Background
Patellofemoral pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders presenting to orthopaedic and sports clinics, as well as general practices [
1‐
5]. Factors contributing to the development of patellofemoral pain in the absence of a defined arthropathy, such as osteoarthritis (OA), are unclear and have predominantly been classified as idiopathic [
6].
It has been widely hypothesised that patellofemoral pain syndrome is the result of patellofemoral maltracking and abnormal patella alignment and congruity [
7,
8]. One study hypothesised that the decrease in contact area is a potential source of pain due to the increased cartilage stress [
9]. Previous research has predominantly been descriptive, comparing parameters of patellofemoral geometry in those with and without patellofemoral pain [
9‐
11]. In contrast, studies that have examined the relationship between patellofemoral geometry on pain and cartilage are scarce. The small number of studies that have been performed have shown that greater lateral patella inclination, a shallower femoral sulcus and patella alta (a high-riding patella) are characteristic of subjects with patellofemoral pain [
8,
9,
11‐
13]. Similarly, a shallow femoral sulcus is thought to reduce the congruency of the patellofemoral joint, and contribute toward instability, being associated with subluxation/dislocation syndromes [
14,
15]. Nonetheless, the relationship between these indices of patella alignment and congruity and anterior knee pain has not been widely examined. Moreover, it is unclear how these indices may influence patellofemoral joint structures, such as cartilage. Understanding how patellofemoral geometry may be related to joint structure and symptomatology is important, since conservative treatment options such as patellofemoral taping and bracing may help to reduce symptoms and radiological signs of disease, and may ultimately contribute to a reduced incidence of clinical pathology.
The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between indices of patellofemoral geometry and both knee pain and patella cartilage volume.
Results
The demographics of the study cohort are described in Table
1. The mean age of our predominantly female cohort (73.8%) was 45.7 (Standard Deviation (SD) ± 9.4) years, while the mean BMI was of 33.9 kg m
-2 (SD ± 9.6) (Table
1). Of the 240 subjects in this study, lateral condyle-patella angle, sulcus angle and Insall-Salvati ratio were only able to be measured in 233, 226, and 222 subjects respectively. This was due to poor quality of the MRI images, which did not allow visualisation and accurate assessment of the required measures. When comparing those who did and did not have interpretable MRI, the only significant difference found was a higher BMI in the uninterpretable group (39.1 ± 6.9 versus 33.9 ± 9.6 kg m
-2). The study subjects had a mean lateral condyle-patella angle of 19.0 (SD ± 7.0), a mean sulcus angle of 150.8 (SD ± 9.7), and a mean Insall-Salvati Ratio of 1.0 (SD ± 0.1) (Table
1).
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the studied population
Age (years) | 45.7 (9.4) |
Gender: n (% female) | 177 (73.8) |
Weight (kg) | 94.3 (27.1) |
Height (m) | 1.7 (0.1) |
BMI (kg m-2) | 33.9 (9.6) |
WOMAC pain score | 53.9 (82.7) |
Patella bone volume (mm3) | 10966 (2580) |
Patella cartilage volume (mm3) | 2213 (544) |
LCPA (degrees) * | 19.0 (7.0) |
SA (degrees) † | 150.8 (9.7) |
I-S Ratio‡ | 1.0 (0.1) |
Increased lateral condyle-patella angle was negatively associated with WOMAC pain score. In the multivariate analyses, adjusted for age, gender, BMI, patella cartilage volume and bone size as a marker of the state of the joint, for every one degree increase in lateral condyle-patella angle, WOMAC pain score was decreased by 1.57 units (95% CI -3.05, -0.09) (Table
2). We further examined whether this association differed between the obese (BMI ≥ 30) and non-obese (BMI < 30) subjects. There was a dose modification due to obesity in the relationship between lateral condyle-patella angle and WOMAC pain (p = 0.01 for difference between subgroups). For every one degree increase in lateral condyle-patella angle, WOMAC pain was reduced by 3.13 units (95% CI -5.60, -0.67) in the obese, and increased by 0.56 units (95% CI -0.63, 1.75) in the non-obese, although this was not statistically significant (Table
4). There was no significant association between sulcus angle or Insall-Salvati ratio and WOMAC pain score, and no dose modification due to obesity.
Table 2
Relationship between patella inclination, sulcus angle and patella height and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score
LCPA | -1.74 (-3.27, -0.21) | 0.03 | -1.57 (-3.05, -0.09) | 0.04 |
SA | 0.25 (-0.85, 1.34) | 0.66 | 0.04 (-1.02, 1.09) | 0.95 |
I-S ratio | 57.26 (-13.23, 127.74) | 0.11 | 33.01 (-36.83, 102.85) | 0.35 |
In the univariate analysis, there was no significant association between any of the parameters of patellofemoral geometry measured and medial or lateral patella cartilage volume. After adjusting for age, gender, BMI, patella cartilage volume and bone size, there was a positive association between lateral condyle-patella angle and medial cartilage volume, and a negative association between Insall-Salvati ratio and cartilage volume in the medial compartment (Table
3). For every one degree increase in lateral condyle-patella angle, there was an associated 51.38 mm
3 (95% CI 1.68, 101.08 mm
3) increase in medial patella cartilage volume, while for every one unit increase in Insall-Salvati ratio, there was a 3187 mm
3 (95% CI -5510, -864 mm
3) reduction in medial patella cartilage volume. No similar results were found in the lateral compartment, although there was a trend for a positive association between sulcus angle and lateral patella cartilage volume. When we examined the obese and non-obese subjects separately, there was no dose modification due to obesity in the relationship between lateral condyle-patella angle and Insall-Salvati ratio and patella cartilage volume. However, when we examined the relationship between sulcus angle and medial patella cartilage, there was a stronger effect in the non-obese (regression coefficient -55.61, 95% CI -104.79, -6.43) compared to the obese population (regression coefficient 12.01, 95% CI -35.76, 59.77) (p = 0.05 for difference between subgroups). There was no significant association between sulcus angle and lateral patella cartilage in either the non-obese (regression coefficient 31.12, 95% CI -44.23, 106.48) or the obese subgroup (regression coefficient 53.63, 95% CI -6.93, 114.19) and no dose modification due to obesity (Table
4).
Table 3
Relationship between patella inclination, sulcus angle and patella height and patella cartilage volume
Medial facet
|
LCPA | 40.34 (-18.30, 98.98) | 0.18 | 67.23 (22.10, 112.36) | 0.004 |
SA | -23.83 (-66.34, 18.68) | 0.27 | -23.63 (-56.89, 9.63) | 0.16 |
I-S ratio | -3213.15 (-6140.70, 285.60) | 0.03 | -3186.89 (-5510.01, -863.77) | 0.01 |
Lateral facet
|
LCPA | 16.90 (-66.20, 100.01) | 0.69 | 48.88 (-12.34, 110.11) | 0.12 |
SA | 41.08 (-20.33, 102.49) | 0.19 | 43.27 (-2.43, 88.98) | 0.06 |
I-S ratio | -3390.01 (-7598.65, 818.63) | 0.11 | -2826.33 (-5985.73, 333.07) | 0.08 |
Table 4
Relationship between parameters of patellofemoral geometry and WOMAC pain and patella cartilage volume: the difference between obese and non-obese subjects
WOMAC pain score
|
LCPA | -3.13 (-5.60, -0.67) | 0.01 | 0.56 (-0.63, 1.75) | 0.36 | 0.01 |
SA | 0.42 (-1.46, 2.29) | 0.66 | -0.1 (-0.79, 0.77) | 0.98 | 0.68 |
I-S ratio | 87.80 (-30.86, 206.46) | 0.15 | -37.58 (-101.45, 26.29) | 0.25 | 0.06 |
Medial patella cartilage volume
|
LCPA | 86.36 (26.15, 146.58) | 0.01 | 47.81 (-22.37, 117.99) | 0.18 | 0.41 |
SA | 12.01 (-35.76, 59.77) | 0.62 | -55.61 (-104.79, -6.43) | 0.03 | 0.05 |
I-S ratio | -3093.84 (-6260.66, 72.98) | 0.06 | -2943.85 (-6497.61, 603.91) | 0.10 | 0.95 |
Lateral patella cartilage volume
|
LCPA | 49.36 (-29.20, 127.93) | 0.22 | 48.77 (-52.06, 149.60) | 0.34 | 0.99 |
SA | 53.63 (-6.93, 114.19) | 0.08 | 31.12 (-44.23, 106.48) | 0.41 | 0.64 |
I-S ratio | -3594.17 (-75463.31, 357.98) | 0.07 | -2433.12 (-7752.83, 2886.59) | 0.37 | 0.73 |
Discussion
In a community-based population of adults, an increased lateral condyle-patella angle (a more medially inclined patella) was associated with reduced WOMAC pain score and increased medial patella cartilage volume. In contrast, an increased Insall-Salvati ratio (towards patella alta) was associated with reduced medial patella cartilage volume. These results suggest that whereas both symptomatic and structural benefits occur with medial patella inclination, patella alta is associated with aberrations in patella cartilage morphology.
Although the aetiology of patella pain remains unclear, patellofemoral maltracking is thought to play a central role in the genesis of anterior knee pain [
7,
25]. Previously, it was shown that women with patellofemoral pain had significantly greater lateral patella inclination compared to healthy controls [
11]. Similarly, in the current study, we demonstrated that the lateral condyle-patella angle, which assesses the inclination of the patella relative to the orientation of the femur, was associated with knee pain. In particular, a more medially inclined patella (an increased lateral condyle-patella angle) (see figure
2) was associated with reduced WOMAC knee pain scores, and this was more pronounced in the obese subjects. We also demonstrated that a more medially inclined patella was associated with increased medial patella cartilage volume. Consistent with our findings, a recent MRI study examining people with knee OA demonstrated that a medially oriented patella (largest lateral condyle-patella angle) was associated with the least reduction in lateral patella cartilage [
26]. In contrast, a recent radiographic study found that a more laterally inclined patella (an increase in the lateral patella tilt angle) was associated with an increase in the medial patellofemoral joint space [
12]. This was regarded by the authors as protective of medial joint space narrowing progression, thereby presuming it to be advantageous to the patellofemoral joint. However, when the patella is laterally inclined, the radiographic patellofemoral joint space will intuitively be widened medially, without necessarily being associated with increased cartilage volume.
In patellofemoral subluxation, dislocation, and pain syndromes, the precipitating event is generally considered to be generated by excessive lateral translation of the patella [
27,
28]. Conservative treatment for these pathologies has therefore been aimed at medial patella translation via strategies including braces, taping and vastus medialis strengthening [
27,
29‐
31]. Likewise, surgical approaches such as medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction [
32‐
34] can be used to optimise patellar tracking, particularly in patellofemoral instability. Although our findings support an advantage imparted by medial patella inclination, the biomechanical mechanism by which the symptomatic and structural benefits are linked remains unclear. One plausible explanation is that medial inclination of the patella offsets the natural tendency of the patella to track laterally which causes excessive shearing across cartilage. However, since cartilage is not innervated, how pain may arise is even less clear.
We also measured other indices of patellofemoral articulation and alignment. The femoral sulcus angle (see figure
3) measures the depth of the femoral articular surface at the patellofemoral joint, and unlike the lateral condyle-patella angle, is viewed as a measure of joint congruity rather than patella tracking [
14,
35]. An increased sulcus angle is commonly associated with patella subluxation and dislocation [
36,
37], and in its most severe form, represents trochlear dysplasia [
38]. Nonetheless, our study demonstrated a trend towards a positive association between the femoral sulcus angle and lateral patella cartilage volume. Although it is generally accepted that a shallower sulcus angle is associated with decreased patellofemoral congruency and stability [
14,
15], and adverse cartilage outcomes [
12,
26,
39], a study in an osteoarthritic population demonstrated a positive association between sulcus angle and patella cartilage volume [
19]. Mechanistically, it may be that a shallower sulcus enables a greater articular surface area, which subsequently reduces patellofemoral contact pressures, thus benefiting articular cartilage [
19]. However, when analysed separately, there was a negative association between sulcus angle and medial patella cartilage volume in the non-obese population, which was significantly different to the obese population. One hypothesis is that those in the non-obese population are more physically active than those who are obese, therefore it may be that the negative association between sulcus angle and medial patella cartilage in the non-obese subgroup is mediated by physical activity. Those with a shallower sulcus are likely to have greater instability, and may therefore be more prone to cartilage loss during vigorous physical activity. In contrast, we have demonstrated that a high-riding patella is associated with adverse cartilage changes. Previously, patella alta has been shown to lead to higher cartilage loss [
26]. The Insall-Salvati ratio is a measure of patella height, calculated as a ratio between the patella tendon and patella length (see figure
4). This ratio helps to identify excessive proximal (patella alta - defined as an Insall-Salvati ratio > 1.2) or distal (patella baja/patella inferra - defined as an Insall-Salvati ratio < 0.8) alignment of the patella relative to the trochlear groove [
40]. Both patella alta and baja can alter the biomechanics of the knee joint and have been shown to lead to deleterious structural changes [
13,
41]. Mechanistically, a higher vertical positioning of the patella (patella alta) corresponds with the largest patellofemoral contact pressures when averaged over the whole range of movement [
42], which may structurally manifest as reduced cartilage volume over time.
Our study has several limitations. WOMAC knee pain scores do not differentiate between tibiofemoral or patellofemoral pain. Whilst the Kujala score may be used to assess patellofemoral disorders [
43], this data was not available in our study, thus we used the WOMAC knee pain score, which has been widely utilised in previous studies of patellofemoral diseases [
44]. Although we did not have radiographic assessment in this study, we adjusted for patella cartilage volume (adjusted for bone size) as we have previously shown that this is strongly related to radiographic grade of OA [
24] and is a very sensitive method for detecting early changes of knee OA [
45]. Our study was based on MRI which has the benefit of
in vivo assessment of cartilage and bone. Additionally, our cohort predominantly comprised females, which may have affected our results as patellofemoral joint biomechanics has been shown to differ between males and females [
46]. We excluded subjects if there was a history of any arthropathy diagnosed by a medical practitioner, prior surgical intervention, and previous significant knee injury, thus it is possible that some subjects with clinically severe patellofemoral pain syndrome were excluded from our study. Finally, our subjects, who ranged from normal weight to obese, were recruited to take part in a study of the relationship between obesity and musculoskeletal disease. As the BMI of the population was normally distributed, we analysed the population as a whole, however we did perform the independent samples z-test to examine for any difference between the obese and non-obese subjects. Whilst it is possible that those with a high BMI were more likely to have knee pain [
47,
48], our multivariate analyses were adjusted for BMI. A small number of images were excluded from this study because of their poor quality which tended to occur in those with higher BMI, thus limiting the generalisability of our results to those of vey high BMI. The inability of current imaging equipments to produce the desired image quality in obese subjects is a limitation to today's imaging techniques [
49].
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
SKT was involved in data collection, analyses and manuscript preparation; AJT was involved in manuscript preparation; AEW, DMU and GJ were involved in manuscript revision; YW and MD-T were involved in data collection; FMC was involved in manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.