nach oben

Annals of Nuclear Medicine

Erschienen in:

11.09.2020 | Review Article

Recent advances in cardiac positron emission tomography for quantitative perfusion analyses and molecular imaging

verfasst von: Osamu Manabe, Masanao Naya, Tadao Aikawa, Nagara Tamaki

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) has been used to noninvasively evaluate myocardial perfusion and metabolism. For clinical assessments of myocardial perfusion, the quantitative capability of PET permits precise assessments of ischemia and microcirculatory dysfunction, playing an important role in patient management and outcome analyses. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET has recently been used to identify active cardiovascular lesions such as cardiac sarcoidosis, endocarditis, and aortitis. This may hold promise for the early and accurate diagnosis of such fatal diseases, as well as for patient management. This review covers new and clinical roles of cardiac PET in treatment strategies and patient outcomes.

Doherty JU, Kort S, Mehran R, Schoenhagen P, Soman P, Rating Panel M, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Structure and Function in Nonvalvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Nucl Cardiol 2019;26(4):1392-413.

Bax JJ, Di Carli M, Narula J, Delgado V. Multimodality imaging in ischaemic heart failure. Lancet. 2019;393(10175):1056–70.PubMed

Manabe O, Kikuchi T, Scholte A, El Mahdiui M, Nishii R, Zhang MR, et al. Radiopharmaceutical tracers for cardiac imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25(4):1204–36.PubMed

Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, Bengel FM, Bober R, et al. Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(18):1639–53.PubMed

Bengel FM, Higuchi T, Javadi MS, Lautamaki R. Cardiac positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(1):1–15.PubMed

Schindler TH, Dilsizian V. PET-determined hyperemic myocardial blood flow: Further progress to clinical application. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(14):1476–8.PubMed

Yoshinaga K, Tomiyama Y, Suzuki E, Tamaki N. Myocardial blood flow quantification using positron-emission tomography: analysis and practice in the clinical setting. Circ J. 2013;77(7):1662–711.PubMed

Schindler TH, Quercioli A, Valenta I, Ambrosio G, Wahl RL, Dilsizian V. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow—clinical and research applications. Semin Nucl Med. 2014;44(4):274–93.PubMed

Dorbala S, Di Carli MF. Cardiac PET perfusion: prognosis, risk stratification, and clinical management. Semin Nucl Med. 2014;44(5):344–57.PubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Yoshinaga K, Manabe O, Tamaki N. Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25(2):635–51.PubMed

11.

Mc Ardle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA, Wells GA, Beanlands RS. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(18):1828–37.PubMed

12.

Parker MW, Iskandar A, Limone B, Perugini A, Kim H, Jones C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus single photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: a bivariate meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(6):700–7.PubMed

13.

Jaarsma C, Leiner T, Bekkers SC, Crijns HJ, Wildberger JE, Nagel E, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(19):1719–28.PubMed

14.

Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, Gaber M, Di Carli G, et al. Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2215–24.PubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Taqueti VR, Hachamovitch R, Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, et al. Global coronary flow reserve is associated with adverse cardiovascular events independently of luminal angiographic severity and modifies the effect of early revascularization. Circulation. 2015;131(1):19–27.PubMed

16.

Naya M, Tamaki N, Tsutsui H. Coronary flow reserve estimated by positron emission tomography to diagnose significant coronary artery disease and predict cardiac events. Circ J. 2015;79(1):15–23.PubMed

17.

Aikawa T, Naya M, Obara M, Manabe O, Magota K, Koyanagawa K, et al. Effects of coronary revascularization on global coronary flow reserve in stable coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(1):119–29.PubMed

18.

Kikuchi Y, Oyama-Manabe N, Naya M, Manabe O, Tomiyama Y, Sasaki T, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow using dynamic 320-row multi-detector CT as compared with (1)(5)O-H(2)O PET. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(7):1547–56.PubMed

19.

Tomiyama Y, Manabe O, Oyama-Manabe N, Naya M, Sugimori H, Hirata K, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with dynamic perfusion 3.0 Tesla MRI: validation with (15) O-water PET. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(3):754–62.PubMed

20.

Ho KT, Ong HY, Tan G, Yong QW. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion measurements of resting and hyperaemic blood flow in low-risk subjects with 128-slice dual-source CT. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(3):300–6.PubMed

21.

Nkoulou R, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Kuest SM, Ghadri JR, Stehli J, et al. Absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve assessed by gated SPECT with cadmium-zinc-telluride detectors using 99mTc-tetrofosmin: head-to-head comparison with 13N-ammonia PET. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(12):1887–922.PubMed

22.

Oyama-Manabe N, Manabe O, Naya M, Kudo K, Tamaki N. Quantitative evaluation of myocardial ischemia with dynamic perfusion CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;5(1):79–83.

23.

Nagara Tamaki T, Matsushima S, Yoshinaga K. Perspectives of quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow. Clin Transl Imaging. 2018;6:321–7.

24.

Marinescu MA, Loffler AI, Ouellette M, Smith L, Kramer CM, Bourque JM. Coronary microvascular dysfunction, microvascular angina, and treatment strategies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(2):210–20.PubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Zagatina A, Zhuravskaya N. The additive prognostic value of coronary flow velocity reserve during exercise echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(10):1179–84.PubMed

26.

Ziadi MC, Dekemp RA, Williams KA, Guo A, Chow BJ, Renaud JM, et al. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(7):740–8.PubMed

27.

Naya M, Murthy VL, Taqueti VR, Foster CR, Klein J, Garber M, et al. Preserved coronary flow reserve effectively excludes high-risk coronary artery disease on angiography. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(2):248–55.PubMed

28.

Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):830–40.PubMed

29.

De Bruyne B, Sarma J. Fractional flow reserve: a review: invasive imaging. Heart. 2008;94(7):949–59.PubMed

30.

Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49(21):2105–11.

31.

Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(3):213–24.

32.

van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA, Barbato E, Baumbach A, Engstrom T, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10006):1853–60.PubMed

33.

De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, et al. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994;89(3):1013–22.PubMed

34.

Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, Schotborgh CE, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, et al. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Circulation. 2001;103(2):184–7.PubMed

35.

van de Hoef TP, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, Delewi R, Piek MA, Chamuleau SA, et al. Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(3):301–11.PubMed

36.

Manabe O, Naya M, Tamaki N. Feasibility of PET for the management of coronary artery disease: comparison between CFR and FFR. J Cardiol. 2017;70(2):135–40.PubMed

37.

Wilson RF, White CW. Does coronary artery bypass surgery restore normal maximal coronary flow reserve? The effect of diffuse atherosclerosis and focal obstructive lesions. Circulation. 1987;76(3):563–71.PubMed

38.

Kosa I, Blasini R, Schneider-Eicke J, Dickfeld T, Neumann FJ, Ziegler S, et al. Early recovery of coronary flow reserve after stent implantation as assessed by positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(4):1036–41.PubMed

39.

Pizzuto F, Voci P, Mariano E, Puddu PE, Sardella G, Nigri A. Assessment of flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and venous adenosine infusion before and after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(1):155–62.PubMed

40.

Nijjer SS, Petraco R, van de Hoef TP, Sen S, van Lavieren MA, Foale RA, et al. Change in coronary blood flow after percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to baseline lesion physiology: Results of the JUSTIFY-PCI study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(6):e001715.PubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Taqueti VR, Solomon SD, Shah AM, Desai AS, Groarke JD, Osborne MT, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and future risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(10):840–9.PubMed

42.

Aikawa T, Naya M, Koyanagawa K, Manabe O, Obara M, Magota K, et al. Improved regional myocardial blood flow and flow reserve after coronary revascularization as assessed by serial 15O-water positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21(1):36–46.PubMed

43.

Tillisch J, Brunken R, Marshall R, Schwaiger M, Mandelkern M, Phelps M, et al. Reversibility of cardiac wall-motion abnormalities predicted by positron tomography. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(14):884–8.PubMed

44.

Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Yamashita K, Saji H, Magata Y, Senda M, et al. Positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 deoxyglucose in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafting. American J Cardiol. 1989;64(14):860–5.

45.

Tamaki N, Kawamoto M, Tadamura E, Magata Y, Yonekura Y, Nohara R, et al. Prediction of reversible ischemia after revascularization. Perfusion and metabolic studies with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1995;91(6):1697–705.PubMed

46.

Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Udelson JE. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(7):1151–8.PubMed

47.

Juneau D, Erthal F, Alzahrani A, Alenazy A, Nery PB, Beanlands RS, et al. Systemic and inflammatory disorders involving the heart: the role of PET imaging. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;60(4):383–96.PubMed

48.

Kang SS, Gosselin C, Ren D, Greisler HP. Selective stimulation of endothelial cell proliferation with inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation by fibroblast growth factor-1 plus heparin delivered from fibrin glue suspensions. Surgery. 1995;118(2):280–6 (discussion 6-7).PubMed

49.

Scholtens AM, Verberne HJ, Budde RP, Lam MG. Additional heparin preadministration improves cardiac glucose metabolism suppression over low-carbohydrate diet alone in (1)(8)F-FDG PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(4):568–73.PubMed

50.

Manabe O, Yoshinaga K, Ohira H, Masuda A, Sato T, Tsujino I, et al. The effects of 18-h fasting with low-carbohydrate diet preparation on suppressed physiological myocardial (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and possible minimal effects of unfractionated heparin use in patients with suspected cardiac involvement sarcoidosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23(2):244–52.PubMed

51.

Tam MC, Patel VN, Weinberg RL, Hulten EA, Aaronson KD, Pagani FD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT in suspected LVAD infections: a case series, systematic review, and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(5):1191–202.PubMed

52.

Doughan AR, Williams BR. Cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart. 2006;92(2):282–8.PubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Mehta D, Lubitz SA, Frankel Z, Wisnivesky JP, Einstein AJ, Goldman M, et al. Cardiac involvement in patients with sarcoidosis: diagnostic and prognostic value of outpatient testing. Chest. 2008;133(6):1426–35.PubMed

54.

Kumita S, Yoshinaga K, Miyagawa M, Momose M, Kiso K, Kasai T, et al. Recommendations for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis-2018 update: Japanese Society of Nuclear Cardiology recommendations. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26(4):1414–33.PubMed

55.

Ishimaru S, Tsujino I, Takei T, Tsukamoto E, Sakaue S, Kamigaki M, et al. Focal uptake on 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography images indicates cardiac involvement of sarcoidosis. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(15):1538–43.PubMed

56.

Ohira H, Tsujino I, Yoshinaga K. (1)(8)F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cardiac sarcoidosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(9):1773–83.PubMed

57.

Yamagishi H, Shirai N, Takagi M, Yoshiyama M, Akioka K, Takeuchi K, et al. Identification of cardiac sarcoidosis with (13)N-NH(3)/(18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(7):1030–6.PubMed

58.

Okumura W, Iwasaki T, Toyama T, Iso T, Arai M, Oriuchi N, et al. Usefulness of fasting 18F-FDG PET in identification of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(12):1989–98.PubMed

59.

Birnie DH, Sauer WH, Bogun F, Cooper JM, Culver DA, Duvernoy CS, et al. HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(7):1305–23.PubMed

60.

Ishida Y, Yoshinaga K, Miyagawa M, Moroi M, Kondoh C, Kiso K, et al. Recommendations for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for cardiac sarcoidosis: Japanese Society of Nuclear Cardiology recommendations. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28(4):393–403.PubMed

61.

Ordovas KG, Higgins CB. Delayed contrast enhancement on MR images of myocardium: past, present, future. Radiology. 2011;261(2):358–74.PubMed

62.

Manabe O, Oyama-Manabe N, Ohira H, Tsutsui H, Tamaki N. Multimodality evaluation of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(3):621–4.PubMed

63.

Ohira H, Birnie DH, Pena E, Bernick J, Mc Ardle B, Leung E, et al. Comparison of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in corticosteroid-naive patients with conduction system disease due to cardiac sarcoidosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(2):259–69.PubMed

64.

Kouranos V, Tzelepis GE, Rapti A, Mavrogeni S, Aggeli K, Douskou M, et al. Complementary role of CMR to conventional screening in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(12):1437–47.PubMed

65.

Blankstein R, Osborne M, Naya M, Waller A, Kim CK, Murthy VL, et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography enhances prognostic assessments of patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(4):329–36.PubMed

66.

Manabe O, Yoshinaga K, Ohira H, Sato T, Tsujino I, Yamada A, et al. Right ventricular (18)F-FDG uptake is an important indicator for cardiac involvement in patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28(7):656–67.PubMed

67.

Norikane T, Yamamoto Y, Maeda Y, Noma T, Dobashi H, Nishiyama Y. Comparative evaluation of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG for detecting cardiac and extra-cardiac thoracic involvement in patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis. EJNMMI Res. 2017;7(1):69.PubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Martineau P, Pelletier-Galarneau M, Juneau D, Leung E, Nery PB, de Kemp R, et al. Imaging cardiac sarcoidosis with FLT-PET compared with FDG/Perfusion-PET: a prospective pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(11 Pt 1):2280–1.PubMed

69.

Manabe O, Hirata K, Shozo O, Shiga T, Uchiyama Y, Kobayashi K, et al. (18)F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) PET may have the potential to detect cardiac sarcoidosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(1):329–31.PubMed

70.

Furuya S, Naya M, Manabe O, Hirata K, Ohira H, Aikawa T, et al. (18)F-FMISO PET/CT detects hypoxic lesions of cardiac and extra-cardiac involvement in patients with sarcoidosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01976-6.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Van Riet J, Hill EE, Gheysens O, Dymarkowski S, Herregods MC, Herijgers P, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/CT for early detection of embolism and metastatic infection in patients with infective endocarditis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(6):1189–97.PubMed

72.

Saby L, Laas O, Habib G, Cammilleri S, Mancini J, Tessonnier L, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis: increased valvular 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a novel major criterion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(23):2374–82.PubMed

73.

Asmar A, Ozcan C, Diederichsen AC, Thomassen A, Gill S. Clinical impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the extra cardiac work-up of patients with infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15(9):1013–9.PubMed

74.

Pizzi MN, Roque A, Fernandez-Hidalgo N, Cuellar-Calabria H, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Alujas MT, et al. Improving the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in prosthetic valves and intracardiac devices with 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography angiography: initial results at an infective endocarditis referral center. Circulation. 2015;132(12):1113–26.PubMed

75.

Jimenez-Ballve A, Perez-Castejon MJ, Delgado-Bolton RC, Sanchez-Enrique C, Vilacosta I, Vivas D, et al. Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in prosthetic infective endocarditis and cardiac implantable electronic device infection: comparison of different interpretation criteria. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(13):2401–12.PubMed

76.

Mahmood M, Kendi AT, Ajmal S, Farid S, O'Horo JC, Chareonthaitawee P, et al. Meta-analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26(3):922–35.PubMed

77.

Bruls S, Courtois A, Nusgens B, Defraigne JO, Delvenne P, Hustinx R, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of aortitis. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41(1):28–33.PubMed

78.

van der Valk FM, Verweij SL, Zwinderman KA, Strang AC, Kaiser Y, Marquering HA, et al. Thresholds for arterial wall inflammation quantified by (18)F-FDG PET Imaging: implications for vascular interventional studies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(10):1198–207.PubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Yabusaki S, Oyama-Manabe N, Manabe O, Hirata K, Kato F, Miyamoto N, et al. Characteristics of immunoglobulin G4-related aortitis/periaortitis and periarteritis on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography co-registered with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. EJNMMI Res. 2017;7(1):20.PubMedPubMedCentral

80.

Oyama-Manabe N, Yabusaki S, Manabe O, Kato F, Kanno-Okada H, Kudo K. IgG4-related cardiovascular disease from the aorta to the coronary arteries: multidetector CT and PET/CT. Radiographics. 2018;38(7):1934–48.PubMed

81.

Mikail N, Benali K, Dossier A, Bouleti C, Hyafil F, Le Guludec D, et al. Additional diagnostic value of combined angio-computed tomography and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in infectious aortitis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(2 Pt 2):361–4.PubMed

82.

Olthof SC, Krumm P, Henes J, Nikolaou K, la Fougere C, Pfannenberg C, et al. Imaging giant cell arteritis and aortitis in contrast enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT: which imaging score correlates best with laboratory inflammation markers? Eur J Radiol. 2018;99:94–102.PubMed

83.

Padoan R, Crimi F, Felicetti M, Padovano F, Lacognata C, Stramare R, et al. Fully integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in large vessel vasculitis. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1824-4785.19.03184-4.CrossRefPubMed

84.

Rahbar K, Seifarth H, Schafers M, Stegger L, Hoffmeier A, Spieker T, et al. Differentiation of malignant and benign cardiac tumors using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(6):856–63.PubMed

85.

Kikuchi Y, Oyama-Manabe N, Manabe O, Naya M, Ito YM, Hatanaka KC, et al. Imaging characteristics of cardiac dominant diffuse large B-cell lymphoma demonstrated with MDCT and PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(9):1337–444.PubMed

86.

Nensa F, Tezgah E, Poeppel TD, Jensen CJ, Schelhorn J, Kohler J, et al. Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging in the assessment of cardiac masses: a pilot study. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(2):255–60.PubMed

87.

Krumm P, Mangold S, Gatidis S, Nikolaou K, Nensa F, Bamberg F, et al. Clinical use of cardiac PET/MRI: current state-of-the-art and potential future applications. Jpn J Radiol. 2018;36(5):313–23.PubMed

88.

Manabe O, Oyama-Manabe N, Nagai T, Furuya S, Anzai T. Detailed visualization of the right and left ventricular, left atrial, and epicardial involvement of cardiac sarcoidosis with novel semiconductor PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(7):1773–4.PubMed

Titel: Recent advances in cardiac positron emission tomography for quantitative perfusion analyses and molecular imaging
verfasst von: Osamu Manabe
Masanao Naya
Tadao Aikawa
Nagara Tamaki
Publikationsdatum: 11.09.2020
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01519-x

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2020

The REICA method for quantification of cerebral blood flow is less affected by lung washout of [123I] IMP than the graph-plot method

Comparison of thyroid hormone withdrawal and recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone administration for adjuvant therapy in patients with intermediate- to high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer

Evaluating and comparing the image quality and quantification accuracy of SiPM-PET/CT and PMT-PET/CT

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: single-center experience

Validation of the 3-variable prognostic score (3-PS) in mCRPC patients treated with 223Radium-dichloride: a national multicenter study

Evaluation of pleural lesions after pleurodesis with OK-432 by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT