Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 6/2021

03.08.2020 | Original Article

PSA-based machine learning model improves prostate cancer risk stratification in a screening population

verfasst von: Marlon Perera, Rohan Mirchandani, Nathan Papa, Geoff Breemer, Anna Effeindzourou, Lewis Smith, Peter Swindle, Elliot Smith

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Context

The majority of prostate cancer diagnoses are facilitated by testing serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels. Despite this, there are limitations to the diagnostic accuracy of PSA. Consideration of patient demographic factors and biochemical adjuncts to PSA may improve prostate cancer risk stratification. We aimed to develop a contemporary, accurate and cost-effective model based on objective measures to improve the accuracy of prostate cancer risk stratification.

Methods

Data were collated from a local institution and combined with patient data retrieved from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer screening Trial (PLCO) database. Using a dataset of 4548 patients, a machine learning model was developed and trained using PSA, free-PSA, age and free-PSA to total PSA (FTR) ratio.

Results

The model was trained on a dataset involving 3638 patients and was then tested on a separate set of 910 patients. The model improved prediction for prostate cancer (AUC 0.72) compared to PSA alone (AUC 0.63), age (AUC 0.52), free-PSA (AUC 0.50) and FTR alone (AUC 0.65). When an operating point is chosen such that the sensitivity of the model is 80% the specificity of the model is 45.3%. The benefit in AUC secondary to the model was related to sample size, with AUC of 0.64 observed when a subset of the cohort was assessed.

Conclusions

Development of a dense neural network model improved the diagnostic accuracy in screening for prostate cancer. These results demonstrate an additional utility of machine learning methods in prostate cancer risk stratification when using biochemical parameters.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:7–30CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:7–30CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabarkapa S, Perera M, McGrath S, Lawrentschuk N (2016) Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: a guide to the guidelines. Prostate Int 4:125–129CrossRef Cabarkapa S, Perera M, McGrath S, Lawrentschuk N (2016) Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: a guide to the guidelines. Prostate Int 4:125–129CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Mansson M et al (2019) A 16-yr follow-up of the european randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 76:43–51CrossRef Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Mansson M et al (2019) A 16-yr follow-up of the european randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 76:43–51CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinsky PF, Prorok PC, Yu K et al (2017) Extended mortality results for prostate cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median follow-up of 15 years. Cancer 15(123):592–599CrossRef Pinsky PF, Prorok PC, Yu K et al (2017) Extended mortality results for prostate cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median follow-up of 15 years. Cancer 15(123):592–599CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Toner L, Papa N, Perera M et al (2017) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer-a comparative study including radical prostatectomy specimens. World J Urol 35:935–941CrossRef Toner L, Papa N, Perera M et al (2017) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer-a comparative study including radical prostatectomy specimens. World J Urol 35:935–941CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 25(389):815–822CrossRef Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 25(389):815–822CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasivisvanathan V, Emberton M, Moore CM (2018) MRI-targeted biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 9(379):589–590 Kasivisvanathan V, Emberton M, Moore CM (2018) MRI-targeted biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 9(379):589–590
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito K, Yamamoto T, Ohi M, Kurokawa K, Suzuki K, Yamanaka H (2003) Free/total PSA ratio is a powerful predictor of future prostate cancer morbidity in men with initial PSA levels of 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL. Urology 61:760–764CrossRef Ito K, Yamamoto T, Ohi M, Kurokawa K, Suzuki K, Yamanaka H (2003) Free/total PSA ratio is a powerful predictor of future prostate cancer morbidity in men with initial PSA levels of 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL. Urology 61:760–764CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Catalona WJ (2014) The prostate Health Index: a new test for the detection of prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 6:74–77CrossRef Loeb S, Catalona WJ (2014) The prostate Health Index: a new test for the detection of prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 6:74–77CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nitta S, Tsutsumi M, Sakka S et al (2019) Machine learning methods can more efficiently predict prostate cancer compared with prostate-specific antigen density and prostate-specific antigen velocity. Prostate Int 7:114–118CrossRef Nitta S, Tsutsumi M, Sakka S et al (2019) Machine learning methods can more efficiently predict prostate cancer compared with prostate-specific antigen density and prostate-specific antigen velocity. Prostate Int 7:114–118CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Snow PB, Smith DS, Catalona WJ (1994) Artificial neural networks in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer: a pilot study. J Urol 152:1923–1926CrossRef Snow PB, Smith DS, Catalona WJ (1994) Artificial neural networks in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer: a pilot study. J Urol 152:1923–1926CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephan C, Xu C, Cammann H et al (2007) Assay-specific artificial neural networks for five different PSA assays and populations with PSA 2–10 ng/ml in 4,480 men. World J Urol 25:95–103CrossRef Stephan C, Xu C, Cammann H et al (2007) Assay-specific artificial neural networks for five different PSA assays and populations with PSA 2–10 ng/ml in 4,480 men. World J Urol 25:95–103CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephan C, Xu C, Finne P et al (2007) Comparison of two different artificial neural networks for prostate biopsy indication in two different patient populations. Urology 70:596–601CrossRef Stephan C, Xu C, Finne P et al (2007) Comparison of two different artificial neural networks for prostate biopsy indication in two different patient populations. Urology 70:596–601CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C et al (2005) Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower. JAMA 294:66–70CrossRef Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C et al (2005) Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower. JAMA 294:66–70CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldenberg SL, Nir G, Salcudean SE (2019) A new era: artificial intelligence and machine learning in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 16:391–403CrossRef Goldenberg SL, Nir G, Salcudean SE (2019) A new era: artificial intelligence and machine learning in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 16:391–403CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Carter HB (2013) American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale. BJU Int 112:543–547CrossRef Carter HB (2013) American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale. BJU Int 112:543–547CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK et al (2018) Screening for prostate cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 8(319):1901–1913 Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK et al (2018) Screening for prostate cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 8(319):1901–1913
19.
Zurück zum Zitat McGrath S, Christidis D, Perera M et al (2016) Prostate cancer biomarkers: are we hitting the mark? Prostate Int 4:130–135CrossRef McGrath S, Christidis D, Perera M et al (2016) Prostate cancer biomarkers: are we hitting the mark? Prostate Int 4:130–135CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Sokoll LJ, Broyles DL et al (2013) Prospective multicenter evaluation of the Beckman Coulter Prostate Health Index using WHO calibration. J Urol 189:1702–1706CrossRef Loeb S, Sokoll LJ, Broyles DL et al (2013) Prospective multicenter evaluation of the Beckman Coulter Prostate Health Index using WHO calibration. J Urol 189:1702–1706CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordstrom T, Vickers A, Assel M, Lilja H, Gronberg H, Eklund M (2015) Comparison between the four-kallikrein panel and prostate health index for predicting prostate cancer. Eur Urol 68:139–146CrossRef Nordstrom T, Vickers A, Assel M, Lilja H, Gronberg H, Eklund M (2015) Comparison between the four-kallikrein panel and prostate health index for predicting prostate cancer. Eur Urol 68:139–146CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun FK, Graefen M, Briganti A et al (2007) Initial biopsy outcome prediction–head-to-head comparison of a logistic regression-based nomogram versus artificial neural network. Eur Urol. 51:1236–1240CrossRef Chun FK, Graefen M, Briganti A et al (2007) Initial biopsy outcome prediction–head-to-head comparison of a logistic regression-based nomogram versus artificial neural network. Eur Urol. 51:1236–1240CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuocolo R, Cipullo MB, Stanzione A et al (2019) Machine learning applications in prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol Exp 7(3):35CrossRef Cuocolo R, Cipullo MB, Stanzione A et al (2019) Machine learning applications in prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol Exp 7(3):35CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo S, Gujrathi I, Haider MA, Khalvati F (2019) Prostate cancer detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Sci Rep 20(9):19518CrossRef Yoo S, Gujrathi I, Haider MA, Khalvati F (2019) Prostate cancer detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Sci Rep 20(9):19518CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Corfield J, Perera M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N (2018) (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol 36:519–527CrossRef Corfield J, Perera M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N (2018) (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol 36:519–527CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M et al (2020) Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 77:403–417CrossRef Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M et al (2020) Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 77:403–417CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
PSA-based machine learning model improves prostate cancer risk stratification in a screening population
verfasst von
Marlon Perera
Rohan Mirchandani
Nathan Papa
Geoff Breemer
Anna Effeindzourou
Lewis Smith
Peter Swindle
Elliot Smith
Publikationsdatum
03.08.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03392-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

World Journal of Urology 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

22.04.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Erst PSA-Test, dann Kallikrein-Score, schließlich MRT und Biopsie – ein vierstufiges Screening-Schema kann die Zahl der unnötigen Prostatabiopsien erheblich reduzieren: Die Hälfte der Männer, die in einer finnischen Studie eine Biopsie benötigten, hatte einen hochgradigen Tumor.

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

20.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Beim chronischen Harnwegsinfekt bei Frauen wird bisher meist eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe eingesetzt. Angesichts der zunehmenden Antibiotikaresistenz erweist sich das Antiseptikum Methenamin-Hippurat als vielversprechende Alternative, so die Auswertung einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.