Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2018

Open Access 01.12.2018 | Study protocol

Resilience to cognitive impairment in the oldest-old: design of the EMIF-AD 90+ study

verfasst von: Nienke Legdeur, Maryam Badissi, Stephen F. Carter, Sophie de Crom, Aleid van de Kreeke, Ralph Vreeswijk, Marijke C. Trappenburg, Mardien L. Oudega, Huiberdina L. Koek, Jos P. van Campen, Carolina J. P. W. Keijsers, Chinenye Amadi, Rainer Hinz, Mark F. Gordon, Gerald Novak, Jana Podhorna, Erik Serné, Frank Verbraak, Maqsood Yaqub, Arjan Hillebrand, Alessandra Griffa, Neil Pendleton, Sophia E. Kramer, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Adriaan Lammertsma, Frederik Barkhof, Bart N. M. van Berckel, Philip Scheltens, Majon Muller, Andrea B. Maier, Karl Herholz, Pieter Jelle Visser

Erschienen in: BMC Geriatrics | Ausgabe 1/2018

Abstract

Background

The oldest-old (subjects aged 90 years and older) population represents the fastest growing segment of society and shows a high dementia prevalence rate of up to 40%. Only a few studies have investigated protective factors for cognitive impairment in the oldest-old. The EMIF-AD 90+ Study aims to identify factors associated with resilience to cognitive impairment in the oldest-old. In this paper we reviewed previous studies on cognitive resilience in the oldest-old and described the design of the EMIF-AD 90+ Study.

Methods

The EMIF-AD 90+ Study aimed to enroll 80 cognitively normal subjects and 40 subjects with cognitive impairment aged 90 years or older. Cognitive impairment was operationalized as amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), or possible or probable Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The study was part of the European Medical Information Framework for AD (EMIF-AD) and was conducted at the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) and at the University of Manchester. We will test whether cognitive resilience is associated with cognitive reserve, vascular comorbidities, mood, sleep, sensory system capacity, physical performance and capacity, genetic risk factors, hallmarks of ageing, and markers of neurodegeneration. Markers of neurodegeneration included an amyloid positron emission tomography, amyloid β and tau in cerebrospinal fluid/blood and neurophysiological measures.

Discussion

The EMIF-AD 90+ Study will extend our knowledge on resilience to cognitive impairment in the oldest-old by extensive phenotyping of the subjects and the measurement of a wide range of potential protective factors, hallmarks of aging and markers of neurodegeneration.

Trial registration

Nederlands Trial Register NTR5867. Registered 20 May 2016.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12877-018-0984-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Abkürzungen
ACE-R
Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised
AD
Alzheimer’s disease
ADL
Activities of daily living
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam University Medical Centers
APOE
Apolipoprotein E
Amyloid β
BIA
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
BIOMARKAPD
Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease
BMI
Body Mass Index
CANTAB
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated battery
CCI
Cognitive Complaints Index
CDR
Clinical Dementia Rating
CERAD
Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease
COGA
Center Of Geriatric medicine Amsterdam
CSF
cerebrospinal fluid
DIN test
digits-in-noise test
DSST
Digit Symbol Substitution Test
DTI
diffusion tensor imaging
EMIF-AD
European Medical Information Framework for AD
ETDRS
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study
FLAIR
fluid attenuated inversion recovery
GDS
Geriatric Depression Scale
GE
General Electric
GNT
Graded Naming Test
HRRT
High Resolution Research Tomograph
iADL
instrumental Activities of Daily Living
IMI
Innovative Medicine Initiative
IOP
Intra-Ocular Pressure
MEG
magnetoencephalography
MMSE
Mini-Mental State Examination
MNA
Mini Nutritional Assessment
MNAS
Manchester and Newcastle Aging Study
MSQ
Mayo Sleep Questionnaire
N/A
not applicable
NART
National Adult Reading Test
NPI-Q
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire
OCT
Optical Coherence Tomography
PASE
Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly
PBMCs
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
PET
positron emission tomography
PLAD
Project of Longevity and Aging in Dujangyan
pRNFL
peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer
RAVLT
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
RCFT
Rey Complex Figure Test
REM
Rapid Eye Movement
rs-fMRI
resting state functional MRI
RVPs
Retinal Vascular Parameters
SD-OCT
Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
SF-12 HRQoL
Short form 12 Health-related Quality of Life
SIVA
Singapore I vessel Assessment
SNP
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
SOP
Standard Operating Procedure
SPPB
Short Physical Performance Battery
SRT
speech reception threshold
SRTM2
Simplified Reference Tissue Model 2
SUVr
standardized uptake value ratio
SWI
susceptibility weighted imaging
TMT
Trail Making Test
VAT
Visual Association Test
WAIS
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
WMH
white matter hyperintensities

Background

Introduction

The oldest-old (subjects aged 90 years and older) population represents the fastest growing segment of society [1]. Worldwide, the number of oldest-old subjects is expected to increase to 71.2 million in 2050, a 5-fold increase of the current oldest-old population [2, 3]. The oldest-old have a high risk of developing dementia with a prevalence up to 40% [4]. The increasing number of oldest-old subjects with dementia will have major clinical and financial consequences for patients, their families and society as a whole [5].
Still a considerable number of subjects remain cognitively normal at high age, indicating the presence of protective factors for cognitive impairment in these subjects. Identification of these protective factors is crucial and will have implications for preventive strategies. In addition, identifying the neurodegenerative markers associated with cognitive impairment in the oldest-old, will enhance our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology in this specific age group.
The EMIF-AD 90+ study was set-up to investigate protective factors for cognitive impairment in the oldest-old. We will first provide an overview of the current status of research on this topic and then present the study outline of the EMIF-AD 90+ study.

Review on studies on cognitive impairment in the oldest-old

We searched for studies focusing on protective factors for cognitive impairment in nonagenarians, which gave us two results: The 90+ Study in the USA and the Danish Birth Cohort Studies [6, 7]. Broadening the search to studies that started inclusion from the age of 85 years or focused on successful aging resulted in eight more studies: the H85 Gothenburg study, Leiden 85-plus Study, Newcastle 85+ Study, NonaSantfeliu study, Octabaix study, Project of Longevity and Aging in Dujangyan (PLAD), Umeå study and Vantaa 85+ Study [815]. Table 1 shows the design characteristics of these ten studies.
Table 1
Design characteristics of other 85+ and 90+ studies that include data about cognitive functioning
Domain
Danish Birth Cohort Studies [6]a
H85 Gothen-burg study [12]
Leiden 85-plus Study [9]
Newcastle 85+ Study [10]
NonaSant-feliu study [8]
Octabaix study [13]
PLAD [15]
The 90+ Study, USA [7]
Umeå 85+ study [14]
Vantaa 85+ Study [11]
Cognitive reserve
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Vascular comorbidity
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mood and sleep
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Sensory system
+
+
+
+
+
+
Physical performance and capacity
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Genetics
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Hallmarks of agingb
+
+
+
Markers of neurodegeneration
+
+
PLAD Project of Longevity and Aging in Dujangyan
aIncluding the cohorts recruited in 1895, 1905, 1910 and 1915, data availability varies per cohort. bInflammation and senescence markers (for example p16, p53 and telomere associated foci)

