Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2020 | Research | Ausgabe 1/2020 Open Access

Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2020

The generic Informed Consent Service gICS®: implementation and benefits of a modular consent software tool to master the challenge of electronic consent management in research

Zeitschrift:
Journal of Translational Medicine > Ausgabe 1/2020
Autoren:
Henriette Rau, Lars Geidel, Martin Bialke, Arne Blumentritt, Martin Langanke, Wenke Liedtke, Sandra Pasewald, Dana Stahl, Thomas Bahls, Christian Maier, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Wolfgang Hoffmann
Wichtige Hinweise
Henriette Rau and Lars Geidel contributed equally to this work

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Background

Defining and protecting participants’ rights is the aim of several ethical codices and legal regulations. According to these regulations, the Informed Consent (IC) is an inevitable element of research with human subjects. In the era of “big data medicine”, aspects of IC become even more relevant since research becomes more complex rendering compliance with legal and ethical regulations increasingly difficult.

Methods

Based on literature research and practical experiences gathered by the Institute for Community Medicine (ICM), University Medicine Greifswald, requirements for digital consent management systems were identified.

Results

To address the requirements, the free-of-charge, open-source software “generic Informed Consent Service” (gICS®) was developed by ICM to provide a tool to facilitate and enhance usage of digital ICs for the international research community covering various scenarios. gICS facilitates IC management based on IC modularisation and supports various workflows within research, including (1) electronic depiction of paper-based consents and (2) fully electronic consents. Numerous projects applied gICS and documented over 336,000 ICs and 2400 withdrawals since 2014.

Discussion

Since the consent’s content is a prerequisite for securing participants’ rights, application of gICS is no guarantee for legal compliance. However, gICS supports fine-granular consents and accommodation of differentiated consent states, which can be directly exchanged between systems, allowing automated data processing.

Conclusion

gICS simplifies and supports sustained IC management as a major key to successfully conduct studies and build trust in research with human subjects. Therefore, interested researchers are invited to use gICS and provide feedback for further improvements.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe