Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2017

14.11.2016 | Original Article

The 300 most cited articles published in periodontology

verfasst von: Clovis Mariano Faggion Jr, Lilian Málaga, Alberto Monje, Anna-Lena Trescher, Stefan Listl, Marco Antonio Alarcón

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

It is important to evaluate the characteristics of the most cited articles in any specialty. The number of citations may be a proxy for clinical and research activity. The objectives of the present methodological study were (1) to report the characteristics of the 300 most cited articles in periodontology and (2) to explore the association of these characteristics with the number of citations.

Methods

We searched in the Web of Science database for the 300 most cited articles published in periodontology on June 15, 2015. We described characteristics of the articles such as type of study, type of scientific journal, topic reported, year of publication, affiliation of the first author of the article, and impact factor. Linear regression analysis was used to investigate associations of these variables with the number of citations.

Results

The search retrieved approximately 155,356 publications; out of the studies that met the eligibility criteria, the 300 most cited were included for analysis. Comprising more than 50 % of the included articles, basic biology and the detection of bacteria were the most prevalent topics. Narrative reviews were the most frequent type of article (27 % of the sample). Regression analysis demonstrated that some characteristics, for example “narrative reviews,” are more prone to be cited than others.

Conclusion

We conclude that scientific evolution in periodontology has been based more on narrative reviews than on reproducible systematic reviews.

Clinical relevance

Future research is encouraged to elucidate the extent to which scientific progress is improved through systematic compared with narrative reviews.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith GD, Coatesworth B, Ferrie J, Ebrahim S (2014) Impact factors: do potential authors care? Epidemiology 25:307–308CrossRefPubMed Smith GD, Coatesworth B, Ferrie J, Ebrahim S (2014) Impact factors: do potential authors care? Epidemiology 25:307–308CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Iqbal A, Glenny AM (2002) General dental practitioners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards evidence based practice. Br Dent J 193:587–591CrossRefPubMed Iqbal A, Glenny AM (2002) General dental practitioners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards evidence based practice. Br Dent J 193:587–591CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pommer B, Becker K, Arnhart C, Fabian F, Rathe F, Stigler RG (2016) How meta-analytic evidence impacts clinical decision making in oral implantology: a Delphi opinion poll. Clin Oral Implants Res 27:282–287CrossRefPubMed Pommer B, Becker K, Arnhart C, Fabian F, Rathe F, Stigler RG (2016) How meta-analytic evidence impacts clinical decision making in oral implantology: a Delphi opinion poll. Clin Oral Implants Res 27:282–287CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieri M, Saletta D, Guidi L, Buti J, Franceschi D, Mauro S et al (2007) Citation classics in periodontology: a controlled study. J Clin Periodontol 34:349–358CrossRefPubMed Nieri M, Saletta D, Guidi L, Buti J, Franceschi D, Mauro S et al (2007) Citation classics in periodontology: a controlled study. J Clin Periodontol 34:349–358CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Corbella S, Francetti L, Taschieri S, Weinstein R, Del Fabbro M (2016) Analysis of the 100 most-cited articles in periodontology. J Investig Clin Dent. doi:10.1111/jicd.12222 Corbella S, Francetti L, Taschieri S, Weinstein R, Del Fabbro M (2016) Analysis of the 100 most-cited articles in periodontology. J Investig Clin Dent. doi:10.​1111/​jicd.​12222
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22:338–342CrossRefPubMed Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22:338–342CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Faggion CM Jr (2015) Animal research as a basis for clinical trials. Eur J Oral Sci 123:61–64CrossRefPubMed Faggion CM Jr (2015) Animal research as a basis for clinical trials. Eur J Oral Sci 123:61–64CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Markovitz AR, Goldstick JE, Levy K, Cevallos W, Mukherjee B, Trostle JA, Eisenberg JN (2012) Where science meets policy: comparing longitudinal and cross-sectional designs to address diarrhoeal disease burden in the developing world. Int J Epidemiol 41:504–513CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Markovitz AR, Goldstick JE, Levy K, Cevallos W, Mukherjee B, Trostle JA, Eisenberg JN (2012) Where science meets policy: comparing longitudinal and cross-sectional designs to address diarrhoeal disease burden in the developing world. Int J Epidemiol 41:504–513CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Listl S, Jürges H, Watt RG (2016 Oct) Causal inference from observational data. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 44(5):409–415CrossRefPubMed Listl S, Jürges H, Watt RG (2016 Oct) Causal inference from observational data. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 44(5):409–415CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB (1997) Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 126:376–380CrossRefPubMed Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB (1997) Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 126:376–380CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L (2006) Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr 3:7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L (2006) Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr 3:7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW (2009) Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 302:1092–1096CrossRefPubMed Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW (2009) Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 302:1092–1096CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, Ramos I, Diz P (2014) The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clin Oral Investig 18:699–706CrossRefPubMed Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, Ramos I, Diz P (2014) The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clin Oral Investig 18:699–706CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fardi A, Kodonas K, Gogos C, Economides N (2011) Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endod 37:1183–1190CrossRefPubMed Fardi A, Kodonas K, Gogos C, Economides N (2011) Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endod 37:1183–1190CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Christou P, Antonarakis GS (2015) The 100 most-cited human cleft lip and palate-related articles published in dentistry, oral surgery, and medicine journals. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 52:437–446CrossRefPubMed Christou P, Antonarakis GS (2015) The 100 most-cited human cleft lip and palate-related articles published in dentistry, oral surgery, and medicine journals. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 52:437–446CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jafarzadeh H, Sarraf Shirazi A, Andersson L (2015) The most-cited articles in dental, oral, and maxillofacial traumatology during 64 years. Dent Traumatol 31:350–360CrossRefPubMed Jafarzadeh H, Sarraf Shirazi A, Andersson L (2015) The most-cited articles in dental, oral, and maxillofacial traumatology during 64 years. Dent Traumatol 31:350–360CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kornman KS, Robertson PB, Williams RC (2014) Commentary: knowledge that shaped the field of periodontology: the American Academy of Periodontology Centennial Commentaries. J Periodontol 85:1–2CrossRefPubMed Kornman KS, Robertson PB, Williams RC (2014) Commentary: knowledge that shaped the field of periodontology: the American Academy of Periodontology Centennial Commentaries. J Periodontol 85:1–2CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (2011). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins, JPT, Green, S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, Available from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (2011). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins, JPT, Green, S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, Available from http://​www.​cochrane-handbook.​org/​.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C et al (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C et al (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B et al (2016) ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 69:225–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B et al (2016) ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 69:225–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
The 300 most cited articles published in periodontology
verfasst von
Clovis Mariano Faggion Jr
Lilian Málaga
Alberto Monje
Anna-Lena Trescher
Stefan Listl
Marco Antonio Alarcón
Publikationsdatum
14.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1990-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.