nach oben

Trials

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2015 | Poster presentation

The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely-used PROMS in RCT publications: are we doing well?

verfasst von: Ines Rombach, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Crispin Jenkinson, Alastair Gray, Órlaith Burke

Erschienen in: Trials | Sonderheft 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are designed to assess patients’ perceived health states or health-related quality of life. However, PROMs are susceptible to missing data, which can affect the validity of conclusions from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This review aims to assess current practice in the handling, analysis and reporting of missing PROMs outcome data in RCTs in relation to contemporary methodology and guidance. …

Titel: The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely-used PROMS in RCT publications: are we doing well?
verfasst von: Ines Rombach
Oliver Rivero-Arias
Crispin Jenkinson
Alastair Gray
Órlaith Burke
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2015
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: Trials / Ausgabe Sonderheft 2/2015
Elektronische ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P67

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely-used PROMS in RCT publications: are we doing well?

Excerpt

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 2/2015

Advertising patient and public involvement in trials as a way of improving participant recruitment: development of an intervention and its evaluation

The challenges of estimating the prevalence of child maltreatment

An adaptive trial design for updating the threshold of a continuous biomarker

Estimating the effect of “treatment in the treated” - instrumental variable analysis vs conventional regression methods in the titre-2 trial in cardiac surgery

Reading or listening to review summaries - which method will produce greater understanding of the key outcomes in a cochrane review?

Do people who choose their treatment in a large randomised trial with parallel preference groups differ at baseline from those who agree to random treatment allocation? Results from the protect study