nach oben

Current Oral Health Reports

Erschienen in:

09.11.2020 | Clinical Periodontics (P Stathopoulou, Section Editor)

Soft Tissue Grafting Around Implants: Why, When, and How?

verfasst von: Ramzi V. Abou-Arraj, Andrea Pizzini, Peter Nasseh, Hussein S. Basma

Erschienen in: Current Oral Health Reports | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper discusses the role of soft tissue grafting around dental implants. The aim of this review is to present pertinent literature on peri-implant soft tissue including its role, indications for augmentation, techniques used to enhance the quality and/or quantity of the soft tissue, and corresponding timing of those procedures.

Recent Findings

Most reviewed soft tissue grafting studies in this paper were published in the last 5 years. However, the review also included older articles to mitigate the lack of recent randomized controlled trials or even case series on the reviewed soft tissue graft types. Soft tissue management with custom healing abutments or temporary restorations should be considered whenever possible. Soft tissue grafting to increase the width of keratinized mucosa (KM) seems to result in greater reduction of inflammation signs and a greater maintenance of crestal bone levels. The use of soft tissue grafts to increase soft tissue thickness tends to have a positive effect on maintaining crestal bone levels, especially when used to increase vertical thickness.

Summary

Apically positioned flaps (APFs) in combination with free gingival grafts (FGGs), subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs), or xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM) can significantly increase the KM width. Grafts to enhance facial tissue thickness lack evidence to support their long-term impact on mucosal marginal levels. Nonetheless, soft tissue manipulation is frequently performed at second-stage surgery to improve the facial thickness and esthetics. No clear advantages for the timing of soft tissue grafting with regard to clinical outcomes can be delineated when grafting is performed to increase KM or tissue thickness in simultaneous or staged approaches. The decision and timing to treat soft tissue defects should be based on risk assessment at the site and patient levels.

Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014;7:CD003815. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub4.CrossRef

Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Kekovic V, Goker F, Tumedei M, Wang HL. A systematic review of survival rates of osseointegrated implants in fully and partially edentulous patients following immediate loading. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122142.

Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(3):242–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431252.PubMedCrossRef

Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.PubMedCrossRef

Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P. Long-term stability of soft tissues following alveolar ridge preservation: 10-year results of a prospective study around nonsubmerged implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34(6):795–804. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2133.PubMedCrossRef

Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(5):433–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x.PubMedCrossRef

• Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hämmerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical oral implants research. 2018;29(Suppl 15):32–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13114This review highlights the rationale for increasing vertical soft tissue thickness and width of keratinized mucosa equipped with best available evidence.PubMedCrossRef

Hämmerle CHF, Tarnow D. The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: a narrative review. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S291–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.16-0810.PubMedCrossRef

Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12167.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2014;29 Suppl:308–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2.

11.

Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):2–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Benic GI, Mokti M, Chen C-J, Weber H-P, Hämmerle CHF, Gallucci GO. Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(5):560–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02253.x.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Gruber R, Lang NP, Salvi GE. Immediate implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration in the esthetic zone: 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):253–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12586.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Zetu L, Wang H-L. Management of inter-dental/inter-implant papilla. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(7):831–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00748.x.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 1997;17(4):326–33.

16.

Daftary F, Mahallati R, Bahat O, Sullivan RM. Lifelong craniofacial growth and the implications for osseointegrated implants. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2013;28(1):163–9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2827.CrossRef

17.

Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hilbe M, Hämmerle CH, Hüsler J, Jung RE. Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(10):874–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12588.PubMedCrossRef

18.

• Bassetti RG, Stähli A, Bassetti MA, Sculean A. Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review. Clinical oral investigations. 2016;20(7):1369–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1815-2This study reviews most effective grafts and techniques to augment keratinized mucosa and tissue thickness at time of implant uncovery.PubMedCrossRef

19.

• Bassetti RG, Stähli A, Bassetti MA, Sculean A. Soft tissue augmentation around osseointegrated and uncovered dental implants: a systematic review. Clinical oral investigations. 2017;21(1):53–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-2007-9This study reviews most effective grafts and techniques to augment keratinized mucosa and tissue thickness around healed and loaded implants.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Bassetti M, Kaufmann R, Salvi GE, Sculean A, Bassetti R. Soft tissue grafting to improve the attached mucosa at dental implants: a review of the literature and proposal of a decision tree. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(6):499–510. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a33688.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2(2):81–90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020206.x.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Linder E, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(5):448–55. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290510.x.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Tomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Wennström J, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Morphogenesis of peri-implant mucosa revisited: an experimental study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12223.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 1994;21(3):189–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1994.tb00302.x.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Nevins M, Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schupbach P, Kim DM. Connective tissue attachment to laser-microgrooved abutments: a human histologic case report. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2012;32(4):385–92.

26.

Geurs NC, Geisinger ML, Vassilopoulos PJ, O'Neal SJ, Haigh SJ, Reddy MS. Optimizing connective tissue integration on laser-ablated implant abutments. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2016;6(3):153–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/cap.2016.150068.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Oh T-J, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang H-L. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol. 2002;73(3):322–33. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.322.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Moon IS, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lindhe J. The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26(10):658–63. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.261005.x.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S313–s8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.17-0739.

30.

Roccuzzo M, Grasso G, Dalmasso P. Keratinized mucosa around implants in partially edentulous posterior mandible: 10-year results of a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(4):491–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12563.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F, Nouneh I. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(2):323–6.PubMed

32.

Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, Fiorellini J, Weber HP. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(10):1170–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01795.x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

33.

Kim BS, Kim YK, Yun PY, Yi YJ, Lee HJ, Kim SG, et al. Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(3):e24–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.010.

34.

Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol. 2006;77(8):1410–20. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050393.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Roos-Jansåker AM, Renvert H, Lindahl C, Renvert S. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part III: factors associated with peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol. 2006;33(4):296–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00908.x.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Wennström JL, Derks J. Is there a need for keratinized mucosa around implants to maintain health and tissue stability? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):136–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02540.x.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Giannobile WV, Jung RE, Schwarz F. Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: Osteology Foundation Consensus Report Part 1-Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 15):7–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13110.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Scheyer ET, Sanz M, Dibart S, Greenwell H, John V, Kim DM, et al. Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86(2 Suppl):S73–6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140377.

39.

Karring T, Lang NP, Loe H. The role of gingival connective tissue in determining epithelial differentiation. J Periodontal Res. 1975;10(1):1–11.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Han TJ, Takei HH, Carranza FA. The strip gingival autograft technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13(2):180–7.PubMed

41.

Schmitt CM, Tudor C, Kiener K, Wehrhan F, Schmitt J, Eitner S, et al. Vestibuloplasty: porcine collagen matrix versus free gingival graft: a clinical and histologic study. J Periodontol. 2013;84(7):914–23. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120084.

42.

Nevins M, Nevins ML, Kim SW, Schupbach P, Kim DM. The use of mucograft collagen matrix to augment the zone of keratinized tissue around teeth: a pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31(4):367–73.PubMed

43.

Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, Martin C, Orsini M. Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(10):868–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01460.x.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Urban IA, Lozada JL, Nagy K, Sanz M. Treatment of severe mucogingival defects with a combination of strip gingival grafts and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015;35(3):345–53. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2287.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Wainwright D, Madden M, Luterman A, Hunt J, Monafo W, Heimbach D, et al. Clinical evaluation of an acellular allograft dermal matrix in full-thickness burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996;17(2):124–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199603000-00006.

46.

Cummings LC, Kaldahl WB, Allen EP. Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. J Periodontol. 2005;76(2):178–86. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.178.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Scarano A, Barros RR, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Novaes AB Jr. Acellular dermal matrix graft for gingival augmentation: a preliminary clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural evaluation. J Periodontol. 2009;80(2):253–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080326.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Jhaveri HM, Chavan MS, Tomar GB, Deshmukh VL, Wani MR, Miller PD Jr. Acellular dermal matrix seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts for the treatment of gingival recession: a proof-of-concept study. J Periodontol. 2010;81(4):616–25. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090530.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Allen EP. AlloDerm: an effective alternative to palatal donor tissue for treatment of gingival recession. Dent Today. 2006;25(1):48, 50-2 quiz 2.

50.

Wei PC, Laurell L, Geivelis M, Lingen MW, Maddalozzo D. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study. J Periodontol. 2000;71(8):1297–305. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.8.1297.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Bhatavadekar NB, Gharpure AS. Sequential ridge augmentation protocol for hard and soft tissue grafting in alveolar ridge deficiencies: a proposed evidence-based algorithm. J Oral Implantol. 2018;44(2):153–60. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00165.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Kadkhodazadeh M, Amid R, Kermani ME, Mirakhori M, Hosseinpour S. Timing of soft tissue management around dental implants: a suggested protocol. Gen Dent. 2017;65(3):50–6.PubMed

53.

Stimmelmayr M, Stangl M, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Clinical prospective study of a modified technique to extend the keratinized gingiva around implants in combination with ridge augmentation: one-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(5):1094–101.PubMed

54.

Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, Wehrhan F, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA. Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft(®) ) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(11):e125–e33. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12575.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Tunkel J, de Stavola L, Khoury F. Changes in soft tissue dimensions following three different techniques of stage-two surgery: a case series report. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2013;33(4):411–8. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.0616.CrossRef

56.

Jiang X, Lin Y. Gain of keratinized mucosa around implants in the posterior mandible by a modified apically positioned flap and xenogeneic collagen matrix. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(5):721–7. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4176.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Basegmez C, Ersanli S, Demirel K, Bölükbasi N, Yalcin S. The comparison of two techniques to increase the amount of peri-implant attached mucosa: free gingival grafts versus vestibuloplasty. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial. European journal of oral implantology. 2012;5(2):139–45.PubMed

58.

Basegmez C, Karabuda ZC, Demirel K, Yalcin S. The comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts with free gingival grafts in the augmentation of peri-implant attached mucosa: a randomised controlled trial. European journal of oral implantology. 2013;6(2):145–52.PubMed

59.

Lorenzo R, García V, Orsini M, Martin C, Sanz M. Clinical efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(3):316–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02260.x.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Park J-B. Increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around endosseous implant using acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent. 2006;15(3):275–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000227078.70869.20.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(10):971–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00520.x.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina R, Schenk RK, Buser D, et al. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res. 2006;85(5):473–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500515.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 1997;68(11):1117–30. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.11.1117.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Ekelund JA, Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: a prospective study on Brånemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(6):602–8.PubMed

65.

Karoussis IK, Brägger U, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Lang NP. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(1):8–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00983.x.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Caricasulo R, Malchiodi L, Ghensi P, Fantozzi G, Cucchi A. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(4):653–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12620.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Hsu YT, Lin GH, Wang HL. Effects of platform-switching on peri-implant soft and hard tissue outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):e9–e24. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5140.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Santiago JF Jr, Batista VE, Verri FR, Honório HM, de Mello CC, Almeida DA, et al. Platform-switching implants and bone preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(3):332–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.009.PubMedCrossRef

69.

Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2006;26(1):9–17.

70.

Trammell K, Geurs NC, O'Neal SJ, Liu P-R, Haigh SJ, McNeal S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of platform-switched and matched-abutment implants in short-span partial denture situations. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2009;29(6):599–605.

71.

Enkling N, Jöhren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(10):1185–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02090.x.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Enkling N, Jöhren P, Katsoulis J, Bayer S, Jervøe-Storm PM, Mericske-Stern R, et al. Influence of platform switching on bone-level alterations: a three-year randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12 Suppl):139s–45s. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513504953.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

73.

Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. Influence of thin mucosal tissues on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching: a 1-year pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(9):2272–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.08.018.PubMedCrossRef

74.

Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: a comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(6):1228–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12222.PubMedCrossRef

75.

• Suárez-López Del Amo F, Lin GH, Monje A, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Influence of soft tissue thickness on Peri-implant marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2016;87(6):690–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.150571This study reviews best evidence on the influence of vertical tissue thickness on crestal bone remodeling.PubMedCrossRef

76.

Lin C-Y, Chen Z, Pan W-L, Wang H-L. Impact of timing on soft tissue augmentation during implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(5):508–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13148.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Puisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone-level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(2):123–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12301.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(4):712–9.PubMed

79.

Linkevicius T, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, Linkeviciene L, Andrijauskas P, Puisys A. Influence of titanium base, lithium disilicate restoration and vertical soft tissue thickness on bone stability around triangular-shaped implants: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(7):716–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13263.PubMedCrossRef

80.

Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, Gineviciute E, Linkeviciene L. The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12903.

81.

Wiesner G, Esposito M, Worthington H, Schlee M. Connective tissue grafts for thickening peri-implant tissues at implant placement. One-year results from an explanatory split-mouth randomised controlled clinical trial. European journal of oral implantology. 2010;3(1):27–35.PubMed

82.

Puisys A, Zukauskas S, Kubilius R, Barbeck M, Razukevičius D, Linkevičiene L, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluations of porcine-derived collagen matrix membrane used for vertical soft tissue augmentation: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(3):341–7. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4097.PubMedCrossRef

83.

Tal H. Autogenous masticatory mucosal grafts in extraction socket seal procedures: a comparison between sockets grafted with demineralized freeze-dried bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(4):289–96.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Jung RE, Siegenthaler DW, Hämmerle CH. Postextraction tissue management: a soft tissue punch technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24(6):545–53.PubMed

85.

Covani U, Marconcini S, Galassini G, Cornelini R, Santini S, Barone A. Connective tissue graft used as a biologic barrier to cover an immediate implant. J Periodontol. 2007;78(8):1644–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060461.PubMedCrossRef

86.

Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Rotated palatal flap. A surgical approach to increase keratinized tissue width in maxillary implant uncovering: technique and clinical evaluation. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2002;22(6):607–12.

87.

Goldstein M, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. The palatal advanced flap: a pedicle flap for primary coverage of immediately placed implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13(6):644–50. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130611.x.PubMedCrossRef

88.

Romanos AH, Geurs NC, Abou-Arraj RV. Pedicle connective tissue graft with novel palatal tunneling. Clinical Advances in Periodontics. 2013;3(4):191–8. https://doi.org/10.1902/cap.2013.120125.CrossRef

89.

Abou-Arraj RV, Geurs NC, Romanos AH. Autogenous options for soft-tissue management of extraction sockets in the anterior maxilla. Clinical Advances in Periodontics. 2013;3(4):259–68. https://doi.org/10.1902/cap.2013.120126.CrossRef

90.

Yoshino S, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized controlled prospective study. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2014;29(2):432–40. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3379.CrossRef

91.

Migliorati M, Amorfini L, Signori A, Biavati AS, Benedicenti S. Clinical and aesthetic outcome with post-extractive implants with or without soft tissue augmentation: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(5):983–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12194.PubMedCrossRef

92.

Hutton CG, Johnson GK, Barwacz CA, Allareddy V, Avila-Ortiz G. Comparison of two different surgical approaches to increase peri-implant mucosal thickness: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2018;89(7):807–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0597.PubMedCrossRef

93.

Lee CT, Tao CY, Stoupel J. The effect of subepithelial connective tissue graft placement on esthetic outcomes after immediate implant placement: systematic review. J Periodontol. 2016;87(2):156–67. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.150383.PubMedCrossRef

94.

Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber H-P, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140–51. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435.PubMedCrossRef

95.

Man Y, Wang Y, Qu Y, Wang P, Gong P. A palatal roll envelope technique for peri-implant mucosa reconstruction: a prospective case series study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(5):660–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.008.PubMedCrossRef

96.

Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S. Minimally invasive technique for gingival augmentation around dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(2):187–93.PubMed

97.

Nemcovsky CE, Moses O, Artzi Z. Interproximal papillae reconstruction in maxillary implants. J Periodontol. 2000;71(2):308–14. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.2.308.PubMedCrossRef

98.

Burkhardt R, Joss A, Lang NP. Soft tissue dehiscence coverage around endosseous implants: a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(5):451–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01497.x.PubMedCrossRef

99.

Roccuzzo M, Dalmasso P, Pittoni D, Roccuzzo A. Treatment of buccal soft tissue dehiscence around single implant: 5-year results from a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(4):1977–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2634-4.PubMedCrossRef

100.

Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hermans A, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. A 5-year prospective study on single immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(8):702–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12571.PubMedCrossRef

101.

Zucchelli G, Felice P, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Mounssif I, Monaco C, et al. 5-year outcomes after coverage of soft tissue dehiscence around single implants: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(2):215–24.PubMed

102.

Anderson LE, Inglehart MR, El-Kholy K, Eber R, Wang H-L. Implant associated soft tissue defects in the anterior maxilla: a randomized control trial comparing subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent. 2014;23(4):416–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000122.PubMedCrossRef

103.

De Bruyckere T, Eghbali A, Younes F, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. Horizontal stability of connective tissue grafts at the buccal aspect of single implants: a 1-year prospective case series. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(9):876–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12448.PubMedCrossRef

104.

Schallhorn RA, McClain PK, Charles A, Clem D, Newman MG. Evaluation of a porcine collagen matrix used to augment keratinized tissue and increase soft tissue thickness around existing dental implants. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2015;35, 99(1):–103. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1888.

105.

González-Martín O, Lee E, Weisgold A, Veltri M, Su H. Contour management of implant restorations for optimal emergence profiles: guidelines for immediate and delayed provisional restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40(1):61–70. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4422.PubMedCrossRef

106.

Furze D, Byrne A, Alam S, Wittneben JG. Esthetic outcome of implant supported crowns with and without peri-implant conditioning using provisional fixed prosthesis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(6):1153–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12416.PubMedCrossRef

107.

Wittneben JG, Buser D, Belser UC, Brägger U. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations in the esthetic zone: the dynamic compression technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(4):447–55. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1268.PubMedCrossRef

108.

Belser U, Buser D, Higginbottom F. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(Suppl):73–4.PubMed

109.

De Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, Cosyn J. Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(6):566–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01674.x.PubMedCrossRef

110.

Block MS, Mercante DE, Lirette D, Mohamed W, Ryser M, Castellon P. Prospective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(11 Suppl):89–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.009.PubMedCrossRef

111.

Ruales-Carrera E, Pauletto P, Apaza-Bedoya K, Volpato CAM, Özcan M, Benfatti CAM. Peri-implant tissue management after immediate implant placement using a customized healing abutment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(6):533–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12512.PubMedCrossRef

112.

Perez A, Caiazzo A, Valente NA, Toti P, Alfonsi F, Barone A. Standard vs customized healing abutments with simultaneous bone grafting for tissue changes around immediate implants. 1-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(1):42–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12871.PubMedCrossRef

113.

Lops D, Stellini E, Sbricoli L, Cea N, Romeo E, Bressan E. Influence of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissues in anterior areas with thin gingival biotype: a multicentric prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(10):1263–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12952.PubMedCrossRef

114.

Jung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27(3):251–7.PubMed

115.

Ioannidis A, Cathomen E, Jung RE, Fehmer V, Husler J, Thoma DS. Discoloration of the mucosa caused by different restorative materials - a spectrophotometric in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(9):1133–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12928.PubMedCrossRef

116.

Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11–25.PubMed

117.

Park J. Increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around endosseous implant using acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent. 2006;15(3):275–81.PubMedCrossRef

118.

119.

Bienz SP, Jung RE, Sapata VM, Hämmerle CHF, Hüsler J, Thoma DS. Volumetric changes and peri-implant health at implant sites with or without soft tissue grafting in the esthetic zone, a retrospective case-control study with a 5-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(11):1459–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13013.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Soft Tissue Grafting Around Implants: Why, When, and How?
verfasst von: Ramzi V. Abou-Arraj
Andrea Pizzini
Peter Nasseh
Hussein S. Basma
Publikationsdatum: 09.11.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Current Oral Health Reports / Ausgabe 4/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-3002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-020-00291-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Soft Tissue Grafting Around Implants: Why, When, and How?

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Current Scientific Evidence of Clinical Performance of Veneered Zirconia Crowns and Fixed Dental Prostheses

Additive Manufacturing in Dentistry: Current Technologies, Clinical Applications, and Limitations

Digital Intraoral Impression Methods: an Update on Accuracy

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Imaging for the Assessment of Periodontal Disease

Clinical Longevity of Zirconia Implants with the Focus on Biomechanical and Biological Outcome

Nile Tilapia Fish Skin, Scales, and Spine as Naturally Derived Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter