Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Public Health 3/2022

25.06.2020 | Original Article

Support for 100% Tobacco-Free Policy on a College Campus in New Jersey: Differences between students and faculty/staff

verfasst von: Aleksandar Kecojevic, William D. Kernan, Abigail Urena, Andrea Pereda, Reem Shair, Elizabeth Amaya-Fernandez

Erschienen in: Journal of Public Health | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

Using quantitative and qualitative approaches we investigated the support for a 100% tobacco-free campus policy (TFCP) at a New Jersey public university.

Subjects and methods

The survey included 912 students and 324 faculty/staff. A multivariate ordinal regression was used to identify predictors of support/opposition to a TFCP. Open-ended comments were analyzed thematically to examine participants’ attitudes regarding TFCP.

Results

Support for TFCP was higher among faculty/staff (Mean = 11.6, SD = 5.2) than among students (Mean = 9.0, SD = 5.9)(t = 6.8, p < 0.001). Among students, predictors of support for TFCP included female sex, not using tobacco, concern about secondhand smoke (SHS), and experiencing SHS effects. Among faculty/staff, predictors of support included not using tobacco and concern about SHS. Open-ended comments emphasized reasons for support (concern about SHS, smokers’ health, cessation encouragement, University image) and opposition (smoker rights, more pressing concerns, stress, concerns about a drop in enrollment).

Conclusion

While a majority of campus constituents support a shift to TFCP, higher levels of opposition among some campus constituents (i.e., students, male smokers) persist. TFCP advocates need to be aware of common misconceptions that contribute to opposition to TFCP.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat American College Health Association (2018) American College Health Association-national college health assessment II: undergraduate student reference group executive summary fall 2018. Hanover, MD American College Health Association (2018) American College Health Association-national college health assessment II: undergraduate student reference group executive summary fall 2018. Hanover, MD
Zurück zum Zitat Kingston HB (2019) Tobacco Control Legal Consortium. There is no constitutional right to smoke or toke. Public Health Law Center/Tobacco Control Legal Consortium. Accessed June 4, 2020 Kingston HB (2019) Tobacco Control Legal Consortium. There is no constitutional right to smoke or toke. Public Health Law Center/Tobacco Control Legal Consortium. Accessed June 4, 2020
Zurück zum Zitat US Department of Health and Human Services (2014) Executive Summary - The Health Consequences of Smoking - 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. U S Department of Health and Human Services,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Health, Office on Smoking and Health. https://doi.org/NBK179276 US Department of Health and Human Services (2014) Executive Summary - The Health Consequences of Smoking - 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. U S Department of Health and Human Services,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Health, Office on Smoking and Health. https://​doi.​org/​NBK179276
Metadaten
Titel
Support for 100% Tobacco-Free Policy on a College Campus in New Jersey: Differences between students and faculty/staff
verfasst von
Aleksandar Kecojevic
William D. Kernan
Abigail Urena
Andrea Pereda
Reem Shair
Elizabeth Amaya-Fernandez
Publikationsdatum
25.06.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Public Health / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 2198-1833
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-2238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01344-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Journal of Public Health 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe