
1.272 (0.456–3.551)
0.646
  
Drug Addiction
 Current Drug Addiction
8 (22.9)
27 (77.1)
Referent
   
 No Drug Addiction
55 (29.7)
130 (70.3)
0.700 (0.299–1.638)
0.411
  
Employment
 Unemployed
32 (26.7)
88 (73.3)
Referent
   
 Employed
31 (31)
69 (69)
0.809 (0.451–1.454)
0.479
  
Dialysis Years
 1 year
23 (37.1)
39 (62.9)
Referent
   
 2–4 years
21 (26.9)
57 (73.1)
1.601 (0.781–3.283)
0.299
  
  > 5 years
19 (23.8)
61 (76.3)
1.893 (0.914–3.923)
0.686
  
Hemodialysis Centers
 Private
29 (22.5)
100 (77.5)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 NGO
12 (36.4)
21 (63.6)
0.508 (0.223–1.153)
0.105
0.413 (0.173–0.985)
0.046
 Governmental
22 (37.9)
36 (62.1)
0.475 (0.242–0.930)
0.030
0.522 (0.248–1.100)
0.087
Vascular access
 Fistula
59 (28.9)
145 (71.1)
Referent
   
 Others
4 (25)
12 (75)
1.221 (0.378–3.938)
0.739
  
Diabetes Mellitus
 No
23 (28.4)
58 (71.6)
Referent
0.952
  
 Yes
40 (28.8)
99 (71.2)
0.981 (0.535–1.800)
   
Cardiovascular Diseases
 No
55 (29.7)
130 (70.3)
Referent
   
 Yes
8 (22.9)
27 (77.1)
1.428 (0.611–3.339)
0.411
  
Gouty Arthritis
 No
56 (29.3)
135 (70.7)
Referent
   
 Yes
7 (24.1)
22 (75.9)
1.304 (0.527–3.225)
0.566
  
Other Comorbidities
 No
44 (28.2)
112 (71.8)
Referent
   
 Yes
19 (29.7)
45 (70.3)
0.930 (0.491–1.764)
0.825
  
Type Therapy
 Mono-therapy
30 (24.8)
91 (75.2)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 Multi-therapy
33 (33.3)
66 (66.7)
0.659 (0.366–1.186)
0.164
0.553 (0.293–1.043)
0.067
Analysis: Univariate and Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. All variables with p-value < 0.25 are included in the multivariate analysis
Low socioeconomic status (≤ RM 2300 or 531 USD), Middle socioeconomic status (RM 2301–5600 or 531–1294 USD) and High socioeconomic status (> RM 5600 or 1294 USD)
OR Odds ratio, CI confidence interval, BMI Body mass index, NGO Non-governmental organization
Other comorbidities: Blood clots, depression, asthma, osteoarthritis, pregnancy losses/birth defects and osteoporosis
In Multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only variable which had statistically significant association with prevalence of depression at baseline visit was treatment given to patients at NGO’s running HD centers (OR = 0.413, p-value = 0.046) (Table 2).

Predictors of prevalence of depression among hemodialysis patients at 2nd visit

Table 3 shows that patients’ gender (OR = 0.676, p-value = 0.245), treatment at NGO’s running HD centers (OR = 0.519, p-value = 0.139), Diabetes (OR = 0.646, p-value = 0.219) and multi-therapy (OR = 0.653, p-value = 0.198) are the variables with p-value < 0.25 and will be included in the multivariate analysis.
Table 3
Predictors of prevalence of depression among hemodialysis patients at 2nd visit (n = 216)
Variables
Prevalence of Depression (No. %)
Univariate analysis OR (95% CI)
P-value
Multivariate analysis OR (95% CI)
P-value
No
Yes
Gender
 Female
17 (17.3)
81 (82.7)
Referent
   
 Male
30 (25.4)
88 (74.6)
0.676 (0.351–1.336)
0.245
0.699 (0.357–1.370)
0.297
Age (years)
  < 40
3 (17.6)
14 (82.4)
Referent
   
 41–60
28 (22)
99 (78)
0.758 (0.203–2.824)
0.679
  
  > 60
16 (22.2)
56 (77.8)
0.750 (0.192–2.937)
0.680
  
BMI
 Underweight
4 (33.3)
8 (66.7)
Referent
   
 Normal
28 (19.2)
118 (80.8)
2.107 (0.592–7.496)
0.250
  
 Overweight
10 (22.2)
35 (77.8)
1.750 (0.436–7.032)
0.430
  
 Obese
5 (38.5)
8 (61.5)
0.800 (0.155–4.123)
0.790
  
Socioeconomic Status
 Low
10 (25.6)
29 (74.4)
Referent
   
 Middle
29 (19.1)
123 (80.9)
1.463 (0.641–3.337)
0.366
  
 High
8 (32)
17 (68)
0.733 (0.243–2.214)
0.582
  
Marital Status
 Single
3 (16.7)
15 (83.3)
Referent
   
 Married
44 (22.2)
154 (77.8)
0.700 (0.194–2.528)
0.586
  
Race
 Malay
47 (22.6)
161 (77.4)
Non-computable
   
 Others
8 (100)
 
  
Smoking status
 Current Smoker
15 (21.1)
56 (78.9)
Referent
   
 Non-Smoker
32 (22.1)
113 (77.9)
0.946 (0.474–1.889)
0.875
  
Alcohol
 Current drinker
4 (23.5)
13 (76.5)
Referent
   
 Non-drinker
43 (21.6)
156 (78.4)
1.116 (0.346–3.598)
0.854
  
Drug Addiction
 Current Drug Addiction
7 (20.6)
27 (79.4)
Referent
   
 No Drug Addiction
40 (22)
142 (78)
0.920 (0.373–2.269)
0.857
  
Employment
 Unemployed
23 (19.7)
94 (80.3)
Referent
   
 Employed
24 (24.2)
75 (75.8)
0.765 (0.400–1.461)
0.417
  
Dialysis Years
 1 year
15 (24.6)
46 (75.4)
Referent
   
 2–4 years
18 (23.7)
58 (76.3)
1.051 (0.478–2.308)
0.902
  
  > 5 years
14 (17.7)
65 (82.3)
1.514 (0.667–3.439)
0.322
  
Hemodialysis Centers
 Private
23 (18.4)
102 (81.6)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 NGO
10 (30.3)
23 (69.7)
0.519 (0.217–1.237)
0.139
0.580 (0.238–1.412)
0.580
 Governmental
14 (24.1)
44 (75.9)
0.709 (0.334–1.504)
0.370
0.646 (0.295–1.417)
0.276
Vascular access
 Fistula
44 (22)
156 (78)
Referent
   
 Others
3 (18.8)
13 (81.3)
1.222 (0.333–4.481)
0.762
  
Diabetes Mellitus
 No
14 (17.3)
67 (82.7)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 Yes
33 (24.4)
102 (75.6)
0.646 (0.322–1.297)
0.219
0.688 (0.335–1.413)
0.309
Cardiovascular Diseases
 No
40 (22)
142 (78)
Referent
   
 Yes
7 (20.6)
27 (79.4)
1.087 (0.441–2.679)
0.857
  
Gouty Arthritis
 No
43 (22.9)
145 (77.1)
Referent
   
 Yes
4 (14.3)
24 (85.7)
1.779 (0.585–5.409)
0.310
  
Other Comorbidities
 No
35 (22.9)
118 (77.1)
Referent
   
 Yes
12 (19)
51 (81)
1.261 (0.605–2.625)
0.536
  
Type Therapy
 Mono-therapy
22 (18.5)
97 (81.5)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 Multi-therapy
25 (25.8)
72 (74.2)
0.653 (0.341–1.250)
0.198
0.628 (0.319–1.237)
0.178
Analysis: Univariate and Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. All variables with p-value < 0.25 are included in the multivariate analysis
Low socioeconomic status (≤ RM 2300 or 531 USD), Middle socioeconomic status (RM 2301–5600 or 531–1294 USD) and High socioeconomic status (> RM 5600 or 1294 USD)
OR Odds ratio, CI confidence interval, BMI Body mass index, NGO Non-governmental organization
Other comorbidities: Blood clots, depression, asthma, osteoarthritis, pregnancy losses/birth defects and osteoporosis
In multivariate logistic regression analysis, no significant association was found between depression and any sociodemographic and clinical factors (Table 3).

Predictors of prevalence of depression among hemodialysis patients at final visit

Analysis of prevalence of depression at final visit presented in (Table 4) revealed that BMI (normal) (OR = 4.133, p-value = 0.039), BMI (overweight) (OR = 5.333, p-value = 0.037), treatment given at NGO’s running HD centers (OR = 0.334, p-value = 0.030), treatment given at governmental HD centers (OR = 0.485, p-value = 0.105), gouty arthritis (OR = 2.630, p-value = 0.203) are the variables with p-value < 0.25 and will be included in the multivariate analysis.
Table 4
Predictors of prevalence of depression among hemodialysis patients at final visit (n = 213)
Variables
Prevalence of Depression (No. %)
Univariate analysis OR (95% CI)
P-value
Multivariate analysis OR (95% CI)
P-value
No
Yes
Gender
 Female
13 (13.7)
82 (86.3)
Referent
   
 Male
19 (16.1)
99 (83.9)
0.826 (0.385–1.773)
0.624
  
Age (years)
  < 40
2 (11.8)
15 (88.2)
Referent
   
 41–60
20 (15.6)
108 (84.4)
0.720 (0.153–3.394)
0.678
  
  > 60
10 (14.7)
58 (85.3)
0.773 (0.153–3.911)
0.756
  
BMI
 Underweight
4 (40)
6 (60)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 Normal
20 (13.9)
124 (86.1)
4.133 (1.071–15.951)
0.039
3.339 (0.833–13.376)
0.089
 Overweight
5 (11.1)
40 (88.9)
5.333 (1.110–25.636)
0.037
4.205 (0.834–21.187)
0.082
 Obese
< 5
11 (78.6)
2.444 (0.405–14.748)
0.330
1.907 (0.300–12.123)
0.494
Socioeconomic Status
 Low
6 (15.8)
32 (84.2)
Referent
   
 Middle
20 (13.4)
129 (86.6)
1.209 (0.449–3.258)
0.707
  
 High
6 (23.1)
20 (76.9)
0.625 (0.177–2.208)
0.465
  
Marital Status
 Single
2 (11.1)
16 (88.9)
Referent
   
 Married
30 (15.4)
165 (84.6)
0.688 (0.150–3.145)
0.629
  
Race
 Malay
32 (15.6)
173 (84.4)
Non-computable
   
 Others
8 (100)
 
  
Smoking status
 Current Smoker
12 (16.4)
61 (83.6)
Referent
   
 Non-Smoker
20 (14.3)
120 (85.7)
1.180 (0.541–2.573)
0.677
  
Alcohol
 Current drinker
2 (11.1)
16 (88.9)
Referent
   
 Non-drinker
30 (15.4)
165 (84.6)
0.688 (0.150–3.145)
0.629
  
Drug Addiction
 Current Drug Addiction
5 (14.3)
30 (85.7)
Referent
   
 No Drug Addiction
27 (15.2)
151 (84.8)
0.932 (0.332–2.615)
0.894
  
Employment
 Unemployed
17 (14.4)
101 (85.6)
Referent
   
 Employed
15 (15.8)
80 (84.2)
0.898 (0.422–1.908)
0.779
  
Dialysis Years
 1 year
10 (16.9)
49 (83.1)
Referent
   
 2–4 years
13 (17.6)
61 (82.4)
0.958 (0.387–2.370)
0.925
  
  > 5 years
9 (11.3)
71 (88.8)
1.610 (0.610–4.253)
0.337
  
Hemodialysis Centers
 Private
13 (10.4)
112 (89.6)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 NGO
8 (25.8)
23 (74.2)
0.334 (0.124–0.897)
0.030
0.347 (0.127–0.949)
0.039
 Governmental
11 (19.3)
46 (80.7)
0.485 (0.203–1.162)
0.105
0.487 (0.196–1.205)
0.120
Vascular access
 Fistula
29 (14.6)
169 (85.4)
Referent
   
 Others
3 (20)
12 (80)
0.686 (0.182–2.583)
0.578
  
Diabetes Mellitus
 No
9 (11.7)
68 (88.3)
Referent
   
 Yes
23 (16.9)
113 (83.1)
0.650 (0.284–1.487)
0.308
  
Cardiovascular Diseases
 No
29 (16.2)
150 (83.8)
Referent
   
 Yes
3 (8.8)
31 (91.2)
1.998 (0.572–6.973)
0.278
  
Gouty Arthritis
 No
30 (16.3)
154 (83.7)
Referent
 
Referent
 
 Yes
2 (6.9)
27 (93.1)
2.630 (0.594–11.653)
0.203
2.637 (0.577–12.056)
0.211
Other Comorbidities
 No
24 (16)
126 (84)
Referent
   
 Yes
8 (19)
55 (87.3)
1.310 (0.554–3.096)
0.539
  
Type Therapy
 Mono-therapy
16 (13.8)
100 (86.2)
Referent
   
 Multi-therapy
16 (16.5)
81 (83.5)
0.810 (0.382–1.719)
0.583
  
Analysis: Univariate and Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. All variables with p-value < 0.25 are included in the multivariate analysis
Low socioeconomic status (≤ RM 2300 or 531 USD), Middle socioeconomic status (RM 2301–5600 or 531–1294 USD) and High socioeconomic status (> RM 5600 or 1294 USD)
OR Odds ratio, CI confidence interval, BMI Body mass index, NGO Non-governmental organization
Other comorbidities: Blood clots, depression, asthma, osteoarthritis, pregnancy losses/birth defects and osteoporosis
Table 4 shows that in multivariate logistic regression analysis, treatment given to patients at NGO’s running HD centers (OR = 0.347, p-value = 0.039) had statistically significant association with prevalence of depression at final visit.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first follow up study which evaluated the prevalence and factors associated with depression among HD patients in Malaysia. In the current study, 220 eligible patients filled the HADS questionnaire on baseline and 213 filled it at the end of the study.
In our study 157 (71.3%) patients suffered from depression at baseline, 169 (78.2%) on 2nd evaluation and 181 (84.9%) on the final visit respectively. However, the previously published literature has reported a comparatively low rate of depression among HD patients, ranging from 23.3 to 60.5% [2, 1625].
In our study the rate of depression worsened with the passage of time, a linear increase was found from baseline (71.3%) to final visit (84.9%) among patients. The possible reasons for this finding could be the lifelong dialysis therapy with at least 3 dialysis procedures per week, patients taking too much medicine at once, economic burden on patients and their families and altered family and social relationships. Similar findings were reported in various studies where depression was noted to increase from baseline towards the end of the study period [18, 26, 27]. Keskin et al. revealed that depression is a risk factor for suicidal ideation and the chances of suicide attempts increasing with the severity of depression. Therefore, HD patients should be under regular psychiatric evaluation and all risk factors should be properly evaluated [28]. Depressive symptoms were linearly increasing in a population of chronic HD patients and there was a significant association of poor sleep quality, unemployment, pruritus, hypoalbuminemia and diabetes with depressive symptoms. Women were at increased risk of depression [29].
There is a wealth of evidence that dialysis has negative impact on depression and the severe depression among patients is in turn associated with mortality among these patients. Fifteen large scales studies indicating the significant association of depression with mortality among dialysis patients [30]. Significantly higher mortality risks were observed with depressive symptoms in patients on dialysis therapy in various longitudinal studies that assessed the repeated measurement of depression [3133]. Studies indicated that depression is associated with initiation of early dialysis treatment [34, 35]. Other studies found relationship of depression with immune and inflammatory responses [36, 37]. Previous studies revealed that poor nutrition and nonadherence to treatment is significantly linked with depression among HD patients [38, 39]. The findings of one other systematic review showed 2-fold risk of dying in patients with depression [40]. Additionally, age is also a risk factor of increased mortality in depressive patients. Findings of another study indicated that in depressive patients with age of 65 years or above, there is 41% higher risk of mortality [41]. Depression is common and serious psychiatric disorder but underrecognized in patients undergoing dialysis therapy. It is reported elsewhere that only one-third of the HD patients with a diagnosis of depression were receiving treatment [42, 43]. Only few observational studies and clinical trials demonstrated the outcomes with pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies in depressive patients [4448]. Two systematic reviews of antidepressants use in treatment of depression among chronic renal failure patients concluded that the evidence for effectiveness of these drugs is insufficient [49, 50].
In our study, comparable rates of depression were observed among female (86.3%) and male participants (83.9%). In contrast to our finding of no significant association between rate of depression among male and female patients, a study conducted in the University of Michigan, female gender was a significant risk factor for depression [51]. Similar positive association between female gender and high rate of depression among HD patients have been reported elsewhere [52, 53]. On the other hand, in line with our finding, no significant differences were observed in prevalence of depression and life event variables among males and females study participants in a study conducted in Turkey [54]. In our study 86.6% patients with middle socioeconomic status were having depression. In a study conducted elsewhere, an inverse relation was observed between depression and socioeconomic status [55]. Similarly, in another study, poor quality of life and depression was reported in study participants with middle and low socioeconomic status [56]. In another study where authors were interested to determine the association between socioeconomic status and depression among community residents and psychiatric patients, the authors concluded that study subjects holding jobs were more likely to have depression as compared to jobless participants [57].
Of the total 195 married patients, 165 (84.6%) were having depression in the current study. In contradiction to our study findings authors reported that depression was less common in married people which were undergoing dialysis therapy while divorced/widowed patients were at higher risk of depression [52]. Similar results were reported from a study in Taiwan where the status of marriage in HD patients was significantly associated with better quality of life [58]. On the other hand, Kimmel and colleagues reported that rate of depression is higher among divorced and widowed women and depression is associated with patient’s poor quality of life [6]. Supportive and peaceful family environment, happy married life and family support is associated with depression free and better quality of life in chronic HD patients [24]. These findings are in contradiction to the findings of the current study.
Out of the total 140 non-smokers in our study, 85.7% patients were having depression. This is in contradiction to the study findings where authors reported that more than half of the current smokers undergoing dialysis therapy were having depression [59]. Beside in dialysis patients, many epidemiological studies have shown that reciprocal relationship exists between smoking and depression [6062]. In some studies, it has been reported that health related quality of life (HRQoL) was not improved in patients by smoking cessation [63] and depressed smokers have very less chances to quit smoking [4466]. Hence, Smoking should be discouraged among HD patients to improve quality of life and to prevent cardiovascular events.
In our study in multivariate logistic regression analysis, treatment given to patients at NGO’s running HD centers (OR = 0.347, p-value = 0.039) had statistically significant negative association with prevalence of depression at final visit. Dalrymple et al. found that overall hospitalization rates of HD patients were remarkably higher (15% higher) for those patients which were receiving treatment in for-profit HD facilities as compared with nonprofit dialysis centers [67]. In Malaysia, the government is the main source of funding for new and existing patients on dialysis. There are 3 different sectors i.e. government, NGO’s and private dialysis centers that are providing dialysis treatment to patients in Malaysia. These funds provided by government are not only allocated for government dialysis facilities but also for NGOs running centers, for public pensioners, civil servants and their family members who are undergoing dialysis therapy in private dialysis facilities. Self-funding for dialysis treatment had dropped remarkably from 26% in 2006 to 17% in 2015. Increase in funding from NGO bodies from 12% in 2006 to 15% in 2015 was reported [68]. It is reported that in economically advanced states of Malaysia, patients were taking dialysis treatment in NGOs running centers and in private dialysis centers and the survival rates and quality of life of HD patients were better as compared to public dialysis centers. On the other hand, in states like Sabah, Sarawak, Kelantan and Terengganu 50% of patients were taking dialysis treatment in public sector dialysis facilities [69]. NGOs running programs like Syrian American Medical Society (SAMS) was initiated to help the Syrian patients in refugee camps and northern Syria during the crises in Syria. SAMS was basically a mission of Syrian American nephrologists for the direct observation, to treat psychological disorders and care of dialysis patients which was severely compromised due to destruction of health care facilities, loss of access to dialysis centers, lack of medications and sue to shortage of medical care professionals [70]. But in another study on assessment of ESRD during Syrian crises, the authors found that the aid from inexperienced NGOs and non-renal charities despite of their good will is insufficient and potentially dangerous. Regional and international renal teams should be involved in organizing aid in situations like Syrian crises [71]. A significant improvement in mortality rate over the years and reduce hospitalization rates due to providing adequate dialysis therapy, EPO and iron usage was reported in NGO based dialysis center. Moreover, the free supply of antihypertensive drugs was associated with better control of hypertension and reduced rates of cardiovascular mortality at this NGO funded dialysis facility in south India [72]. Authors of a study reported that Malaysian government reforms to encourage NGOs dialysis facilities and private facilities has brought a transformation and resulted in greatly expanded and an easy access to dialysis patients specially with low socioeconomic status to avail dialysis services [73]. Those dialysis patients who were receiving financial help from NGO’s, hospitals and other funding organizations were less depressed as compared to those who were not [74]. Most notably, the association of depression in NGOs and government sector dialysis centers has never been studied. Further studies are warranted to confirm this finding.

Strengths and limitations of the study

  • This study involved a group of patients from tertiary-level teaching hospital of Malaysia.
  • To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first follow up study to assess the prevalence and predictors of depression among hemodialysis patients in a Malaysian setting.
  • For determining the factors associated with depression, multivariate analysis was conducted.
  • Being a prospective observational study, the findings of the present study need to be interpreted with caution since it is limited to only 6 months follow up.
  • Nevertheless, a multicenter study with a large sample size and longer follow up time is needed to confirm the findings of the current study.

Conclusion

The current study revealed that the negative association of depression with dialysis therapy at NGOs running dialysis facilities is an indication of better depression management practices at these centers. For better management of depression and to enhance the quality of life of HD patients, studies should be carried out on national level in government, private and NGOs running dialysis centers and strategies should be adopted on how to reduce the prevalence of depression where it is more prevalent.

Study limitations

The findings of the present study need to be interpreted with caution since it is limited to only 6 months follow up. Nevertheless, a multicenter study with a large sample size and longer follow-up time is needed to confirm the findings of the current study. As we have not correlated the depression scores of same individuals assessed on multiple times, our results should be interpreted with the limitation of separate analysis.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Institute of Postgraduate Studies (IPS) of Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) for the fellowship support [Ref. no. P-FD0011/15(R)].

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this current article. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The current study was approved by the Human Resource Ethics Committee of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM/JEPeM/16020058). Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Turkistani I, et al. The prevalence of anxiety and depression among end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis in Saudi Arabia. Ren Fail. 2014;36(10):1510–5.PubMedCrossRef Turkistani I, et al. The prevalence of anxiety and depression among end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis in Saudi Arabia. Ren Fail. 2014;36(10):1510–5.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wa Wang L-J, Chen C-K. The Psychological impact of hemodialysis on patients with chronic renal failure. In: Renal failure-the facts; 2012. InTech. Wa Wang L-J, Chen C-K. The Psychological impact of hemodialysis on patients with chronic renal failure. In: Renal failure-the facts; 2012. InTech.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Biesen W, et al. Fluid status in peritoneal dialysis patients: the European body composition monitoring (EuroBCM) study cohort. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e17148.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Van Biesen W, et al. Fluid status in peritoneal dialysis patients: the European body composition monitoring (EuroBCM) study cohort. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e17148.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chertow GM, et al. Bioimpedance norms for the hemodialysis population. Kidney Int. 1997;52(6):1617–21.PubMedCrossRef Chertow GM, et al. Bioimpedance norms for the hemodialysis population. Kidney Int. 1997;52(6):1617–21.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimmel PL, et al. ESRD patient quality of life: symptoms, spiritual beliefs, psychosocial factors, and ethnicity. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(4):713–21 91 & 126 & 285.PubMedCrossRef Kimmel PL, et al. ESRD patient quality of life: symptoms, spiritual beliefs, psychosocial factors, and ethnicity. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(4):713–21 91 & 126 & 285.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stasiak CES, et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depression and its comorbidities in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Bras Nefrol. 2014;36(3):325–31.PubMedCrossRef Stasiak CES, et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depression and its comorbidities in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Bras Nefrol. 2014;36(3):325–31.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu AW, et al. Changes in quality of life during hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment: generic and disease specific measures. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(3):743–53.PubMedCrossRef Wu AW, et al. Changes in quality of life during hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment: generic and disease specific measures. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(3):743–53.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ginieri-Coccossis M, et al. Quality of life, mental health and health beliefs in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: investigating differences in early and later years of current treatment. BMC Nephrol. 2008;9(1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ginieri-Coccossis M, et al. Quality of life, mental health and health beliefs in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: investigating differences in early and later years of current treatment. BMC Nephrol. 2008;9(1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Varela L, et al. Predictores psicológicos de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en pacientes en tratamiento de diálisis peritoneal. Nefrología (Madrid). 2011;31(1):97–106. Varela L, et al. Predictores psicológicos de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en pacientes en tratamiento de diálisis peritoneal. Nefrología (Madrid). 2011;31(1):97–106.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zigmond A, Snaith R. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.PubMedCrossRef Zigmond A, Snaith R. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelan-Goodinson R, Ponsford J, Schönberger M. Validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale to assess depression and anxiety following traumatic brain injury as compared with the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV. J Affect Disord. 2009;114(1):94–102.PubMedCrossRef Whelan-Goodinson R, Ponsford J, Schönberger M. Validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale to assess depression and anxiety following traumatic brain injury as compared with the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV. J Affect Disord. 2009;114(1):94–102.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yahya F, Othman Z. Validation of the Malay version of hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Int Med J. 2015;22:80–2. Yahya F, Othman Z. Validation of the Malay version of hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Int Med J. 2015;22:80–2.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjelland I, et al. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77.PubMedCrossRef Bjelland I, et al. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138(11):923–36.PubMedCrossRef Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138(11):923–36.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossola M, et al. Correlates of symptoms of depression and anxiety in chronic hemodialysis patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(2):125–31 168 & 192.PubMedCrossRef Bossola M, et al. Correlates of symptoms of depression and anxiety in chronic hemodialysis patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(2):125–31 168 & 192.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Taskapan H, et al. Psychiatric disorders and large interdialytic weight gain in patients on chronic haemodialysis. Nephrology. 2005;10(1):15–20.PubMedCrossRef Taskapan H, et al. Psychiatric disorders and large interdialytic weight gain in patients on chronic haemodialysis. Nephrology. 2005;10(1):15–20.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Drayer RA, et al. Characteristics of depression in hemodialysis patients: symptoms, quality of life and mortality risk. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(4):306–12.PubMedCrossRef Drayer RA, et al. Characteristics of depression in hemodialysis patients: symptoms, quality of life and mortality risk. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(4):306–12.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalender B, et al. Quality of life in chronic kidney disease: effects of treatment modality, depression, malnutrition and inflammation. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61(4):569–76.PubMedCrossRef Kalender B, et al. Quality of life in chronic kidney disease: effects of treatment modality, depression, malnutrition and inflammation. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61(4):569–76.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cukor D, et al. Course of depression and anxiety diagnosis in patients treated with hemodialysis: a 16-month follow-up. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(6):1752–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cukor D, et al. Course of depression and anxiety diagnosis in patients treated with hemodialysis: a 16-month follow-up. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(6):1752–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedayati SS, et al. Death or hospitalization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated with a physician-based diagnosis of depression. Kidney Int. 2008;74(7):930–6.PubMedCrossRef Hedayati SS, et al. Death or hospitalization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated with a physician-based diagnosis of depression. Kidney Int. 2008;74(7):930–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim S, El Salamony O. Depression, quality of life and malnutrition-inflammation scores in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2008;28(5):784–91.PubMedCrossRef Ibrahim S, El Salamony O. Depression, quality of life and malnutrition-inflammation scores in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2008;28(5):784–91.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu HJ, Chen C-K, Wu M-S. Lower prevalence of depression in hemodialysis patients who use polysulfone dialyzers. Am J Nephrol. 2009;29(6):592–7.PubMedCrossRef Hsu HJ, Chen C-K, Wu M-S. Lower prevalence of depression in hemodialysis patients who use polysulfone dialyzers. Am J Nephrol. 2009;29(6):592–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kao TW, et al. Economic, social, and psychological factors associated with health-related quality of life of chronic hemodialysis patients in northern Taiwan: a multicenter study. Artif Organs. 2009;33(1):61–8 254 & 286.PubMedCrossRef Kao TW, et al. Economic, social, and psychological factors associated with health-related quality of life of chronic hemodialysis patients in northern Taiwan: a multicenter study. Artif Organs. 2009;33(1):61–8 254 & 286.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Montinaro V, et al. Emotional symptoms, quality of life and cytokine profile in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 2010;73(1):36.PubMedCrossRef Montinaro V, et al. Emotional symptoms, quality of life and cytokine profile in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 2010;73(1):36.