Erschienen in:
01.02.2006 | Original Paper
Results of a Union-based Smoking Cessation Intervention
for Apprentice Iron Workers (United States)
verfasst von:
Elizabeth M. Barbeau, Yi Li, Patricia Calderon, Cathy Hartman, Margaret Quinn, Pia Markkanen, Cora Roelofs, Lindsay Frazier, Charles Levenstein
Erschienen in:
Cancer Causes & Control
|
Ausgabe 1/2006
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Objective Blue-collar workers are more likely to smoke, smoke more heavily, and have less success in quitting compared to white-collar workers, and this occupational gap is growing over time. Effective smoking cessation interventions among blue-collar workers are needed to address growing class-based disparities.
Methods We used a pre–post study design to test feasibility and effect size of a smoking cessation trial in a union apprenticeship training program for iron workers (n=337). The 4-month intervention drew upon a health promotion–health protection model for smoking cessation among blue-collar workers. We conducted pairwise analyses to assess pre–post intervention differences in 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence measured 1 month after intervention was completed. Additional secondary outcomes, including smoking frequency, intensity, intention and self-efficacy to quit, were also assessed.
Results Baseline smoking prevalence was 41%. We observed a 19.4% post-intervention quit rate among baseline smokers. There were statistically significant positive changes pre- and post-intervention in intention to quit smoking, self-efficacy to quit, and a reduction in the number of days smoked. Participation in pro-active intervention components was associated with a three-fold (OR = 3.0, 1.15, 7.83) increase in the likelihood of quitting. Overall, participation in intervention components was low.
Conclusions Labor union apprenticeship programs represent a promising venue for smoking cessation interventions, particularly those that draw upon a health promotion–health protection model.