Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2017

01.10.2017 | Research Article

Redefining the pharmacology and pharmacy subject category in the journal citation reports using medical subject headings (MeSH)

verfasst von: Fernando Minguet, Teresa M. Salgado, Claudio Santopadre, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background The Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Pharmacology and Pharmacy subject category is heterogeneous. The inclusion of journals with basic and clinical scopes, which have different citation patterns, compromises comparability of impact factors among journals within the category. Objective To subdivide the Pharmacology and Pharmacy category into basic pharmacology, clinical pharmacology, and pharmacy based on the analyses of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as a proxy of journals’ scopes. Setting JCR. Method All articles, and respective MeSH, published in 2013, 2014, and 2015 in all journals included in the 2014 JCR Pharmacology and Pharmacy category were retrieved from PubMed. Several models using a combination of the 14 MeSH categories and specific MeSH tree branches were tested using hierarchical cluster analysis. Main outcome measure Distribution of journals across the subcategories of the JCR Pharmacology and Pharmacy subject category. Results A total of 107,847 articles from 214 journals were included. Nine different models combining the MeSH categories M (Persons) and N (Health Care) with specific MeSH tree branches (selected ad-hoc) and Pharmacy-specific MeSH (identified in previous research) consistently grouped 142 journals (66.4%) in homogeneous groups reflecting their basic and clinical pharmacology, and pharmacy scopes. Ultimately, journals were clustered into: 150 in basic pharmacology, 43 in clinical pharmacology, 16 in basic pharmacology and clinical pharmacology, and 5 in pharmacy. Conclusion The reformulation of the Pharmacology and Pharmacy category into three categories was demonstrated by the consistent results obtained from testing nine different clustering models using the MeSH terms assigned to their articles.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lippi G. The impact factor for evaluating scientists: the good, the bad and the ugly. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:1585–6.PubMed Lippi G. The impact factor for evaluating scientists: the good, the bad and the ugly. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:1585–6.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat The Monatstersky R, Science Number That’s Devouring. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2005;52:A12. The Monatstersky R, Science Number That’s Devouring. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2005;52:A12.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Not-so-deep impact. Nature. 2005;435:1003-4. Not-so-deep impact. Nature. 2005;435:1003-4.
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-Llimos F. Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016;14:842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fernandez-Llimos F. Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016;14:842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorta-Gonzalez P, Dorta-Gonzalez MI. Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor. Scientometrics. 2013;95:645–72.CrossRef Dorta-Gonzalez P, Dorta-Gonzalez MI. Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor. Scientometrics. 2013;95:645–72.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Waltman L, van Eck NJ, van Leeuwen TN, Visser MS, van Raan AFJ. Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis. Scientometrics. 2011;87:467–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Waltman L, van Eck NJ, van Leeuwen TN, Visser MS, van Raan AFJ. Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis. Scientometrics. 2011;87:467–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Morillo F, Bordons M, Gomez I. Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2003;54:1237–49.CrossRef Morillo F, Bordons M, Gomez I. Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2003;54:1237–49.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pudovkin AI, Garfield E. Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2002;53:1113–9.CrossRef Pudovkin AI, Garfield E. Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2002;53:1113–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Silcox B, Makar S, Ouimette M. Technology Services Reports: analysis of the Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology: National Institute of Standards and Technology 2005. Silcox B, Makar S, Ouimette M. Technology Services Reports: analysis of the Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology: National Institute of Standards and Technology 2005.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat van Eck NJ, Waltman L, van Raan AF, Klautz RJ, Peul WC. Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62395.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Eck NJ, Waltman L, van Raan AF, Klautz RJ, Peul WC. Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62395.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Narin F, Hamilton KS. Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics. 1996;6:293–310.CrossRef Narin F, Hamilton KS. Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics. 1996;6:293–310.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Seglen PO. Bruk av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forskningsaktivitet. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989;31:3229–34. Seglen PO. Bruk av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forskningsaktivitet. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989;31:3229–34.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Narin F, Pinski G, Gee HH. Structure of the biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1976;27:25–45.CrossRef Narin F, Pinski G, Gee HH. Structure of the biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1976;27:25–45.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Folly G, Hajtman B, Nagy JI, Ruff I. Some methodological problems in ranking scientists by citation analysis. Scientometrics. 1981;3:135–47.CrossRef Folly G, Hajtman B, Nagy JI, Ruff I. Some methodological problems in ranking scientists by citation analysis. Scientometrics. 1981;3:135–47.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Minguet F, Salgado TM, van den Boogerd L, Fernandez-Llimos F. Quality of pharmacy-specific Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) assignment in pharmacy journals indexed in MEDLINE. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015;11:686–95.CrossRefPubMed Minguet F, Salgado TM, van den Boogerd L, Fernandez-Llimos F. Quality of pharmacy-specific Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) assignment in pharmacy journals indexed in MEDLINE. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015;11:686–95.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Carpenter MP, Narin F. Clustering of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1973;24:425–36.CrossRef Carpenter MP, Narin F. Clustering of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1973;24:425–36.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Narin F, Carpenter MP. Clustering of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1973;24:425–35.CrossRef Narin F, Carpenter MP. Clustering of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1973;24:425–35.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Narin F, Carpenter MP, Berlt N. Interrelationships of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1972;23:323–31.CrossRef Narin F, Carpenter MP, Berlt N. Interrelationships of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1972;23:323–31.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Small H, Sweeney E, Greenlee E. Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. II. Mapping science. Scientometrics. 1985;8:321–40. Small H, Sweeney E, Greenlee E. Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. II. Mapping science. Scientometrics. 1985;8:321–40.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rafols I, Leydesdorff L. Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2009;60:1823–35.CrossRef Rafols I, Leydesdorff L. Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2009;60:1823–35.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Schvaneveldt RW, Dearholt DW, Durso FT. Graph theoretic foundations of Pathfinder networks. Comput Math Appl. 1988;15:337–45.CrossRef Schvaneveldt RW, Dearholt DW, Durso FT. Graph theoretic foundations of Pathfinder networks. Comput Math Appl. 1988;15:337–45.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Guerrero-Bote VP, Zapico-Alonso F, Espinosa-Calvo ME, Gomez-Crisostomo R, Moya-Anegón F. Binary Pathfinder: an improvement to the Pathfinder algorithm. Inform Process Manag. 2006;42:1484–90.CrossRef Guerrero-Bote VP, Zapico-Alonso F, Espinosa-Calvo ME, Gomez-Crisostomo R, Moya-Anegón F. Binary Pathfinder: an improvement to the Pathfinder algorithm. Inform Process Manag. 2006;42:1484–90.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Leydesdorf L. The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 1994;31:59–84.CrossRef Leydesdorf L. The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 1994;31:59–84.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Small H, Sweeney E. Clustering the Science Citation Index® using co-citations. I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics. 1985;7:391–409. Small H, Sweeney E. Clustering the Science Citation Index® using co-citations. I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics. 1985;7:391–409.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Moya-Anegón F, Vargas-Quesada B, Herrero-Solana V, Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Corera-Álvarez E, Munoz-Fernández FJ. A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics. 2004;61:129–45.CrossRef Moya-Anegón F, Vargas-Quesada B, Herrero-Solana V, Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Corera-Álvarez E, Munoz-Fernández FJ. A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics. 2004;61:129–45.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Leydesdorf L. Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Res Policy. 1989;18:209–23.CrossRef Leydesdorf L. Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Res Policy. 1989;18:209–23.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Callon M, Courtial JP, Turner WA, Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to coword analysis. Social Science Information. 1983;22:191–235.CrossRef Callon M, Courtial JP, Turner WA, Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to coword analysis. Social Science Information. 1983;22:191–235.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Clatworthy J, Buick D, Hankins M, Weinman J, Horne R. The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:329–58.CrossRefPubMed Clatworthy J, Buick D, Hankins M, Weinman J, Horne R. The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:329–58.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Yim O, Ramdeen KT. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: Comparison of Three Linkage Measures and Application to Psychological Data. Quant Methods Psychol. 2015;11:8–21.CrossRef Yim O, Ramdeen KT. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: Comparison of Three Linkage Measures and Application to Psychological Data. Quant Methods Psychol. 2015;11:8–21.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Minguet F, Van Den Boogerd L, Salgado TM, Correr CJ, Fernandez-Llimos F. Characterization of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus for pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71:1965–72.CrossRefPubMed Minguet F, Van Den Boogerd L, Salgado TM, Correr CJ, Fernandez-Llimos F. Characterization of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus for pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71:1965–72.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorraiz J, Schloegl C. A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science. J Inf Sci. 2008;34:715–25.CrossRef Gorraiz J, Schloegl C. A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science. J Inf Sci. 2008;34:715–25.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez RW. Comparison of indexing times among articles from medical, nursing, and pharmacy journals. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016;73:569–75.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez RW. Comparison of indexing times among articles from medical, nursing, and pharmacy journals. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016;73:569–75.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanz EJ. Pharmacoepidemiology and the “impact factor”. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;60:765–72.CrossRefPubMed Sanz EJ. Pharmacoepidemiology and the “impact factor”. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;60:765–72.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous. The International Catalogue of Scientific Literature. Science. 1895;2:154-7. Anonymous. The International Catalogue of Scientific Literature. Science. 1895;2:154-7.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Seglen PO. Evaluation of scientific quality using citation analysis and other bibliometric methods. Nord Med. 1989;104(331–5):41. Seglen PO. Evaluation of scientific quality using citation analysis and other bibliometric methods. Nord Med. 1989;104(331–5):41.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Drettner B, Seglen PO, Sivertsen G. Inverkanstal som fördelningsinstrument: ej accepterat av tidskrifter i Norden. Läkartidningen. 1994;91:744–5.PubMed Drettner B, Seglen PO, Sivertsen G. Inverkanstal som fördelningsinstrument: ej accepterat av tidskrifter i Norden. Läkartidningen. 1994;91:744–5.PubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Gøtzsche PC, Krog JW, Moustgaard R. Bibliometrisk analyse af dansk sundhedsvidenskabelig forskning 19881992. Ugeskr Laeger. 1995;157:5075–81.PubMed Gøtzsche PC, Krog JW, Moustgaard R. Bibliometrisk analyse af dansk sundhedsvidenskabelig forskning 19881992. Ugeskr Laeger. 1995;157:5075–81.PubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinkler P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics. 1986;10:157–77.CrossRef Vinkler P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics. 1986;10:157–77.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Redefining the pharmacology and pharmacy subject category in the journal citation reports using medical subject headings (MeSH)
verfasst von
Fernando Minguet
Teresa M. Salgado
Claudio Santopadre
Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Elektronische ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-017-0527-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.