Background
Methods
Study design
Respondents
Data collection
-
Proportion of registered general practitioners (%) = number of registered general practitioners / number of clinical (assistant) physicians.
-
The proportion of nurses (%) = number of nurses included in the family doctor team / number of nurses in the community.
-
Doctor to nurse ratio (%) = number of clinical (assistant) physicians / number of nurses in the community.
-
Village physicians ratio (%) = number of village physicians included in the family doctor team / number of clinical (assistant) physicians.
-
Family doctors per 10,000 permanent residents (N/10,000) = number of family doctors / number of permanent residents in the community / 10,000.
-
Coverage of community health service stations (%) = number of community health service stations providing family doctor services / number of community health service stations.
-
Coverage of the proportion of village clinics (%) = number of village clinics providing family doctor services / number of village clinics.
-
Rate of contracted permanent residents (%) = number of permanent residents signing services / number of permanent residents.
-
Rate of contracted household residents (%) = number of household residents signing services / number of household residents.
-
Rate of contracted resident families (%) = number of permanent families signing services / number of permanent families.
-
Proportion of contracted residents’ visits in total outpatient visits per year (%) = number of residents signing services who visited the community / number of residents signing services.
-
Outpatient appointment rate per year (%) = number of appointments for outpatients (persons) / number of outpatients in the community health service center during the year.
-
Rate of contracted residents establishing profile (%) = number of contracted residents’ electronic health records / number of contract residents.
-
Ratio of health records dynamic updates (%) = number of contracted residents’ electronic health records updates / number of contracted residents’ electronic health records.
-
Rate of contracted residents’ health screening (%) = number of contracted residents who conducted health screening / number of contract residents.
-
Rate of contracted residents’ health assessment interventions (%) = number of contract residents who received targeted intervention guidance programs / number of contracted residents who received health status and health needs assessment services.
Statistical analyses
Results
Characteristics of CHSCs
Characteristics | Year | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |
Regional classification (N/%) | ||||
Urban division | 13(28.9) | 13(28.9) | 13(28.9) | 13(28.9) |
Suburban district | 8(17.8) | 8(17.8) | 8(17.8) | 8(17.8) |
Rural area | 24(53.3) | 24(53.3) | 24(53.3) | 24(53.3) |
Standardized construction (N/%) | ||||
Yes | 42(93.3) | 42(93.3) | 45(100.0) | 45(100.0) |
No | 3(6.7) | 3(6.7) | 0 | 0 |
GP practice training base (N/%) | ||||
Yes | 4(8.9) | 6(13.3) | 7(15.6) | 8(17.8) |
No | 41(91.1) | 39(86.7) | 38(84.4) | 37(82.2) |
Medical insurance fixed-points(N/%) | ||||
Yes | 44(97.8) | 45(100.0) | 45(100.0) | 45(100.0) |
No | 1(2.2) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
Zero difference sales of essential drugs (N/%) | ||||
Yes | 0(0.0) | 6(13.3) | 10(22.2) | 13(28.9) |
No | 45(100.0) | 39(86.7) | 35(77.8) | 32(71.1) |
Number of employees on the job (N) | 6381 | 6562 | 6707 | 6793 |
Real number of beds (N) | 3362 | 3220 | 3207 | 3188 |
Housing construction area (m2) | 345,045 | 352,519 | 348,223 | 344,876 |
Family doctor team construction
Year | Regional classification | Family doctor team construction | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proportion of registered general practitioners (%) | The proportion of nurses (%) | Doctor to nurse ratio (%) | Village physicians ratio (%) | Number of family doctors per ten thousand permanent residents (N/10000) | Number of family doctor service teams (N) | ||
2013 | Urban division | 375/816(46.0) | 187/550(34.0) | 816/550(1.5) | 0(0.0) | 318(2.0) | 82 |
Suburban district | 231/417(55.4) | 112/315(35.6) | 417/315(1.3) | 75/114(65.8) | 162(1.0) | 42 | |
Rural area | 523/989(52.9) | 345/737(46.8) | 989/737(1.3) | 638/720(88.6) | 419(1.9) | 172 | |
Total | 1129/2222(50.8) | 644/1602(40.2) | 2222/1602(1.4) | 713/834(85.5) | 899(1.7) | 296 | |
Statistics (P) a | 1.174(0.319) | 1.939(0.157) | 0.430(0.653) | – | – | 0.619(0.544) | |
2014 | Urban division | 404/820(49.3) | 213/562(37.9) | 820/562(1.5) | 0(0.0) | 337(2.1) | 84 |
Suburban district | 246/422(58.3) | 114/324(35.2) | 422/324(1.3) | 74/112(66.1) | 164(1.1) | 43 | |
Rural area | 589/1000(58.9) | 384/742(51.8) | 1000/742(1.4) | 639/719(88.9) | 488(2.1) | 179 | |
Total | 1239/2242(55.3) | 711/1628(43.7) | 2242/1628(1.4) | 713/831(85.8) | 989(1.8) | 306 | |
Statistics (P) a | 1.743(0.187) | 2.189(0.125) | 0.450(0.640) | – | – | 0.672(0.516) | |
2015 | Urban division | 431/787(54.8) | 248/579(42.8) | 787/579(1.4) | 0(0.0) | 359(2.3) | 94 |
Suburban district | 286/450(63.6) | 114/382(29.8) | 450/382(1.2) | 74/123(60.2) | 190(1.3) | 42 | |
Rural area | 639/999(64.0) | 413/805(51.3) | 999/805(1.2) | 632/710(89.0) | 522(2.2) | 167 | |
Total | 1356/2236(60.6) | 775/1766(43.9) | 2236/1766(1.3) | 706/833(84.8) | 1071(2.0) | 303 | |
Statistics (P) a | 1.656(0.203) | 2.846(0.069) | 0.521(0.598) | – | – | 0.375(0.689) | |
2016 | Urban division | 501/794(63.1) | 283/586(48.3) | 794/586(1.4) | 0(0.0) | 406(2.6) | 101 |
Suburban district | 310/445(69.7) | 116/412(28.2) | 445/412(1.1) | 63/114(55.3) | 200(1.4) | 42 | |
Rural area | 698/1029(67.8) | 450/843(53.4) | 1029/843(1.2) | 623/703(88.6) | 551(2.2) | 176 | |
Total | 1509/2268(66.5) | 849/1841(46.1) | 2268/1841(1.2) | 686/817(84.0) | 1157(2.1) | 319 | |
Statistics (P)a | 0.701(0.502) | 3.233(0.049)c | 1.948(0.155) | – | – | 0.426(0.656) | |
Statistics (P) b | 7.731(0.000)d | 0.250(0.861) | 1.974(0.120) | 0.001(1.000) | 2.503(0.061) | 0.077(0.972) |
Family doctor system coverage and contract
Year | Regional classification | Family doctor system coverage and contract situation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coverage of community health service stations (%) | Covering the proportion of village clinics (%) | Rate of contract permanent residents (%) | Rate of contract household residents (%) | Rate of contract resident families(%) | ||
2013 | Urban division | 52/53(98.1) | 0(0.0) | 7,123,145/1659332(42.9) | 501,629/1135807(44.2) | 418,829/582929(71.9) |
Suburban district | 29/29(100.0) | 34/42(81.0) | 449,309/1177420(38.2) | 324,248/448081(72.4) | 206,551/433250(47.7) | |
Rural area | 23/25(92.0) | 269/275(97.8) | 834,083/2262285(36.9) | 655,649/1075640(61.0) | 380,480/797488(47.7) | |
Total | 104/107(97.2) | 303/317(95.6) | 1,995,706/5099037(39.1) | 1,481,526/2659528(55.7) | 1,005,860/1813667(55.5) | |
Statistics (P) a | 3.477(0.176) | – | 0.102(0.903) | 7.333(0.002) c | 4.327(0.020)f | |
2014 | Urban division | 52/53(98.1) | 0(0.0) | 763,558/1646658(46.4) | 544,900/1014883(53.7) | 455,518/585660(77.8) |
Suburban district | 30/30(100.0) | 40/40(100.0) | 482,950/1189133(40.6) | 339,901/432888(78.5) | 226,946/438707(51.7) | |
Rural area | 24/25(96.0) | 272/272(100.0) | 927,679/2268178(40.9) | 680,973/950174(71.7) | 421,602/809522(52.1) | |
Total | 106/108(98.2) | 312/312(100.0) | 2,174,187/5103969(42.6) | 1,565,774/2397945(65.3) | 1,104,066/1833889(60.2) | |
Statistics (P) a | 1.201(0.549) | – | 0.144(0.866) | 5.816(0.006) d | 5.278(0.009) g | |
2015 | Urban division | 52/52(100.0) | 0(0.0) | 784,209/1656623(47.3) | 571,326/1044387(54.7) | 600,359/469673(78.2) |
Suburban district | 31/31(100.0) | 38/38(100.0) | 492,349/1247302(39.5) | 332,156/448075(74.1) | 460,969/233035(50.6) | |
Rural area | 27/27(100.0) | 270/270(100.0) | 953,766/2292078(41.6) | 704,119/944568(74.5) | 443,276/823395(53.8) | |
Total | 110/110(100.0) | 308/308(100.0) | 2,230,324/5196003(42.9) | 1,607,601/2437030(66.0) | 1,145,984/1884723(60.8) | |
Statistics (P) a | – | – | 0.247(0.782) | 8.170(0.001) e | 5.870(0.006) h | |
2016 | Urban division | 53/53(100.0) | 0(0.0) | 881,547/1608690(54.8) | 688,211/1035593(66.5) | 569,449/592532(96.1) |
Suburban district | 30/30(100.0) | 32/32(100.0) | 510,645/1196288(42.7) | 347,923/447566(77.7) | 248,696/448164(55.5) | |
Rural area | 27/27(100.0) | 268/268(100.0) | 973,462/2349714(41.4) | 711,122/955129(74.5) | 457,366/840055(54.4) | |
Total | 110/110(100.0) | 300/300(100.0) | 2,365,654/5154692(45.9) | 1,747,256/2438288(71.7) | 1,275,511/1880751(67.8) | |
Statistics (P) a | – | – | 1.572(0.220) | 1.245(0.298) | 7.605(0.002) i | |
Statistics (P)b | 5.604(0.133) | 0.253(0.859) | 1.910(0.130) | 3.783(0.012)j | 1.696(0.170) |
Family doctors offering contracted medical services
Year | Regional classification | Family doctor providing orderly medical service | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proportion of contract residents visits in the total outpatient visits per year(%) | Outpatient appointment rate per year(%) | Number of contract residents visits each family doctor per year (N) | People times of referral to higher level hospital by family doctor per year (N) | People times of referral from higher level hospital by family doctor per year (N) | ||
2013 | Urban division | 48.0 | 0.8 | 9996 | 18,799 | 1265 |
Suburban district | 31.9 | 2.1 | 6501 | 39,520 | 6232 | |
Rural area | 29.0 | 2.7 | 4277 | 114,415 | 1643 | |
Total | 37.4 | 1.8 | 6701 | 172,734 | 9140 | |
Statistics (P) a | 2.471(0.097) | 1.800(0.178) | 8.363(0.001) c | 2.644(0.038)d | 11.479(0.000)h | |
2014 | Urban division | 44.3 | 1.4 | 8834 | 23,290 | 1579 |
Suburban district | 24.3 | 2.2 | 5228 | 48,602 | 6707 | |
Rural area | 30.0 | 3.0 | 4238 | 188,509 | 2654 | |
Total | 34.4 | 2.2 | 5968 | 260,401 | 10,940 | |
Statistics (P) a | 1.324(0.277) | 1.377(0.264) | 4.701(0.014)j | 3.273(0.048) e | 7.725(0.001) i | |
2015 | Urban division | 46.8 | 1.2 | 9310 | 26,013 | 3145 |
Suburban district | 23.3 | 1.9 | 4455 | 45,012 | 6516 | |
Rural area | 37.5 | 4.9 | 5310 | 210,917 | 2977 | |
Total | 38.3 | 2.8 | 6499 | 281,942 | 12,638 | |
Statistics (P) a | 1.827(0.173) | 2.134(0.131) | 5.551(0.007) k | 3.632(0.035)f | 0.279(0.758) | |
2016 | Urban division | 50.5 | 1.7 | 8693 | 31,644 | 5201 |
Suburban district | 26.3 | 1.4 | 4957 | 65,367 | 8597 | |
Rural area | 38.5 | 3.7 | 5617 | 244,604 | 4217 | |
Total | 40.5 | 2.5 | 6582 | 341,615 | 18,015 | |
Statistics (P) a | 2.115(0.133) | 2.055(0.141) | 2.286(0.114) | 4.330(0.020)g | 0.369(0.693) | |
Statistics(P)b | 1.116(0.344) | 1.074(0.361) | 0.143(0.934) | 2.154(0.095) | 1.030(0.380) |
Family doctors offering health management services
Year | Regional classification | Family doctor health management service | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rate of contract residents establishing profile (%) | Ratio of health records dynamic update (%) | Rate of contract residents health screening (%) | Rate of contract residents health assessment intervention (%) | ||
2013 | Urban division | 69.1 | 64.9 | 46.9 | 92.4 |
Suburban district | 48.2 | 47.7 | 36.4 | 82.8 | |
Rural area | 51.4 | 41.4 | 62.4 | 63.4 | |
Total | 55.7 | 51.2 | 50.0 | 76.8 | |
Statistics (P) a | 0.666(0.519) | 0.097(0.908) | 1.685(0.198) | 1.604(0.213) | |
2014 | Urban division | 55.2 | 39.4 | 60.5 | 93.5 |
Suburban district | 49.4 | 35.6 | 45.8 | 85.6 | |
Rural area | 47.0 | 35.9 | 68.0 | 68.4 | |
Total | 50.2 | 37.1 | 59.7 | 80.7 | |
Statistics (P) a | 0.246(0.783) | 0.006(0.994) | 1.339(0.273) | 1.517(0.231) | |
2015 | Urban division | 51.2 | 29.2 | 75.7 | 96.3 |
Suburban district | 46.8 | 29.1 | 58.4 | 91.7 | |
Rural area | 48.2 | 38.9 | 74.4 | 75.9 | |
Total | 48.8 | 33.1 | 70.7 | 86.8 | |
Statistics (P) a | 0.262(0.771) | 0.885(0.420) | 0.715(0.495) | 0.665(0.519) | |
2016 | Urban division | 95.4 | 41.6 | 77.7 | 100.0 |
Suburban district | 99.1 | 31.0 | 60.8 | 94.2 | |
Rural area | 97.0 | 36.5 | 77.7 | 74.9 | |
Total | 96.8 | 37.2 | 72.1 | 91.8 | |
Statistics (P) a | 0.002(0.998) | 0.900(0.414) | 0.392(0.678) | 0.435(0.650) | |
Statistics(P)b | 1.404(0.243) | 2.168(0.093) | 8.570(0.000)c | 4.876(0.003)d |