Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01.12.2019 | Research article

Risk factors for malnutrition among school-aged children: a cross-sectional study in rural Madagascar

verfasst von: Hirotsugu Aiga, Kanae Abe, Vonjy Nirina Andrianome, Emmanuel Randriamampionona, Angèle Razafitompo Razafinombana, Toshiyasu Murai, Masahiro Hara

Erschienen in: BMC Public Health | Ausgabe 1/2019

Abstract

Background

For over 20 years, Madagascar has been challenged by continued high prevalence of stunting, underweight and wasting among children under 5 years of age. Yet, nutritional status of post-under-five age group has never been assessed in the country, despite its importance in relation not only to physical health but also to cognitive capacity and educational achievements of children. This study aims to estimate prevalence of malnutrition among schoolchildren aged 5–14 years in Madagascar. It further attempts to identify the possible risk factors for their malnutrition. This is the first study that estimates prevalence of malnutrition among school-aged children in Madagascar.

Methods

A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in Antananarivo-Avaradrano district, Analamanga region, Madagascar. The study targeted 393 first and second graders 5–14 years of age enrolled at 10 primary schools, where school-feeding was implemented. Data were collected from anthropometric measurements, their subsequent household structured interviews and observations. Bivariate (Chi-square test or Mann-Whitney’s U test) and multivariable (logistic regression) analyses were performed, to identify the possible risk factors associated with malnutrition.

Results

The overall prevalence rates of stunting, underweight and thinness were 34.9%, 36.9% and 11.2%, respectively. Nineteen children (4.8%) suffered from all the three forms of undernutrition. Older schoolchildren had a significantly greater likelihood of being stunted, underweight and thin. The greater number of members a household had, the higher likelihood of being stunted and thin its schoolchild had. Children having lower Household Dietary Diversity Score were more likely to be underweight. Yet, ‘Had lunch at school yesterday’ was associated neither with being stunted nor with being underweight and thin. This implies room for improvement of the current school feeding program.

Conclusions

Prevalence rates of stunting and underweight among 393 children examined were as high as the national averages among children under 5 years of age. Adequate food availability and dietary diversity over a sufficient period (incl. 5–14 years of age) are necessary for increasing likelihood of catch-up in height-for-age and weight-for-age, which are expectable during adolescence. To supplement inadequate household dietary diversity practices, school-feeding program may need to use more animal-protein ingredients.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12889-019-7013-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
HDDS
Household Dietary Diversity Score
JICA
Japan International Cooperation Agency
MDGs
Millennium Development Goals
MoNE
Ministry of National Education
OR
Odds ratio
PNAN III
The third National Nutrition Action Plan
SDGs
Sustainable Development Goals
SUN
Scaling Up Nutrition
WHO
World Health Organization

Background

Nutrition continues to be a key global development agenda under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) after the completion of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) era. Despite a critical need for addressing malnutrition among all populations, the monitoring indicators currently in SDG2 and previously in MDG1 are consistently focused on children under 5 years of age [1, 2]. While admitting children under 5 years of age serve not only as the highest priority sub-population but also as a leading proxy for entire populations in monitoring nations’ nutritional status, it is necessary to capture broader age groups. Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN), a global multisectoral movement on nutrition, addresses malnutrition in a more comprehensive manner, by expanding its target monitoring groups beyond children under 5 years of age (children 13–15 years of age, women 15–49 years of age, and adults ≥18 years of age) [3]. Yet, schoolchildren aged 5–14 years remain excluded from the monitoring frameworks of these major global development agendas as if they were a neglected sub-population. As a result, school-aged children are rarely targeted in nutrition surveys, despite significant impacts of nutritional status on their health, cognition, educational achievements and future economic productivity [4, 5].
Malnutrition among children under 5 years of age has been regularly monitored in all countries since the WHO’s launch of the standard growth chart in 1978 [6]. Yet, it was just 2007 when WHO launched the standard growth chart for children and adolescents aged 5–19 years, by applying prevalence of stunting, underweight, and not wasting but thinness as the malnutrition indicators [7]. The long-term absence of the technical tools for monitoring the three malnutrition dimensions until 2007 might have discouraged researchers from conducting studies on malnutrition among school-aged children. Recently, World Bank started highlighting a need for addressing malnutrition among school-aged children as a foundational investment a country should make, by launching the Human Capital Measurement Project [5]. Thus, a global momentum is being created toward more studies on malnutrition among school-aged children.
For over 20 years, Madagascar has been challenged by consistently higher prevalence of stunting among children under 5 years of age (around 50%) for decades. The latest data (49.2% as of 2016) is the fifth highest in the world [8]. To address the country’s long-lasting high malnutrition prevalence, the Government of Madagascar increasingly focuses on multi-sectoral coordination for greater coverage and impacts of the national nutrition program, by launching the third National Nutrition Action Plan (PNAN III). PNAN III also calls for multisectoral interventions for school-aged children, e.g. community-based deworming, school feeding, household food security, and crop diversification [9]. As a subcomponent policy of PNAN III, National School Feeding and Nutrition Strategy (SNANS) specifies the school-based nutrition interventions. Nevertheless, even basic malnutrition indicators among school-aged children (i.e. prevalence of stunting, underweight, thinness, overweight and obesity) have been neither analyzed nor reported. It is generally difficult for stunted children to catch up during 24–59 months of age [10]. Therefore, the malnutrition status among children under 5 years of age in Madagascar implies the equally high malnutrition prevalence among those ≥5 years of age, due to chronic food insecurity and inadequate feeding practices in the country [11].
In view of unknown but presumably higher malnutrition among school-aged children, the Malagasy Ministry of National Education (MoNE), in collaboration with Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), has been committed to strengthening the community-based school feeding program, by developing and piloting its effective and sustainable model. Basic framework of the program defines community-based school feeding as regular provision of meals on school days using locally either produced, procured or donated food items through a school management committee. This study provides the program with the baseline data which not only inform its detailed design but also will be compared with end-line data in the future.
This study is aimed at estimating malnutrition prevalence among children enrolled in rural public primary schools in Madagascar, where school-feeding is implemented, as the pre-intervention baseline data. It further attempts to identify the possible risk factors for malnutrition among them. This study is expected to contribute to informing the design of the community-based school feeding program, by making evidence-based recommendations on it.

Methods

A cross-sectional household survey was conducted, to estimate malnutrition prevalence (i.e. stunting, underweight, thinness, overweight and obesity) among school-aged children in Antananarivo-Avaradrano district, Analamanga region, Madagascar. Note that stunting and underweight among children 5–19 years of age are defined in the same manner as those among children under 5 years of age (i.e. by employing z-scores for height-for-age and weight-for-age). Yet, thinness among children 5–19 years of age is differently defined from wasting among children under 5 years of age, though both are aimed at measuring acute malnutrition in common. Thinness is defined as those having a z-score < − 2 for BMI-for-age, while wasting is defined as those having a z-score < − 2 for weight-for-height [7]. Moreover, overweight and obesity among children 5–19 years of age are defined as those having z-scores > 1 and > 2 respectively for BMI-for-age, while definitions of overweight and obesity among children under 5 years of age are based on z-scores for weight-for-height.

Study area

Antananarivo-Avaradrano district is a typical mountainous area located in central inland Madagascar, where temperature is relatively stable all year around (minimum 10 °C - maximum 27 °C). Eighty-one percent of population of the district live in rural area. Average household size is 4.9 members per household and the proportion of male-headed households is 80.1% [12]. Locally produced food crops include rice, cassava, maize, sweet potato, beans and potatoes, accounting for more than 95% of cultivated areas [13].

Study group

It was reported to the MoNE that local-food-based school feeding was implemented at approximately 50 public primary schools in Antananarivo-Avaradrano district. Through conducting document reviews and its subsequent systematic school visits, it was confirmed that 10 of them were actually implementing local-food-based school feeding (yet only on a very limited scale) as of August 2017, i.e. Ambohimarina, Ambohitrarahaba, Ambohitsoa, Ambovona, Ankadinandriana, Isahafa, Ikianja, Soavinandriamanitra, Tsarahasina, and Viliahazo primary schools. Therefore, all 10 primary schools were targeted in the study. The other 40 primary schools were not implementing school feeding, primarily due to relatively poorer schools’ commitments. Of all children enrolled in the 10 schools, exclusively first and second graders were targeted in this study, for the three reasons. First, targeting first and second graders would help minimize the number of dropouts in the post-intervention survey. This is because they will be more contactable at the time of post-intervention survey to be conducted 4–5 years after strengthening local-food-based school feeding starts. They are likely to stay enrolled in the same schools without going on to secondary schools or getting a job elsewhere. Second, a majority of first and second graders have just entered post-under-five age group, in which the likelihood of recovering from stunting might be expected [14, 15]. Third, as AnthroPlus, a WHO’s software, allows z-scores for weight-for-age to be calculated only for children up to 120.8 months of age [16], first and second graders who are overall younger than that age should be targeted.

Sample size and sampling methods

Prevalence of malnutrition (i.e. stunting, underweight, thinness, overweight and obesity) among school-aged children was previously reported neither from Antananarivo-Avaradrano district nor from any other parts of Madagascar. National prevalence of stunting among children under 5 years of age has been around 50% for decades [8]. Therefore, we assumed that the prevalence among first and second graders could be 50%, under which sample size becomes the greatest (i.e. sufficient sample size also for estimating prevalence rates of underweight, thinness, overweight and obesity). To estimate prevalence representative of children 5–14 years of age enrolled in public primary schools implementing local-food-based school feeding in Antananarivo-Avaradrano district, the sample size was calculated with α (error) = 0.05 and d (precision) = 0.05. Thus, 384 school-aged children were determined as the required sample size. Assuming 5% of non-response rate [17], 404 children were employed as the final sample size. To ensure equal representativity of children in each stratum (school, grade and sex), probability-proportional-to-size sampling was applied (Table 1) [7, 8, 1820]. A total of 404 first and second graders were randomly selected from the respective strata, using student registries of the 10 primary schools.
Table 1
Prevalence of malnutrition among schoolchildren 5–14 years of age
Primary school
N
Stuntinga
n = 393
Underweightb
n = 382
Thinnessc
N = 393
Overweightd
N = 393
Obsesitye
N = 393
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
Ambohimarina
25
9
36.0
7
30.4
2
8.0
1
4.0
0
0.0
Ambohitrarahaba
106
33
31.1
36
34.6
10
9.4
1
0.9
0
0.0
Ambohitsoa
38
11
28.9
10
27.8
3
7.9
0
0.0
0
0.0
Ambovona
9
5
55.6
5
55.6
3
33.3
1
11.1
0
0.0
Ankadinandriana
21
10
47.6
9
42.9
1
4.5
0
0.0
0
0.0
Isahafa
45
12
26.7
14
31.8
2
4.4
1
2.2
0
0.0
Ikianja
31
13
41.9
12
41.4
5
16.1
0
0.0
0
0.0
Soavinandriamanitra
35
14
40.0
15
45.5
5
14.3
0
0.0
0
0.0
Tsarahasina
50
18
36.0
20
40.0
5
10.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
Viliahazo
33
12
36.4
17
51.5
8
24.2
0
0.0
0
0.0
Total
393
137
34.9
145
36.9
44
11.2
4
1.0
0
0.0
95% CI: 30.4–39.7
95% CI: 32.2–41.9
95% CI: 8.5–14.7
95% CI: 0.4–2.6
95% CI: 0.0–1.0
National prevalence among children under 5 years of age
49.2f
36.0g
(n.a.)h
6.2i
(n.a.)h
aZ-score for height-for-age < −2 [7]
bZ-score for weight-for-age < −2 [7]. As WHO’s growth reference does not cover children 121 months of age and older, 11 children categorized into the age group were excluded from estimation of prevalence of underweight [18]
cZ-score for BMI-for-age < − 2 [7]
d2 > Z-score for BMI-for-age > 1 [7]
eZ-score for BMI-for-age > 2 [7]
fNationally representative prevalence among children under 5 years of age as of 2015 (IFPRI, 2016) [8]
gNationally representative prevalence among children under 5 years of age as of 2008–2012 (UNICEF, 2018) [19]
hThinness and obesity are not internationally employed as malnutrition indicators for children under 5 years of age
iNationally representative prevalence among children under 5 years of age as of 2004 (World Bank, 2018) [20]

Data collection

Anthropometric measurements of sampled first and second graders and structured interviews with their parents were conducted during the period from 20 November to 11 December 2017, early rainy season in Madagascar. Weight and height of children were measured in classrooms of their primary schools by enumerators. Weight measurements were undertaken to the nearest 0.1 kg using the electronic scale for mother/child 150kg x 100g (UNICEF reference model: S0141021). Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm, using the UNICEF standard height scale. To precisely calculate age of children, their dates of birth were collected from student registries. Data of food items used for lunch served at schools on the previous day were collected from school feeding program records at each primary school.
Subsequently to data collection at schools, children’s households were visited to collect data of background variables for malnutrition. A total of 21 background variables were employed to examine their associations with malnutrition among school-aged children (Tables 2 and 3). These background variables were selected primarily from those representing three categories of underlying causes of childhood undernutrition (i.e. household food insecurity, inadequate caring and feeding practices, and unhealthy living environment) [2123]. The questions on those background variables were included in the structured questionnaire (see Additional file 1). Of them, the data on types of drinking water source, types of toilet, presence of soap/ash for handwashing, food storage, and utensil maintenance were collected through enumerators’ observations. The data on other variables were collected through interviews with parents and other household members responsible for food preparation (incl. Children’s food consumption data based on 24-h dietary recall). Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) was further calculated by summing up the number of food groups consumed by the children during last 24 h [21]. Dietary diversity is a qualitative measure of food consumption that reflects household’s access to a variety of foods, and serves as a proxy for both macro- and micro-nutrient adequacy of the diet of individuals [21]. School feeding can not only complement inadequate household dietary diversity by providing children with food items not being often consumed at their households, but also trigger households’ dietary behavior changes [24].
Table 2
Bivariate analyses between schoolchildren’s malnutrition and its categorical background variables
Background variable
Stunting (N = 393)
Underweight (N = 382)
Thinness (N = 393)
(+) Stunted
(−) Not stunted
P-value a
(+) Under-weight
(−) Not underweight
P-valuea
(+) Thin
(−) Not thin
P-valuea
n
(%)
N
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
v1: Sex
 Male
75
54.7
135
52.7
0.751
83
57.2
121
51.1
0.247
25
56.8
185
53.0
0.749
 Female
62
45.3
121
47.3
 
62
42.8
116
48.9
 
19
43.2
164
47.0
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
v2: Diarrhea during last 14 days
 With diarrhea
4
2.9
8
3.1
1.000
5
3.4
7
3.0
0.771
2
4.5
10
2.9
0.632
 Without diarrhea
133
97.1
252
96.9
 
140
96.6
230
97.0
 
42
95.5
339
97.1
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
v3: Took deworming tables at school
 Took
53
38.7
99
38.7
1.000
63
43.2
85
35.9
0.160
16
36.4
136
39.0
0.870
 Did not take
84
61.3
157
61.3
 
82
56.8
152
64.1
 
28
63.6
213
61.0
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
Major income sources
 Daily job
46
33.6
93
36.7
Ref.
44
30.3
90
37.9
Ref.
16
36.4
122
35.7
Ref.
 v4: Agriculture or crop sales
35
25.5
83
32.4
0.137
42
29.0
73
30.8
0.731
10
22.7
110
30.9
0.299
 v5: Seller, trader or commercial business
23
16.8
22
8.6
0.020*
26
17.9
18
7.6
0.003**
7
15.9
38
10.9
0.317
 v6: Skilled wage labor
9
6.6
19
7.4
0.839
9
6.2
19
8.0
0.551
0
0.0
28
8.0
0.058
 v7: Unskilled wage labor
12
8.8
14
5.5
0.286
11
7.6
15
6.3
0.687
5
11.4
21
6.0
0.193
 v8: Small-scale industry or handicraft
8
5.8
18
6.6
0.831
8
5.5
16
6.8
0.671
5
11.4
20
5.7
0.180
 v9: Livestock or animal sales
1
0.7
4
1.6
0.662
2
1.4
3
1.3
1.000
0
0.0
5
1.4
1.000
 v10: Others
3
2.2
3
1.2
0.424
3
2.1
3
1.3
0.678
1
2.3
5
1.4
0.512
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
v11: Land ownership
 Own land for housing or farming
101
73.7
207
80.9
0.123
111
76.6
188
79.3
0.526
33
75.0
275
78.8
0.562
 Don’t own land for housing or farming
36
26.3
49
19.1
 
34
23.4
49
20.7
 
11
25.0
75
21.2
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
Education attainment of household member responsible for food preparation
 v12: Never gone to school
6
4.4
9
3.5
0.783
6
4.1
9
3.8
1.000
0
0.0
15
4.3
0.392
     Dropped out from primary school
72
52.5
112
44.1
Ref.
70
48.3
107
45.2
Ref.
22
50.0
163
46.7
Ref.
 v13: Primary school
49
35.8
100
39.1
0.586
59
40.7
88
37.1
0.516
16
36.4
133
38.1
0.870
 v14: Secondary school
8
5.8
29
11.3
0.102
10
6.9
26
11.0
0.210
6
13.6
31
8.9
0.282
 v15: High school
2
1.5
4
1.6
1.000
0
0.0
6
2.5
0.087
0
0.0
6
1.7
1.000
 v16: University or other higher education
0
0.0
2
0.4
1.000
0
0.0
1
0.4
1.000
0
0.0
1
0.3
1.000
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
v17: Type of source of water
 Improved type of source of water b
61
44.5
109
42.6
0.749
57
39.3
107
45.1
0.288
19
43.2
151
43.3
1.000
 Not improved type of source of water c
76
55.5
147
57.4
 
88
60.7
130
54.9
 
25
56.8
198
56.7
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
v18: Type of sanitation facility
 Improved type of sanitation facility d
7
5.1
16
6.3
0.622
7
4.8
16
6.8
0.512
3
6.8
20
5.7
0.733
 Not improved type of sanitation facility e
132
94.9
240
93.8
 
138
95.2
221
93.2
 
41
93.2
329
94.3
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
v19: Hand-washing after toilet of household member responsible for food preparation
 Wash hands after toilet
36
26.3
76
29.7
0.558
40
27.6
71
30.0
0.644
17
38.6
95
27.2
0.155
 Don’t wash hands after toilet
101
73.7
180
70.3
 
105
72.4
166
70.0
 
27
61.4
254
72.8
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
v20: Hand-washing before cooking of household member responsible for food preparation
 Wash hands before cooking
33
24.1
66
25.8
0.807
37
25.5
61
25.7
1.000
14
31.8
85
24.4
0.275
 Don’t wash hands before cooking
104
75.9
190
74.2
 
108
74.5
176
74.3
 
30
68.2
264
75.6
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
v21: Hand-washing before eating
 Wash hands before cooking
33
24.1
70
27.3
0.548
36
24.8
66
27.8
0.553
14
31.8
89
25.5
0.367
 Don’t wash hands before cooking
104
75.9
186
72.7
 
109
75.2
171
72.2
 
30
68.2
260
74.5
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
Rice storage
     Plastic/metal container with cover
40
29.2
106
41.3
Ref.
40
27.5
104
43.9
Ref.
13
29.5
133
38.1
Ref.
 v22: Plastic/metal container without cover
1
0.7
8
3.1
0.171
3
2.1
5
2.1
1.000
1
2.3
8
2.3
1.000
 v23: 50 kg rice bag
32
23.4
45
17.6
0.183
28
19.3
46
19.4
1.000
9
20.5
68
19.5
0.842
 v24: Handbasket bag
35
25.5
48
18.8
0.121
38
26.2
42
17.7
0.053
13
29.5
70
20.1
0.169
 v25: Plastic bag
19
13.9
24
9.4
0.179
23
15.9
20
8.4
0.030*
5
11.4
38
10.9
1.000
 v26: None (buy rice only for the day)
9
6.6
22
8.6
0.599
12
8.3
17
7.2
0.695
3
6.8
28
8.0
1.000
 v27: Others
1
0.7
3
1.2
1.000
1
0.7
3
1.3
1.000
0
0.0
4
1.1
1.000
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
Utensil maintenance
 v28: In cabinet after cleaning
23
16.8
45
17.6
0.889
23
15.9
44
18.6
0.580
7
15.9
61
17.5
1.000
     In open-space after cleaning
69
50.4
123
48.0
Ref.
74
51.0
111
46.8
Ref.
25
56.8
167
47.9
Ref.
 v29: Covered with cloth after cleaning
28
20.4
47
18.4
0.686
29
20.0
43
18.1
0.684
10
22.7
65
18.6
0.542
 v30: In open-space without cleaning
17
12.4
41
16.0
0.373
19
13.1
39
16.5
0.463
2
4.5
56
16.0
0.042*
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
Meals taken yesterday
     Breakfast, lunch and dinner/supper
135
98.6
254
99.2
Ref.
144
99.3
234
98.8
Ref.
44
100
345
98.8
Ref.
 v31: Breakfast and lunch
1
0.7
0
0.0
0.349
1
0.7
0
0.0
0.380
0
0.0
1
0.3
1.000
 v32: Lunch and dinner/supper
1
0.7
0
0.0
0.349
0
0.0
1
0.4
1.000
0
0.0
1
0.3
1.000
 v33: Only breakfast
0
0.0
2
0.8
0.545
0
0.0
2
0.8
0.528
0
0.0
2
0.6
1.000
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
v34: Yesterday’s lunch at school
 Had lunch through school feeding program
25
18.2
47
18.4
1.000
24
16.6
47
19.8
0.498
7
15.9
65
18.6
0.836
 Did not have lunch at school
113
81.8
209
81.6
 
121
83.4
190
80.2
 
37
84.1
284
81.4
 
 Total
137
100
256
100
 
145
100
237
100
 
44
100
349
100
 
Food consumption during last 24 hf
 v35: Cereal
137
100
256
100
(n.a.)
145
100
237
100
(n.a.)
44
100
349
100
(n.a.)
 v36: White tubers and roots
57
41.6
97
37.9
0.516
59
40.7
92
38.8
0.747
135
38.7
19
43.2
0.624
 v37: Vegetables
130
94.9
246
96.1
0.608
136
93.8
229
96.6
0.209
41
93.2
335
96.0
0.421
 v38: Fruits
13
9.5
22
8.6
0.853
14
9.7
20
8.4
0.713
4
9.1
31
3.9
1.000
 v39: Meats
38
27.7
82
32.0
0.422
33
22.8
82
34.6
0.016*
106
30.4
14
31.8
0.863
 v40: Eggs
10
7.3
34
13.3
0.093
32
13.5
11
7.6
0.095
41
11.7
3
6.8
0.450
 v41: Fish and other seafood
27
19.7
54
21.1
0.795
26
17.9
54
22.8
0.300
6
13.6
75
21.5
0.322
 v42: Legumes, nuts and seeds
59
43.1
109
42.6
1.000
63
43.4
100
42.2
0.832
20
45.5
148
42.4
0.748
 v43: Milk and milk products
10
7.3
37
14.5
0.041*
11
7.6
36
15.2
0.036*
5
11.4
42
12.0
1.000
 v44: Oils and fats
134
97.8
247
96.5
0.554
141
97.2
229
96.6
1.000
43
97.7
338
96.8
1.000
 v45: Sweets
83
60.6
184
71.9
0.024*
93
64.1
168
70.9
0.176
28
63.6
239
68.5
0.499
 v46: Spices, condiments and beverage
135
98.5
256
100
0.121
143
98.6
237
100
0.143
44
100
347
99.4
1.000
*P < 0.05
** P < 0.01
aChi-square test
bImproved types of source of water include: (i) piped household water connection; (ii) public standpipe; (iii) protected well/borehole; (iv) Protected spring; and (v) rainwater collection
cNot improved types of source of water include: (i) unprotected well; (ii) unprotected spring; (iii) surface water (river, lake, reservoir, dam, canal, irrigation channel); (iv) vendor-provided water (cart, tanker truck); and (v) bottled water
dImproved types of toilet include: (i) flush connected to sewerage system (ii) flush connected to a septic tank; (iii) toilet connected to a pit; (iv) improved ventilated latrine; and (v) latrines with slab
eNot improved types of toilet include: (i) flush toilet not connected to sewerage/pit; (ii) latrines without slab/open pit; (iii) bucket; (vi) joint installation with other households (public toilet); and (viii) Outdoor defecation (field, forest, bush and river)
fTwelve categories of foods are based on food groups for calculating Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [21]
Table 3
Bivariate analyses between schoolchildren’s malnutrition and its interval/ratio background variables
Background variable
Stunting (N = 393)
Underweight (N = 382)
Thinness (N = 393)
(+) Stunted
(−) Not stunted
P-valuea
(+) Under-weight
(−) Not underweight
P-valuea
(+) Thin
(−) Not thin
P-valuea
Mean
s.d.
Mean
s.d.
Mean
s.d.
Mean
s.d.
Mean
s.d.
Mean
s.d.
v47: Age [year]
7.6
1.65
7.0
1.05
< 0.001**
7.4
1.12
6.8
0.99
< 0.001**
7.9
1.95
7.1
1.20
0.004**
v48: Total number of household members [person]
5.9
1.82
5.2
1.65
< 0.001**
5.8
1.73
5.2
1.66
< 0.001**
6.3
2.03
5.3
1.67
0.002**
v48: Access to source of water by foot [min] b
3.3
3.32
3.7
3.28
0.163
3.4
3.41
3.7
3.28
0.205
3.6
2.68
3.6
3.37
0.454
v50: Access to the nearest health facility [min]
34.6
14.3
35.9
19.9
0.485
35.6
16.3
35.1
18.7
0.278
39.1
18.4
35.0
18.1
0.173
v51: Household dietary diversity score (HDDS) [pt] c
6.1
1.42
6.3
1.27
0.066
6.0
1.35
6.4
1.29
0.021*
6.2
1.49
6.3
1.31
0.851
*P < 0.05
**P < 0.01
aMann-Whitney U test
bThe number of minutes spent reaching a water source was measured by allowing an enumerator to walk
cHousehold Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) is the score ranging from 0 (min) to 12 (max), which is calculated by summing up the number of food groups consumed during previous day (24 h) [21]
Interviews were undertaken by asking the questions in Malagasy, the local language of Madagascar. Two repeated household visits were made, when parents and other household members were absent. The questionnaire was completed by the enumerator during an interview, and later field-checked. Eighteen locally recruited skilled enumerators were trained on anthropometric measurement, interviewing and observation, and supervised by four field team leaders.

Data analysis

The data obtained through household interviews, observations and anthropometric measurements were entered into a microcomputer. By using AnthroPlus (WHO, Geneva) [16] and R for Mac OS X version 3.2.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna) [25], z-scores for height-for-age, weight-for-age and BMI-for-age were calculated based on the WHO standard reference population 5–19 years of age [7, 18]. In Madagascar, children under 5 years of age are sometimes enrolled in first or second graders due to the country’s flexible and less enforced age requirements for primary education enrollment. Those aged under 5 years of age were excluded from the analysis, since they are out of the scope of this study. The statistical analyses other than z-score calculations were conducted, by using SPSS for Windows, version 22 (IBM/SPSS Inc., Chicago) [26].
Both bivariate and multivariable analyses were undertaken to identify the background variables (independent variables) associated with whether being malnourished (dependent variable). While the dependent variables are dichotomous, the independent variables are composed of interval/ratio variables and categorical variables. Therefore, two types of bivariate analyses were employed. First, the associations between 16 categorical variables and whether being malnourished were examined, using Chi-square test. For five categorical variables composed of three or more categories (‘Major income sources’, ‘Education attainment of household member responsible for food preparation’, ‘Rice storage’, ‘Utensil maintenance’, and ‘Meals taken yesterday’), dummy variables were created. As a result, 46 categorical variables were created (incl. 24 dummy variables). The category with the greatest frequency was designated as the reference for the dummy variables. Second, the associations between five interval/ratio variables and whether being malnourished were examined, using a non-parametric method (Mann-Whitney’s U test), as data of those variables were expected not to be normally distributed. Thus, a total of 51 background variables (= 46 categorical + 5 interval/ratio variables) were employed.
The background variables significantly associated with being malnourished (P <  0.05 in Chi-square test or Mann-Whitney’s U test) were selected as the possible independent variables for multivariable analyses. Prior to applying them to multivariable analyses, multicollinearity between those possible independent variables was examined by assessing variance inflation factor (VIF). Only those with VIF < 10 were selected as the independent variables for multivariable analyses. As the dependent variables were dichotomous (e.g. stunted or not stunted, underweight or not underweight, and thin or not thin), binominal logistic regression was conducted as the multivariable analyses to control potential confounding variables.

Ethical consideration

The study protocol was submitted to the National Committee for Biomedical Research Ethics, the Malagasy Ministry of Health, for its ethical clearance. Yet, the Committee officially approved the study protocol by exempting it from an ethical clearance process, due to low level invasiveness of the study design (Exemption letter No. 52).
It was found that all the first and second graders at the target 10 primary schools were under 16 years of age, by reviewing the student registries. Therefore, an advanced informed consent to participate in both anthropometric measurements and structured household interviews was obtained in written form from the parents of each sampled schoolchild through teaching staff of the primary schools. In addition, a verbal informed consent to participate in the study was further obtained from the parents or other household members responsible for food preparation upon a household visit, in case they change their minds.

Results

Of 404 children sampled, five were dropped due to parental refusal or absence at their households despite successful contacts with children at schools. It was found that six of 399 children were under 5 years of age. Thus, those six children were excluded from the analysis. As a result, data collected from 393 children and their household members were analyzed. WHO growth reference does not cover children older than 120.8 months of age in z-score calculation for weight-for-age. Therefore, 11 children categorized into the age group were excluded from estimation of prevalence of underweight [16].
The overall prevalence rates of stunting, underweight and thinness were 34.9% [95% CI: 30.4–39.7%], 36.9% [95% CI: 32.2–41.9%] and 11.2% [95% CI: 8.5–14.7%], respectively (Table 1 [7, 8, 1820] and Fig. 1). Of 393 children assessed in this study, 123 (31.2%) suffered from multiple forms of malnutrition (Fig. 2). Note that 19 children (4.8%) suffered from all three forms of undernutrition. Prevalence rates of overweight and obesity were 1.0% [95% CI: 0.4–2.6%] and 0% [95% CI: 0.0–1.0%], respectively. Thus, overnutrition among school-aged children in Antananarivo-Avaradrano district need not be addressed as a major public health issue. For this reason, further analyses were conducted only for stunting, underweight and thinness in search for their possible risk factors.
The background variables were compared between stunted and not stunted children, between underweight and not underweight children, and between thin and not thin children. Of 51 background variables, five produced significant associations (P <  0.05) with whether being stunted in bivariate analyses (Tables 2 and 3). Similarly, seven and three background variables produced significant associations (P < 0.05) with whether being underweight and with whether being thin, respectively. Moreover, multicollinearity was not confirmed, as only VIF < 10 was detected among them. Therefore, all these background variables with significant associations were employed as the independent variables for logistic regressions.
The results of logistic regressions are shown in Table 4. In the logistic regression on being stunted, four of five independent variables produced significant adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (P < 0.05), i.e. ‘Seller, trader or commercial business’, ‘Sweets’, ‘Age’, and ‘Total number of household members’. In the logistic regression on being underweight, four of seven independent variables produced significant adjusted ORs (P < 0.05), i.e. ‘Seller, trader or commercial business’, ‘Age’, ‘Total number of household members’, and ‘Household dietary diversity score ’. In the logistic regression on being thin, two of three independent variables produced significant ORs (P < 0.05), i.e. ‘Age’ and ‘Total number of household members’.
Table 4
Logistic regressions on being malnourished with background variables
Logistic regression model
Adjusted OR
95% CI
P-value
Logistic regression on being stunteda
 v5: Seller, trader or commercial business (dummy variable for ‘Major income sources’)
2.173
1.120–4.219
0.022*
 v43: Milk and milk products (dummy variable for ‘Food consumption during last 24 h’)
0.671
0.309–1.458
0.313
 v45: Sweets (dummy variable for ‘Food consumption during last 24 h’)
0.616
0.382–0.994
0.047*
 v47: Age [year]
1.392
1.164–1.664
< 0.001**
 v48: Total number of household members [person]
1.172
1.031–1.333
0.015*
Logistic regression on being underweightb
 v5: Seller, trader or commercial business (dummy variable for ‘Major income sources’)
2.654
1.339–5.261
0.005**
 v25: Plastic bag (dummy variable for ‘Rice storage’)
1.923
0.962–3.844
0.064
 v39: Meats (dummy variable for ‘Food consumption during last 24 h’)
0.711
0.410–1.233
0.224
 v43: Milk and milk products (dummy variable for ‘Food consumption during last 24 h’)
0.725
0.321–1.634
0.437
 v47: Age [year]
1.474
1.189–1.827
<  0.001**
 v48: Total number of household members [person]
1.189
1.043–1.356
0.010*
 v51: Household dietary diversity score (HDDS) [pt]
0.832
0.701–0.993
0.043*
Logistic regression on being thinc
 v30: In open-space without cleaning (dummy variable for ‘Utensil maintenance’)
0.298
0.069–1.284
0.104
 v47: Age [year]
1.348
1.092–1.663
0.005**
 v48: Total number of household members [person]
1.240
1.038–1.481
0.018*
*P < 0.05
**P < 0.01
aThe dichotomous independent variable (i.e. stunted or not stunted)
bThe dichotomous independent variable (i.e. underweight or not underweight)
cThe dichotomous independent variable (i.e. thin or not thin)

Discussion

Prevalence of stunting among children aged 5–14 years (34.9%) was lower than national prevalence of stunting among children under 5years of age (49.2%) [8]. Its data as of 2008–2016, during which the children assessed in this study used to be under 5 years of age, were consistently around 50%, too [18]. Yet, the data specific to Antananarivo-Avaradrano district as of 2008–2016 is not available. We should assume that prevalence of stunting during their under-five childhood was at the same level as the current figure, as catch-up in height-for-age during 24–59 months of age is generally unexpectable [10, 14].
Prevalence of underweight among children aged 5–14 years (36.9%) was at the same level as national prevalence of underweight among children under 5 years of age (36.0%). Prevalence of thinness among children (11.2%) was lower than those of stunting and underweight. Absence of national and provincial prevalence of thinness makes it difficult to compare this result with others. This is because prevalence of thinness has never been reported from Madagascar. Prevalence of thinness is a malnutrition indicator applicable exclusively for 5–19 years of age. Therefore, the indicator is rarely assessed. Note that a majority of nutrition surveys target not school-aged children and older age groups but exclusively children under 5 years of age and their mothers. It is not surprising to learn that the relatively new indicator is generally not attractive enough for health ministries to monitor its data, as it has not been employed as an indicator for global agenda such as SDGs [1].
Age’ produced significant ORs > 1 (P < 0.05) in all three logistic regression models for stunting, underweight and thinness (Table 4). This is consistent with the increase in prevalence of stunting, underweight and thinness according to age (Fig. 3). Earlier studies reported that z-score of height-for-age either remains low or even further drops during the period from two to 14 years of age in low- and middle-income countries. It is only adolescence (i.e. 14–20 years of age) when catch-up in height-for-age could occur after the initial 2 years of life [10, 14]. Since there remain 4–5 years for the current first and second graders to enter that age group, impact of strengthening school feeding on height-for-age might not be observable during their primary education enrollments. Nevertheless, adequate food availability and dietary diversity over a sufficient period time including primary education period should be ensured [10, 14]. Thus, strengthening of school feeding will be an essential investment and its evaluation should be conducted not prematurely in a few years but at an appropriate time, i.e. when and/or after first and second graders complete primary education. To increase the likelihood of post-under-two catch-up in both height-for-age and weight-for-age, childhood gastrointestinal infections [14] (schistosomiasis in particular) [2729] should be adequately prevented and controlled. Madagascar has the world’s fifth highest prevalence of schistosomiasis (52.1% as of 2010) [30]. WHO recommends that all school-aged children be treated by mass praziquantel administration once a year in schistosomiasis high endemic countries with prevalence > 50% [31] such as Madagascar. Though 152 of 399 children (38.1%) assessed in this study underwent school-based deworming, their prevalence of all three forms of undernutrition was not significantly different from those not having undergone it (Table 2). Irregular and sporadic implementations of school-based deworming program might have made deworming less effective. Of 10 primary schools visited, eight implemented deworming interventions before. Yet, at three of eight primary schools, more than 3 years have passed since the last deworming implementation.
Also, ‘Total number of household members’ produced significant ORs > 1 (P < 0.05) in logistic regression models for stunting, underweight, and thinness (Table 4). This indicates that, the greater number of members a household has, the higher likelihood of being stunted, underweight and thin its schoolchild has. There are two possible reasons for this. First, per-capita food availability at larger households should become smaller. Members of larger households naturally can access and consume a less amount of foods than those of small households, when comparing households at the same income level. In addition, the average number of household members in the lowest quintile income group is the greatest of all quintile income groups, in Madagascar [32]. This synchronously makes it difficult for larger households to ensure per-capita food availability. Second, Malagasy households generally tends to allocate a less amount of foods inadequately meeting age-specific energy requirement to young and older children [33]. Thus, nutritional deficiencies among schoolchildren in this study might be more severe than among their parents. Having assumed this, school-feeding should play a key role as the critical nutrient source supplementary to children’s inadequate diet at household level derived from inappropriate intrahousehold food distribution.
Household dietary diversity score (HDDS)’ produced significant OR < 1 (P < 0.05) in the logistic regression model for underweight (Table 4). This indicates that children consuming a fewer number of food groups are likely to be underweight. Inadequate intake of animal-based protein ingredients (‘Meats’, ‘Milk and milk products’) were significantly associated with being stunted and underweight (P < 0.05) in bivariate analyses (Table 2), though these variables did not produce significant OR (P < 0.05) (Table 4). This may imply that there might be a need for improvement of dietary diversity through using particularly animal-based protein ingredients for school meals. Those having ‘had lunch through school feeding program’ on the previous day of anthropometric measurements had significantly greater HDDS than those not having (P < 0.05: Mann-Whitney U test). Yet, its mean difference between the two groups was only 1.12 (=7.17–6.05). In fact, ‘had lunch through school feeding program’ was not associated with being stunted, underweight and thin. These support a need for improvement in school feeding program by increasing the number of food groups in school meals.
This study has limitations in accuracy in schoolchildren’s individual dietary data, as parental 24-h diet recalls and school feeding program records were sources of the data. Yet, monotonous dietary pattern in rural Malagasy households is generally likely to ensure a certain generalizability of 24-h dietary not only over a period of time but also to all household members. Note that parents of 384 children in this study (97.7%) stated that dietary pattern of last 4 days remained the same. Moreover, earlier studies found that parents are reliable reporters at least of their children’s in-home dietary intake [34].

Conclusions

Prevalence rates of stunting and underweight among 5–14 years of age were as high as those among children under 5 years of age. Difference in the definitions between thinness among children 5–14 years of age and wasting among children under 5 years of age makes it difficult to compare their prevalence rates.
Age’ and ‘Total number of household members’ were identified as the common possible risk factors for stunting, underweight and thinness among schoolchildren aged 5–14 years. Adequate food availability and dietary diversity over a sufficient period time including primary education period should be necessary for increasing likelihood of catch-up expectable during adolescence. Malagasy households have strong preference for rice and cannot afford to buy meats except on the days when they receive income [35]. School feeding program, therefore, should be able to more feasibly procure animal-protein ingredients than households, by leveraging economies of scale in food procurement.
Nevertheless, household feeding practices should improve in parallel, as school feeding can cover only 172 days (Malagasy standard number of school days) out of 365 days (47%) at a maximum in a year. Efforts on feeding practices need to be made both at school and household levels up to 14 years of age and beyond. Note that this study is expected to contribute to evidence-based menu planning for the school feeding program, by serving as the first study that reports risk factors and profiles for malnutrition of school-aged children in Madagascar.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank Nobuhiro Kunieda for his valuable technical supports. The authors also thank Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) for their funding support to the study. This work is sincerely dedicated to all the school-aged children, their parents and caregivers, and teaching staff of primary schools in rural areas of Madagascar.
The study protocol was submitted to the National Committee for Biomedical Research Ethics, the Malagasy Ministry of Health, for its ethical clearance. Yet, the Committee officially approved the study protocol by exempting it from an ethical clearance process, due to low level invasiveness of the study design (Exemption letter No. 52). An advanced informed consent to participate in both anthropometric measurements and structured household interviews was obtained in written form from the parents of each sampled schoolchild.
Similarly to consent to participate, an advanced informed consent for publication was obtained in written form from the parents of each sampled schoolchild..

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Scaling up nutrition (SUN). SUN movement monitoring, evaluation, accountability, and learning. Geneva: SUN; 2017. Scaling up nutrition (SUN). SUN movement monitoring, evaluation, accountability, and learning. Geneva: SUN; 2017.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Best C, Neufingerl N, van Geel L, van den Briel T, Osendarp S. The nutritional status of school-aged children: why should we care? Food Nutr Bull. 2010;31(3):400–17.CrossRef Best C, Neufingerl N, van Geel L, van den Briel T, Osendarp S. The nutritional status of school-aged children: why should we care? Food Nutr Bull. 2010;31(3):400–17.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization (WHO). The growth chart – a tool for use in infant and child health care. Geneva: WHO; 1986. World Health Organization (WHO). The growth chart – a tool for use in infant and child health care. Geneva: WHO; 1986.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(9):660–7.CrossRef de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(9):660–7.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Global nutrition report 2016 – from promise to impact, ending malnutrition by 2030. Washington DC: IFPRI; 2016. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Global nutrition report 2016 – from promise to impact, ending malnutrition by 2030. Washington DC: IFPRI; 2016.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat L’Office National de Nutrition (ONN). Plan National d’Action pour la NutrtionIII 2017-2021. Antananarivo: ONN; 2017. (in French). L’Office National de Nutrition (ONN). Plan National d’Action pour la NutrtionIII 2017-2021. Antananarivo: ONN; 2017. (in French).
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Victora CG, de Onis M, Hallal PC, Blössner M, Shrimpton R. Worldwide timing of growth faltering: revisiting implications for interventions. Pediatrics. 2010;125(3):e473–80.CrossRef Victora CG, de Onis M, Hallal PC, Blössner M, Shrimpton R. Worldwide timing of growth faltering: revisiting implications for interventions. Pediatrics. 2010;125(3):e473–80.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat World Food Programme (WFP). Madagascar-comprehensive food security and vulnerability analysis. Rome: WFP; 2006. World Food Programme (WFP). Madagascar-comprehensive food security and vulnerability analysis. Rome: WFP; 2006.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Institut National des Statistiques. Recensement General de la Population et de l’habitation. Institut National des Statistiques. Antananarivo: Institut National des Statistiques; 1993. (in French) Institut National des Statistiques. Recensement General de la Population et de l’habitation. Institut National des Statistiques. Antananarivo: Institut National des Statistiques; 1993. (in French)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Institut National des Statistiques. Monographie d’Antananarivo, UPDR/Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Elevage et de la Pêche. Antananarivo: Institut National des Statistiques; 2005. (in French) Institut National des Statistiques. Monographie d’Antananarivo, UPDR/Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Elevage et de la Pêche. Antananarivo: Institut National des Statistiques; 2005. (in French)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Prentice AM, Ward KA, Goldberg GR, Jarjou LM, Moore SE, Fulford AJ, Prentice A. Critical windows for nutritional interventions against stunting. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(5):911–8.CrossRef Prentice AM, Ward KA, Goldberg GR, Jarjou LM, Moore SE, Fulford AJ, Prentice A. Critical windows for nutritional interventions against stunting. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(5):911–8.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Golden MHN. Is complete catch-up possible for stunted malnourished children? Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994;48(Suppl 1):S58–70.PubMed Golden MHN. Is complete catch-up possible for stunted malnourished children? Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994;48(Suppl 1):S58–70.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat ACT watch. Household survey Madagascar 2012 Survey Report. Washington DC: ACT watch; 2013. ACT watch. Household survey Madagascar 2012 Survey Report. Washington DC: ACT watch; 2013.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization (WHO). Computation of centiles and z-scores for height-for-age, weight-for-age and BMI-for-age. Geneva: WHO; 2007. World Health Organization (WHO). Computation of centiles and z-scores for height-for-age, weight-for-age and BMI-for-age. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Guidelines for measuring household and individual dietary diversity. Rome: FAO; 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Guidelines for measuring household and individual dietary diversity. Rome: FAO; 2010.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Improving child nutrition: The achievable imperative for global progress. New York: UNICEF; 2013. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Improving child nutrition: The achievable imperative for global progress. New York: UNICEF; 2013.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Aiga H, Matsuoka S, Kuroiwa C, Yamamoto S. Malnutrition among the children in the rural Malawian fish-farming households. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103(8):827–33.CrossRef Aiga H, Matsuoka S, Kuroiwa C, Yamamoto S. Malnutrition among the children in the rural Malawian fish-farming households. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103(8):827–33.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Negishi H. Vulnerability of maternal and child diet habit - strong impact of school feeing and challenges of agricultural cooperatives. Monthly Rev Agric Forestry Fishery Finance. 1990;43(12):796–805 (in Japanese). Negishi H. Vulnerability of maternal and child diet habit - strong impact of school feeing and challenges of agricultural cooperatives. Monthly Rev Agric Forestry Fishery Finance. 1990;43(12):796–805 (in Japanese).
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoltzfus RJ, Albonico M, Tielsch JM, Chwaya HM, Savioli L. School-based deworming program yields small improvement in growth of Zanzibari school children after one year. J Nutr. 1997;127(11):2187–93.CrossRef Stoltzfus RJ, Albonico M, Tielsch JM, Chwaya HM, Savioli L. School-based deworming program yields small improvement in growth of Zanzibari school children after one year. J Nutr. 1997;127(11):2187–93.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Frigerio S, Macario M, Iacovone G, Dussey-Comlavi KJ, Narcisi P, Ndiaye AT, Moramarco S, Alvaro R, Palombi L, Buonomo E. Schistosoma haematobium infection, health and nutritional status in school-age children in a rural setting in northern Senegal. Minerva Pediatr. 2016;68(4):282–7.PubMed Frigerio S, Macario M, Iacovone G, Dussey-Comlavi KJ, Narcisi P, Ndiaye AT, Moramarco S, Alvaro R, Palombi L, Buonomo E. Schistosoma haematobium infection, health and nutritional status in school-age children in a rural setting in northern Senegal. Minerva Pediatr. 2016;68(4):282–7.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinung’hi SM, Mazigo HD, Dunne DW, Kepha S, Kaatano G, Kishamawe C, Ndokeji S, Angelo T, Nuwaha F. Coinfection of intestinal schistosomiasis and malaria and fassociation with haemoglobin levels and nutritional status in school children in Mara region, Northwestern Tanzania: a cross-sectional exploratory study. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):583.CrossRef Kinung’hi SM, Mazigo HD, Dunne DW, Kepha S, Kaatano G, Kishamawe C, Ndokeji S, Angelo T, Nuwaha F. Coinfection of intestinal schistosomiasis and malaria and fassociation with haemoglobin levels and nutritional status in school children in Mara region, Northwestern Tanzania: a cross-sectional exploratory study. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):583.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rollinson D, Knopp S, Levitz S, Stothard JR, Tchuem Tchuenté LA, Garba A, Mohammed KA, Schur N, Person B, Colley DG, Utzinger J. Time to set the agenda for schistosomiasis elimination. Acta Trop. 2013;128(2):423–40.CrossRef Rollinson D, Knopp S, Levitz S, Stothard JR, Tchuem Tchuenté LA, Garba A, Mohammed KA, Schur N, Person B, Colley DG, Utzinger J. Time to set the agenda for schistosomiasis elimination. Acta Trop. 2013;128(2):423–40.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization (WHO). Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: report of a WHO expert committee. WHO tech. Rep. Ser. 912. Geneva: WHO; 2002. p. 1–57. World Health Organization (WHO). Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: report of a WHO expert committee. WHO tech. Rep. Ser. 912. Geneva: WHO; 2002. p. 1–57.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat International Monetary Fund (IMF). Republic of Madagascar Economic Development Document-IMF Country Report No. 17/225. Washington DC: IMF; 2017. International Monetary Fund (IMF). Republic of Madagascar Economic Development Document-IMF Country Report No. 17/225. Washington DC: IMF; 2017.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Berti PR. Intrahousehold distribution of food: a review of the literature and discussion of the implications for food fortification programs. Food Nutr Bull. 2012;33((3 Suppl):S163–9.CrossRef Berti PR. Intrahousehold distribution of food: a review of the literature and discussion of the implications for food fortification programs. Food Nutr Bull. 2012;33((3 Suppl):S163–9.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Klesges RC, Klesges LM, Brown G, Frank GC. Validation of the 24-hour dietary recall in preschool children. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987;87(10):1383–5.PubMed Klesges RC, Klesges LM, Brown G, Frank GC. Validation of the 24-hour dietary recall in preschool children. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987;87(10):1383–5.PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramaroson RV, Arvisenet G, Valentin D. Studying the nutritional beliefs and food practices of Malagasy school children parents. A contribution to the understanding of malnutrition in Madagascar. Appetite. 2014;81:67–75.CrossRef Ramaroson RV, Arvisenet G, Valentin D. Studying the nutritional beliefs and food practices of Malagasy school children parents. A contribution to the understanding of malnutrition in Madagascar. Appetite. 2014;81:67–75.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Risk factors for malnutrition among school-aged children: a cross-sectional study in rural Madagascar
verfasst von
Hirotsugu Aiga
Kanae Abe
Vonjy Nirina Andrianome
Emmanuel Randriamampionona
Angèle Razafitompo Razafinombana
Toshiyasu Murai
Masahiro Hara
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2019
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Public Health / Ausgabe 1/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7013-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe