Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2012 | Study protocol | Ausgabe 1/2012 Open Access

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Sustainability of healthcare innovations (SUSHI): long term effects of two implemented surgical care programmes (protocol)

Zeitschrift:
BMC Health Services Research > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Stephanie M C Ament, Freek Gillissen, José M C Maessen, Carmen D Dirksen, Trudy van der Weijden, Maarten F von Meyenfeldt
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1472-6963-12-423) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Stephanie M C Ament, Freek Gillissen contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests.

Authors’ contributions

SMCA is a health scientist, main investigator and PhD student. FG is a medical doctor, also main investigator and PhD student. MVM is the principal investigator and applicant of the proposed research. TvdW is co-applicant of this project. CDD and JMCM are the daily coordinators of the SUSHI-study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

Two healthcare innovations were successfully implemented using different implementation strategies. First, a Short Stay Programme for breast cancer surgery (MaDO) was implemented in four early adopter hospitals, using a hospital-tailored implementation strategy. Second, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme for colonic surgery was implemented in 33 Dutch hospitals, using a generic breakthrough implementation strategy. Both strategies resulted in a shorter hospital length of stay without a decrease in quality of care. Currently, it is unclear to what extent these innovative programmes and their results have been sustained three to five years following implementation. The aim of the sustainability of healthcare innovations (SUSHI) study is to analyse sustainability and its determinants using two implementation cases.

Methods

This observational study uses a mixed methods approach. The study will be performed in 14 hospitals in the Netherlands, from November 2010. For both implementation cases, the programme aspects and the effects will be evaluated by means of a follow-up measurement in 160 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery and 300 patients who underwent colonic surgery. A policy cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective will be performed prospectively for the Short Stay Programme for breast cancer surgery in 160 patients. To study determinants of sustainability key professionals in the multidisciplinary care processes and implementation change agents will be interviewed using semi-structured interviews.

Discussion

The concept of sustainability is not commonly studied in implementation science. The SUSHI study will provide insight in to what extent the short-term implementation benefits have been maintained and in the determinants of long-term continuation of programme activities.
Zusatzmaterial
Additional file 1: Short Stay Programme in breast cancer surgery.(DOC 30 KB)
12913_2012_2387_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Additional file 2: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme in colonic surgery.(DOC 28 KB)
12913_2012_2387_MOESM2_ESM.doc
Additional file 3: Interview themes for sustainability.(DOC 26 KB)
12913_2012_2387_MOESM3_ESM.doc
Authors’ original file for figure 1
12913_2012_2387_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe