Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 5/2018

08.02.2018

PROMIS depression measures perform similarly to legacy measures relative to a structured diagnostic interview for depression in cancer patients

verfasst von: Kerrie Clover, Sylvie D. Lambert, Christopher Oldmeadow, Benjamin Britton, Madeleine T. King, Alex J. Mitchell, Gregory Carter

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the convergent validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression measures relative to legacy measures and criterion validity against a structured diagnostic interview for depression in an oncology sample.

Methods

132 oncology/haematology outpatients completed the PROMIS Depression Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-D-CAT) and PROMIS Depression Short Form (PROMIS-D-SF) along with seven legacy measures: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D); Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Patient Health Questionnaire; Distress Thermometer and PSYCH-6. Correlations, area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic accuracy statistics were calculated with Structured Clinical Interview as the gold standard.

Results

Both PROMIS measures correlated with all legacy measures at p < .001 (ρ = 0.589–0.810) and all AUCs (> 0.800) were comparable. At the cut-off points for mild depression of 53, the PROMIS measures had sensitivity (0.83 for PROMIS-D-CAT and 0.80 for PROMIS-D-SF) similar to or better than 6/7 legacy measures with high negative predictive value (> 90%). At cut-off points of 60 for moderate depression, PROMIS measures had specificity > 90%, similar to or better than all legacy measures and positive predictive value ≥ 0.50 (similar to 5/7 legacy measures).

Conclusions

The convergent and criterion validity of the PROMIS depression measures in cancer populations was confirmed, although the optimal cut-off points are not established. PROMIS measures were briefer than BDI-II and CES-D but do not offer any advance in terms of diagnostic accuracy, reduced response burden or cost over other legacy measures of depression in oncology patients.
Literatur
1.
Institute of Medicine Report 2008, (IOM) (2008). Cancer care for the whole patient: Meeting psychosocial health needs. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.
2.
Alex, J., Mitchell, N., Hussain, L., & Grainger, P. S. (2011). Identification of patient-reported distress by clinical nurse specialists in routine oncology practice: a multicentre UK study. Psychooncology, 20(10) 1076–1083.CrossRef
3.
Holland, J. C., & Bultz, B. D. (2007). The NCCN guideline for distress management: A case for making distress the sixth vital sign. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 5(1), 3–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Carlson, L. E., Waller, A., & Mitchell, A. J. (2012). Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with cancer: Review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(11), 1160–1177.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Lambert, S. D., Clover, K., Pallant, J. F., Britton, B., King, M. T., Mitchell, A. J., & Carter, G. (2015). Making sense of variations in prevalence estimates of depression in cancer: A co-calibration of commonly used depression scales using Rasch Analysis. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 13(10), 1203–1211.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Mitchell, A. J., Meader, N., Davies, E., Clover, K., Carter, G. L., Loscalzo, M. J., et al. (2012). Meta-analysis of screening and case finding tools for depression in cancer: evidence based recommendations for clinical practice on behalf of the Depression in Cancer Care consensus group. Journal of Affective Disorders, 140(2), 149–160.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). Initial adult health item banks and first wave testing of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS™) network: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Pilkonis, P. A., Hays, R. D., & Cella, D. (2010). Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 125–136.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Baum, G., Basen-Engquist, K., Swartz, M. C., Parker, P. A., & Carmack, C. L. (2014). Comparing PROMIS computer-adaptive tests to the Brief Symptom Inventory in patients with prostate cancer. Quality of Life Research, 23(7), 2031–2035.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Cella, D., Choi, S., Garcia, S., Cook, K. F., Rosenbloom, S., Lai, J. S., Tatum, D. S., & Gershon, R. (2014). Setting standards for severity of common symptoms in oncology using the PROMIS item banks and expert judgment. Quality of Life Research, 23(10), 2651–2661.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
13.
14.
Mitchell, A. J. (2007). Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(29), 4670–4681.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Clover, K., Carter, G., Adams, C., Hickie, I., & Davenport, T. (2009). Concurrent validity of the PSYCH-6, a very short scale for detecting anxiety and depression, among oncology outpatients. Australian New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(7), 682–688.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Wagner, L. I., Schink, J., Bass, M., Patel, S., Diaz, M. V., Rothrock, N., et al. (2015). Bringing PROMIS to practice: Brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care. Cancer, 121(6), 927–934.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Junghaenel, D. U., Schneider, S., & Schwartz, J. E. (2016). PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 74, 194–206.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
19.
Mitchell, A. J., Meader, N., & Symonds, P. (2010) Diagnostic validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in cancer and palliative settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 126(3), 335–348.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Vodermaier, A., & Millman, R. D. (2011). Accuracy of the hospital anxiety and depression scale as a screening tool in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer 19(12), 1899–1908.CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2003) Distress management. Clinical practice guidelines. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 1(3), 344–374.CrossRef
23.
Hickie, I. B., Koschera, A., Davenport, T. A., Naismith, S. L., & Scott, E. M. (2001). Comorbidity of common mental disorders and alcohol or other substance misuse in Australian general practice. The Medical Journal of Australia, 175, S31–S36.PubMed
24.
First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2002). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders: Research Version. Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
25.
Clover, K. A., Rogers, K., Britton, B., Oldmeadow, C., Attia, J., & Carter, G. L. (2017) Reduced prevalence of pain and distress during four years of screening with QUICATOUCH in Australian oncology patients. European Journal of Cancer Care.
26.
Dancy, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2004). Statistics without maths for psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
27.
28.
Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Centre for Epidemiologic Studies. (1970) Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health.
30.
Fischer, H. F., Klug, C., Roeper, K., Blozik, E., Edelmann, F., Eisele, M., et al. (2014). Screening for mental disorders in heart failure patients using computer-adaptive tests. Quality of Life Research, 23(5), 1609–1618.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Clover, K., Carter, G., Mackinnon, A., & Adams, C. (2009). Is my patient suffering clinically significant emotional distress? Demonstration of a probabilities approach to evaluating algorithms for screening for distress. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17, 1455–1462.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Krebber, A. M., Buffart, L. M., Kleijn, G., Riepma, I. C., Bree, R., Leemans, C. R., et al. (2014) Prevalence of depression in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of diagnostic interviews and self-report instruments. Psycho-Oncology, 23(2), 121–130.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
PROMIS depression measures perform similarly to legacy measures relative to a structured diagnostic interview for depression in cancer patients
verfasst von
Kerrie Clover
Sylvie D. Lambert
Christopher Oldmeadow
Benjamin Britton
Madeleine T. King
Alex J. Mitchell
Gregory Carter
Publikationsdatum
08.02.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1803-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Quality of Life Research 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Review

Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations

OriginalPaper

COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study

OriginalPaper

The association between post-diagnosis health behaviors and long-term quality of life in survivors of ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based longitudinal cohort study

OriginalPaper

COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

OriginalPaper

Assessing the equivalence of Web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis: a case of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ)

Review

Quality of life among parents of preterm infants: a scoping review