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Preljevic VT, et al. Screening for anxiety and depression in dialysis patients: comparison of the hospital anxiety and depression scale and the Beck depression inventory. J Psychosom Res. 2012;73(2):139–44 (171 & 195).PubMedCrossRef Preljevic VT, et al. Screening for anxiety and depression in dialysis patients: comparison of the hospital anxiety and depression scale and the Beck depression inventory. J Psychosom Res. 2012;73(2):139–44 (171 & 195).PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tavallaii SA, et al. Effect of depression on health care utilization in patients with end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2009;20(4):411–4 174 & 198.CrossRef Tavallaii SA, et al. Effect of depression on health care utilization in patients with end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2009;20(4):411–4 174 & 198.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Keskin G, Engin E. The evaluation of depression, suicidal ideation and coping strategies in haemodialysis patients with renal failure. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(19–20):2721–32.PubMedCrossRef Keskin G, Engin E. The evaluation of depression, suicidal ideation and coping strategies in haemodialysis patients with renal failure. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(19–20):2721–32.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Araujo SM, et al. Risk factors for depressive symptoms in a large population on chronic hemodialysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(4):1229–35.PubMedCrossRef Araujo SM, et al. Risk factors for depressive symptoms in a large population on chronic hemodialysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(4):1229–35.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrokhi F, et al. Association between depression and mortality in patients receiving long-term dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(4):623–35.PubMedCrossRef Farrokhi F, et al. Association between depression and mortality in patients receiving long-term dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(4):623–35.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulware LE, et al. Temporal relation among depression symptoms, cardiovascular disease events, and mortality in end-stage renal disease: contribution of reverse causality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(3):496–504.PubMedCrossRef Boulware LE, et al. Temporal relation among depression symptoms, cardiovascular disease events, and mortality in end-stage renal disease: contribution of reverse causality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(3):496–504.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimmel PL, et al. Multiple measurements of depression predict mortality in a longitudinal study of chronic hemodialysis outpatients. Kidney Int. 2000;57(5):2093–8.PubMedCrossRef Kimmel PL, et al. Multiple measurements of depression predict mortality in a longitudinal study of chronic hemodialysis outpatients. Kidney Int. 2000;57(5):2093–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Beukel TO, Verdujin M, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT, Dekker FW, Van Dijk S. The association of baseline, newonset, and persistent depressive symptoms with mortality in ESRD patients. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Nephrology Renal Week; November 16-21, 2010; Denver, CO. Abstract TH-PO529. Van den Beukel TO, Verdujin M, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT, Dekker FW, Van Dijk S. The association of baseline, newonset, and persistent depressive symptoms with mortality in ESRD patients. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Nephrology Renal Week; November 16-21, 2010; Denver, CO. Abstract TH-PO529.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedayati SS, et al. Association between major depressive episodes in patients with chronic kidney disease and initiation of dialysis, hospitalization, or death. Jama. 2010;303(19):1946–53.PubMedCrossRef Hedayati SS, et al. Association between major depressive episodes in patients with chronic kidney disease and initiation of dialysis, hospitalization, or death. Jama. 2010;303(19):1946–53.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai Y-C, et al. Association of symptoms of depression with progression of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60(1):54–61.PubMedCrossRef Tsai Y-C, et al. Association of symptoms of depression with progression of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60(1):54–61.PubMedCrossRef
36.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R. Depression and immune function: central pathways to morbidity and mortality. J Psychosom Res. 2002;53(4):873–6.PubMedCrossRef Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R. Depression and immune function: central pathways to morbidity and mortality. J Psychosom Res. 2002;53(4):873–6.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilgic A, et al. Nutritional status and depression, sleep disorder, and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2007;17(6):381–8.PubMedCrossRef Bilgic A, et al. Nutritional status and depression, sleep disorder, and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2007;17(6):381–8.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Cukor D, et al. Depression is an important contributor to low medication adherence in hemodialyzed patients and transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2009;75(11):1223–9.PubMedCrossRef Cukor D, et al. Depression is an important contributor to low medication adherence in hemodialyzed patients and transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2009;75(11):1223–9.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuijpers P, Smit F. Excess mortality in depression: a meta-analysis of community studies. J Affect Disord. 2002;72(3):227–36.PubMedCrossRef Cuijpers P, Smit F. Excess mortality in depression: a meta-analysis of community studies. J Affect Disord. 2002;72(3):227–36.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoevers R, et al. Depression and excess mortality: evidence for a dose response relation in community living elderly. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2009;24(2):169–76.PubMedCrossRef Schoevers R, et al. Depression and excess mortality: evidence for a dose response relation in community living elderly. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2009;24(2):169–76.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes AA, et al. Screening for depression in hemodialysis patients: associations with diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2004;66(5):2047–53.PubMedCrossRef Lopes AA, et al. Screening for depression in hemodialysis patients: associations with diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2004;66(5):2047–53.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedayati S, et al. The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006;69(9):1662–8.PubMedCrossRef Hedayati S, et al. The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006;69(9):1662–8.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Blumenfield M, et al. Fluoxetine in depressed patients on dialysis. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 1997;27(1):71–80.PubMedCrossRef Blumenfield M, et al. Fluoxetine in depressed patients on dialysis. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 1997;27(1):71–80.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Spigset O, et al. Citalopram pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic renal failure and the effect of haemodialysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;56(9–10):699–703.PubMedCrossRef Spigset O, et al. Citalopram pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic renal failure and the effect of haemodialysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;56(9–10):699–703.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Wuerth, D., S.H. Finkelstein, and F.O. Finkelstein. Psychosocial factors in patients with chronic kidney disease: the identification and treatment of depression in patients maintained on dialysis. In Seminars in dialysis. 2005. Wiley Online Library. Wuerth, D., S.H. Finkelstein, and F.O. Finkelstein. Psychosocial factors in patients with chronic kidney disease: the identification and treatment of depression in patients maintained on dialysis. In Seminars in dialysis. 2005. Wiley Online Library.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Duarte PS, et al. Cognitive–behavioral group therapy is an effective treatment for major depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2009;76(4):414–21.PubMedCrossRef Duarte PS, et al. Cognitive–behavioral group therapy is an effective treatment for major depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2009;76(4):414–21.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Ouzouni S, et al. Effects of intradialytic exercise training on health-related quality of life indices in haemodialysis patients. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(1):53–63.PubMedCrossRef Ouzouni S, et al. Effects of intradialytic exercise training on health-related quality of life indices in haemodialysis patients. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(1):53–63.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabindranath KS, et al. Physical measures for treating depression in dialysis patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;1(2):4-9. Rabindranath KS, et al. Physical measures for treating depression in dialysis patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;1(2):4-9.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagler EV, et al. Antidepressants for depression in stage 3–5 chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety with recommendations by European renal best practice (ERBP). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(10):3736–45.PubMedCrossRef Nagler EV, et al. Antidepressants for depression in stage 3–5 chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety with recommendations by European renal best practice (ERBP). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(10):3736–45.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Nolen-Hoeksema S. Gender differences in depression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2001;10(5):173–6.CrossRef Nolen-Hoeksema S. Gender differences in depression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2001;10(5):173–6.CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Theofilou P. Depression and anxiety in patients with chronic renal failure: the effect of sociodemographic characteristics. Int J Nephrol. 2011;2011:169–93.CrossRef Theofilou P. Depression and anxiety in patients with chronic renal failure: the effect of sociodemographic characteristics. Int J Nephrol. 2011;2011:169–93.CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes GB, et al. Depression as a potential explanation for gender differences in health-related quality of life among patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Nephron Clinical Practice. 2010;115(1):c35–40.PubMedCrossRef Lopes GB, et al. Depression as a potential explanation for gender differences in health-related quality of life among patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Nephron Clinical Practice. 2010;115(1):c35–40.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat House AA, et al. Definition and classification of cardio-renal syndromes: workgroup statements from the 7th ADQI consensus conference. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(5):1416–20.PubMedCrossRef House AA, et al. Definition and classification of cardio-renal syndromes: workgroup statements from the 7th ADQI consensus conference. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(5):1416–20.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Dohrenwend BP, et al. Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science. 1992;255(5047):946–52.PubMedCrossRef Dohrenwend BP, et al. Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science. 1992;255(5047):946–52.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Miech RA, Shanahan MJ. Socioeconomic status and depression over the life course. J Health Soc Behav. 2000;41(2):162–76.CrossRef Miech RA, Shanahan MJ. Socioeconomic status and depression over the life course. J Health Soc Behav. 2000;41(2):162–76.CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Link BG, Lennon MC, Dohrenwend BP. Socioeconomic status and depression: the role of occupations involving direction, control, and planning. Am J Sociol. 1993;98(6):1351–87.CrossRef Link BG, Lennon MC, Dohrenwend BP. Socioeconomic status and depression: the role of occupations involving direction, control, and planning. Am J Sociol. 1993;98(6):1351–87.CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiang C-K, et al. Health-related quality of life of hemodialysis patients in Taiwan: a multicenter study. Blood Purif. 2004;22(6):490–8.PubMedCrossRef Chiang C-K, et al. Health-related quality of life of hemodialysis patients in Taiwan: a multicenter study. Blood Purif. 2004;22(6):490–8.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Østhus TBH, et al. Health-related quality of life and depression in dialysis patients: associations with current smoking. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2010;44(1):46–55.PubMedCrossRef Østhus TBH, et al. Health-related quality of life and depression in dialysis patients: associations with current smoking. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2010;44(1):46–55.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Egede LE, Zheng D. Independent factors associated with major depressive disorder in a national sample of individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(1):104–11.PubMedCrossRef Egede LE, Zheng D. Independent factors associated with major depressive disorder in a national sample of individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(1):104–11.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Breslau N, et al. Major depression and stages of smoking: a longitudinal investigation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(2):161–6.PubMedCrossRef Breslau N, et al. Major depression and stages of smoking: a longitudinal investigation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(2):161–6.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasco JA, et al. Tobacco smoking as a risk factor for major depressive disorder: population-based study. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193(4):322–6.PubMedCrossRef Pasco JA, et al. Tobacco smoking as a risk factor for major depressive disorder: population-based study. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193(4):322–6.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarna L, et al. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on health-related quality of life in women in the nurses’ health study. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(10):1217–27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sarna L, et al. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on health-related quality of life in women in the nurses’ health study. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(10):1217–27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Anda RF, et al. Depression and the dynamics of smoking: a national perspective. Jama. 1990;264(12):1541–5.PubMedCrossRef Anda RF, et al. Depression and the dynamics of smoking: a national perspective. Jama. 1990;264(12):1541–5.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Glassman AH, et al. Smoking, smoking cessation, and major depression. Jama. 1990;264(12):1546–9.PubMedCrossRef Glassman AH, et al. Smoking, smoking cessation, and major depression. Jama. 1990;264(12):1546–9.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Thorndike AN, et al. Depressive symptoms and smoking cessation after hospitalization for cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):186–91.PubMedCrossRef Thorndike AN, et al. Depressive symptoms and smoking cessation after hospitalization for cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):186–91.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Straube BM. Do health outcomes vary by profit status of hemodialysis units? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(1):1–2.PubMedCrossRef Straube BM. Do health outcomes vary by profit status of hemodialysis units? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(1):1–2.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan YM, Zalilah MS, Hii SZ. Determinants of compliance behaviours among patients undergoing hemodialysis in Malaysia. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41362.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chan YM, Zalilah MS, Hii SZ. Determinants of compliance behaviours among patients undergoing hemodialysis in Malaysia. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41362.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Makki A, et al. The Syrian national kidney foundation: response for the need of kidney patients during the crisis. Avicenna J Med. 2014;4(3):54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Al-Makki A, et al. The Syrian national kidney foundation: response for the need of kidney patients during the crisis. Avicenna J Med. 2014;4(3):54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Sekkarie MA, et al. The Syrian conflict: assessment of the ESRD system and response to hemodialysis needs during a humanitarian and medical crisis. Kidney Int. 2015;87(2):262–5.PubMedCrossRef Sekkarie MA, et al. The Syrian conflict: assessment of the ESRD system and response to hemodialysis needs during a humanitarian and medical crisis. Kidney Int. 2015;87(2):262–5.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Georgi A, et al. Resource settings have a major influence on the outcome of maintenance hemodialysis patients in South India. Hemodial Int. 2010;14(2):211–7.CrossRef Georgi A, et al. Resource settings have a major influence on the outcome of maintenance hemodialysis patients in South India. Hemodial Int. 2010;14(2):211–7.CrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim T-O, et al. How public and private reforms dramatically improved access to dialysis therapy in Malaysia. Health Aff. 2010;29(12):2214–22.CrossRef Lim T-O, et al. How public and private reforms dramatically improved access to dialysis therapy in Malaysia. Health Aff. 2010;29(12):2214–22.CrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Anees M, et al. Depression in hemodialysis patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2008;24(4):560–5. Anees M, et al. Depression in hemodialysis patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2008;24(4):560–5.
Metadaten
Titel
Prevalence and predictors of depression among hemodialysis patients: a prospective follow-up study
verfasst von
Amjad Khan
Amer Hayat Khan
Azreen Syazril Adnan
Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman
Saima Mushtaq
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2019
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Public Health / Ausgabe 1/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6796-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe