nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

18.08.2020

Reliability, construct validity, and measurement invariance of the PROMIS Physical Function 8b—Adult Short Form v2.0

verfasst von: Du Feng, Fimbel Laurel, Dorothy Castille, Alma Knows His Gun McCormick, Suzanne Held

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The National Institutes of Health established the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to assess health across various chronic illnesses. The standardized PROMIS measures have been used to assess symptoms in studies that included Native American participants, although the psychometric properties of these measures have not been assessed among a solely Native American population. This study aimed to assess the reliability, construct validity, and measurement invariance of a widely used PROMIS Physical Function survey among Native Americans residing on or near the Apsáalooke (Crow) Reservation who were living with chronic illnesses.

Methods

Participants aged 24 to 82 years and living with at least one chronic illness were recruited for a community-based participatory research project. Baseline data were used for the current study (N = 210). The 8-item PROMIS Physical Function 8b—Adult Short Form v2.0 was used to assess the function of upper and lower extremities, central core regions, and the ability to complete daily activities on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results

Results indicated that the above PROMIS survey had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.95) and split-half (r = 0.92, p < 0.001) reliabilities. Confirmatory factor analyses supported construct validity among females of the above population and when the two sex groups were combined. Results also indicated that corresponding thresholds and factor loadings were invariant across male and female groups.

Conclusions

The above PROMIS measure had good psychometric properties in females and when the two sex groups were combined among Native American adults living on or near the Apsáalooke reservation with chronic illnesses. Thresholds and factor loadings appeared to be invariant by sex. Future studies with a larger sample size among males and more studies on the psychometric properties of other PROMIS measures among Native American populations are needed.

Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23(5 Suppl 39), S53–S57.PubMed

Black, N. (2013). Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ British Medical Journal, 346, f167. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f167.CrossRefPubMed

Boyce, M. B., Browne, J. P., & Greenhalgh, J. (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(6), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002524.CrossRef

Gershon, R., Rothrock, N. E., Hanrahan, R. T., Jansky, L. J., Harniss, M., & Riley, W. (2010). The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center. Quality of Life Research, 19(5), 677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9634-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., et al. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5), S3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5), S12. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Klem, M., Saghafi, E., Abromitis, R., Stover, A., Dew, M., & Pilkonis, P. (2009). Building PROMIS item banks: Librarians as co-investigators. Quality of Life Research, 18(7), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9498-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Lai, J.-S., et al. (2010). An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9619-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Becker, J., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2008). Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.025.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Bajaj, J., Thacker, L., Wade, J., Sanyal, A., Heuman, D., Sterling, R., et al. (2011). PROMIS computerised adaptive tests are dynamic instruments to measure health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 34(9), 1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04842.x.CrossRef

12.

Jensen, R., Potosky, A., Reeve, B., Hahn, E., Cella, D., Fries, J., et al. (2015). Validation of the PROMIS physical function measures in a diverse US population-based cohort of cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 24(10), 2333–2344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0992-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Quach, C., Langer, M., Chen, R., Thissen, D., Usinger, D., Emerson, M., et al. (2016). Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study. Quality of Life Research, 25(11), 2811–2823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Hung, M., Clegg, D. O., Greene, T., Weir, C., & Saltzman, C. L. (2012). A lower extremity physical function computerized adaptive testing instrument for orthopaedic patients. Foot & Ankle International, 33(4), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2012.0326.CrossRef

15.

Bartlett, S. J., Ana-Maria, O., Duncan, T., DeLeon, E., Ruffing, V., Clegg-Smith, K., et al. (2015). Reliability and validity of selected PROMIS measures in people with rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0138543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138543.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Broderick, J. E., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Schwartz, J. E., & Stone, A. A. (2013). Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 65(10), 1625–1633. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22025.CrossRef

17.

Benyshek, D. C. (2001). The political ecology of diabetes among the Havasupai Indians of northern Arizona. Tempe: Arizona State University.

18.

Denny, C. H., Holtzman, D., Goins, R. T., & Croft, J. B. (2005). Disparities in chronic disease risk factors and health status between American Indian/Alaska Native and white elders: Findings from a telephone survey, 2001 and 2002. American Journal of Public Health, 95(5), 825–827. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.043489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Walls, M. L., Sittner, K. J., Aronson, B. D., Forsberg, A. K., Whitbeck, L. B., & Mustafa, A. A. (2017). Stress exposure and physical, mental, and behavioral health among American Indian adults with type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9), 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091074.CrossRefPubMedCentral

20.

Goins, R. T., Innes, K., & Dong, L. (2012). Lower body functioning prevalence and correlates in older American Indians in a southeastern tribe: The Native Elder Care Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60(3), 577–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03869.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Crow Apsalooke. (2020). Retrieved June 29, 2020, from https://www.visitmt.com/places-to-go/indian-nations/apsaalooke-crow.html.

22.

Medicine Crow, J. (1992). From the heart of the Crow country: The Crow Indians’ Own Stories (1st ed.). London: Orion Books.

23.

Hallett, J., Held, S., McCormick, A. K. H. G., Simonds, V., Real Bird, S., Martin, C., et al. (2017). What touched your heart? Collaborative story analysis emerging from an Apsáalooke cultural context. Qualitative Health Research, 27(9), 1267–1277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316669340.CrossRefPubMed

24.

HealthMeasures Scoring Service powered by Assessment CenterSM. (n.d). Retrieved June 29, 2020, from https://www.assessmentcenter.net/ac_scoringservice.

25.

David, C., Gershon, R., Bass, M., & Rothrock, N. (2020). Assessment center scoring servicesm user manual. Retrieved from https://www.assessmentcenter.net/ac_scoringservice/templates/UserManual.pdf.

26.

PROMIS Physical Function Scoring Manual (2019, June 10). Retrieved June 29, 2020, from https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/manuals/PROMIS_Physical_Function_Scoring_Manual.pdf.

27.

Charter, R. A. (2003). A breakdown of reliability coefficients by test type and reliability method, and the clinical implications of low reliability. The Journal of General Psychology, 130(3), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300309601160.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Rosseel, Y., Oberski, D., Byrnes, J., Vanbrabant, L., Savalei, V., Merkle, E., Hallquist, M., Rhemtulla, M., Katsikatsou, M., Barendse, M., Chow, M., & Jorgensen, T. (2020, May 13). Package ‘lavaan’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lavaan/lavaan.pdf.

29.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

30.

Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.CrossRef

31.

Jorgensen, T.D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2018). SemTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-1. Retrieved from https://github.com/simsem/semTools.wiki.git.

32.

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.CrossRef

33.

Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1292–1306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Wu, H., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Svetina, D., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2020). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using M plus and the lavaan/semtools packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776.CrossRef

36.

Bureau of Indian Affairs (2020). Indian entities recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/01/30/2020-01707/indian-entities-recognized-by-and-eligible-to-receive-services-from-the-united-states-bureau-of.

37.

George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e16–e31. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Mitchell, T. L., & Baker, E. (2005). Community-building versus career-building research: The challenges, risks, and responsibilities of conducting research with Aboriginal and Native American communities. Journal of Cancer Education, 20(S1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Barun, N. (2010). Understanding the relevance of sample size calculation. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 58(6), 469–470. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.71673.CrossRef

40.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170.CrossRef

Titel: Reliability, construct validity, and measurement invariance of the PROMIS Physical Function 8b—Adult Short Form v2.0
verfasst von: Du Feng
Fimbel Laurel
Dorothy Castille
Alma Knows His Gun McCormick
Suzanne Held
Publikationsdatum: 18.08.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02603-5

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2020

Registered Reports: response from the Chinese PRO SIG

Social cohesion and quality of life among survivors of a natural disaster

An assessment of symptom burden in inflammatory bowel diseases to develop a patient preference-weighted symptom score

The association between sociodemographic factors, frailty, and health-related quality of life in older inpatients: a cross-sectional study

Depression, temporomandibular disorders, and genetic polymorphisms in IL6 impact on oral health-related quality of life in patients requiring orthognathic surgery

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): can they be used to guide patient-centered care and optimize outcomes in total knee replacement?