Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 9/2016

23.02.2016

The internal and external responsiveness of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) in patients with prostate cancer

verfasst von: Edmond P. H. Choi, Carlos K. H. Wong, Eric Y. F. Wan, James H. L. Tsu, W. Y. Chin, Kenny Kung, M. K. Yiu

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the responsiveness of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) in prostate cancer patients because there is a lack of evidence to support their responsiveness in this patient population.

Methods

One hundred sixty-eight subjects with prostate cancer were surveyed at baseline and at 6 months using the SF-12 v2 and FACT-P version 4. Internal responsiveness was assessed using paired t test and generalized estimating equation. External responsiveness was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

The internal responsiveness of the FACT-P and SF-12 v2 to detect positive change was satisfactory. The FACT-P and SF-12 v2 could not detect negative change. The FACT-P and the SF-12 v2 performed the best in distinguishing between improved general health and worsened general health. The FACT-P performed better in distinguishing between unchanged general health and worsened general health. The SF-12 v2 performed better in distinguishing between unchanged general health and improved general health.

Conclusions

Positive change detected by these measures should be interpreted with caution as they might be too responsive to detect “noise,” which is not clinically significant. The ability of the FACT-P and the SF-12 v2 to detect negative change was disappointing. The internal and external responsiveness of the social well-being of the FACT-P cannot be supported, suggesting that it is not suitable to longitudinally monitor the social component of HRQOL in prostate cancer patients. The study suggested that generic and disease-specific measures should be used together to complement each other.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay, J., et al. (2010). Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International Journal of Cancer, 127(12), 2893–2917.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay, J., et al. (2010). Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International Journal of Cancer, 127(12), 2893–2917.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pu, Y. S., et al. (2004). Changing trends of prostate cancer in Asia. Aging Male, 7(2), 120–132.CrossRefPubMed Pu, Y. S., et al. (2004). Changing trends of prostate cancer in Asia. Aging Male, 7(2), 120–132.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel, R., et al. (2014). Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64(1), 9–29. Siegel, R., et al. (2014). Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64(1), 9–29.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanda, M. G., et al. (2008). Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(12), 1250–1261.CrossRefPubMed Sanda, M. G., et al. (2008). Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(12), 1250–1261.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, D. C., et al. (2005). Long-term outcomes among localized prostate cancer survivors: Health-related quality-of-life changes after radical prostatectomy, external radiation, and brachytherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(12), 2772–2780.CrossRefPubMed Miller, D. C., et al. (2005). Long-term outcomes among localized prostate cancer survivors: Health-related quality-of-life changes after radical prostatectomy, external radiation, and brachytherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(12), 2772–2780.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Litwin, M. S., et al. (1995). Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. JAMA, 273(2), 129–135.CrossRefPubMed Litwin, M. S., et al. (1995). Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. JAMA, 273(2), 129–135.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, D. P., et al. (2009). Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ, 339, b4817. Smith, D. P., et al. (2009). Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ, 339, b4817.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, E. P., et al. (2016). Health-related quality of life of Chinese patients with prostate cancer in comparison to general population and other cancer populations. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2980-6. Choi, E. P., et al. (2016). Health-related quality of life of Chinese patients with prostate cancer in comparison to general population and other cancer populations. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-015-2980-6.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sommers, S. D., & Ramsey, S. D. (1999). A review of quality-of-life evaluations in prostate cancer. Pharmacoeconomics, 16(2), 127–140.CrossRefPubMed Sommers, S. D., & Ramsey, S. D. (1999). A review of quality-of-life evaluations in prostate cancer. Pharmacoeconomics, 16(2), 127–140.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamoen, E. H., et al. (2015). Measuring health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A systematic review of the most used questionnaires and their validity. Urology and Oncology, 33(2), 69 e19–28. Hamoen, E. H., et al. (2015). Measuring health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A systematic review of the most used questionnaires and their validity. Urology and Oncology, 33(2), 69 e19–28.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rnic, K., et al. (2013). Measuring symptoms in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of assessment instruments. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 16(2), 111–122.PubMed Rnic, K., et al. (2013). Measuring symptoms in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of assessment instruments. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 16(2), 111–122.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Revicki, D. A., et al. (2000). Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States. Quality of Life Research, 9(8), 887–900.CrossRefPubMed Revicki, D. A., et al. (2000). Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States. Quality of Life Research, 9(8), 887–900.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Testa, M. A., & Nackley, J. F. (1994). Methods for quality-of-life studies. Annual Review of Public Health, 15, 535–559.CrossRefPubMed Testa, M. A., & Nackley, J. F. (1994). Methods for quality-of-life studies. Annual Review of Public Health, 15, 535–559.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Revicki, D., et al. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109.CrossRefPubMed Revicki, D., et al. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt, G., Walter, S., & Norman, G. (1987). Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis, 40(2), 171–178.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt, G., Walter, S., & Norman, G. (1987). Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis, 40(2), 171–178.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Husted, J. A., et al. (2000). Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(5), 459–468.CrossRefPubMed Husted, J. A., et al. (2000). Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(5), 459–468.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, E. P., Lam, C. L., & Chin, W.-Y. (2014). The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) can be applicable to Chinese males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 7(4), 403–411.CrossRefPubMed Choi, E. P., Lam, C. L., & Chin, W.-Y. (2014). The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) can be applicable to Chinese males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 7(4), 403–411.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–859.CrossRefPubMed Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–859.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware, J. E, Jr, Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.CrossRefPubMed Ware, J. E, Jr, Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam, E. T., et al. (2013). Is the SF-12 version 2 Health Survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF-36 version 2 Health Survey for the Chinese? Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 19(1), 200–208.CrossRefPubMed Lam, E. T., et al. (2013). Is the SF-12 version 2 Health Survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF-36 version 2 Health Survey for the Chinese? Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 19(1), 200–208.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Esper, P., et al. (1997). Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the Functional Assessment Of Cancer Therapy-Prostate instrument. Urology, 50(6), 920–928.CrossRefPubMed Esper, P., et al. (1997). Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the Functional Assessment Of Cancer Therapy-Prostate instrument. Urology, 50(6), 920–928.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong, C. K., et al. (2015). Psychometric properties of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) in Chinese patients with prostate cancer. Quality of Life Research, 24(10), 2397–2402.CrossRefPubMed Wong, C. K., et al. (2015). Psychometric properties of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) in Chinese patients with prostate cancer. Quality of Life Research, 24(10), 2397–2402.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamper, S. J., Maher, C. G., & Mackay, G. (2009). Global rating of change scales: A review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 17(3), 163–170.CrossRef Kamper, S. J., Maher, C. G., & Mackay, G. (2009). Global rating of change scales: A review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 17(3), 163–170.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong, C. K., et al. (2013). Condition-specific measure was more responsive than generic measure in colorectal cancer: All but social domains. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(5), 557–565.CrossRefPubMed Wong, C. K., et al. (2013). Condition-specific measure was more responsive than generic measure in colorectal cancer: All but social domains. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(5), 557–565.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaton, D. E., Hogg-Johnson, S., & Bombardier, C. (1997). Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(1), 79–93.CrossRefPubMed Beaton, D. E., Hogg-Johnson, S., & Bombardier, C. (1997). Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(1), 79–93.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong, C. K., et al. (2014). Responsiveness was similar between direct and mapped SF-6D in colorectal cancer patients who declined. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(2), 219–227.CrossRefPubMed Wong, C. K., et al. (2014). Responsiveness was similar between direct and mapped SF-6D in colorectal cancer patients who declined. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(2), 219–227.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Juniper, E. F., et al. (1994). Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47(1), 81–87.CrossRefPubMed Juniper, E. F., et al. (1994). Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47(1), 81–87.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright, J. G., & Young, N. L. (1997). A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(3), 239–246.CrossRefPubMed Wright, J. G., & Young, N. L. (1997). A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(3), 239–246.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Stavem, K., Frøland, S. S., & Hellum, K. B. (2005). Comparison of preference-based utilities of the 15D, EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with HIV/AIDS. Quality of Life Research, 14(4), 971–980.CrossRefPubMed Stavem, K., Frøland, S. S., & Hellum, K. B. (2005). Comparison of preference-based utilities of the 15D, EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with HIV/AIDS. Quality of Life Research, 14(4), 971–980.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Marra, C. A., et al. (2005). Are indirect utility measures reliable and responsive in rheumatoid arthritis patients? Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1333–1344.CrossRefPubMed Marra, C. A., et al. (2005). Are indirect utility measures reliable and responsive in rheumatoid arthritis patients? Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1333–1344.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerhards, S. A., et al. (2011). The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: a comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD). Value in Health, 14(5), 732–739.CrossRefPubMed Gerhards, S. A., et al. (2011). The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: a comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD). Value in Health, 14(5), 732–739.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, E. P., et al. (2015). The responsiveness of the International Prostate Symptom Score, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(8), 1857–1870.CrossRefPubMed Choi, E. P., et al. (2015). The responsiveness of the International Prostate Symptom Score, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(8), 1857–1870.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang, M. H., Fossel, A. H., & Larson, M. G. (1990). Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Medical Care, 28(7), 632–642.CrossRefPubMed Liang, M. H., Fossel, A. H., & Larson, M. G. (1990). Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Medical Care, 28(7), 632–642.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Terwee, C. B., et al. (2003). On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation. Quality of Life Research, 12(4), 349–362.CrossRefPubMed Terwee, C. B., et al. (2003). On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation. Quality of Life Research, 12(4), 349–362.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt, G., Walter, S., & Norman, G. (1987). Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(2), 171–178.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt, G., Walter, S., & Norman, G. (1987). Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(2), 171–178.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman, G. R., Stratford, P., & Regehr, G. (1997). Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(8), 869–879.CrossRefPubMed Norman, G. R., Stratford, P., & Regehr, G. (1997). Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(8), 869–879.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(397), 171–185.CrossRef Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(397), 171–185.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin, D. B. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys (Vol. 81). New Jersey: Wiley. Rubin, D. B. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys (Vol. 81). New Jersey: Wiley.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo, R. A., & Centor, R. M. (1986). Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. Journal of chronic diseases, 39(11), 897–906.CrossRefPubMed Deyo, R. A., & Centor, R. M. (1986). Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. Journal of chronic diseases, 39(11), 897–906.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Terwee, C. B., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.CrossRefPubMed Terwee, C. B., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotonda, C., et al. (2008). Validation of the French version of the colorectal-specific quality-of-life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-CR38 and FACT-C. Quality of Life Research, 17(3), 437–445.CrossRefPubMed Rotonda, C., et al. (2008). Validation of the French version of the colorectal-specific quality-of-life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-CR38 and FACT-C. Quality of Life Research, 17(3), 437–445.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong, C. K., et al. (2012). Validity and reliability study on traditional Chinese FACT-C in Chinese patients with colorectal neoplasm. J Eval Clin Pract, 18(6), 1186–1195.CrossRefPubMed Wong, C. K., et al. (2012). Validity and reliability study on traditional Chinese FACT-C in Chinese patients with colorectal neoplasm. J Eval Clin Pract, 18(6), 1186–1195.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The internal and external responsiveness of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) in patients with prostate cancer
verfasst von
Edmond P. H. Choi
Carlos K. H. Wong
Eric Y. F. Wan
James H. L. Tsu
W. Y. Chin
Kenny Kung
M. K. Yiu
Publikationsdatum
23.02.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1254-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

Quality of Life Research 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe