Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2008

01.03.2008 | Original Article

Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Mortality from Prostate Cancer

verfasst von: Stephen W. Marcella, MD, MPH, George G. Rhoads, MD, MPH, Jeffrey L. Carson, MD, Frances Merlino, RN, Homer Wilcox, MS

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is no available evidence from randomized trials that early detection of prostate cancer improves health outcomes, but the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test is commonly used to screen men for prostate cancer.

Objective

The objective of the study is to see if screening with PSA decreases mortality from prostate cancer.

Design, setting, and participants

This is a case-control study using one-to-one matching on race, age, and time of availability of exposure to PSA screening. Decedents, 380, from New Jersey Vital Statistics 1997 to 2000 inclusive, 55–79 years of age at diagnosis were matched to living controls without metastatic prostate cancer. Medical records were obtained from all providers, and we abstracted information about PSA tests from 1989 to the time of diagnosis in each index case.

Measurements

Measurements consist of a comparison of screening (yes, no) between cases and controls. Measure of association was the odds ratio.

Results

Eligible cases were diagnosed each year from 1989 to 1999 with the median year being 1993. PSA screening was evident in 23.2–29.2% of cases and 21.8–26.1% of controls depending on the screening criteria. The unadjusted, matched odds ratio for dying of prostate cancer if ever screened was 1.09 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.60) for the most restrictive criteria and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.66) for the least restrictive. Adjustment for comorbidity and education level made no significant differences in these values. There were no significant interactions by age or race.

Conclusions

PSA screening using an ever/never tabulation for tests from 1989 until 2000 did not protect New Jersey men from prostate cancer mortality.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat US Task Force on Prevention. Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann of Intern Med. 2002;137:915–16. US Task Force on Prevention. Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann of Intern Med. 2002;137:915–16.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:11–25.PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:11–25.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sox HC, Mulrow C. An editorial update: should benefits of radical prostatectomy affect the decision to screen for early prostate cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:232–3.PubMed Sox HC, Mulrow C. An editorial update: should benefits of radical prostatectomy affect the decision to screen for early prostate cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:232–3.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gann PH, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ. A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer. JAMA. 1995;273:289–94.PubMedCrossRef Gann PH, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ. A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer. JAMA. 1995;273:289–94.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobsen SJ, Bergstralh EJ, Guess HA, et al. Predictive properties of serum prostate-specific antigen testing in a community-based setting. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2462–8.PubMedCrossRef Jacobsen SJ, Bergstralh EJ, Guess HA, et al. Predictive properties of serum prostate-specific antigen testing in a community-based setting. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2462–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Cruijsen-Koeter IW, Vis AN, Roobol MJ, et al. Comparison of screen detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section Rotterdam. J Urol. 2005;174:121–5.PubMedCrossRef van der Cruijsen-Koeter IW, Vis AN, Roobol MJ, et al. Comparison of screen detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section Rotterdam. J Urol. 2005;174:121–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < = 4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2239–46.PubMedCrossRef Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < = 4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2239–46.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1977–84.PubMedCrossRef Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1977–84.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F, et al. A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:781–9.PubMedCrossRef Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F, et al. A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:781–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Concato J, Wells CK, Horwitz RI, et al. The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:38–43.PubMedCrossRef Concato J, Wells CK, Horwitz RI, et al. The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:38–43.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopec JA, Goel V, Bunting PS, et al. Screening with prostate-specific antigen and metastatic prostate cancer risk: a population based case-control study. J Urol. 2005;174:495–9.PubMedCrossRef Kopec JA, Goel V, Bunting PS, et al. Screening with prostate-specific antigen and metastatic prostate cancer risk: a population based case-control study. J Urol. 2005;174:495–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinmann S, Richert-Boe K, Glass AG, Weiss NS. Prostate cancer screening and mortality: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:133–8.PubMedCrossRef Weinmann S, Richert-Boe K, Glass AG, Weiss NS. Prostate cancer screening and mortality: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:133–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat New Jersey Administrative Code (N.J.A.C. 8:57A-1.1 et seq.). New Jersey Administrative Code (N.J.A.C. 8:57A-1.1 et seq.).
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Waksberg J. Sampling methods for random digit dialing. J Am Statistical Association. 1978;73:40–6.CrossRef Waksberg J. Sampling methods for random digit dialing. J Am Statistical Association. 1978;73:40–6.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlesselman JJ. Analysis of Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982. Schlesselman JJ. Analysis of Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr., Weiss NS. Effect of fecal occult blood testing on mortality from colorectal cancer: a case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:1–6.PubMed Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr., Weiss NS. Effect of fecal occult blood testing on mortality from colorectal cancer: a case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:1–6.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr., Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:653–7.PubMedCrossRef Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr., Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:653–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1741–8.PubMedCrossRef Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1741–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke EA, Anderson TW. Does screening by “Pap” smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study. Lancet. 1979;2:1–4.PubMedCrossRef Clarke EA, Anderson TW. Does screening by “Pap” smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study. Lancet. 1979;2:1–4.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Graaf Y, Zielhuis GA, Peer PG, Vooijs PG. The effectiveness of cervical screening: a population-based case-control study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41121–6.PubMedCrossRef van der Graaf Y, Zielhuis GA, Peer PG, Vooijs PG. The effectiveness of cervical screening: a population-based case-control study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41121–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Demissie K, Mills OF, Rhoads GG. Empirical comparison of the results of randomized controlled trials and case-control studies in evaluating the effectiveness of screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:81–91.PubMedCrossRef Demissie K, Mills OF, Rhoads GG. Empirical comparison of the results of randomized controlled trials and case-control studies in evaluating the effectiveness of screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:81–91.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Fine J. 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:2095–2101.PubMedCrossRef Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Fine J. 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:2095–2101.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:251S.PubMedCrossRef Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:251S.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat de Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Berenguer Sanchez A, et al. Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:237–44.PubMedCrossRef de Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Berenguer Sanchez A, et al. Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:237–44.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Frankel S, Smith GD, Donovan J, Neal D. Screening for prostate cancer. Lancet. 2003;361:1122–8.PubMedCrossRef Frankel S, Smith GD, Donovan J, Neal D. Screening for prostate cancer. Lancet. 2003;361:1122–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ransohoff DF, McNaughton Collins M, Fowler FJ. Why is prostate cancer screening so common when the evidence is so uncertain? A system without negative feedback. Am J Med. 2002;113:663–7.PubMedCrossRef Ransohoff DF, McNaughton Collins M, Fowler FJ. Why is prostate cancer screening so common when the evidence is so uncertain? A system without negative feedback. Am J Med. 2002;113:663–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Mortality from Prostate Cancer
verfasst von
Stephen W. Marcella, MD, MPH
George G. Rhoads, MD, MPH
Jeffrey L. Carson, MD
Frances Merlino, RN
Homer Wilcox, MS
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0479-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.