Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Odontology 1/2014

01.01.2014 | Original Article

Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture

verfasst von: Netrporn Chinvipas, Yuh Hasegawa, Kazuto Terada

Erschienen in: Odontology | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influences of repeated bonding, using 2 different orthodontic adhesive systems, on the shear bond strength (SBS) and the enamel surface morphology. Sixty premolars were divided into 2 groups (n = 30), and either Transbond XT (T group) or Fuji Ortho LC (F group) adhesives were used. SBS was measured 24 h after bonding, using a universal testing machine. Then, the enamel surfaces were investigated and the mode of failure was described using adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. After each debonding, 10 teeth from each group were examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the penetration of adhesives, the length of resin tags, and the state of the enamel surface. The other teeth were subjected to two more bonding/debonding procedures. In T group, the second debonding sequences had significantly higher bond strengths than the other sequences. The length of resin tags was greatest in the second debonding sequence, although there was no significant difference. In F group, the SBS increased with further rebonding and the failure mode tended towards cohesive failure. In both groups, the ARI scores increased with rebonding. Enamel loss could have occurred with both adhesives, although the surfaces appeared unchanged to the naked eye. From this study, we suggest that enamel damage caused by repeated bonding is of concern. To prevent bond failure, we should pay attention to the adhesion method used for bondable retainers.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Reitan K. Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1967;53:721–45.PubMedCrossRef Reitan K. Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1967;53:721–45.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong PM, Freer TJ. A comprehensive survey of retention procedures in Australia and New Zealand. Aust Orthod J. 2004;20:99–106.PubMed Wong PM, Freer TJ. A comprehensive survey of retention procedures in Australia and New Zealand. Aust Orthod J. 2004;20:99–106.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:553–68.PubMed Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:553–68.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod. 1977;71:440–8.PubMedCrossRef Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod. 1977;71:440–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beam DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:207–13.CrossRef Beam DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:207–13.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Paulson RC. A functional rationale for routine maxillary bonded retention. Angle Orthod. 1992;62:223–6.PubMed Paulson RC. A functional rationale for routine maxillary bonded retention. Angle Orthod. 1992;62:223–6.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Taner T, Aksu M. A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:470–4.PubMedCrossRef Taner T, Aksu M. A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:470–4.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lumsden KW, Saidler G, McColl JH. Breakage incidence with direct-bonded lingual retainers. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:191–4.PubMedCrossRef Lumsden KW, Saidler G, McColl JH. Breakage incidence with direct-bonded lingual retainers. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:191–4.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:435–41.PubMed Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:435–41.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA. A three-year follow up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:501–9.PubMedCrossRef Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA. A three-year follow up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:501–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod. 1991;25:619–30.PubMed Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod. 1991;25:619–30.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zachrisson BU. Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1995;28:39–48. Zachrisson BU. Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1995;28:39–48.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bearn DR, McCabe JF, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire–composite interface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:67–74.PubMedCrossRef Bearn DR, McCabe JF, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire–composite interface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:67–74.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdullah MA, Al-Mutairi TK, Hakami ZW, Al-Malki MM. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combination. J Orofacial Orthop. 2010;71:290–9.CrossRef Abdullah MA, Al-Mutairi TK, Hakami ZW, Al-Malki MM. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combination. J Orofacial Orthop. 2010;71:290–9.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Valletta R, Prisco D, De Santis R, Ambrosio L, Martina R. Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:571–7.PubMedCrossRef Valletta R, Prisco D, De Santis R, Ambrosio L, Martina R. Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:571–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers A, Kao E, Gilmore J, Gunel E, Ngan P. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:200–6.PubMedCrossRef Summers A, Kao E, Gilmore J, Gunel E, Ngan P. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:200–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333–40.PubMedCrossRef Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333–40.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171–8. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171–8.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tavas MA, Watts DC. A visible light activated direct bonding material: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1984;11:33–7.PubMed Tavas MA, Watts DC. A visible light activated direct bonding material: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1984;11:33–7.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Waters NE. Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1980;34:99–135.PubMed Waters NE. Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1980;34:99–135.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nujella BPS, Choudary MT, Reddy SP, Kumar MK, Gopal T. Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3:22–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nujella BPS, Choudary MT, Reddy SP, Kumar MK, Gopal T. Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3:22–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Regan D, Noort RV. Bond strengths of two integral bracket-base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foil-mesh. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:144–53.PubMed Regan D, Noort RV. Bond strengths of two integral bracket-base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foil-mesh. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:144–53.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Torii Y, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:528–33.PubMedCrossRef Torii Y, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:528–33.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fjeld M, Ogaard B. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel surfaces exposed to 3 orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130:575–81.CrossRef Fjeld M, Ogaard B. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel surfaces exposed to 3 orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130:575–81.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CH, Cuozzo PT, Mante FK. Shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:52–4.PubMedCrossRef Chung CH, Cuozzo PT, Mante FK. Shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:52–4.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Leas TJ, Hondrum S. The effect of rebonding on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets—a comparison of two clinical techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:200–1. Leas TJ, Hondrum S. The effect of rebonding on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets—a comparison of two clinical techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:200–1.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawasaki M, Hayakawa T, Takizawa T, Sirirungrojying S, Saitoh K, Kasai K. Assessing the performance of a methyl methacrylate-based resin cement with self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:702–9.PubMed Kawasaki M, Hayakawa T, Takizawa T, Sirirungrojying S, Saitoh K, Kasai K. Assessing the performance of a methyl methacrylate-based resin cement with self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:702–9.PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:463–9.PubMed Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:463–9.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Knosel M, Mattysek S, Jung K, Sadat-Khonsari R, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Bauss O, Ziebolz D. Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:1036–44.PubMedCrossRef Knosel M, Mattysek S, Jung K, Sadat-Khonsari R, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Bauss O, Ziebolz D. Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:1036–44.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Melsen B, Scribante A. A 12 month clinical study of bond failures of recycled versus new stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:449–54.PubMedCrossRef Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Melsen B, Scribante A. A 12 month clinical study of bond failures of recycled versus new stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:449–54.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 1: wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:29–36.PubMed Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 1: wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:29–36.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2: bonding on dry enamel and on enamel soaked with saliva. Clinical Orthod Res. 1999;2:186–93. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2: bonding on dry enamel and on enamel soaked with saliva. Clinical Orthod Res. 1999;2:186–93.
Metadaten
Titel
Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture
verfasst von
Netrporn Chinvipas
Yuh Hasegawa
Kazuto Terada
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Odontology / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-012-0095-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Odontology 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.