Surgical outcomes of spinal fusion for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in patients with Parkinson’s disease: what is the impact of Parkinson’s disease on surgical outcome?
To date, there have been little published data on surgical outcomes for patients with PD with thoracolumbar OVF. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of registry data to investigate the outcomes of fusion surgery for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) with osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) in the thoracolumbar junction.
Methods
Retrospectively registered data were collected from 27 universities and their affiliated hospitals in Japan. In total, 26 patients with PD (mean age, 76 years; 3 men and 23 women) with thoracolumbar OVF who underwent spinal fusion with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included (PD group). Surgical invasion, perioperative complications, radiographic sagittal alignment, mechanical failure (MF) related to instrumentation, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. A control group of 296 non-PD patients (non-PD group) matched for age, sex, distribution of surgical procedures, number of fused segments, and follow-up period were used for comparison.
Results
The PD group showed higher rates of perioperative complications (p < 0.01) and frequency of delirium than the non-PD group (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the degree of kyphosis correction, frequency of MF, visual analog scale of the symptoms, and improvement according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system between the two groups. However, the PD group showed a higher proportion of non-ambulators and dependent ambulators with walkers at the final follow-up (p < 0.01).
Conclusions
A similar surgical strategy can be applicable to patients with PD with OVF in the thoracolumbar junction. However, physicians should pay extra attention to intensive perioperative care to prevent various adverse events and implement a rehabilitation regimen to regain walking ability.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an age-related, neurodegenerative disorder with a prevalence that is increasing as the population ages. It is characterized by motor- and various non-motor symptoms, which, in particular, increases the risk of falls and consequent fragility fractures. A large epidemiological study of community dwelling elderly women reported that people with PD were more likely to sustain a fracture than their peers (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–3.1). [1] This has been caused by a higher chance of both falls and reduced bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with PD. [2] Reduced BMD is common, and can be typically diagnosed using dual X-ray absorptiometry imaging. [3] A recent study of 186 patients with PD at the early stage demonstrated that 11.8 and 41.4% of patients were diagnosed as osteoporosis (T-score less than − 2.5), and osteopenia (T-score between − 1 and − 2.5), respectively. [4] In addition, reduced BMD can be caused by immobility, vitamin D deficiency, use of dopaminergic treatments, and reduced nutritional intake in patients with PD.
Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is the most common fragility fracture and frequently causes back pain, neurological symptoms, and spinal deformity. Thoracolumbar OVF is a common spinal disorder in elderly patients, [5, 6] and the number of patients with thoracolumbar OVF undergoing spinal fusion has been increasing in our aging society. Consequently, a large variety of surgical fusion techniques have been used to treat OVF including anterior spinal fusion (ASF) [7, 8]; posterior spinal fusion alone (PSF) [9, 10]; combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion (APSF) [11]; posterior 3 column osteotomy (3CO), including shortening osteotomy [12, 13] or vertebral column resection [14]; and vertebroplasty with posterior spinal fusion (VP + PSF) [13, 15‐17]. However, there is little published data on surgical outcomes of spinal fusion for patients with PD with thoracolumbar OVF.
Anzeige
We hypothesized that patients with PD with thoracolumbar OVF suffered from poorer surgical outcomes, including frequency of perioperative complications and quality of life, compared to non-PD patients. To evaluate this hypothesis, we conducted a retrospective review of a multicenter database of patients with OVF in the thoracolumbar spine to clarify the effectiveness and associated problems of fusion surgery for patients with PD.
Methods
This study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of all institutions involved. The study was performed by JASA (Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition) using a retrospective analysis of patients with OVF treated by spinal fusion surgery at 27 university hospitals and their affiliated hospitals. A total of 26 patients with PD (PD group), including 3 men and 22 women, were identified based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) OVF in the thoracolumbar spine (from T10 to L2); 2) existence of neurological impairment, including motor deficit or neuralgia in the lower extremity; 3) underwent instrumented spinal fusion concomitant with autologous bone grafting (excluding stand-alone vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty); and 4) a minimum of 2 years of follow-up after surgery. The diagnosis of PD was based on the United Kingdom Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank Criteria. [18] The average age and body mass index (BMI) at the time of surgery were 75.7 years (range, 67–89 years) and 21.8 kg/m2 (range, 14.2–34.9 kg/m2), respectively. The collapsed vertebral levels were T11, T12, L1, and L2 in 3, 8, 11, and 4 patients, respectively. The surgical procedures consisted of 4 typical techniques: PSF (n = 3), APSF (n = 2), 3CO (n = 9), and VP + PSF (n = 12), and the mean number of fused segments was 4.1 segments (range, 2–8 segments). The mean PD duration was 60.0 ± 50.6 months (range, 0–168 months), and the Hoehn and Yahr stage [19] was stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 in 2, 6, 13, and 5 patients, respectively. Demographic data are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Comparison of demographic data between the 2 groups
PD group
Non-PD group
p value
N of patients
26
296
–
Age at operation (years) median, [IQR]
76.0 [8.0]
75.0 [10.8]
0.3343
Sex [male/female] (N of patients)
3/23
66/230
0.1999
BMI (kg/m2) median, [IQR]
22.1 [6.3]
22.5 [4.7]
0.1600
Vertebral level (N of patients)
T11: 3
T10: 16
0.6112
T12: 8
T11: 25
L1: 11
T12: 116
L2: 4
L1: 103
L2: 36
Surgical procedure (N of patients)
APSF: 2
ASF: 19
0.7176
PSF: 3
APSF: 27
3CO: 9
PSF: 37
VP + PSF: 12
3CO: 84
VP + PSF: 129
Number of fused segment (segment) median, [IQR]
4.0 [2.0]
4.0 [2.0]
0.9534
BMD YAM (%) median, [IQR]
73.0 [25.0]
69.0 [19.8]
0.9295
Number of patients with existing vertebral fracture [fx/no fx] (N of patients)
8/18
108/188
0.7338
Number of comorbidity (disease) median, [IQR]
1.0 [0.0]
1.0 [1.0]
< 0.0001
Follow-up period (month) median, [IQR]
37.0 [19.0]
44.0 [28.0]
0.1787
Abbreviation: N number, IQR interquartile range, BMI body mass index, ASF anterior spinal fusion, APSF combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion, PSF posterior spinal fusion, 3CO 3 column osteotomy, VP + PSF vertebroplasty with PSF, BMD bone mineral density, YAM young adult mean, fx fracture
The control group comprised 296 non-PD patients with thoracolumbar OVF (non-PD group) whose data were retrieved from the same database (Table 1); there were no statistically significant differences with respect to age, sex, BMI, distribution of collapsed vertebral levels, distribution of surgical procedures, number of fused segments, and follow-up period between the PD and non-PD groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The outcome measures were compared between the 2 study groups.
Surgical procedure
The surgical procedures comprised various instrumentations or bone grafting techniques used in the retrospective multicenter database. The ASF surgical procedure was performed using a rod or plate system with an iliac or rib bone strut graft or metal cage. The APSF surgical procedure was a combination of ASF using an iliac or fibula strut graft and PSF using a pedicle screw and rod system. The PSF surgical procedure was performed using a pedicle screw and rod system, occasionally using laminar hooks in the uppermost or lowermost instrumented vertebra. The 3CO surgical procedure consisted of PSF as described above and vertebral column resection with reconstruction using a metal cage or eggshell shortening osteotomy through the posterior approach only. For VP + PSF, the surgical procedure consisted of PSF as described above and VP using hydroxyapatite blocks or paste performed via a transpedicular approach.
Anzeige
Evaluation
Surgical invasion, radiographic sagittal alignment, mechanical failure (MF), and clinical outcomes were evaluated from medical charts, plain radiographs, and computed tomography images. The evaluation of surgical invasion included the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative complications. Radiographic sagittal alignment included the local kyphosis angle on the lateral view of plain radiographs measured between the upper endplate of the uninvolved vertebra above the affected level and the lower endplate of the uninvolved vertebra below the affected level using the Cobb method (Fig. 1). The evaluation of mechanical failure included the presence of pedicle screw pull-out, cage migration, fracture of the uppermost or lowermost instrumented vertebra, hook dislodgement, and rod fracture. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS; ranging from 0 [no symptoms] to 100 [worst symptoms]) for lower back pain and lower extremity pain or numbness; the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring system ([JOA score], ranging from 0 [worst condition] to 15 [best condition]) (Additional file 1); walking ability using the following grading system: grade 1, independent walking; 2, dependent walking with a cane; 3, dependent walking with walker; and 4, unable to walk (requiring a wheelchair); and occurrence of subsequent vertebral fracture. The rate of improvement in both lower back pain and lower extremity pain was assessed with the JOA score using Hirabayashi’s method [20] as follows: ([postsurgical score - presurgical score] / [15 - presurgical score] × 100).
Fig. 1
Line graph showing the change in the mean local kyphosis angle preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Both groups showed significant correction between the before surgery and the final follow-up (p < 0.05). PD, Parkinson’s disease
×
Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed using StatView-J 5.0 software (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). The changes in investigated parameters before and after surgery were evaluated using the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The changes in continuous and discrete variables between the two groups were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-squared test, respectively. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in all analyses.
Comparison of the outcome variables data between the 2 groups
PD group
Non-PD group
p value
Operation time (min.) median, [IQR]
214.0 [100.0]
237.0 [130.5]
0.4193
Intraoperative blood loss (ml) median, [IQR]
450.0 [627.0]
402.0 [575.5]
0.2761
Perioperative complication [complication/ no complication] (N of patients)
10/16
45/251
0.0063
Local kyphosis angle (°) median, [IQR]
Preop.
27.0 [21.0]
26.0 [19.0]
0.9965
Postop.
6.0 [18.0]
8.0 [13.4]
0.8072
Final
18.7 [18.0]
14.0 [18.0]
0.3357
Amount of kyphosis correction
10.8 [26.1]
10.0 [16.0]
0.6611
Mechanical failure (%)
26.9
17.9
0.7464
JOA score improvement rate (%) median, [IQR]
50.0 [38.5]
53.8 [39.2]
0.1074
Walking ability (N of patients)
Preop.
Grade1: 2
Grade1: 16
0.1030
Grade 2: 1
Grade 2: 44
Grade 3: 4
Grade 3: 86
Grade 4: 19
Grade 4: 150
Final
Grade1: 3
Grade1: 114
0.0007
Grade 2: 5
Grade 2: 92
Grade 3: 12
Grade 3: 70
Grade 4: 6
Grade 4: 19
Subsequent vertebral fracture (%)
38.4
35.1
0.7338
Abbreviation: N number, IQR interquartile range, JOA score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system
Surgical invasion
There were no significant differences in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the 2 groups (p > 0.05 for both comparisons). The PD group showed a higher rate of perioperative complications (odds ratio 3.48; 95% CI 1.488–8.168, p = 0.0060) and frequency of delirium than the non-PD group (PD group: 23.1%, non-PD group: 3.4%)(odds ratio 8.58; 95% CI 2.83–26.009, p < 0.0001) (Table 3).
Table 3
Details of perioperative complications
Perioperative complication
PD group (N of patients)
Non-PD group (N of patients)
Overall [incidence]
10 [38.5%]
45 [15.2%]
Intraoperative complication
Surgical site infection
0
7
Neurological deficit
1
6
Dural tear
0
5
Epidural hematoma
0
3
Massive hemorrhage (> 5000 ml)
0
1
Postoperative complication
Delirium
6
10
Cardiac disease
0
4
Gastrointestinal disease
0
4
Deep venous thrombosis
1
2
Urinary tract infection
1
0
Pneumonia
0
2
Electrolyte abnormality
0
1
Decubitus
1
0
Abbreviation: N number
Radiographic sagittal alignment
Regarding the correction of the local kyphosis angle after surgery, both groups showed significant correction between the before surgery and the final follow-up (p < 0.05 for both comparisons) (Fig. 1). There were no significant differences in the degree of kyphosis correction between the groups (p > 0.05).
MF
In the PD group, 8 mechanical failures (26.9%) were identified. There were no significant differences in the frequency of mechanical failures between the two groups (Table 4).
Table 4
Details of mechanical failures
Mechanical failure
PD group (N of patients)
Non-PD group (N of patients)
Overall [incidence]
7 [26.9%]
53 [17.9%]
Pedicle/vertebral screw pull-out
4
24
Intervertebral cage migration
0
9
Uppermost vertebral fracture
2
11
Lowermost vertebral fracture
1
4
Hook dislodgement
0
3
Rod fracture
0
2
Abbreviation: N number
Clinical outcome
Regarding the severity of neurological symptoms according to the VAS, both groups demonstrated significant improvement in lower back pain and lower extremity pain at the final follow-up (p < 0.05 for all comparisons) (Fig. 2). There were no significant differences in the VAS preoperatively and at the final follow-up between the groups. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in the JOA score (p < 0.05 for all comparisons) (Fig. 3), and there was no significant difference in the improvement rate between the groups. There were no significant differences in the walking ability grade preoperatively; however, the PD group showed a higher proportion of patients in grades 3 and 4 at the final follow-up (odds ratio 3.788; 95% CI 1.719–8.347, p = 0.0007). Overall, 114 patients (35.4%) sustained a subsequent vertebral fracture and there were no significant differences in the incidence between the groups.
Fig. 2
a Box and whisker plot showing the mean lower back pain VAS preoperatively and at the final follow-up. b Box and whisker plot showing the mean lower extremity pain VAS preoperatively and at the final follow-up. VAS, visual analog scale
Fig. 3
Box and whisker plot showing the mean JOA scores preoperatively and at the final follow-up. JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring system
×
×
Discussion
In the present study, patients with PD unexpectedly demonstrated acceptable and similar clinical outcomes compared to non-PD patients, including surgical invasion, local kyphosis correction, frequency of instrumentation-related MF, severity of symptoms, and JOA score. On the other hand, patients with PD demonstrated a higher rate of perioperative complications and inferior walking ability after surgery due to characteristic physical conditions related to PD itself.
Anzeige
Frequency of perioperative complications
According to a large, national insurance database, PD was significantly associated with an increased risk for major medical complications (adjusted OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11–1.34) including myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accidents, and pneumonia following thoracolumbar fusion surgery. [21] According to another large, nationwide inpatient database, PD was a significant predictor of major postoperative complications (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.37–2.22) including surgical site infection, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory complications, cardiac events, stroke, and renal failure following spine surgery. [22] In addition, postoperative delirium was more common in patients with PD (30.3%) than in the controls (4.3%), [22] which was in agreement with the present study. Postoperative delirium is a common complication of surgical procedures in the elderly, [23] and acute delirium increases morbidity and mortality leading to prolonged hospitalization. [24, 25] Therefore, physicians should be aware of the various adverse events that may occur, especially due to interruption of anti-parkinsonism drugs following spine surgery. Moreover, a noteworthy finding is that despite the relatively higher risk of potentially fatal parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia syndrome, [26] no such cases occurred in the present study. Needless to say, the establishment of a partnership between orthopedic surgeons and neurologists is essential for perioperative care, and early intervention against adverse events is desirable.
Surgical strategy for patients with PD and OVF in the thoracolumbar junction
Thoracolumbar OVF is a common spinal disorder in elderly patients, [5, 6] which frequently causes neurological symptoms including spinal cord or cauda equina impairment. Based on previous reports, a consensus has emerged that delayed neurological impairment following OVF is primarily caused by instability of the fracture site rather than mechanical neural compression by ectopic bony fragments. [9, 10, 15] Based on the previous studies, patients with PD have higher chance of postoperative complications and unintended revision surgeries after spinal fusion. Additionally, surgically treated patients with PD tend to have poorer outcomes and lower fusion rates, especially in patients who undergo multi-level fusion. [27, 28] A consensus has emerged that long-segment corrective fusion surgery tends to be necessary for global sagittal malalignment, owing to the progressively stooped posture as PD progresses, and the risk of unfavorable biomechanics related to a long lever arm at the lumbosacral junction. [29] Although various surgical procedures have provided acceptable outcomes for thoracolumbar OVF, we hypothesized that patients with PD and thoracolumbar OVF may have poorer surgical outcomes. In the present study, they surprisingly showed acceptable outcomes as assessed by several indicators including frequency of perioperative complications, amount of kyphosis correction, and improvement of the VAS and JOA score. With regard to the walking ability, patients with PD had a higher proportion of non-ambulators and dependent ambulators with walkers, which might be caused by the diminished baseline physical capacity due to PD itself. Therefore, the results of the present study can conclude that the same conventionally used surgical indications are applicable to PD patients with OVF in the thoracolumbar junction.
There are some limitations of this study. First, the study design was retrospective, and the study was based on data review, which did not allow us to evaluate the severity of preoperative vertebral collapse, surgical details, such as choice of approach, use of supplemental anchors, and concomitant decompression procedures, and global spinal alignment. Second, selection bias could not be avoided due to different indications for non-PD and PD patients based on the various motor or non-motor symptoms associated with PD. Third, we could evaluate the PD status according to the simple 5-grade classification, but could not evaluate the severity of motor- or non-motor symptoms associated with PD. Therefore, a prospective study with a larger sample size that provides detailed specific symptoms on PD must be conducted to elucidate the effect of PD on surgical outcomes in patients with OVF. Despite these limitations, this study presents the largest case series evaluating the surgical outcomes in patients with PD and OVF in the thoracolumbar junction; the number of such patients is currently increasing due to unprecedented aging of the population.
Conclusion
Spinal fusion for patients with PD and OVF in the thoracolumbar junction resulted in good radiological and symptomatic improvement, except for frequency of perioperative complications and functional improvement of walking ability, compared to non-PD patients. Moreover, they were similar with regard to prevalence of instrumentation-related MF and subsequent vertebral fracture. The results of this study imply that same conventionally used surgical strategy can be applicable for patients with PD and OVF in the thoracolumbar junction. However, multidisciplinary, intensive perioperative care must be provided by the orthopedic surgeons and neurologists in unison to prevent various adverse events and a rehabilitation regimen implemented to regain the patients’ walking status before the OVF-related injury.
Anzeige
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all supporting members of the Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition (JASA).
Funding
The research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies.
Availability of data and materials
All relevant data supporting the conclusions are included within the article and tables. The dataset used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the ethics committee of all institutions involved. Informed consent was waivered by the above ethics committee as the present retrospective cohort study involved already existing data and records at the time of investigation, and did not retain personal identifiers of the gathered information.
Anzeige
The ethical committee, Niigata University School of Medicine; reference number 2015-1385
The ethical committee, Osaka University School of Medicine; 11360-3
The ethical committee, Tokyo Medical University; 2605
The ethical committee, Osaka City University School of Medicine; 3170
The ethical committee, Nagasaki University School of Medicine; 17032715
The ethical committee, Tokyo Medical and Dental University; M2016-055
The ethical committee, Kyushu University School of Medicine; 28-359
The ethical committee, Jichi Medical University; A13-82
The ethical committee, Kitasato University School of Medicine; B16-34
The ethical committee, Osaka Medical College; 2169
The ethical committee, Tokai University School of Medicine; 16R-033
The ethical committee, Shinshu University School of Medicine; 3456
The ethical committee, Chiba University School of Medicine; 2481
The ethical committee, Nagoya University School of Medicine; 2016-0177
The ethical committee, Kochi University School of Medicine; 2016-116
The ethical committee, Kanazawa University School of Medicine; 2015-075
The ethical committee, University of Toyama School of Medicine; 21-22
The ethical committee, Akita University School of Medicine; 1879
The ethical committee, Kobe University School of Medicine; 160004
The ethical committee, Nihon University Itabashi Hospital; RK-160913-21
The ethical committee, Hokkaido University School of Medicine; 015-0396
The ethical committee, Iwate Medical University; H28-88
The ethical committee, University of Tsukuba School of Medicine; H27-133
The ethical committee, Hiroshima University School of Medicine; Epi-139
The ethical committee, Keio University School of Medicine; 20110141
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Surgical outcomes of spinal fusion for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in patients with Parkinson’s disease: what is the impact of Parkinson’s disease on surgical outcome?
Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.
Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.
Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.
Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.
Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.
