INTRODUCTION
Bronchial asthma is a common respiratory disease that involves eosinophilic airway inflammation induced by sensitization and exposure to antigens, such as house dust mite (HDM) [
14,
23]. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), which is the principal medication for the treatment of asthma, has contributed to disease control and reduction of mortality for the past 20 years [
47]. However, 5% to 10% of cases that are refractory to standard treatment are identified as severe asthma [
8,
27,
35]. Severe asthma is characterized by uncontrolled symptoms, frequent exacerbations, airflow limitation, and airway inflammation [
28,
46]. As a result, patients with severe asthma need higher cost of medical treatment than those with mild asthma [
1,
2]. Severe asthma is considered to be a heterogeneous syndrome that has features of early-onset atopic factor, late-onset eosinophilic airway inflammation, neutrophilic airway inflammation, and obesity [
35,
46]. Basic as well as clinical research has shown that obesity is an important phenotype of severe asthma [
3,
20,
34,
38]. In addition, asthmatic patients who are obese do not respond as well to ICS as patients with normal body mass index (BMI) [
4,
33,
39]. In fact, weight loss was shown to improve airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and symptom control in obese asthmatic patients [
11,
12]. These studies implied that the extent of obesity and the severity of asthma are closely related; however, the interaction between obesity and the pathogenesis of asthma, including airway inflammation, is not fully understood.
Obesity itself is considered an inflammatory disease [
45] that is associated with other low-grade systemic inflammatory diseases, such as metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver, and cardiovascular disease [
17,
43]. In previous studies, animal models were administered a high-fat diet (HFD) to induce obesity so that the interaction between obesity and inflammation could be analyzed [
15,
18,
22]. Overconsumption of saturated fatty acids (SFA), which compose a HFD, was discovered to be a risk factor for obesity-related diseases [
13,
37]. SFA induces inflammatory molecules, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inhibitory factor through toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) [
36,
44,
52], and regulates organ inflammation through macrophage recruitment [
9,
50]. According to these data, increased amount of SFA in obese individuals would lead to inflammation in various organs.
In the present study, an increased number of lung macrophages were observed in a HFD mouse model. HDM-induced mice with augmented neutrophilic airway inflammation and AHR were found to have elevated levels of IL-17A and macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP2) after receiving a HFD for 10 weeks. Palmitic acid (PA), which is the main SFA component of HFD, directly induced inflammatory cytokine and chemokine production from macrophages. Finally, we demonstrated that similar to administration of HFD, administration of PA to mice increased the number of lung macrophages and augmented HDM-induced neutrophilic airway inflammation and AHR. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first report that demonstrated SFA-augmented pathogenesis of asthma in an obese mouse model; this observation was associated with lung macrophages, which are likewise considered to enhance the mechanism of obese asthma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Allergen and Chemicals
HDM extracts from Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) were purchased from ITEA Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). PA (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in 50% ethanol at 60 °C to yield a 50-mM stock concentration, which was kept at −20 °C. PA was diluted to the appropriate concentration using 1% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 37 °C. The endotoxin level in the PA solution was less than the detection limit of 0.0015 EU/ml by the assay kit (Limulus ES-2, Wako, Japan).
Mice
Female BALB/c mice (Japan SLC Inc.; Hamamatsu, Japan) aged 3–6 weeks were kept at the Saga University animal facility under specific pathogen-free conditions. Animal experiments were undertaken following the guidelines for care and use of experimental animals by the Japanese Association for Laboratory Animals Science (1987) and were approved by the Saga University Animal Care and Use Committee.
Administration of High-Fat Diet and Palmitic Acid
Starting at 3 weeks of age, female mice were fed with either normal chow or an HFD for 10 weeks. The HFD (D12492; Research Diets Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) provided 60% of energy in the form of fat. At the age of 6 weeks, BSA or 50-μM (150 μl) palmitate–BSA complex was administered by intraperitoneal injection five times per week for 4 weeks. Body weight was measured every week.
Protocol for House Dust Mite-Induced Airway Inflammation in Mice Administered with High-Fat Diet or Palmitic Acid
In the HFD model, mice aged 3 weeks were fed normal chow or HFD for total 10 weeks. After 7 weeks of HFD intake, mice were sensitized by intranasal administration of 25 μg HDM or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) once a week for 3 weeks. At 10 weeks of HFD intake, mice were exposed to continuous intranasal administration of 5 μg HDM or PBS for 3 days. In the PA mouse model aged 6 weeks, 50 μM (150 μl) of palmitate–BSA complex or a BSA vehicle was administered by intraperitoneal injection five times per week for 4 weeks. Sensitization was done by intranasal administration of 25 μg HDM or a vehicle on days 2, 9, and 16. Exposure was carried out by intranasal administration of 5 μg HDM or a vehicle on days 23, 24, and 25. On days with simultaneous PA and HDM administration, PA was given 30 min before HDM inoculation. For all these models, mice were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital 24 h after the final exposure. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung tissue were collected for further analyses.
Isolation of Single Cells from Lung Tissue
Peripheral lung tissue was cut into small pieces then transferred through a 70-μm mesh before processing in a digestion buffer that included deoxyribonuclease I (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) and collagenase type 2 (Worthington Inc., Lakewood, NJ). The remaining red cells were lysed using BD Pharm Lysis (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) to obtain single-cell suspensions.
Flow Cytometry
Single-cell suspensions were pre-incubated with FcγR-specific blocking mAb and washed before staining. Cells were stained with CD11b, CD11c, CD45, and Ly6c (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) before collection on a flow cytometer (FACS Aria 2; BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and analysis by FlowJo 8.3.3 software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
Collection of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
BALF samples were collected, as described previously [
21,
40]. Briefly, a 20-G tube was inserted in the trachea, followed by two times of lung lavage with 1 ml of saline. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 100×
g for 5 min at 4 °C. The total number of cells was counted using a hemocytometer. Cytospin samples were prepared from the cell suspension. Cell differentiation was determined by counting at least 300 leukocytes in samples stained with Diff-Quik (Siemens, Germany).
Airway Hyperresponsiveness to Methacholine
Briefly, mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital before insertion of an 18-G metal needle into an exposed trachea, which was connected to a forced oscillation technique (flexiVent system; SCIREQ Inc., Montreal, Canada). Next, their lungs were inflated to a pressure of 30 cmH2O; baseline recordings were obtained using a single frequency (2.5 Hz, 1.2 s; Snapshot-150) and a broadband low frequency (1–20.5 Hz, 3 s; Quick-Prime-3). The mice were then exposed to an aerosol of PBS. All parameters calculated from both test signals were recorded alternately every 10 s for 3 min. Finally, two deep lung inflations were given. The above protocol was repeated for five times more with aerosols containing sequentially increasing concentrations of 0.1, 1.0, 10, 20, and 50 mg/ml methacholine (Sigma-Aldrich, Japan).
Hematoxylin–Eosin and Periodic Acid-Schiff Histology Examination
Histologic examination was performed, as previously reported [
16]. Lungs were fixed with 10% neutral-buffered formalin (Wako, Japan) and embedded in paraffin. Lung sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS).
Preparation of Lung Homogenates
After BAL, the left lung was isolated and homogenized in 50-mM Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1 mM NaF. The lung homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000×g for 15 min; supernatants were collected and stored at −80 °C until needed.
Quantification of Cytokines Using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
IL-13, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-17A, MCP-1, and MIP2 were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Kits (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. All samples were tested in duplicate.
Cell Culture of RAW 264.7, Bone Marrow Macrophages, and Peritoneal Macrophages
RAW 264.7 was grown in an RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Bone marrow (BM) cells were isolated from BALB/c mice, as previously reported [
41], and were suspended at 1.0 × 10
6 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS. The cells were cultured in the presence of 10 ng/ml recombinant murine macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% carbon dioxide for 6 days. On day 6, cells were harvested and cultured as BM-derived macrophages (BMMs). To obtain fresh peritoneal macrophages, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1 ml thioglycollate (3%). After 4 days, peritoneal fluid was obtained by lavage with 10 ml PBS. The fluid was centrifuged to isolate peritoneal macrophages, which were re-suspended in RPMI 1640 medium. These cells were cultured at a density of 1 × 10
6 cells in RPMI 1640 containing FCS and were stimulated as indicated in Fig.
3. RNA was isolated after 8 h and the supernatant was analyzed by ELISA after 24 h.
RNA Extraction and Quantitative PCR
RNA was extracted from RAW 264.7 using the RNeasy Protect Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Netherlands); assessed by quantity and quality using a NanoDrop 1000A spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Products, Wilmington, DE, USA); and was reverse transcribed to cDNA. Taqman gene expression assays were used to detect TLR4 (Mm00445273-m1 Tlr4) and 18S RNA (Mm03928990-g1 Rn18s). Messenger RNA expression levels were standardized using 18S RNA expression.
Statistical Analysis
Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between two groups were analyzed by Student’s t test. Multiple comparisons of continuous variables were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by a post hoc Tukey–Kramer test for multiple groups. Significance was set at a p value of 0.05.
DISCUSSION
The present study demonstrated that SFA had important roles in the augmenting the mechanisms of asthma in obesity. Specifically, these roles included progression of neutrophilic airway inflammation and AHR. HFD, which comprised a large amount of SFA, increased the number of macrophages in the lungs and exacerbated neutrophilic airway inflammation and AHR. This observation was associated with elevation in the levels of IL-17A and MIP2 cytokines in the lungs. Moreover, intraperitoneal administration of SFA showed similar effects with HFD mice in increasing lung macrophages and progression of HDM-induced neutrophilic airway inflammation and AHR, along with increased IL-1β and MIP2 cytokines in the lungs. PA affected not only MCP-1 induction but also TNF-α and IL-1β production and TLR4 upregulation in macrophages. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first report that clarified the augmenting mechanisms of asthma in obesity in relation to SFA and macrophages.
In the present study, lung macrophages, including circulating monocytes and alveolar macrophages, were significantly increased in HFD mice and PA-administered mice, although there was no difference in the number of macrophages in BALF. A previous study reported that the phenotypes of alveolar and interstitial macrophages in BALF were different from those in lung tissue [
51]. We considered that interstitial macrophages might be related to the increasing number of macrophages in lung tissue. Macrophages were reported as pivotal regulators of immunity and inflammation in obesity and asthma [
10,
32]. Mcneils et al. reported that obesity increased the recruitment of tissue macrophages and led to inflammation in adipose tissue, liver, and skeletal muscle [
25]. Obesity has been shown to regulate macrophage phenotype and to induce inflammatory signals, such as nuclear factor-κB and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [
6,
49]. In addition, SFA was shown to modulate TNF-α expression in mice macrophage lineage and to activate inflammation through nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeats containing family, and pyrin domain-containing-3 inflammasome [
9,
44]. Circulating and alveolar macrophages are crucial for airway inflammation and are related to the pathogenesis of severe asthma through LPS responsiveness [
19,
31]. We have reported that circulating macrophages, as the source of IL-33, contributed to severe asthma [
42]. The findings in this study of increased lung macrophages in HFD mice and PA-administered mice were consistent with those of previous studies.
In the present study, neutrophilic airway inflammation and AHR were augmented along with elevation of MIP2 and IL-17A in the lungs. A previous study reported that asthmatic patients with obesity (BMI >30) had poor asthma-specific quality of life, poor asthma control, and frequent asthma-related hospitalizations, compared with non-obese (BMI <25) asthma patients [
29]. Recent studies showed that innate lymphoid cell 3-induced IL-17 production was related to obesity-associated AHR through macrophage-derived IL-1β [
22] and that blockade of TNF-α attenuated ozone-induced neutrophilic inflammation and AHR in obesity [
48]. Additionally, PA induced islet inflammation and recruited macrophages with MCP-1 through TLR4
in vivo [
13]. According to these data, we considered that SFA recruited macrophages to the lungs and caused progression of HDM-induced neutrophilic airway inflammation in refractory asthma. This ICS-insensitive phenotype might be a result of IL-17A and MIP2 induction, as demonstrated in this HFD mouse model.
We have shown that PA induced MCP-1 production and exacerbation of LPS-primed inflammatory cytokine production from macrophages. MCP-1 was reported as an obesity-related chemokine that modulates tissue migration of macrophages [
30]. In addition, obese patients were shown to express higher plasma levels of MCP-1 than normal patients [
5,
7]. LPS, which is contained in HDM, caused a shift from eosinophilic to neutrophilic airway inflammation, along with elevation of IL-8; these contributed to resistance to asthma treatment [
24,
53]. According to these results, attenuation of SFA levels might control neutrophilic airway inflammation in obese patients with asthma. In the future, reduction of SFA-regulated migration of lung macrophages may be a target of treatment in severe asthma patients with obesity.
In conclusion, SFA induced MCP-1 production for macrophage recruitment to the lungs and directly enhanced LPS-induced TNF-α and IL-1β production by macrophages. Furthermore, SFA increased the number of lung macrophages, augmented HDM-induced neutrophilic airway inflammation and AHR, and increased the levels of IL-17A and MIP2 in HFD mice.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.