Erschienen in:
27.09.2017 | Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY
The Baba classification focused on implant designs is useful in setting the therapeutic strategy for interprosthetic femoral fracture
verfasst von:
Tomonori Baba, Kazuo Kaneko, Yasuhiro Homma, Hironori Ochi, Yu Ozaki, Taiji Watari, Mikio Matsumoto
Erschienen in:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
|
Ausgabe 2/2018
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of femoral fracture with implants on the proximal and distal sides to verify whether actual fracture morphologies follow the fracture types of Baba classification focusing on implant designs useful for periprosthetic femoral fracture.
Methods
Prosthesis was present in 85 with periprosthetic femoral fractures. Excluding 73 patients with fracture around the femoral stem or fracture of the TKA femoral component alone, 12 patients with 14 legs with both implants were investigated. All patients were radiographically assessed for implant stability according to the Baba classification. For clinical evaluation, intra- and postoperative complications, the operation time, and intra-operative blood loss were investigated.
Results
The Baba classification fracture type showed the implant as unstable and stable types in 3 and 11 legs, respectively. The consistency rate between the Baba classification-based judgment of plain radiograms acquired at the time of injury and actual surgical findings was 100%. As a result of treatment according to the Baba classification, bone union was achieved in all patients. There were no intra- or postoperative complications.
Conclusions
Applying the Baba classification, implant stability could be sufficiently evaluated in not only periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty, but also interprosthetic femoral fractures, thereby verifying its usefulness in setting the treatment strategy.