Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drug Safety 8/2007

01.08.2007 | Review Article

Safety Profile of Meropenem

An Updated Review of Over 6000 Patients Treated with Meropenem

verfasst von: Professor Peter Linden

Erschienen in: Drug Safety | Ausgabe 8/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibacterial with potent antimicrobial activity against a broad range of Gram-negative, Gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria. The second parenteral carbapenem to be introduced worldwide, meropenem has been in clinical use since 1994. Two previous safety reviews have established that meropenem has a favourable and acceptable safety profile. This new review was conducted after the approval of meropenem in the US in 2005 for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections, in addition to the previously approved indications of intra-abdominal infections and paediatric bacterial meningitis. The analysis includes the clinical trial data from the previous safety reviews, updated with expanded experience across a number of serious bacterial infections, including a large international study in patients with skin or skin-structure infections and further experience in patients with intra-abdominal infections and bacterial meningitis. A total of 6154 patients with 6308 meropenem exposures were compared with 4483 patients treated with comparator agents (4593 exposures), and the paediatric population base for which safety data are available has doubled to over 1000 patients.
The data presented reinforce the favourable safety profile of meropenem. In general, the incidence and pattern of adverse events occurring with meropenem were similar to those of the first carbapenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and to those of the cephalosporin-and clindamycin-based regimens to which it had been compared. The most common adverse events reported for meropenem were diarrhoea (2.5%), rash (1.4%) and nausea/vomiting (1.2%). No adverse event occurred in more than 3% of patient exposures to meropenem, indicating a low overall frequency of adverse events as well as excellent gastrointestinal tolerability. Furthermore, no unexpected adverse events were identified, and the very low incidence of seizures in patients with meningitis was not considered to be drug related. In infections other than meningitis, the incidence of seizures considered by investigators to be related to meropenem treatment was 0.07%. In the new studies that updated the earlier safety data, no new cases of drug-related seizure were reported for any treatment or patient group (meningitis/non-meningitis infections).
In conclusion, meropenem is well tolerated and has good CNS and gastrointestinal tolerability when used for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in a wide range of adult and paediatric patient populations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Masterton RG, Turner PJ. Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility in UK centres: the MYSTIC Programme (1997–2002). Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006; 27(1): 69–72PubMedCrossRef Masterton RG, Turner PJ. Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility in UK centres: the MYSTIC Programme (1997–2002). Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006; 27(1): 69–72PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhomberg PR, Jones RN. Contemporary activity of meropenem and comparator broad-spectrum agents: MYSTIC program report from the United States component (2005). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 57(2): 207–15PubMedCrossRef Rhomberg PR, Jones RN. Contemporary activity of meropenem and comparator broad-spectrum agents: MYSTIC program report from the United States component (2005). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 57(2): 207–15PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Goossens H, Grabein B. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility data for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the MYSTIC Program in Europe and the United States (1997–2004). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 53(4): 257–64PubMedCrossRef Goossens H, Grabein B. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility data for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the MYSTIC Program in Europe and the United States (1997–2004). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 53(4): 257–64PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones RN, Mendes C, Turner PJ, et al. An overview of the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program: 1997–2004. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 53(4): 247–56PubMedCrossRef Jones RN, Mendes C, Turner PJ, et al. An overview of the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program: 1997–2004. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 53(4): 247–56PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Unal S, Garcia-Rodriguez JA. Activity of meropenem and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. isolated in the MYSTIC Program, 2002–2004. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 53(4): 265–71PubMedCrossRef Unal S, Garcia-Rodriguez JA. Activity of meropenem and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. isolated in the MYSTIC Program, 2002–2004. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 53(4): 265–71PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowe MN, Lamb HM. Meropenem: an updated review of its use in the management of intra-abdominal infections. Drugs 2000; 60(3): 619–46PubMedCrossRef Lowe MN, Lamb HM. Meropenem: an updated review of its use in the management of intra-abdominal infections. Drugs 2000; 60(3): 619–46PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Norrby SR, Gildon KM. Safety profile of meropenem: a review of nearly 5,000 patients treated with meropenem. Scand J Infect Dis 1999; 31(1): 3–10PubMedCrossRef Norrby SR, Gildon KM. Safety profile of meropenem: a review of nearly 5,000 patients treated with meropenem. Scand J Infect Dis 1999; 31(1): 3–10PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Norrby SR, Newell PA, Faulkner KL, et al. Safety profile of meropenem: international clinical experience based on the first 3125 patients treated with meropenem. J Antimicrob Chemother 1995; 36 Suppl. A: 207–23PubMedCrossRef Norrby SR, Newell PA, Faulkner KL, et al. Safety profile of meropenem: international clinical experience based on the first 3125 patients treated with meropenem. J Antimicrob Chemother 1995; 36 Suppl. A: 207–23PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Balfour JA, Bryson HM, Brogden RN. Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections. Drugs 1996; 51(1): 99–136PubMedCrossRef Balfour JA, Bryson HM, Brogden RN. Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections. Drugs 1996; 51(1): 99–136PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Calandra GB, Wang C, Aziz M, et al. The safety profile of imipenem/cilastatin: worldwide clinical experience based on 3470 patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 1986; 18 Suppl. E: 193–202PubMed Calandra GB, Wang C, Aziz M, et al. The safety profile of imipenem/cilastatin: worldwide clinical experience based on 3470 patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 1986; 18 Suppl. E: 193–202PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Curran M, Simpson D, Perry C. Ertapenem: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections. Drugs 2003; 63(17): 1855–78PubMedCrossRef Curran M, Simpson D, Perry C. Ertapenem: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections. Drugs 2003; 63(17): 1855–78PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Calandra G, Lydick E, Carrigan J, et al. Factors predisposing to seizures in seriously ill infected patients receiving antibiotics: experience with imipenem/cilastatin. Am J Med 1988; 84(5): 911–8PubMedCrossRef Calandra G, Lydick E, Carrigan J, et al. Factors predisposing to seizures in seriously ill infected patients receiving antibiotics: experience with imipenem/cilastatin. Am J Med 1988; 84(5): 911–8PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Norrby SR, Vandercam B, Louie T, et al. Imipenem/cilastatin versus amikacin plus piperacillin in the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients: a prospective, randomized multi-clinic study. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1987; 52: 65–78PubMed Norrby SR, Vandercam B, Louie T, et al. Imipenem/cilastatin versus amikacin plus piperacillin in the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients: a prospective, randomized multi-clinic study. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1987; 52: 65–78PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang C, Calandra GB, Aziz MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin: a review of worldwide clinical experience. Rev Infect Dis 1985; 7 Suppl. 3: S528–36PubMedCrossRef Wang C, Calandra GB, Aziz MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin: a review of worldwide clinical experience. Rev Infect Dis 1985; 7 Suppl. 3: S528–36PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison MP, Haworth SJ, Moss SR, et al. The disposition and metabolic fate of 14C-meropenem in man. Xenobiotica 1993 Nov; 23: 1311–23PubMedCrossRef Harrison MP, Haworth SJ, Moss SR, et al. The disposition and metabolic fate of 14C-meropenem in man. Xenobiotica 1993 Nov; 23: 1311–23PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Majumdar AK, Musson DG, Birk KL, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ertapeneme in healthy young volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002 Nov; 46(11): 3506–11PubMedCrossRef Majumdar AK, Musson DG, Birk KL, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ertapeneme in healthy young volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002 Nov; 46(11): 3506–11PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards SJ, Emmas CE, Campbell HE. Systematic review comparing meropenem with imipenem plus cilastatin in the treatment of severe infections. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21(5): 785–94PubMedCrossRef Edwards SJ, Emmas CE, Campbell HE. Systematic review comparing meropenem with imipenem plus cilastatin in the treatment of severe infections. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21(5): 785–94PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Paul M, Yahav D, Fraser A, et al. Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 57(2): 176–89PubMedCrossRef Paul M, Yahav D, Fraser A, et al. Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 57(2): 176–89PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley JS, Behrendt CE, Arrieta AC, et al. Convalescent phase outpatient parenteral antiinfective therapy for children with complicated appendicitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001; 20(1): 19–24PubMedCrossRef Bradley JS, Behrendt CE, Arrieta AC, et al. Convalescent phase outpatient parenteral antiinfective therapy for children with complicated appendicitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001; 20(1): 19–24PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabian TC, File TM, Embil JM, et al. Meropenem versus imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparative study. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2005; 6(3): 269–82CrossRef Fabian TC, File TM, Embil JM, et al. Meropenem versus imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparative study. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2005; 6(3): 269–82CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hou F, Li J, Wu G, et al. A randomized, controlled clinical trial on meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial infections. Chin Med J (Engl) 2002; 115(12): 1849–54 Hou F, Li J, Wu G, et al. A randomized, controlled clinical trial on meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial infections. Chin Med J (Engl) 2002; 115(12): 1849–54
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu HL, Lu CY, Tseng HY, et al. Empirical monotherapy with meropenem in serious bacterial infections in children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2001; 34(4): 275–80PubMed Hsu HL, Lu CY, Tseng HY, et al. Empirical monotherapy with meropenem in serious bacterial infections in children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2001; 34(4): 275–80PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Snedden S, Rudoy R, Arrieta A, et al. Meropenem versus cefotaxime-based therapy for the initial treatment of infants and children hospitalised with non-CNS infections. Clin Drug Investig 1999; 17(1): 9–20CrossRef Snedden S, Rudoy R, Arrieta A, et al. Meropenem versus cefotaxime-based therapy for the initial treatment of infants and children hospitalised with non-CNS infections. Clin Drug Investig 1999; 17(1): 9–20CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Verwaest C. Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin as empirical monotherapy for serious bacterial infections in the intensive care unit. Clin Microbiol Infect 2000; 6(6): 294–302PubMedCrossRef Verwaest C. Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin as empirical monotherapy for serious bacterial infections in the intensive care unit. Clin Microbiol Infect 2000; 6(6): 294–302PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanetti G, Harbarth SJ, Trampuz A, et al. Meropenem (1.5 g/ day) is as effective as imipenem/cilastatin (2 g/day) for the treatment of moderately severe intra-abdominal infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999; 11(2): 107–13PubMedCrossRef Zanetti G, Harbarth SJ, Trampuz A, et al. Meropenem (1.5 g/ day) is as effective as imipenem/cilastatin (2 g/day) for the treatment of moderately severe intra-abdominal infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999; 11(2): 107–13PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Odio CM, Puig JR, Feris JM, et al. Prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded study of the efficacy and safety of meropenem vs. cefotaxime therapy in bacterial meningitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18(7): 581–90PubMedCrossRef Odio CM, Puig JR, Feris JM, et al. Prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded study of the efficacy and safety of meropenem vs. cefotaxime therapy in bacterial meningitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18(7): 581–90PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Embil JM, Soto NE, Melnick DA. A post hoc subgroup analysis of meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of complicated skin and skin-structure infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2006; 28(8): 1164–74PubMedCrossRef Embil JM, Soto NE, Melnick DA. A post hoc subgroup analysis of meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of complicated skin and skin-structure infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2006; 28(8): 1164–74PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Eng RH, Munsif AN, Yangco BG, et al. Seizure propensity with imipenem. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149(8): 1881–3PubMedCrossRef Eng RH, Munsif AN, Yangco BG, et al. Seizure propensity with imipenem. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149(8): 1881–3PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong VK, Wright Jr HT, Ross LA, et al. Imipenem/cilastatin treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10(2): 122–5PubMedCrossRef Wong VK, Wright Jr HT, Ross LA, et al. Imipenem/cilastatin treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10(2): 122–5PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Poutanen SM, Simor AE. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults. CMAJ 2004; 171(1): 51–8PubMed Poutanen SM, Simor AE. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults. CMAJ 2004; 171(1): 51–8PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wistrom J, Norrby SR, Myhre EB, et al. Frequency of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in 2462 antibiotic-treated hospitalized 668 patients: a prospective study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 47(1): 43–50PubMedCrossRef Wistrom J, Norrby SR, Myhre EB, et al. Frequency of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in 2462 antibiotic-treated hospitalized 668 patients: a prospective study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 47(1): 43–50PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas C, Stevenson M, Riley TV. Antibiotics and hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 51(6): 1339–50PubMedCrossRef Thomas C, Stevenson M, Riley TV. Antibiotics and hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 51(6): 1339–50PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Musher DM, Aslam S, Logan N, et al. Relatively poor outcome after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis with metronidazole. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40(11): 1586–90PubMedCrossRef Musher DM, Aslam S, Logan N, et al. Relatively poor outcome after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis with metronidazole. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40(11): 1586–90PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurst M, Lamb HM. Meropenem: a review of its use in patients in intensive care. Drugs 2000; 59(3): 653–80PubMedCrossRef Hurst M, Lamb HM. Meropenem: a review of its use in patients in intensive care. Drugs 2000; 59(3): 653–80PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Alvarez C, Ramos JM, San Juan R, et al. Risk of superinfection related to antibiotic use: are all antibiotics the same? [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Quimioter 2005; 18(1): 39–44PubMed Alvarez C, Ramos JM, San Juan R, et al. Risk of superinfection related to antibiotic use: are all antibiotics the same? [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Quimioter 2005; 18(1): 39–44PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourgault AM, Lamothe F, Loo VG, et al. In vitro susceptibility of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates from a multi-institutional outbreak in Southern Quebec, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50(10): 3473–5PubMedCrossRef Bourgault AM, Lamothe F, Loo VG, et al. In vitro susceptibility of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates from a multi-institutional outbreak in Southern Quebec, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50(10): 3473–5PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Saxon A, Adelman DC, Patel A, et al. Imipenem cross-reactivity with penicillin in humans. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988; 82(2): 213–7PubMedCrossRef Saxon A, Adelman DC, Patel A, et al. Imipenem cross-reactivity with penicillin in humans. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988; 82(2): 213–7PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Prescott Jr WA, Kusmierski KA. Clinical importance of carbapenem hypersensitivity in patients with self-reported and documented penicillin allergy. Pharmacotherapy 2007; 27(1): 137–42PubMedCrossRef Prescott Jr WA, Kusmierski KA. Clinical importance of carbapenem hypersensitivity in patients with self-reported and documented penicillin allergy. Pharmacotherapy 2007; 27(1): 137–42PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunha BA. Meropenem in elderly and renally impaired patients [published erratum appears in Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999; 11 (2): 167–77]. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1998; 10(2): 107–17PubMedCrossRef Cunha BA. Meropenem in elderly and renally impaired patients [published erratum appears in Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999; 11 (2): 167–77]. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1998; 10(2): 107–17PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Fudio S, Carcas A, Pinana E, et al. Epileptic seizures caused by low valproic acid levels from an interaction with meropenem. J Clin Pharm Ther 2006; 31(4): 393–6PubMedCrossRef Fudio S, Carcas A, Pinana E, et al. Epileptic seizures caused by low valproic acid levels from an interaction with meropenem. J Clin Pharm Ther 2006; 31(4): 393–6PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Clause D, Decleire PY, Vanbinst R, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between valproic acid and meropenem. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31(9): 1293–4PubMedCrossRef Clause D, Decleire PY, Vanbinst R, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between valproic acid and meropenem. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31(9): 1293–4PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Coves-Orts FJ, Borras-Blasco J, Navarro-Ruiz A, et al. Acute seizures due to a probable interaction between valproic acid and meropenem. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39(3): 533–7PubMedCrossRef Coves-Orts FJ, Borras-Blasco J, Navarro-Ruiz A, et al. Acute seizures due to a probable interaction between valproic acid and meropenem. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39(3): 533–7PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat De Turck BJ, Diltoer MW, Cornelis PJ, et al. Lowering of plasma valproic acid concentrations during concomitant therapy with meropenem and amikacin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998; 42(4): 563–4PubMedCrossRef De Turck BJ, Diltoer MW, Cornelis PJ, et al. Lowering of plasma valproic acid concentrations during concomitant therapy with meropenem and amikacin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998; 42(4): 563–4PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Santucci M, Parmeggiani A, Riva R. Seizure worsening caused by decreased serum valproate during meropenem therapy. J Child Neurol 2005; 20(5): 456–7PubMedCrossRef Santucci M, Parmeggiani A, Riva R. Seizure worsening caused by decreased serum valproate during meropenem therapy. J Child Neurol 2005; 20(5): 456–7PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagai K, Shimizu T, Togo A, et al. Decrease in serum levels of valproic acid during treatment with a new carbapenem, panipenem/betamipron. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997; 39(2): 295–6PubMedCrossRef Nagai K, Shimizu T, Togo A, et al. Decrease in serum levels of valproic acid during treatment with a new carbapenem, panipenem/betamipron. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997; 39(2): 295–6PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamagata T, Momoi MY, Murai K, et al. Panipenem-betamipron and decreases in serum valproic acid concentration. Ther Drug Monit 1998; 20(4): 396–400PubMedCrossRef Yamagata T, Momoi MY, Murai K, et al. Panipenem-betamipron and decreases in serum valproic acid concentration. Ther Drug Monit 1998; 20(4): 396–400PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Safety Profile of Meropenem
An Updated Review of Over 6000 Patients Treated with Meropenem
verfasst von
Professor Peter Linden
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2007
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drug Safety / Ausgabe 8/2007
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200730080-00002

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2007

Drug Safety 8/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Correspondence

The Authors’ Reply