Protective factors for cognitive impairment in the oldest-old

Table 2 summarizes the findings on the protective factors for cognitive impairment or dementia of the ten studies. A high level of education was found to be protective against dementia in the oldest-old and one study indicated that high cognitive activity, examined by looking at the time spend on reading, around age 90 years was related to resilience to dementia [4, 1618]. The influence of vascular comorbidities on cognition has been studied quite extensively in this age group. Most studies did not find an association between cholesterol levels and cognition in the oldest-old [15, 17, 1922]. Hypertension has mostly been found to be protective in the oldest-old, especially when hypertension is diagnosed after the age of 80 years [17, 19, 2327]. This is in contrast to studies that have shown a higher dementia risk in the presence of midlife hypertension [28]. In addition, although midlife diabetes mellitus has been related to dementia in younger subjects [29], the influence of diabetes mellitus on cognition might be less evident in the oldest-old [11, 30, 31]. The protective effect related to the absence of stroke seemed to persist in the oldest-old [18, 32] and one study on atrial fibrillation and dementia did not find an association [32]. The absence of depressive symptoms seemed to be associated with resilience to cognitive impairment, which is consistent with findings in younger subjects [14, 33, 34]. One study related sleep quality to cognition and reported a higher sleep quality in subjects without cognitive impairment, which is in line with results in younger subjects [35, 36]. With regard to the sensory system, visual and auditory impairments have been associated with worse cognitive functioning in the oldest-old [37, 38] and although olfactory impairment has been associated with incident dementia in a younger age group [39], no studies were found studying this in the oldest-old.
Table 2
Potential protective factors for cognitive impairment in the oldest-old
Domain
Potential protective factor
Study
Agea
Sample size (N)
Outcome variable
Result
Cognitive reserve
High level of education
H85 Gothenburg study [18]
85.7 (±0.05)
No dementia: 794
Dementia: 271
Dementia
Protective
The 90+ Study [4]
94 (90–106)
No dementia: 536
Dementia: 375
Dementia
Protective
Vantaa 85+ Study [17]
88.4 (85.0–104.0)
No incident dementia: 239
Incident dementia: 100
Incident dementia
Protective
High cognitive activity
The 90+ Study [16]
93 (90–103)
No incident dementia: 319
Incident dementia: 268
Incident dementia
Equivocal
Vascular comorbidity
Low total/LDL or high HDL cholesterol level
Leiden 85-plus Study [20]
85 (85)
No dementia: 488
Dementia: 73
Cognition
Dementia
Equivocal
Newcastle 85+ Study [19]
85 (85)
No dementia: 767
Dementia: 78
Cognition
Cognitive decline
Equivocal
NonaSantfeliu study [21]
94.3 (±2.6)
62, dementia status unknown
Cognition
No effect
Octabaix study [22]
85 (85)
321, dementia status unknown
Cognition
No effect
PLAD [15]
93.6 (90–108)
No cognitive impairment: 300
Cognitive impairment: 409
Cognition
No effect
Vantaa 85+ Study [17]
88.4 (85.0–104.0)
No incident dementia: 239
Incident dementia: 100
Incident dementia
No effect
Absence of hypertension
Leiden 85-plus Study [23]
85 (85)
572, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Cognitive decline
Risk
Newcastle 85+ Study [19]
85 (85)
No dementia: 767
Dementia: 78
Cognition
Cognitive decline
Equivocal
PLAD [27]
93.6 (90–108)
No cognitive impairment: 317
Cognitive impairment: 465
Cognition
No effect
Umeå 85+ study [26]
85, 90 and ≥ 95
No dementia: 342
Dementia: 233
Cognition
Dementia
Protective
Umeå 85+ study [25]
88.8 (±4.1)
No incident dementia: 136
Incident dementia: 69
Incident dementia
No effect
The 90+ Study [24]
93.2 (90–103)
No incident dementia: 335
Incident dementia: 224
Incident dementia
Risk
Vantaa 85+ Study [17]
88.4 (85.0–104.0)
No incident dementia: 239
Incident dementia: 100
Incident dementia
Equivocal
Absence of DM
Leiden 85-plus Study [30]
85 (85)
596, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Cognitive decline
Equivocal
Octabaix study [31]
85 (85)
167, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Cognitive decline
No effect
Vantaa 85+ Study [11]
≥85
No incident dementia: 249
Incident dementia: 106
Incident dementia
Protective
Absence of stroke
H85 Gothenburg study [18]
85.7 (±0.05)
No dementia: 794
Dementia: 271
Dementia
Protective
Vantaa 85+ Study [32]
88.4 (±2.9)
No dementia: 339
Dementia: 214
Incident dementia: 100
Dementia
Incident dementia
Protective
Absence of AF
Vantaa 85+ Study [32]
88.4 (±2.9)
No dementia: 339
Dementia: 214
Incident dementia: 100
Dementia
Incident dementia
No effect
Mood and sleep
No depression
Leiden 85-plus Study [34]
85 (85)
500, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Protective
Umeå 85+ study [14]
85, 90 and 95–103
No dementia: 173
Dementia: 69
Dementia
Protective
High sleep quality
PLAD [35]
93.5 (±3.4)
No dementia: 251
Dementia: 409
Dementia
Cognition
Protective
Sensory system
Absence of visual impairment
Leiden 85-plus Study [37]
85 (85)
459, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Protective
Newcastle 85+ Study [38]
85 (85)
No dementia: 771
Dementia: 68
Cognition
Protective
Absence of glaucoma or cataract
Newcastle 85+ Study [105]
85 (85)
No dementia: 771
Dementia: 68
Cognition
Equivocal
Absence of hearing impairment
Leiden 85-plus Study [37]
85 (85)
459, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Equivocal
Physical performance and capacity
Good physical performance
Leiden 85-plus Study [40]
85 (85)
555, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Protective
The 90+ Study [41]
93.3 (±2.6)
No incident dementia: 366
Incident dementia: 212
Incident dementia
Protective
High physical activity
The 90+ Study [16]
93 (90–103)
No incident dementia: 319
Incident dementia: 268
Incident dementia
No effect
Genetics
Absence of APOEε4 and/or presence of APOEε2
Danish 1905 birth cohort [42]
93.1 (±0.3)
1551, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Cognitive decline
No effect
Leiden 85-plus Study [43]
89.0 (87.4–91.2)b
No dementia: 242
Dementia: 78
Dementia
Protective
The 90+ Study [44]
93.7 (90–105)
No dementia: 566
Dementia: 236
Incident dementia: 188
Dementia
Incident dementia
Equivocal
Vantaa 85+ Study [45]
≥85
313 without dementia
197 with dementia
Dementia
Protective
Vantaa 85+ Study [46]
≥85
No incident dementia: 187
Incident dementia: 58
Incident dementia
Cognitive decline
No effect
MnSOD, GLRX, GSTP1, MT1A, NDUFV1, PRDX3, UQCRFS1, PICALM
Danish 1905 birth cohort [106108]
92-93c
1089–1650, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Protective
ACOX1
Danish 1905 birth cohort [106]
93.2 (92.7–93.8)
1089, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Risk
Cytokine genes, CLU
Danish 1905 birth cohort [108110]
92-93c
1380–1651, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Cognitive decline
Equivocal
MTHFR, MTR
Danish 1905 birth cohort [111]
93.1 (±0.3)
1651, dementia status unknown
Cognition
Cognitive decline
No effect
KLOTHO
PLAD [112]
93.5 (90–108)
No cognitive impairment: 236
Cognitive impairment: 470
Cognition
Protective
PPAR-γ2
PLAD [113]
93.7 (90–108)
No cognitive impairment: 257
Cognitive impairment: 475
Cognition
No effect
LRP, LPL, ACE
Vantaa 85+ Study [114]
≥85
No dementia: 203
Dementia (AD): 113
Dementia
No effect
Hallmarks of ageing
Low level of inflammation markers
Leiden 85-plus Study [49]
85 (85)
No dementia: 491
Cognition
Cognitive decline
Equivocal
The 90+ Study [50]
94.3 (90–105)
No dementia: 232
Dementia: 73
Dementia
Equivocal
The 90+ Study [51]
93.9 (90–102)
No incident dementia: 145
Incident dementia: 82
Incident dementia
No effect
Low level of senescence markers
Leiden 85-plus Study [52]
89.8 (85–101)
No dementia: 452
Dementia: 146
Incident dementia: unknown
Cognition
Dementia
Incident dementia
No effect
Markers of neurodegeneration
Normal levels of Aβ and tau in CSF
H85 Gothenburg study [56]
85 (85)
No incident dementia: 28
Incident dementia: 7
Incident dementia
Protective
Negative amyloid PET-scan
The 90+ Study [57]
94.2 (90–99)d
No incident dementia: 10
Incident dementia: 3
Cognitive decline
Protective
Less brain atrophy
H85 Gothenburg study [58]
85 (85)
No dementia: 30
Dementia: 23
Dementia
Equivocal
Less WMH
H85 Gothenburg study [59]
85 (85)
No dementia: 133
Dementia: 103
Dementia
Protective
High white matter integrity
The 90+ Study [60]
94.6 (90–103)
Normal: 64
CIND: 30
CIND
No effect
Amyloid β, AD Alzheimer’s disease, APOE Apolipoprotein E, CIND Cognitive Impairment, No Dementia, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DM diabetes mellitus, HDL high-density lipoproteins, LDL low-density lipoproteins, MCI Mild Cognitive Impairment, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, N Number, PET positron emission tomography, PLAD Project of Longevity and Aging in Dujangyan, WMH white matter hyperintensities
aMean age (range, if available, or ± if standard deviation) in years at baseline, unless stated otherwise; bMedian age (interquartile range, IQR) in years; cMinimal and maximum mean age in years of the studies referred to; dMedian age (range) in years
Data about physical performance and activity have been collected in the Leiden 85-plus study and The 90+ Study. Good physical performance, measured with handgrip strength, 4 m walk or standing balance tests, was associated with better cognitive functioning and lower dementia incidence in the oldest-old but high physical activity did not seem to influence dementia incidence [16, 40, 41].
With regard to genetics, the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, a major risk factor for AD in younger subjects, has been extensively studied in the oldest-old, with mixed results regarding the relation to cognition and dementia [4246]. The Danish 1905 birth cohort, PLAD and Vantaa 85+ Study also studied a number of other genotypes in the oldest-old and found some additional protective and risk genotypes which are described in Table 2.

Hallmarks of aging and cognition in the oldest-old

Hallmarks of aging [47], such as inflammation and cellular senescence [48], have been scarcely studied in relation to cognition in the oldest-old. The Leiden 85-plus Study and The 90+ Study related inflammation markers to cognition and dementia but showed mixed results [4951]. In addition, telomere length measured in white blood cells were not associated with cognition, dementia prevalence or incident dementia [52].

Markers of neurodegeneration and cognition in the oldest-old

Limited information is available about the relation of markers of neurodegeneration, such as amyloid β and tau measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or with a positron emission tomography (PET) scan with cognitive impairment in the oldest-old. Postmortem studies have shown that the prevalence of amyloid aggregation increases with age in cognitively healthy subjects but decreases in the oldest-old subjects with dementia [1]. A similar trend can be seen with regard to amyloid β measured in CSF or on an amyloid PET scan [53, 54]. In subjects without dementia, greater amyloid load has been associated with poorer cognitive functioning and a higher rate of incident dementia, although the number of oldest-old subjects in these studies was limited [5557]. There are a few studies that have related brain MRI measurements in the oldest-old to cognitive functioning. Less atrophy and fewer white matter hyperintensities were seen in subjects without dementia compared to subjects with dementia [58, 59] but white matter integrity was not related to cognition [60]. In younger subjects, neurophysiological measures on magnetoencephalography (MEG) have been related to dementia [61] but it is unknown whether this relationship persists in the oldest-old.

Aims and objectives of the EMIF-AD 90+ study

The EMIF-AD 90+ Study was set-up to investigate the protective factors for cognitive impairment in the oldest-old. The study was part of the Innovative Medicine Initiative (IMI) European Medical Information Framework for AD (EMIF-AD) project (http://​www.​emif.​eu/​about/​emif-ad) on diagnostic markers, prognostic markers, and protective factors for AD. The EMIF-AD 90+ study focuses on the extreme phenotype of the cognitively normal oldest-old. The primary objectives of the EMIF-AD 90+ study are:
i)
To identify factors associated with resilience to cognitive impairment in the oldest-old.
 
ii)
To test the relationship between hallmarks of aging and cognitive impairment in the oldest-old.
 
iii)
To test the relationship between markers of neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment in the oldest-old.
 
This paper describes the design and protocol of the study.

Methods

Study subjects

We aimed to include 80 cognitively normal subjects and 40 subjects with cognitive impairment, both aged 90 years and older. Inclusion criteria for cognitively normal subjects were a global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0 [62] and a score ≥ 26 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [63]. Inclusion criteria for subjects with cognitive impairment were a diagnosis of amnestic MCI (aMCI) [64] or a diagnosis of probable or possible AD [65] by a neurologist, geriatrician, or general practitioner, a global CDR score ≥ 0.5 point (s) and a MMSE score of 20–28 points (inclusive). Exclusion criteria were the physical inability to undergo the procedures, visual or hearing impairment which made neuropsychological testing impossible, severe depression (Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score ≥ 11 points [66]) and other comorbidities or medication that could impair cognition at the discretion of the investigator (e.g. stroke, epilepsy or use of lithium carbonate). During the inclusion period it turned out to be difficult to identify subjects of 90 years and older with aMCI or probable or possible AD; we therefore broadened the inclusion criteria in this group to subjects older than 85 years.
Subjects were recruited at two sites: the Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands and The University of Manchester, United Kingdom. Cognitively normal subjects were recruited from general practitioners or via advertisements (Amsterdam) or from the Manchester and Newcastle Ageing Study (MNAS, Manchester). Subjects with cognitive impairment were only recruited in the Netherlands. They were recruited from the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam and the Center Of Geriatric medicine Amsterdam (COGA) at the Amsterdam UMC, geriatric departments of other hospitals in the surroundings of Amsterdam, other healthcare facilities (such as a care home), general practitioners or via advertisement. The sample collection started on the 1st of June 2016 and ended on the 30th of June 2018. Currently we are working on the first data analyses.
The Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Amsterdam UMC approved the study in Amsterdam and the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West - Greater Manchester South performed approval of the study in Manchester. The study was carried out in accordance with the ethical conduct and juridical laws of the Declaration of Helsinki 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013, (www.​wma.​net), and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). All subjects gave written informed consent.

Study design

The EMIF-AD 90+ Study is a case-control study in which we search for protective factors for cognitive impairment. Therefore, the cognitively normal subjects are described as cases and the subjects with cognitive impairment as controls.

Study procedures

The study consisted of two home visits and one or two visits at the hospital/clinical research facility (CRF). During the first home visit, in- and exclusion criteria (MMSE, CDR, impression of physical ability to undergo the procedures, hearing and visual abilities) were verified, in addition to collection of first study data (Table 3, paragraphs 2.3.1, 2.3.2 and 2.3.4). The MMSE is a short cognitive screening test with a maximum score of 30 points [63]. The CDR is a scale for the severity of symptoms of dementia, which was assessed by interviews with the subject and, if available, study partner (somebody that is in regular contact with the subject) in combination with judgement by the researchers [62]. The second home visit consisted of a neuropsychological assessment performed by a neuropsychologist (paragraph 2.3.3). During the hospital/CRF visits several procedures were performed, which are listed in Table 3 and described in paragraphs 2.3.4. – 2.3.10. These procedures provided information on i) potential protective factors (classified in six different domains), ii) hallmarks of aging, and iii) markers of neurodegeneration (Fig. 1 and Table 3). For each domain, hallmark of aging or markers of neurodegeneration, we will test one or more parameters (Table 3). In most cases, all procedures were performed within three months from start of the inclusion. Any differences in study procedures between Amsterdam and Manchester are explicitly stated in this paper.
Table 3
The domains of interest in the EMIF-AD 90+ Study
Domain
Parameter
Procedure (measurement)
Schedule Amsterdam
Schedule Manchester
Cognitive reserve
Level of education
Interview
Home
Home
Cognitive activity
Cognitive abilities questionnaire
Home
Home
Vascular comorbidity
Cholesterol level, hypertension, DM, stroke, AF
Blood collection
Hospital
WMIC
Medical history and medication use
Home
Home
Blood pressure
Hospital
CRF
Diagnostick/heart rate
Home
CRF
Ultrasound carotid artery
Hospital
CRF
Mood and sleep
Depressive symptoms
Geriatric Depression Scale
Home
Home
Sleep disorder
Berlin Questionnaire and MSQ
Home
Home
Accelerometer (sleep quality)
Home
N/A
Sensory system
Visual acuity
ETDRS chart
Hospital
N/A
Retinal thickness
OCT
Hospital
N/A
Auditory function
Digits-in-noise test
Home
N/A
Olfactory function
Sniffin sticks
Hospital
N/A
Physical performance and capacity
Physical performance
Grip strength
Home
CRF
Short Physical Performance Battery or 4-min walking test
Hospital
CRF
BIA (muscle mass)
Hospital
N/A
Physical activity
Accelerometer
Home
N/A
Genetics
APOEε4 and APOEε2
Blood collection
Hospital
WMIC
Hallmarks of ageing
Level of inflammation markers
Blood collection (i.a. PBMCs)
Hospital
WMIC
Level of senescence markers
Skin biopsy (senescence markers p16, p53 and telomere associated foci)
Hospital
N/A
Nutritional status
BIA
Hospital
N/A
Blood collection
Hospital
CRF
BMI
Hospital
CRF
MNA
Home
N/A
Markers of neurodegeneration
Aβ1–42 and tau in CSF and blood
CSF collection
Blood collection
Hospital
N/A
Amyloid PET scan
Amyloid PET scan
Hospital
WMIC
Brain atrophy
Brain MRI scan or brain CT scan
Hospital
CRF
WMH
Brain MRI scan or brain CT scan
Hospital
CRF
White matter integrity
Brain MRI scan
Hospital
N/A
Brain connectivity
Brain MRI scan
Hospital
CRF
MEG
Hospital
N/A
Amyloid β, AD Alzheimer’s disease, AF atrial fibrillation, APOE Apolipoprotein E, BIA Bioelectrical impedance analysis, BMI Body Mass Index, CRF Clinical Research Facility, CT Computerized Tomography, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DM diabetes mellitus, ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, MEG magnetoencephalography, MNA Mini Nutritional Assessment, MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MSQ Mayo Sleep Questionnaire, N/A not applicable, OCT Optical Coherence Tomography, PBMCs Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells, PET positron emission tomography, PLAD Project of Longevity and Aging in Dujangyan, WMH white matter hyperintensities, WMIC Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre

Interview

Data about the medical and family history, medication use, education and intoxications (alcohol use and smoking) were collected through a structured interview, in combination with information provided by the study partner (if available), general practitioner and/or medical specialist.

Questionnaires

In Amsterdam, subjects were asked to complete six questionnaires. Activities of daily living (ADL) were evaluated by use of the Katz ADL [67]. Functional health and wellbeing were evaluated by the Short form-12 Health-related Quality of Life (SF-12 HRQoL) questionnaire [68] and by the Cognitive Complaints Index (CCI) [69]. Nutrition was evaluated by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-long version) [70]. Sleep disorders were evaluated by use of the Berlin Questionnaire which identifies the risk of sleep disordered breathing [71]. Cognitive activity during life, such as reading books and playing games, was assessed with the cognitive abilities questionnaire [72]. Subjects with cognitive impairment filled in the questionnaires together with a study partner. The GDS was filled in together with the researcher [66].
In Amsterdam, the study partner was asked to complete five questionnaires: the AD8 (an 8-question test for the study partner to assess mild dementia) [73], the Amsterdam instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL) scale (a study partner based tool aimed at detecting iADL problems in early dementia) [74, 75], the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q, to assess the severity of behavioral symptoms in the subject and the distress these symptoms cause in the study partner) [76], the Mayo Sleep Questionnaire (MSQ, to screen for the presence of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep disorders) [77], and finally the CCI [69].
In Manchester, subjects were asked to complete the SF-12 HRQoL questionnaire [68], the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) [78], the CCI [69] and the cognitive abilities questionnaire [72]. The study partner was asked to complete the AD8 [73], the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) [79] and the CCI [69].

Neuropsychological assessment

The neuropsychological assessment took approximately one and a half hours during which several cognitive domains were tested. Table 4 gives an overview of the different cognitive tests that were administered, which domain they examine and at which site they were performed.
Table 4
Cognitive tests in the EMIF-AD 90+ Study
Cognitive test
Cognitive domain
Site
CERAD 10 words test [115]
 Immediate recall
 Delayed recall after 10 min
Memory
Ba
Logical Memory test [116]
 Immediate recall
 Delayed recall after 20–30 min
Memory
A
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test [117]
 Immediate recall
 Delayed recall after 20 min
Memory
M
Rey Complex Figure Test [118]
 Copy
 Delayed copy after 3 min
Memory
Visuoconstructive skills
B
WAIS-III Digit span forward and backward [119, 120]
Executive functioning
B
Animal (2 min) and Letter fluency (1 min per letterb) [121]
Executive functioning
B
Clock Drawing Testc [122]
Executive functioning
Visuospatial functioning
A
Graded Naming Test [123]
Object-naming ability
B
Trail Making Test A and B [124]
Information processing speed
Visual attention
Task switching
B
WAIS-R Digit Symbol Substitution Test [125]
Perceptual-motor speed
Incidental learning
B
Computerised Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated battery [126]
Paired associate learning
Spatial-working memory
Reaction time
B
National Adult Reading Test [127]
Pre-morbid IQ
B
Visual Association Test [128]
Visuospatial association learning
A
Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised battery [129]
Attention/orientation
Memory
Verbal fluency
Language
Visuospatial abilities
M
A administered only in Amsterdam, B administered in Amsterdam and Manchester, CERAD Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease, M administered only in Manchester, min minute (s), WAIS (−R) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (-Revised)
aIn Manchester only in the cognitively normal subjects. bIn Amsterdam using the letters D, A and T and in Manchester the letters F, A, and S. cThe subject will be asked to draw a clock showing the time “ten after eleven”. In total 14 points can be scored based on the presence and sequencing of the numbers and the positioning of the two hands

Physical examination

In Amsterdam, data on waist and hip circumference (cm), and hand grip strength (kg), as well as a standard neurologic screening examination were recorded during the first home visit. Hand grip strength was measured to estimate muscle strength and was performed with a hand dynamometer (Jamar hand dynamometer; Sammons Preston, Inc., Bolingbrook, IL., USA) [80]. In addition, a ‘Diagnostick’ was used to determine whether the subject had atrial fibrillation by measuring one derivative of an electrocardiogram [81]. At the end of the first home visit, the subject was asked to wear an accelerometer (DynaPort MoveMonitor, McRoberts B.V., The Hague, The Netherlands) for seven days to measure physical activity and sleep quality.
During the hospital visit in Amsterdam, continuous blood pressure measurements were performed non-invasively using a digital photoplethysmogram on the right middle finger (Nexfin®, BMEYE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), resulting in beat-to-beat BP data. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) included balance tests, a 4 m walk to measure walking speed and the chair stand test [82]. Body composition, including the Body Mass Index (BMI), was measured using a Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA; InBody 770; Biospace Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea).
In Manchester, waist and hip circumference (cm), hand grip strength (kg), BMI, resting blood pressure, heart rate, ankle/brachial pressure index [83] and a 4 min walking test were recorded at the clinical research facility.

Sensory system

Measurements of the sensory system were only performed in Amsterdam. With regard to visual functioning, best corrected visual acuity was tested with an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) and refraction data of all subjects were obtained, and all subjects underwent slit lamp examination and indirect fundoscopy. Pupils were dilated using tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 5%. Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (pRNFL) thickness and macular (layer) thickness were measured with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT, Heidelberg Spectralis) using Heidelberg’s build-in software [84]. With enhanced depth imaging, the choroid was imaged and its thickness was (manually) measured. With fundus photography (Topcon TRC 50DX type IA), we acquired digital fundus images (50°). From these, seven Retinal Vascular Parameters (RVPs) were obtained using Singapore I Vessel Assessment (SIVA, version 3.0) [85].
For the auditory function, we used the digits-in-noise (DIN) test [86]. The DIN test is a speech-in-noise test using digit triplets as speech material. The digit triplets are presented against a constant level of stationary background noise. The test uses an adaptive procedure to determine the signal-to-noise ratio at which a listener understands 50% of the digit triplets correctly (i.e. the speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise). Olfactory function was measured using “Sniffin’ Sticks” (Burghart, Wedel, Germany). The test consists of pen-like odor dispensing devices with odors that are considered to be familiar. The smell test in the present study contained the odor identification part of the test [87].

Blood collection and skin biopsy

In both centers, blood samples were collected according to the biobanking pre-analytical Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) of the Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease (BIOMARKAPD) project [88]. Blood samples were collected for DNA and RNA analysis, inflammation markers, proteomics, neurodegenerative markers (amyloid β, tau, neurofilament light), routine blood analysis (i.e. lipids and glucose), vitamin status (B12 and folic acid) and, in Amsterdam only, for Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs). Planned DNA analysis includes Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) analysis of known genetic risk factors for AD or amyloid pathology [8992]. DNA and RNA isolation will be performed by EMIF-AD partners. Remaining samples will be stored for future biomarker identification and validation studies.
In Amsterdam, four millimeter skin biopsies were taken from the inner upper medial arm and will be stained for senescence markers p16, p53 and telomere associated foci.

Cerebrospinal fluid collection

In Amsterdam, up to 20 mL CSF was obtained by lumbar puncture in Sarstedt polypropylene syringes using a Spinocan 25 Gauge needle in one of the intervertebral spaces between L3 and S1. A half mL CSF was immediately processed for leukocyte count, erythrocyte count, glucose, and total protein. The remaining CSF was mixed and centrifuged at 1300–2000 × g at 4 °C for ten minutes. Supernatants were stored in aliquots of 0.25–0.5 mL and frozen within two hours at − 80 °C and stored for future biomarker discovery studies. The processing and storing of CSF was performed according to the BIOMARKAPD SOP [88]. Amyloid β 1–42, total tau and phosphorylated tau 181 will be analyzed in a single batch. Remaining samples will be stored for future biomarker identification and validation studies.

Ultrasound carotid artery

At both sites, a duplex ultrasound scan of the carotid artery was performed. In Amsterdam, the right carotid artery was scanned to assess intima media thickness and distension using ArtLab software [93, 94]. In Manchester, left and right carotid arteries were scanned to determine velocity, vessel thickness, stenosis and plaques, rated according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial guidelines [95].

Brain MRI scan

Subjects underwent locally optimized brain MRI protocols including 3D-T1, fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). MRI scans were performed on Philips 3 T Achieva scanners. Additionally, in Manchester regional cerebral blood flow was measured by arterial spin labelling [96], but no DTI scan was acquired in Manchester. In Amsterdam, if a subject could not undergo the MRI scan, we considered a CT scan (Philips Ingenuity TF or Gemini TF camera). Scans will be analyzed locally and centrally by EMIF-AD partners using the Neugrid infrastructure if applicable (see Additional file 1).

Amyloid PET scan

[18F] Flutemetamol, a specific fibrillary amyloid β radiotracer, was used for the amyloid PET scans. In Amsterdam, [18F] flutemetamol was produced by General Electric (GE) Healthcare at the Cyclotron Research Center of the University of Liège (Liège, Belgium) and PET scans were performed using a Philips Ingenuity TF PET-MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) or, in case of a PET-CT scan, the Philips Ingenuity TF (Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) or Gemini TF scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). In Manchester, [18F] flutemetamol was produced at the Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (WMIC)‘s Good Manufacturing Practice radiochemistry facility using GE Healthcare’s FASTlab and cassettes and PET scans were performed using a High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT; Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN). In both centers, the emission scan was performed in two parts. First a 30 min dynamic emission scan was started simultaneously with a bolus intravenous injection of 185 MBq [18F] flutemetamol. The second part of the scan was performed from 90 to 110 min post injection. In Amsterdam, immediately before each part of the PET scan a T1-weighted gradient echo pulse MRI or low dose CT scan was obtained. This MRI or CT scan was used for attenuation correction of the PET scan. In Manchester, two seven minute transmission scans, one before the first emission scan and the other after the second emission scan, using a 137Cs point source were acquired for subsequent attenuation and scatter correction.
All [18F] flutemetamol scans were read visually as positive or negative. Additionally, we determined time activity curves for each region of interest with cerebellum grey matter as input function [97]. The dynamic data were analyzed on a voxel-by-voxel level using the Simplified Reference Tissue Model 2 (SRTM2) [98, 99]. Finally, we investigated tracer uptake by using a simplified method: the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr, target to grey matter cerebellum SUV over 90–110 min pi) [100]. Variability in acquisition of amyloid PET scans were reduced by harmonizing acquisition protocols and will be reduced by adding it to the analyses as a covariate.

Neurophysiology

In Amsterdam, MEG was performed using a 306 channel whole-head system (Elekta Neuromag Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-state MEG data were recorded with subjects in supine position inside a magnetically shielded room. We will use transformed time series [101] to extract spectral properties (relative band power and peak frequency) [102], and estimates of functional connectivity between brain regions, and metrics that characterize the topology of the functional brain networks [103, 104]. These analyses will be applied using Elekta’s beamformer software, and both in-house developed Matlab tools and BrainWave software (http://​home.​kpn.​nl/​stam7883/​brainwave.​html).

Planned statistical analyses

For each parameter listed in Table 3, we will test with logistic regression models whether it is associated with resilience to cognitive impairment. In addition, linear regression models will be used to associate the same parameters with cognitive functioning in the total sample. Potential additional analyses include the identification of protective factors for abnormal AD biomarkers in the subsample of cognitively normal subjects and the identification of protective factors for cognitive impairment in subjects with a high risk, for example APOE ε4 carriers.

Discussion

We described the design of the EMIF-AD 90+ Study that aims to unravel the factors associated with resilience to cognitive impairment in the oldest-old. An important additional value of the EMIF-AD 90+ Study compared to the previous studies is the extensive phenotyping of subjects, which includes data about cognitive reserve, vascular comorbidities, mood, sleep, sensory system capacity, physical performance and capacity and genetic risk factors. Furthermore, the EMIF-AD 90+ Study is one of the first studies that collects a broad range of markers of neurodegeneration in the oldest-old, including an amyloid PET scan, amyloid β and tau measured in CSF and blood and neurophysiological measures.
The EMIF-AD 90+ is the first study worldwide that combines data regarding the hallmarks of aging with markers of neurodegeneration. The process of aging and the incidence of aMCI and possible or probable AD are very much interrelated. Our study allows to test hypotheses such as that common risk factors and pathways drive both the aging process and development of cognitive impairment or AD. Another strength of the EMIF-AD 90+ study is that we use objective measures wherever possible, instead of using questionnaires. For example, physical activity and sleep quality were measured with an accelerometer in Amsterdam.
To conclude, the results of the EMIF-AD 90+ Study will provide an important contribution to the existing literature in many different ways. It will extend our knowledge on protective factors for cognitive impairment in the oldest-old and will determine how hallmarks of aging and markers of neurodegeneration relate to cognitive impairment in this specific age group.

Acknowledgements

We very much acknowledge all subjects who participated in the EMIF-AD 90+ Study.

Funding

The EMIF-AD 90+ Study was funded by the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking EMIF grant agreement no. 115372. FB is supported by the NIHR UCLH biomedical research centre.

Availability of data and materials

Data collected in the EMIF-AD 90+ Study will be available through the EMIF-AD portal.
The Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Amsterdam UMC approved the study in Amsterdam (reference number: 2015.374) and the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West - Greater Manchester South performed approval of the study in Manchester (reference number: 14/NW/0011). All subjects gave their written informed consent in accordance with the ethical conduct and juridical laws of the Declaration of Helsinki 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013, (www.​wma.​net), and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO).
Not applicable.

Competing interests

PJV is a Section Editor for BMC Geriatrics. None of the other authors reports any conflicts of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivoirard R, Chargari C, Trone J-C, Falk AT, Guy J-B, Eddekaoui H, et al. General management of nonagenarian patients: a review of the literature. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w14059.PubMed Rivoirard R, Chargari C, Trone J-C, Falk AT, Guy J-B, Eddekaoui H, et al. General management of nonagenarian patients: a review of the literature. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w14059.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section. World Population Prospects, the 2012 Revision. Population by Age Groups- Both Sexes. Medium-fertility variant, 2010–2100. n.d. http://esa.un.org/wpp/ExcelData/population.htm (accessed May 11, 2015). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section. World Population Prospects, the 2012 Revision. Population by Age Groups- Both Sexes. Medium-fertility variant, 2010–2100. n.d. http://​esa.​un.​org/​wpp/​ExcelData/​population.​htm (accessed May 11, 2015).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Corrada M, Brookmeyer R, Berlau D, Paganini-Holl A, Kawas C. Prevalence of dementia after age 90 results from the 90+ study. Neurology. 2008;71:337–44.CrossRef Corrada M, Brookmeyer R, Berlau D, Paganini-Holl A, Kawas C. Prevalence of dementia after age 90 results from the 90+ study. Neurology. 2008;71:337–44.CrossRef
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Corrada MM, Berlau DJ, Kawas CH. A population-based clinicopathological study in the oldest-old: the 90+ study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:709–17.CrossRef Corrada MM, Berlau DJ, Kawas CH. A population-based clinicopathological study in the oldest-old: the 90+ study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:709–17.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van Exel E, Gussekloo J, Houx P, de Craen AJM, Macfarlane PW, der Wiel AB, et al. Atherosclerosis and cognitive impairment are linked in the elderly. The Leiden 85-plus study. Atherosclerosis. 2002;165:353–9.CrossRef van Exel E, Gussekloo J, Houx P, de Craen AJM, Macfarlane PW, der Wiel AB, et al. Atherosclerosis and cognitive impairment are linked in the elderly. The Leiden 85-plus study. Atherosclerosis. 2002;165:353–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Skoog I, Nilsson L, Palmertz B, Andreasson L-A, Svanborg A. A population-based study of dementia in 85-years-olds. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:153–8.CrossRef Skoog I, Nilsson L, Palmertz B, Andreasson L-A, Svanborg A. A population-based study of dementia in 85-years-olds. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:153–8.CrossRef
13.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Formiga F, Ferrer A, Chivite D, Pinto X, Badia T, Padros G, et al. Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels correlate well with functional but not with cognitive status in 85-year-old subjects. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16:449–53.CrossRef Formiga F, Ferrer A, Chivite D, Pinto X, Badia T, Padros G, et al. Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels correlate well with functional but not with cognitive status in 85-year-old subjects. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16:449–53.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Formiga F, Ferrer A, Padros G, Corbella X, Cos L, Sinclair AJ, et al. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for functional and cognitive decline in very old people: the Octabaix study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:924–8.CrossRef Formiga F, Ferrer A, Padros G, Corbella X, Cos L, Sinclair AJ, et al. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for functional and cognitive decline in very old people: the Octabaix study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:924–8.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Gildner TE, Liebert MA, Kowal P, Chatterji S, Snodgrass JJ. Associations between Sleep Duration , Sleep Quality , and Cognitive Test Performance among Older Adults from Six Middle Income Countries : Results from the Study on Global. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014;10:613–21.PubMedPubMedCentral Gildner TE, Liebert MA, Kowal P, Chatterji S, Snodgrass JJ. Associations between Sleep Duration , Sleep Quality , and Cognitive Test Performance among Older Adults from Six Middle Income Countries : Results from the Study on Global. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014;10:613–21.PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullain SS, Corrada MM, Perry SM, Kawas CH. Sound body sound mind? Physical performance and the risk of dementia in the oldest-old: the 90+ study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:1408–15.CrossRef Bullain SS, Corrada MM, Perry SM, Kawas CH. Sound body sound mind? Physical performance and the risk of dementia in the oldest-old: the 90+ study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:1408–15.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Bathum L, Christiansen L, Jeune B, Vaupel J, McGue M, Christensen K. Apolipoprotein E genotypes: relationship to cognitive functioning, cognitive decline, and survival in nonagenarians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:654–8.CrossRef Bathum L, Christiansen L, Jeune B, Vaupel J, McGue M, Christensen K. Apolipoprotein E genotypes: relationship to cognitive functioning, cognitive decline, and survival in nonagenarians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:654–8.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Heijmans BT, Slagboom PE, Gussekloo J, Droog S, Lagaay AM, Kluft C, et al. Association of APOE epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 and promoter gene variants with dementia but not cardiovascular mortality in old age. Am J Med Genet. 2002;107:201–8.CrossRef Heijmans BT, Slagboom PE, Gussekloo J, Droog S, Lagaay AM, Kluft C, et al. Association of APOE epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 and promoter gene variants with dementia but not cardiovascular mortality in old age. Am J Med Genet. 2002;107:201–8.CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Juva K, Verkkoniemi A, Viramo P, Polvikoski T, Kainulainen K, Kontula K, et al. Apolipoprotein E, cognitive function, and dementia in a general population aged 85 years and over. Int Psychogeriatrics. 2000;72:379–87.CrossRef Juva K, Verkkoniemi A, Viramo P, Polvikoski T, Kainulainen K, Kontula K, et al. Apolipoprotein E, cognitive function, and dementia in a general population aged 85 years and over. Int Psychogeriatrics. 2000;72:379–87.CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Juva K, Verkkoniemi A, Viramo P, Polvikoski T, Kainulainen K, Kontula K, et al. APOE epsilon4 does not predict mortality, cognitive decline, or dementia in the oldest old. Neurology. 2000;54:412–5.CrossRef Juva K, Verkkoniemi A, Viramo P, Polvikoski T, Kainulainen K, Kontula K, et al. APOE epsilon4 does not predict mortality, cognitive decline, or dementia in the oldest old. Neurology. 2000;54:412–5.CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Schram MT, Euser SM, de Craen AJM, Witteman JC, Frolich M, Hofman A, et al. Systemic markers of inflammation and cognitive decline in old age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:708–16.CrossRef Schram MT, Euser SM, de Craen AJM, Witteman JC, Frolich M, Hofman A, et al. Systemic markers of inflammation and cognitive decline in old age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:708–16.CrossRef
56.
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawas CH, Greenia DE, Bullain SS, Clark CM, Pontecorvo MJ, Joshi AD, et al. Amyloid imaging and cognitive decline in nondemented oldest-old: the 90+ study. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:199–203.CrossRef Kawas CH, Greenia DE, Bullain SS, Clark CM, Pontecorvo MJ, Joshi AD, et al. Amyloid imaging and cognitive decline in nondemented oldest-old: the 90+ study. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:199–203.CrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris J. The clinical dementia rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43:2412–4.CrossRef Morris J. The clinical dementia rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43:2412–4.CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Folstein M, Robins L, Helzer J. The mini-mental state examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40:812.CrossRef Folstein M, Robins L, Helzer J. The mini-mental state examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40:812.CrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the MINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Forse on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-122299.CrossRef McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the MINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Forse on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3233/​JAD-122299.CrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of Adl: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–9.CrossRef Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of Adl: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–9.CrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Jakobsson U. Using the 12-item short form health survey (SF-12) to measure quality of life among older people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007;19:457–64.CrossRef Jakobsson U. Using the 12-item short form health survey (SF-12) to measure quality of life among older people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007;19:457–64.CrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Vellas B, Villars H, Abellan G, Soto ME, Rolland Y, Guigoz Y, et al. Overview of the MNA – It’s history and challenges. J Nutr. 2006;10:456–65. Vellas B, Villars H, Abellan G, Soto ME, Rolland Y, Guigoz Y, et al. Overview of the MNA – It’s history and challenges. J Nutr. 2006;10:456–65.
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Netzer NC, Stoohs RA, Netzer CM, Clark K, Strohl KP. Using the Berlin questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:485–91.CrossRef Netzer NC, Stoohs RA, Netzer CM, Clark K, Strohl KP. Using the Berlin questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:485–91.CrossRef
74.
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Jutten RJ, Peeters CFW, Leijdesdorff SMJ, Visser PJ, Maier AB, Terwee CB, et al. Detecting functional decline from normal aging to dementia: development and validation of a short version of the Amsterdam IADL questionnaire. Alzheimer’s Dement Diagnosis, Assess Dis Monit. 2017;8:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2017.03.002.CrossRef Jutten RJ, Peeters CFW, Leijdesdorff SMJ, Visser PJ, Maier AB, Terwee CB, et al. Detecting functional decline from normal aging to dementia: development and validation of a short version of the Amsterdam IADL questionnaire. Alzheimer’s Dement Diagnosis, Assess Dis Monit. 2017;8:26–35. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​dadm.​2017.​03.​002.CrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:153–62.CrossRef Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:153–62.CrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:556–62.CrossRef Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:556–62.CrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer MA, Hornegger J, Mardin CY, Tornow RP. Retinal nerve fiber layer segmentation on FD-OCT scans of normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Biomed Opt Express. 2010;1:1358–83.CrossRef Mayer MA, Hornegger J, Mardin CY, Tornow RP. Retinal nerve fiber layer segmentation on FD-OCT scans of normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Biomed Opt Express. 2010;1:1358–83.CrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert J-C, Heath S, Even G, Campion D, Sleegers K, Hiltunen M, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1094–9.CrossRef Lambert J-C, Heath S, Even G, Campion D, Sleegers K, Hiltunen M, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1094–9.CrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert J-C, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, Naj AC, Sims R, Bellenguez C, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1452–8.CrossRef Lambert J-C, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, Naj AC, Sims R, Bellenguez C, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1452–8.CrossRef
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW, Taylor LM, Lee RW, Cummings CA, et al. Correlation of north American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70 to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:152–9.CrossRef Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW, Taylor LM, Lee RW, Cummings CA, et al. Correlation of north American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70 to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:152–9.CrossRef
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Y, Carson RE. Noise reduction in the simplified reference tissue model for neuroreceptor functional imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:1440–52.CrossRef Wu Y, Carson RE. Noise reduction in the simplified reference tissue model for neuroreceptor functional imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:1440–52.CrossRef
103.
Zurück zum Zitat de Haan W, van der Flier WM, Koene T, Smits LL, Scheltens P, Stam CJ. Disrupted modular brain dynamics reflect cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2012;59:3085–93.CrossRef de Haan W, van der Flier WM, Koene T, Smits LL, Scheltens P, Stam CJ. Disrupted modular brain dynamics reflect cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2012;59:3085–93.CrossRef
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Stam CJ. Use of magnetoencephalography (MEG) to study functional brain networks in neurodegenerative disorders. J Neurol Sci. 2010;289:128–34.CrossRef Stam CJ. Use of magnetoencephalography (MEG) to study functional brain networks in neurodegenerative disorders. J Neurol Sci. 2010;289:128–34.CrossRef
109.
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Bathum L, von Bornemann HJ, Christiansen L, McGue M, Jeune B, Christensen K. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C>T and methionine synthase 2756A>G mutations: no impact on survival, cognitive functioning, or cognitive decline in nonagenarians. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:196–201.CrossRef Bathum L, von Bornemann HJ, Christiansen L, McGue M, Jeune B, Christensen K. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C>T and methionine synthase 2756A>G mutations: no impact on survival, cognitive functioning, or cognitive decline in nonagenarians. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:196–201.CrossRef
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Myllykangas L, Polvikoski T, Sulkava R, Verkkoniemi A, Tienari P, Niinisto L, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and Alzheimer’s disease: a genetic association study in a population aged 85 or over. Neurosci Lett. 2000;292:195–8.CrossRef Myllykangas L, Polvikoski T, Sulkava R, Verkkoniemi A, Tienari P, Niinisto L, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and Alzheimer’s disease: a genetic association study in a population aged 85 or over. Neurosci Lett. 2000;292:195–8.CrossRef
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Rey A. L’examen clinique en psychologie (the clinical examination in psychology). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1964. Rey A. L’examen clinique en psychologie (the clinical examination in psychology). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1964.
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Cronholm B, Viding G. Digit span as a test of immediate memory. Nord Med. 1956;56:1612–4.PubMed Cronholm B, Viding G. Digit span as a test of immediate memory. Nord Med. 1956;56:1612–4.PubMed
120.
Zurück zum Zitat Wechsler D. The psychological corporation. TX: San Antonia; 1997. Wechsler D. The psychological corporation. TX: San Antonia; 1997.
121.
Zurück zum Zitat Tombaugh T. Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency FAS and animal naming. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1999;14:167–77.PubMed Tombaugh T. Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency FAS and animal naming. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1999;14:167–77.PubMed
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Royall DR, Cordes JA, Polk M. CLOX: an executive clock drawing task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;64:588–94.CrossRef Royall DR, Cordes JA, Polk M. CLOX: an executive clock drawing task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;64:588–94.CrossRef
123.
Zurück zum Zitat McKenna PAT, Warrington EK. Testing for nominal dysphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980;43:781–8.CrossRef McKenna PAT, Warrington EK. Testing for nominal dysphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980;43:781–8.CrossRef
124.
Zurück zum Zitat Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8:271–6.CrossRef Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8:271–6.CrossRef
125.
Zurück zum Zitat Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale - revised manual; 1981. Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale - revised manual; 1981.
126.
Zurück zum Zitat Robbins TW, James M, Owen AM, Sahakian BJ, McInnes L, Rabbitt P. Cambridge neuropsychological test automated battery (CANTAB): a factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia. 1994;5:266–81.PubMed Robbins TW, James M, Owen AM, Sahakian BJ, McInnes L, Rabbitt P. Cambridge neuropsychological test automated battery (CANTAB): a factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia. 1994;5:266–81.PubMed
127.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson HE, O’Connell A. Dementia: the estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the new adult Reading test. Cortex. 1978;14:234–44.CrossRef Nelson HE, O’Connell A. Dementia: the estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the new adult Reading test. Cortex. 1978;14:234–44.CrossRef
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindeboom J, Schmand B, Tulner L, Walstra G, Jonker C. Visual association test to detect early dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:126–33.CrossRef Lindeboom J, Schmand B, Tulner L, Walstra G, Jonker C. Visual association test to detect early dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:126–33.CrossRef
129.
Zurück zum Zitat Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Arnold R, Hodges JR. The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21:1078–85.CrossRef Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Arnold R, Hodges JR. The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21:1078–85.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Resilience to cognitive impairment in the oldest-old: design of the EMIF-AD 90+ study
verfasst von
Nienke Legdeur
Maryam Badissi
Stephen F. Carter
Sophie de Crom
Aleid van de Kreeke
Ralph Vreeswijk
Marijke C. Trappenburg
Mardien L. Oudega
Huiberdina L. Koek
Jos P. van Campen
Carolina J. P. W. Keijsers
Chinenye Amadi
Rainer Hinz
Mark F. Gordon
Gerald Novak
Jana Podhorna
Erik Serné
Frank Verbraak
Maqsood Yaqub
Arjan Hillebrand
Alessandra Griffa
Neil Pendleton
Sophia E. Kramer
Charlotte E. Teunissen
Adriaan Lammertsma
Frederik Barkhof
Bart N. M. van Berckel
Philip Scheltens
Majon Muller
Andrea B. Maier
Karl Herholz
Pieter Jelle Visser
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Geriatrics / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0984-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

BMC Geriatrics 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.