The objective of this study is to test if patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) declines after prostate biopsy to detect Pca, and after subsequent treatment decision-making in case Pca is confirmed, and to test whether personality state and traits are associated with these potential changes in HRQoL.
Patients who were scheduled for prostate biopsy to detect Pca (N = 377) filled out a baseline questionnaire about HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 and PR25), “big five” personality traits (BFI-10), optimism (LOT-r), and self-efficacy (Decision Self-efficacy Scale) (t0). Patients with confirmed Pca (N = 126) filled out a follow-up questionnaire on HRQoL within 2 weeks after treatment was chosen but had not yet started (t1).
HRQoL declined between t0 and t1, reflected in impaired role and cognitive functioning, and elevated fatigue, constipation, and prostate-specific symptoms. Sexual activity and functioning improved. Baseline HRQoL scores were unrelated to the selection of a particular treatment, but for patients who chose a curative treatment, post-decision HRQoL showed a greater decline compared to patients who chose active surveillance. Optimism was associated with HRQoL at baseline; decisional self-efficacy was positively associated with HRQoL at follow-up. No associations between HRQoL and the “big five” personality traits were found.
Patients who have undergone prostate biopsy and treatment decision-making for Pca experience a decline in HRQoL. Choosing treatment with a curative intent was associated with greater decline in HRQoL. Interventions aimed at optimism and decision self-efficacy could be helpful to reduce HRQoL impairment around the time of prostate biopsy and treatment decision-making.
Smith DP, King MT, Egger S, Berry MP, Stricker PD, Cozzi P et al (2009) Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ 339
Victorson DE, Schuette S, Schalet BD, Kundu SD, Helfand BT, Novakovic K et al (2016) Factors affecting quality of life at different intervals after treatment of localized prostate cancer: unique influence of treatment decision making satisfaction, personality and sexual functioning. J Urol 196(5):1422–1428
Rammstedt B, John OP (2007) Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J Res Pers 41(1):203–212 CrossRef
Rammstedt B, Beierlein C (2014) Can’t we make it any shorter? J Individ Differ 35(4):212–220 CrossRef
Ten Klooster P, Weekers A, Eggelmeijer F, Van Woerkom J, Drossaert C, Taal E et al (2010) Optimisme en/of pessimisme: factorstructuur van de Nederlandse Life Orientation Test-Revised. Psychologie en Gezondheid 38(2):89–100 CrossRef
O’Connor AM (2002) User manual—Decision Self-Efficacy Scale Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHIR). Available from: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decision_SelfEfficacy.pdf
Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Univer. Press, Stanford
Nomura T, Fukuda Y, Sakamoto S, Nasu N, Tasaki Y (2016) Comprehensive evaluation of the health-related quality of life after ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study. Andrology (Los Angel) 5(160):2167–0250.1000160
Orom H, Biddle C, Underwood W, Nelson CJ, Homish DL (2016) What is a “good” treatment decision? Decisional control, knowledge, treatment decision making, and quality of life in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Med Decis Mak 36(6):714–725 CrossRef
- The impact of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment decision-making on health-related quality of life before treatment onset
Romy E. D. Lamers
Erik B. Cornel
Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse
Marieke de Vries
Paul J. M. Kil
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie
Mail Icon II