Anzeige
Erschienen in:
20.08.2022 | Original Article
Prognosis and treatment pattern of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of first-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment
Erschienen in: Hepatology International | Ausgabe 5/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background
The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) has become the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the prognosis and treatment pattern after its treatment failure are unclear.
Methods
We reviewed the medical records of patients who failed first-line Atezo-Bev treatment for advanced HCC from January 2018 to May 2021 in four Taiwan medical centers. Post-first-line survival (PFLS) was defined as the date from the failure of Atezo-Bev treatment to the date of death or last follow-up.
Results
A total of 41 patients were included in the study. All patients had Child–Pugh A liver reserve before the initiation of Atezo-Bev treatment, but the liver reserve of 6 (15%) and 7 (17%) patients deteriorated to Child–Pugh B and C, respectively, after treatment failure. The median PFLS was 5.9 months. PFLS significantly differed among patients with various liver reserves after the failure of Atezo-Bev treatment (median 9.6 vs 3.8 vs 1.2 months, for Child–Pugh A, B, and C; p < 0.001). In total, 30 (73%) patients received second-line systemic therapy, and they exhibited significantly longer PFLS (median 8.0 vs 1.8 months, p = 0.033) than patients who did not. Deteriorated liver function and not receiving second-line therapy remained associated with inferior PFLS in multivariate analysis. The most common second-line therapies were sorafenib (n = 19, 63%) and lenvatinib (n = 9, 30%), with no significant differences in efficacies.
Conclusion
Receiving second-line therapy and good liver reserve were associated with favorable PFLS after the failure of first-line Atezo-Bev treatment.