nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

25.07.2018 | Brief Communication

Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment in Singapore

verfasst von: Lidia Suárez, Benjamin Tay, Fazlin Abdullah

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study validated the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire with 3400 respondents living in Singapore.

Methods

The ethnic composition was 76.1% Chinese, 12.3% Malay, 9.6% Indian, and 2% Others. The sample included adults with disabilities (28.9%), adults recovering from mental health issues (14%), and adults from the general population (57.1%). Questionnaires about health-related conditions, the effects of disability on everyday functioning (WHODAS 2.0), the WHOQOL-BREF, and add-on modules of QOL of people with disabilities (WHOQOL-DIS) and QOL of elders (WHOQOL-OLD) were administrated.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis supported a construct of QOL made of four domains, revealing good construct validity. The four domains predicted overall QOL and health satisfaction. Good internal consistency was evidenced by high alpha coefficients for the physical (.79), psychological (.82), social relationships (.81), and environment (.83) domains. Convergent validity was shown by moderate correlations between the different questionnaires measuring QOL (WHOQOL-BREF, WHOQOL-DIS, and WHOQOL-OLD), and discriminant validity by a lower correlation between the WHOQOL-BREF and disability. Convergent and divergent validity were also indicated by higher correlations between similar constructs across the different measures, and lower correlations between dissimilar constructs across measures, respectively. Concurrent validity was supported by showing that individuals with chronic medical conditions had lower QOL than individuals without chronic medical conditions.

Conclusions

The results showed that the WHOQOL-BREF has sound psychometric properties and can be used to measure QOL in Singapore.

Tan, K. K., Chan, S. W. C., Wang, W., & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2016). A salutogenic program to enhance sense of coherence and Quality of Life for older people in the community: A feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(1), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.003.CrossRefPubMed

Godfrin, K. A., & van Heeringen, C. (2010). The effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on recurrence of depressive episodes, mental health and Quality of Life: A randomized controlled study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(8), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.04.006.CrossRefPubMed

Koszycki, D., Benger, M., Shlik, J., & Bradwejn, J. (2007). Randomized trial of a meditation-based stress reduction program and cognitive behavior therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(10), 2518–2526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.011.CrossRefPubMed

Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Turner-Bowker, D. M., & Gandek, B. (2002). How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). Lincoln: Quality Metric Incorporated.

Hunt, S. M., & McEwen, J. (1980). The development of a subjective indicator. Society of Health & Illness, 2, 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.1980.tb00213.x.CrossRef

World Health Organization. (1998). WHOQOL user manual. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Griva, K., Kang, A. W., Yu, Z. L., Mooppil, N. K., Foo, M., Chan, C. M., et al. (2014). Quality of Life and emotional distress between patients on peritoneal dialysis versus community-based hemodialysis. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0431-8.CrossRefPubMed

Yu, Z. L., Lee, V. Y. W., Kang, A. W. C., Chan, S., Foo, M., Chan, C. M., et al. (2016). Rates of intentional and unintentional nonadherence to peritoneal dialysis regimes and associated factors. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149784.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Subramaniam, M., Abdin, E., Qiu, S., & Munidasa, W. (2011). Quality of Life in pathological gamblers in a multiethnic Asian setting. Annals Academy of Medicine, 40(6), 264–268.

10.

Chan, S. W. C., Li, Z., Klainin-Yobas, P., Ting, S., Chan, M. F., & Eu, P. W. (2014). Effectiveness of a peer-led self-management programme for people with schizophrenia: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(6), 1425–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12306.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tay, K. C. P., Seow, C. C. D., Xiao, C., Lee, H. M. J., Chiu, H. F. K., & Chan, S. W. C. (2016). Structured interviews examining the burden, coping, self-efficacy, and Quality of Life among family caregivers of persons with dementia in Singapore. Dementia, 15(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301214522047.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Harper, A., Power, M., Orley, J., Herrman, H., Schofield, H., Murphy, B., et al. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798006667.CrossRef

13.

Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:qure.0000018486.91360.00.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Benitez-Borrego, S., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Urzúa-Morales, A. (2014). Factorial structural analysis of the Spanish version of WHOQOL-BREF: An exploratory structural equation model study. Quality of Life Research, 23(8), 2205–2212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0663-2.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Moreno, A. B., Faerstein, E., Werneck, G. L., Lopes, C. S., & Chor, D. (2006). Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization abbreviated instrument for quality of life assessment in the Pró-Saúde Study. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 22(12), 2585–2597.CrossRef

16.

World Health Organization. (2010). Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0. Geneva: The World Health Organization.

17.

World Health Organization. (2011). WHOQOL-disabilities module manual. Geneva: World Health Organization.

18.

Power, M., Quinn, K., & Schmidt, S. (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-Old module. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2197–2214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9 .CrossRefPubMed

19.

Xia, P., Li, N., Hau, K. T., Liu, C., & Lu, Y. (2012). Quality of life of Chinese urban community residents: A psychometric study of the mainland Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Yoshitake, N., Sun, Y., Sugawara, M., Matsumoto, S., Sakai, A., Takaoka, J., et al. (2015). The psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF in Japanese couples. Health Psychology Open, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102915598089.CrossRef

21.

Chien, C. W., Wang, J. D., Yao, G., Sheu, C. F., & Hsieh, C. L. (2007). Development and validation of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect. Quality of Life Research, 16(8), 1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9236-y.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Hwang, H. F., Liang, W. M., Chiu, Y. N., & Lin, M. R. (2003). Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan. Age and Ageing, 32(6), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afg102.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Power, M., Harper, A., & Bullinger, M. (1999). The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: Tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychology, 18(5), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.5.495.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

25.

Fu, T. S. T., Tuan, Y. C., Yen, M. Y., Wu, W. H., Huang, C. W., Chen, W. T., et al. (2013). Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment—brief in methadone patients: A validation study in northern Taiwan. Harm Reduction Journal, 10(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-10-37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment in Singapore
verfasst von: Lidia Suárez
Benjamin Tay
Fazlin Abdullah
Publikationsdatum: 25.07.2018
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1947-8

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2018

Correction to: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of eight pediatric PROMIS® item banks into Spanish and German

Physical, sensory, and cognitive functioning among centenarians: a comparison between the Tokyo and Georgia centenarian studies

Association of religiosity and spirituality with quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review

Subjectively different but objectively the same? Three profiles of QoL in people with severe mental health problems

Life satisfaction and pain interference in spine surgery patients before and after surgery: comparison between on-opioid and opioid-naïve patients

Comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between ileal conduit diversion and orthotopic neobladder based on validated questionnaires: a systematic review and meta-analysis