Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 7/2016

14.03.2016

The Impact of WIC on Birth Outcomes: New Evidence from South Carolina

verfasst von: Lyudmyla Sonchak

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the impact of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) on a variety of infant health outcomes using recent South Carolina Vital Statistics data (2004–2012). Methods To account for non-random WIC participation, the study relies on a maternal fixed effects estimation, due to the availability of unique maternally linked data. Results The results indicate that WIC participation is associated with an increase in birth weight and length of gestation, decrease in the probability of low birth weight, prematurity, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission. Additionally, addressing gestational bias and accounting for the length of gestation, WIC participation is associated with a decrease in the probability of delivering a low weight infant and a small for gestational age infant among black mothers. Conclusions for Practice Accounting for non-random program participation, the study documents a large improvement in birth outcomes among infants of WIC participating mothers. Even in the context of somewhat restrictive gestation-adjusted specification, the positive impact of WIC remains within the subsample of black mothers.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander, G. R. (1996). A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87(2), 163–168.CrossRefPubMed Alexander, G. R. (1996). A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87(2), 163–168.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Almond, D., et al. (2005). The cost of low birth weight. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 1031–1083. Almond, D., et al. (2005). The cost of low birth weight. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 1031–1083.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Besharov, D. J., & Germanis, D. (2001). Rethinking WIC: An evaluation of the women, infants and children program. Washington, DC: AEI Press. Besharov, D. J., & Germanis, D. (2001). Rethinking WIC: An evaluation of the women, infants and children program. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bitler, M., & Currie, J. (2005). Does WIC work? The effect of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(4), 73–91.CrossRef Bitler, M., & Currie, J. (2005). Does WIC work? The effect of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(4), 73–91.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Black, S., Devereux, P., & Salvanes, K. (2007). From the cradle to the labor market? The effect of birth weight on adult outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(1), 409–439.CrossRef Black, S., Devereux, P., & Salvanes, K. (2007). From the cradle to the labor market? The effect of birth weight on adult outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(1), 409–439.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Behrman, J., & Rosenzweig, M. (2004). Returns to birthweight. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 586–601.CrossRef Behrman, J., & Rosenzweig, M. (2004). Returns to birthweight. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 586–601.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Brien, M.J., & Swann, C.A. (2001). Prenatal WIC participation and infant health: Selection and maternal fixed effects. Manuscript, SUNY-Stony-Brook Department of Economics. Brien, M.J., & Swann, C.A. (2001). Prenatal WIC participation and infant health: Selection and maternal fixed effects. Manuscript, SUNY-Stony-Brook Department of Economics.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Conway, K. S., & Deb, P. (2005). Is prenatal care really ineffective? Or, is the “devil” in the distribution? Journal of Health Economics, 24(3), 489–513.CrossRefPubMed Conway, K. S., & Deb, P. (2005). Is prenatal care really ineffective? Or, is the “devil” in the distribution? Journal of Health Economics, 24(3), 489–513.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Currie, J. (2001). Early childhood intervention programs: What do we know? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 213–238.CrossRef Currie, J. (2001). Early childhood intervention programs: What do we know? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 213–238.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Currie, J., & Rajani, I. (2015). Within mother estimates of the effects of WIC on birth outcomes in New York city. Economic Inquiry, 53(4), 1691–1701.CrossRef Currie, J., & Rajani, I. (2015). Within mother estimates of the effects of WIC on birth outcomes in New York city. Economic Inquiry, 53(4), 1691–1701.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1995). Does head start make a difference? The American Economic Review, 85(3), 341–364. Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1995). Does head start make a difference? The American Economic Review, 85(3), 341–364.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. (1986). Errors in variables in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 93–118.CrossRef Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. (1986). Errors in variables in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 93–118.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoynes, H., Page, M., & Stevens, A. (2011). Can targeted transfers improve birth outcomes? Evidence from the introduction of the WIC program. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 813–827.CrossRef Hoynes, H., Page, M., & Stevens, A. (2011). Can targeted transfers improve birth outcomes? Evidence from the introduction of the WIC program. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 813–827.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Joyce, T., Gibson, D., & Colman, S. (2005). The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York City. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 663–685.CrossRef Joyce, T., Gibson, D., & Colman, S. (2005). The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York City. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 663–685.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Joyce, T., Racine, A., & Yunzal-Butler, C. (2008). Reassessing the WIC effect: Evidence from the Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(2), 277–303.CrossRefPubMed Joyce, T., Racine, A., & Yunzal-Butler, C. (2008). Reassessing the WIC effect: Evidence from the Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(2), 277–303.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kowaleski-Jones, Lori, & Duncan, Greg. (2002). Effects of Participation in the WIC Program on birth weight: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. American Journal of Public Health, 92(5), 799–804.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kowaleski-Jones, Lori, & Duncan, Greg. (2002). Effects of Participation in the WIC Program on birth weight: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. American Journal of Public Health, 92(5), 799–804.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludwig, Jens, & Miller, Matthew. (2005). Interpreting the WIC debate. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 691–701.CrossRefPubMed Ludwig, Jens, & Miller, Matthew. (2005). Interpreting the WIC debate. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 691–701.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin, J., et al. (2013). Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: Results from two states. National Vital Statistics Reports, 62 (2). Martin, J., et al. (2013). Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: Results from two states. National Vital Statistics Reports, 62 (2).
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira, V., Racine, E., Olmsted, J., & Ghelfi, L. (2002). The WIC Program: Background and trends, USDA economics research service, food assistance and nutrition research report number 27. Oliveira, V., Racine, E., Olmsted, J., & Ghelfi, L. (2002). The WIC Program: Background and trends, USDA economics research service, food assistance and nutrition research report number 27.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Stockbauer, J. W. (1987). WIC prenatal participation and its relation to pregnancy outcomes in Missouri: A second look. American Journal of Public Health, 77(7), 813–818.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stockbauer, J. W. (1987). WIC prenatal participation and its relation to pregnancy outcomes in Missouri: A second look. American Journal of Public Health, 77(7), 813–818.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yunzal-Butler, et al. (2010). Maternal smoking and the timing of WIC enrollment. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(3), 318–331.CrossRefPubMed Yunzal-Butler, et al. (2010). Maternal smoking and the timing of WIC enrollment. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(3), 318–331.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Impact of WIC on Birth Outcomes: New Evidence from South Carolina
verfasst von
Lyudmyla Sonchak
Publikationsdatum
14.03.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-1951-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Maternal and Child Health Journal 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe