nach oben

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

Erschienen in:

28.08.2022 | Original Article

The influence of prior dental pathology on medical complications and peri-prosthetic joint infections following primary shoulder arthroplasty

verfasst von: Adam M. Gordon, Andrew R. Horn, Keith B. Diamond, Eric S. Roth, Miriam D. Weisberg, Ramin Sadeghpour, Jack Choueka

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 5/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures is a common practice in the USA. Consensus regarding the influence of prior dental pathology (DP) on postoperative complications is lacking. The objectives are to determine the association of DP prior to shoulder arthroplasty (SA) on: (1) lengths of stay (LOS), (2) medical complications, (3) readmissions, (4) implant-related complications including peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and (5) healthcare expenditures.

Methods

The PearlDiver database was queried for primary shoulder arthroplasty from 2010 to 2020. Patients with history of dental caries or dental implant placement before SA represented the study group (n = 1419). Patients without prior DP represented controls (n = 7062). Study group patients were 1:5 ratio matched to controls by age, sex, and comorbidities. Outcomes included LOS, 90-day complications, readmissions, 2-year implant-related complications, and healthcare reimbursements. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) of complications and readmissions. T tests compared LOS and costs. P values < 0.003 were significant.

Results

LOS (2.17 vs. 2.07 days; p = 0.071) were similar between groups. Patients with DP had higher 90-day medical complications compared to controls (OR: 1.74, p < 0.0001), including myocardial infarctions (2.2% vs. 0.8%; OR: 2.79, p < 0.0001), acute kidney injuries (8.3% vs. 4.6%; OR: 1.92, p < 0.0001), and pneumonias (8.7% vs. 5.3%; OR: 1.72, p < 0.0001). Readmission rates (1.97% vs. 1.54%; p = 0.248) were similar. Two-year implant complications were higher in patients with DP compared to controls (16.1% vs. 11.5%; OR: 1.38, p = 0.0003), including dislocations (6.4% vs. 4.5%; OR: 1.45, p = 0.002) and mechanical loosenings (4.0% vs. 2.4%; OR: 1.67, p = 0.001); however, PJIs were similar (2.2% vs. 1.9%; OR: 1.12, p = 0.583). Healthcare expenditures between groups were similar ($12,611 vs. $12,059; p = 0.075).

Conclusion

Patients with prior DP have higher 90-day medical complications and 2-year implant-related complications. Two-year incidence of PJIs were similar between groups. These findings can help shoulder surgeons counsel patients with a pertinent dental history.

Level of evidence III. Retrospective comparative study.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Wagner ER, Farley KX, Higgins I et al (2020) The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. J shoulder Elb Surg 29:2601–2609. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSE.2020.03.049CrossRef

Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM (2011) Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 93:2249–2254. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01994CrossRef

Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL et al (2010) Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:1115–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.02.009CrossRef

Ortmaier R, Resch H, Hitzl W et al (2014) Treatment strategies for infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:723–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00590-013-1251-9CrossRefPubMed

Kunutsor SK, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW, Beswick AD (2016) Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0150866CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Garrigues GE, Zmistowski B, Cooper AM et al (2019) Proceedings from the 2018 international consensus meeting on orthopedic infections: the definition of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28:S8–S12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSE.2019.04.034CrossRef

Cooper ME, Trivedi NN, Sivasundaram L et al (2019) Diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection after shoulder arthroplasty. JBJS Rev. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00152CrossRefPubMed

Farley KX, Wilson JM, Kumar A et al (2021) Prevalence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States and the increasing burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty. JBJS Open Access. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Simha S, Shields EJW, Wiater JM (2018) Periprosthetic infections of the shoulder. JBJS Rev 6:e6. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00191CrossRefPubMed

10.

Paxton ES, Green A, Krueger VS (2019) Periprosthetic infections of the shoulder: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27:E935–E944. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00232CrossRefPubMed

11.

Aibinder W, Schoch B, Parsons M et al (2021) Risk factors for complications and revision surgery after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.029CrossRef

12.

Rethman MP, Watters W, Abt E et al (2013) The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Dental Association clinical practice guideline on the prevention of orthopaedic implant infection in patients undergoing dental procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:745–747. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-201304170-00011CrossRefPubMed

13.

Alamanda VK, Springer BD (2018) Perioperative and modifiable risk factors for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and recommended guidelines. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 11:325–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12178-018-9494-ZCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Richards J, Inacio MCS, Beckett M et al (2014) Patient and procedure-specific risk factors for deep infection after primary shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:2809–2815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3696-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Keblish PA, Dickson TB, Vernick CG, Finnegan WJ (1979) Hematogenous infection in total joint replacement: recommendations for prophylactic antibiotics. JAMA 242:2213–2214. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.1979.03300200043023CrossRefPubMed

16.

Ainscow DAP, Denham RA (1984) The risk of haematogenous infection in total joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:580–582. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.66B4.6430907CrossRefPubMed

17.

Jaspers MT, Little JW (1985) Prophylactic antibiotic coverage in patients with total arthroplasty: current practice. J Am Dent Assoc 111:943–948. https://doi.org/10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.1985.0224CrossRefPubMed

18.

Quinn RH, Murray JN, Pezold R, Sevarino KS (2017) The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons appropriate use criteria for the management of patients with orthopaedic implants undergoing dental procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:161–163. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01107CrossRefPubMed

19.

Sollecito TP, Abt E, Lockhart PB et al (2015) The use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental procedures in patients with prosthetic joints: evidence-based clinical practice guideline for dental practitioners–a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 146:11-16.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADAJ.2014.11.012CrossRefPubMed

20.

McNally CM, Visvanathan R, Liberali S, Adams RJ (2016) Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental treatment after prosthetic joint replacement: exploring the orthopaedic surgeon’s opinion. Arthroplast today 2:123–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTD.2015.12.003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Sonn KA, Larsen CG, Adams W et al (2019) Effect of preoperative dental extraction on postoperative complications after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34:2080–2084. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTH.2019.04.056CrossRefPubMed

22.

Skaar DD, O’Connor H, Hodges JS, Michalowicz BS (2011) Dental procedures and subsequent prosthetic joint infections: findings from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. J Am Dent Assoc 142:1343–1351. https://doi.org/10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.2011.0134CrossRefPubMed

23.

Barrington JW, Barrington TA (2011) What is the true incidence of dental pathology in the total joint arthroplasty population? J Arthroplasty 26:88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTH.2011.03.036CrossRefPubMed

24.

Thornhill MH, Crum A, Rex S et al (2022) Analysis of prosthetic joint infections following invasive dental procedures in England. JAMA Netw Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2021.42987CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Springer BD, Baddour LM, Lockhart PB, Thornhill MH (2022) Antibiotic prophylaxis for prosthetic joint patients undergoing invasive dental procedures: Time for a rethink? J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTH.2022.02.014CrossRefPubMed

26.

Minassian C, D’Aiuto F, Hingorani AD, Smeeth L (2010) Invasive dental treatment and risk for vascular events: a self-controlled case series. Ann Intern Med 153:499–506. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00006CrossRefPubMed

27.

Scannapieco FA, Bush RB, Paju S (2003) Associations between periodontal disease and risk for atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and stroke. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 8:38–53. https://doi.org/10.1902/ANNALS.2003.8.1.38CrossRefPubMed

28.

Tonetti MS, D’Aiuto F, Nibali L et al (2007) Treatment of periodontitis and endothelial function. N Engl J Med 356:911–920. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa063186CrossRefPubMed

29.

Gordon AM, Diamond KB, Ashraf AM et al (2022) Benign prostatic hyperplasia is associated with increased 90-day medical complications but not peri-prosthetic joint infections following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00590-022-03344-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Schoch BS, King JJ, Wright TW et al (2022) Patient age at time of reverse shoulder arthroplasty remains stable over time: a 7.5-year trend evaluation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00590-022-03227-WCrossRefPubMed

31.

Danilkowicz RM, Lachiewicz AM, Lorenzana DJ et al (2021) Prosthetic joint infection after dental work: Is the correct prophylaxis being prescribed? A systematic review. Arthroplast Today 7:69. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTD.2020.11.007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Terpenning M (2005) Geriatric oral health and pneumonia risk. Clin Infect Dis 40:1807–1810. https://doi.org/10.1086/430603/3/40-12-1807-FIG001.GIFCrossRefPubMed

33.

Young H, Hirsh J, Hammerberg EM, Price CS (2014) Dental disease and periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:162–168. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01379CrossRefPubMed

34.

Pollard JP, Hughes SPF, Evans MJ et al (1979) Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip replacement. Br Med J 1:707–709. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.1.6165.707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Council on Dental Therapeutics (1990) Management of dental patients with prosthetic joints. J Am Dent Assoc 121:537–538. https://doi.org/10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.1990.0185CrossRef

36.

Nelson J, Jr RF, Jaspers M, et al Prophylactic antimicrobial coverage in arthroplasty patients. journals.lww.com

37.

Shrout MK, Scarbrough F, Powell BJ (1994) Dental care and the prosthetic joint patient: a survey of orthopedic surgeons and general dentists. J Am Dent Assoc 125:429–430. https://doi.org/10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.1994.0047CrossRefPubMed

38.

American Dental Association, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (2003) Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with total joint replacements. J Am Dent Assoc 134:895–898. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0289CrossRef

39.

Watters W, Rethman MP, Hanson NB et al (2013) Prevention of orthopaedic implant infection in patients undergoing dental procedures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:180–189. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-03-180CrossRefPubMed

40.

Pallasch TJ, Slots J (1996) Antibiotic prophylaxis and the medically compromised patient. Periodontology 10:107–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0757.1996.TB00071.XCrossRef

41.

Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Carr A et al (2010) Dental procedures as risk factors for prosthetic hip or knee infection: a hospital-based prospective case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 50:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1086/648676CrossRefPubMed

42.

Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Ramsey ML et al (2015) Periprosthetic shoulder infection in the United States: incidence and economic burden. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24:741–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.044CrossRef

43.

Baghdadi YMK, Maradit-Kremers H, Dennison T et al (2017) The hospital cost of two-stage reimplantation for deep infection after shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Open Access 1:15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSES.2017.02.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: The influence of prior dental pathology on medical complications and peri-prosthetic joint infections following primary shoulder arthroplasty
verfasst von: Adam M. Gordon
Andrew R. Horn
Keith B. Diamond
Eric S. Roth
Miriam D. Weisberg
Ramin Sadeghpour
Jack Choueka
Publikationsdatum: 28.08.2022
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 5/2023
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03378-w

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2023

Comparison of functional outcome and complications of locking plate versus coracoclavicular fixation in the treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures: the multicenter, propensity-matched TRON study

Drilling the cement mantle in well-fixed periprosthetic femur fractures is not associated with arthroplasty-related complications

Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS) versus tension-band plating (TBP): comparative study of outcomes for correcting limb length discrepancy

The relevance of the number of distal locking planes and nail to canal ratio in bone healing after intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft fractures

Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture treatment: a retrospective functional outcome analysis