Administrative information
Title {1} | The BEACON Study: Protocol for a cohort study as part of an evaluation of the effectiveness of smartphone-assisted problem-solving therapy in men who present with intentional self-harm to Emergency Departments in Ontario |
Trial registration {2a and 2b}. | ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03473535. Registered on March 22, 2018; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03473535 |
Protocol version {3} | Version 4, March 13, 2019 |
Funding {4} | The trial is sponsored by the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI) and funded by the Ontario Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Support Unit (OSSU), funded through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Government of Ontario. |
Author details {5a} | 1 Ottawa Hospital Research Institute 2 University of Ottawa 3 Lawson Health Research Institute 4 Western University 5 Queen’s University 6 Kingston Health Sciences Centre 7 Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention 8 Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre 9 St. Michael’s Hospital 10 University of Toronto 11 William Osler Health System 12 McMaster University 13 Carleton University 14 Lakehead University 15 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences 16 Sunnybrook Research Institute 17 Wayne State University |
Name and contact information for the trial sponsor {5b} | Trial Sponsor: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI) Sponsor’s reference: 20150765 Contact name: Dr. Duncan Stewart Address: 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8 L6, Canada Telephone: (613) 798–5555, ext.79017 Email: djstewart@ohri.ca |
Role of sponsor {5c} | The funders had no role in the review or approval of the manuscript for publication. |
Introduction
Background and rationale {6a}
Objectives {7}
Objective | Research question | Testable hypothesis |
---|---|---|
To evaluate the relationship between the amount of smartphone-assisted PST and suicidal ideas in men over a 1-year period. | In men who present to the ED with self-harm, is the amount of smartphone-assisted PST linked to a reduction in suicidal ideas in the year following their enrolment in the study? | Reduction in severity of symptoms: Suicidal ideation at 1 year will decrease compared with the time of enrolment, proportionally with the number of PST sessions completed by participants. A participant who attends all PST session should experience a greater decrease in suicidality than a participant who does not attend all PST sessions. |
Objective | Research question | Testable hypothesis |
---|---|---|
To evaluate the relationship between the amount of smartphone-assisted PST and health-related outcomes in men who present to ED with intentional self-harm. | After 1 year, what is the effect of the amount of smartphone-assisted PST on the following? | That there will be a significant correlation between the number of completed sessions of smartphone-assisted PST and the following: |
• Depression symptoms | • Reductions in the severity of depression symptoms | |
• Anxiety symptoms | • Reductions in the severity of anxiety symptoms | |
• PTSD symptoms | • Reductions in the severity of PTSD symptoms | |
• Healthcare costs | • Reductions in healthcare costs | |
• Experienced meaning in life | • Improvements in experienced meaning in life | |
• Perceived social supports | • Improvements in perceived social supports | |
• Health-related quality of life | • Improvements in health-related quality of life | |
To evaluate the impact of conformity to masculine gender norms and explore to suicide in the media on men who self-harm | What is the effect of the following? | |
• Conformity to masculine gender norms | Conformity to masculine gender norms will moderate the effect of the study intervention. | |
• Exposure to suicide in the media | Exposure to suicide in the media will moderate the effect of the study intervention. | |
• Use of the internet to research means of self-harm | Use of the internet to research means of self-harm will moderate the effect of the study intervention. | |
• Use of the internet to access self-harm resources | Use of the internet to access self-harm resources will moderate the effect of the study intervention. | |
To evaluate mechanisms of change among men who self-harm | What are the mechanisms of change among men enrolled in the study? | There will be a significant correlation between the number of smartphone-assisted PST sessions and improvements in social problem-solving skills. |
Trial design {8}
Methods: participants, interventions, and outcomes
Study setting {9}
Eligibility criteria {10}
Inclusion criteria | |
---|---|
1. | Identifies as male. |
2. | 18 years of age or older |
3. | Has presented at a participating ED with self-harm within the preceding 4 weeks. Self-harm is defined as self-reported intentional self-poisoning or self-injury, regardless of whether there is evidence that the act was intended to result in death. Where there is ambiguity about intent, inclusion will be guided by discussion with the PI to allow consistency between sites. |
4. | Able to read and understand English or French |
5. | Willing to attend six PST sessions for a period of up to 6 weeks |
6. | Willing to use a smartphone application to facilitate the treatment of self-harm |
7. | Willing to return to hospital for follow-up appointments |
8. | Willing and able to provide informed consent |
Who will obtain informed consent? {26a}
Additional consent provisions for collection and use of participant data and biological specimens {26b}
Interventions
Explanation for the choice of comparators {6b}
Intervention description {11a}
Intervention: problem-solving therapy
BEACON prescription management system
Data collection method | Data collected |
---|---|
Program documentation and observation (to assess fidelity, dose, reach, and context) | Number of PST sessions attended |
Smartphone application use, including total number of mood log entries, surveys completed, journal entries, goals completed, views/downloads of resource material, and BEACON button presses | |
Whether each site implemented other hospital-based suicide reduction measures during the study intervention period | |
Structured qualitative interviews (to assess barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improvement) | Interview a purposive sample of participants regarding what helped and what did not help and the effect of the intervention on help-seeking behaviours |
Timing of sessions
Criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions {11b}
Strategies to improve adherence to interventions {11c}
Relevant concomitant care permitted or prohibited during the trial {11d}
Provisions for post-trial care {30}
Outcomes {12}
Primary outcome
Secondary outcomes
Confounding variables
Assessing potential processes of change
Process evaluation
Participant timeline {13}
Sample size {14}
Recruitment {15}
Assignment of interventions: allocation
Sequence generation {16a}
Concealment mechanism {16b}
Implementation {16c}
Assignment of interventions: blinding
Who will be blinded? {17a}
Procedure for unblinding if needed {17b}
Data collection and management
Plans for assessment and collection of outcomes {18a}
Plans to promote participant retention and complete follow-up {18b}
Data management {19}
Confidentiality {27}
Plans for collection, laboratory evaluation, and storage of biological specimens for genetic or molecular analysis in this trial/future use {33}
Statistical methods
Statistical methods for primary and secondary outcomes {20a}
Interim analyses {21b}
Methods for additional analyses (e.g., subgroup analyses) {20b}
Process evaluation
Methods in analysis to handle protocol non-adherence and any statistical methods to handle missing data {20c}
Plans to give access to the full protocol, participant-level data, and statistical code {31c}
Oversight and monitoring
Composition of the coordinating centre and trial steering committee {5d}
Principal investigator (SH) and co-principal investigator (SH)
-
Design and conduct of the BEACON study
-
Preparation of protocol and revisions
-
Preparation of study documentation
-
Organisation of steering committee meetings
-
Publication of study reports
-
Participation as members of TMC
Steering committee
-
Includes: PI (SH), co-PI (MH), and site PIs
-
Approval of the final protocol
-
All co-PIs at each intervention site will be steering committee members.
-
Recruitment of patients and liaising with PI and co-PI
-
Reviewing progress of study and, if necessary, approval of changes to the protocol and to facilitate the smooth running of the study
Trial management committee
-
Includes: PI (SH), co-PI (MH), and clinical research associates (NE, SM)
-
Study planning
-
Organisation of steering committee meetings
-
Organisation of DSMC meetings
-
Provide annual reporting to REB
-
Serious adverse event (SAE) reporting to DSMC and REB
-
Responsible for master tracking log
-
Budget administration and contractual issues with individual centres
-
Advice for lead investigators
-
Coordination of study monitoring
-
Assistance with REB applications
-
Data verification
-
Randomisation
Composition of the data monitoring committee, its role and reporting structure {21a}
-
Ensures the ongoing safety of study participants
-
Reviews the conduct of the study, including protocol violations and deviations
-
Reviews data on participant recruitment, accrual, and retention, as well as assessments of data quality, completeness, timeliness, data retention, data storage, data transmission, and data access
-
Reviews adverse events (AEs) and SAEs reported between meeting dates
-
Protects the confidentiality of the study data and the DSMC discussions
-
Makes recommendations to continue, modify, or terminate the study