Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2018 | Research | Ausgabe 1/2018 Open Access

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018

Rare disease registries: potential applications towards impact on development of new drug treatments

Zeitschrift:
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases > Ausgabe 1/2018
Autoren:
Marijke C. Jansen-van der Weide, Charlotte M. W. Gaasterland, Kit C. B. Roes, Caridad Pontes, Roser Vives, Arantxa Sancho, Stavros Nikolakopoulos, Eric Vermeulen, Johanna H. van der Lee

Abstract

Background

Low prevalence, lack of knowledge about the disease course, and phenotype heterogeneity hamper the development of drugs for rare diseases. Rare disease registries (RDRs) can be helpful by playing a role in understanding the course of the disease, and providing information necessary for clinical trial design, if designed and maintained properly. We describe the potential applications of a RDR and what type of information should be incorporated to support the design of clinical trials in the process of drug development, based on a broad inventory of registry experience. We evaluated two existing RDRs in more detail to check the completeness of these RDRs for trial design.

Results

Before and during the application for regulatory approval a RDR can improve the efficiency and quality in clinical trial design by informing the sample size calculation and expected disease course. In exceptional circumstances information from RDRs has been used as historical controls for a one-armed clinical trial, and high quality RDRs may be used for registry-based randomized controlled trials. In the post marketing phase of (conditional) drug approval a disease-specific RDR is likely to provide more relevant information than a product-specific registry.

Conclusions

A RDR can be very helpful to improve the efficiency and quality of clinical trial design in several ways. To enable the applicability and optimal use of a RDR longitudinal data collection is indispensable, and specific data collection, prepared for repeated measurement, is needed. The developed checklist can help to define the appropriate variables to include. Attention should be paid to the inclusion of patient-relevant outcome measures in the RDR from the start. More research and experience is needed on the possibilities and limitations of combining RDR information with clinical trial data to maximize the availability of relevant evidence for regulatory decisions in rare diseases.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe