The tensile strength of Cooper’s ligament suturing: comparison of abdominal and transvaginal techniques

This study was designed to compare the strength and position of sutures anchored into Cooper’s ligament utilizing a minimally invasive transvaginal suturing technique, versus the ‘open’ abdominal approach. In 12 fresh cadavers, Cooper’s ligament was accessed via abdominal and vaginal incisions. After randomization, polytetrafluoroethylene (00) sutures were spaced along one ligament with the transvaginal device (n=36). Contralaterally, sutures were placed abdominally (n=36). Progressive load was applied until suture breakage or dislodgement, and tensile strength was measured using a digital tensiometer. Peak tension averaged 14.5 psi for abdominal and 12.96 psi for vaginal (p=0.28). Suture breakage rather than ligament ‘pullout’ was more likely for abdominal (95 vs. 56%, p=0.0001). Vaginal and abdominal sutures demonstrated nearly identical mean distances from mid-symphysis (4.62 vs. 4.24 cm, p=0.56). Peak tension was not correlated with suture location (r²=0.17, p=0.28). We conclude that transvaginal suturing, using the minimally invasive device, achieved similar tensile strength and position to the open technique. Transvaginal sutures were associated with greater likelihood of ligament ‘pullout’ before suture breakage under maximal load; however, the clinical implications of this finding are uncertain.