Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology 9/2018

17.07.2018 | Urology - Original Paper

Topical rectal antiseptic at time of prostate biopsy: how a resident patient safety project has evolved into institutional practice

verfasst von: Rosa Park, Justin Gyorfi, Kalyan Dewan, Girish Kirimanjeswara, Joseph Y. Clark, Matthew G. Kaag, Kathleen Lehman, Jay D. Raman

Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To report outcomes 5 years after a resident quality initiative incorporated topical rectal antiseptic into our ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB) protocol.

Methods

A chart review was conducted on 1007 men who underwent TRUS PNB between 2010 and 2017. Comparison groups include those who received a topical rectal antiseptic (N = 437) compared to those who did not (N = 570). Povidone-iodine (N = 303) or 4% chlorhexidine solution without alcohol (N = 134) were topical agents. Outcomes of interest included post-biopsy infection (urinary tract infection and/or sepsis), hospital admission, and need for ICU monitoring.

Results

Median age and PSA of men included in this study were 64 years and 12 ng/mL. Almost 90% of patients were Caucasian, 13% had diabetes, 3% were on immunosuppression, 32% had at least one prior biopsy, 14% received antibiotics, and 7% were hospitalized in the past 6 months. 22 patients (2.2%) developed a post-biopsy infection with a significant reduction in the group receiving topical rectal antiseptic (0.8 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.01). Post-biopsy UTI rates (p = 0.04) and hospital admission (p = 0.03) were also lower in the topical antiseptic group with trends to reduction in sepsis and need for ICU monitoring.

Conclusions

What started as a resident quality safety project 5 years ago has demonstrated a reduction in infections and hospital admissions following TRUS PNB. Our institutional practice now routinely uses povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine as an adjunct to oral quinolones for TRUS PNB perioperative prophylaxis.
Literatur
1.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S, Meng MV, Raman JD, Spears V, Stroup SP (2017) An update of the American Urological Association white paper on the prevention and treatment of the more common complications related to prostate biopsy. J Urol 198(2):329–334CrossRefPubMed Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S, Meng MV, Raman JD, Spears V, Stroup SP (2017) An update of the American Urological Association white paper on the prevention and treatment of the more common complications related to prostate biopsy. J Urol 198(2):329–334CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Carter HB, Berndt SI, Ricker W, Schaeffer EM (2011) Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. J Urol 186(5):1830–1834CrossRefPubMed Loeb S, Carter HB, Berndt SI, Ricker W, Schaeffer EM (2011) Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. J Urol 186(5):1830–1834CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mosharafa AA, Torky MH, El Said WM, Meshref A (2011) Rising incidence of acute prostatitis following prostate biopsy: fluoroquinolone resistance and exposure is a significant risk factor. Urology 78(3):511–514CrossRefPubMed Mosharafa AA, Torky MH, El Said WM, Meshref A (2011) Rising incidence of acute prostatitis following prostate biopsy: fluoroquinolone resistance and exposure is a significant risk factor. Urology 78(3):511–514CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kandil H, Cramp E, Vaghela T (2016) Trends in antibiotic resistance in urologic practice. Eur Urol Focus 2(4):363–373CrossRefPubMed Kandil H, Cramp E, Vaghela T (2016) Trends in antibiotic resistance in urologic practice. Eur Urol Focus 2(4):363–373CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zowawi HM, Harris PN, Roberts MJ, Tambyah PA, Schembri MA, Pezzani MD, Williamson DA, Paterson DL (2015) The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology. Nat Rev Urol 12(10):570–584CrossRefPubMed Zowawi HM, Harris PN, Roberts MJ, Tambyah PA, Schembri MA, Pezzani MD, Williamson DA, Paterson DL (2015) The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology. Nat Rev Urol 12(10):570–584CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gyorfi JR, Otteni C, Brown K, Patel A, Lehman K, Phillips BE, Dewan K, Kirimanjeswara G, Raman JD (2014) Peri-procedural povidone-iodine rectal preparation reduces microorganism counts and infectious complications following ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. World J Urol 32(4):905–909CrossRefPubMed Gyorfi JR, Otteni C, Brown K, Patel A, Lehman K, Phillips BE, Dewan K, Kirimanjeswara G, Raman JD (2014) Peri-procedural povidone-iodine rectal preparation reduces microorganism counts and infectious complications following ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. World J Urol 32(4):905–909CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett HY, Roberts MJ, Doi SA, Gardiner RA (2016) The global burden of major infectious complications following prostate biopsy. Epidemiol Infect 144(8):1784–1791CrossRefPubMed Bennett HY, Roberts MJ, Doi SA, Gardiner RA (2016) The global burden of major infectious complications following prostate biopsy. Epidemiol Infect 144(8):1784–1791CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chamberland RR (2016) Cutting to the core of the issue: emerging strategies to reduce prostate biopsy-related infections. J Clin Microbiol 54(10):2431–2435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chamberland RR (2016) Cutting to the core of the issue: emerging strategies to reduce prostate biopsy-related infections. J Clin Microbiol 54(10):2431–2435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinkhasov GI, Lin YK, Palmerola R, Smith P, Mahon F, Kaag MG, Dagen JE, Harpster LE, Reese CT, Raman JD (2012) Complications following prostate needle biopsy requiring hospital admission or emergency department visits—experience from 1000 consecutive cases. BJU Int 110(3):369–374CrossRefPubMed Pinkhasov GI, Lin YK, Palmerola R, Smith P, Mahon F, Kaag MG, Dagen JE, Harpster LE, Reese CT, Raman JD (2012) Complications following prostate needle biopsy requiring hospital admission or emergency department visits—experience from 1000 consecutive cases. BJU Int 110(3):369–374CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanjanawongdeengam P, Viseshsindh W, Santanirand P, Prathombutr P, Nilkulwattana S (2009) Reduction in bacteremia rates after rectum sterilization before transrectal, ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thail 92(12):1621–1626 Kanjanawongdeengam P, Viseshsindh W, Santanirand P, Prathombutr P, Nilkulwattana S (2009) Reduction in bacteremia rates after rectum sterilization before transrectal, ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thail 92(12):1621–1626
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghafoori M, Shakiba M, Seifmanesh H, Hoseini K (2012) Decrease in infection rate following use of povidone-iodine during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Iran J Radiol 9(2):67–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ghafoori M, Shakiba M, Seifmanesh H, Hoseini K (2012) Decrease in infection rate following use of povidone-iodine during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Iran J Radiol 9(2):67–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Abughosh Z, Margolick J, Goldenberg SL, Taylor SA, Afshar K, Bell R, Lange D, Bowie WR, Roscoe D, Machan L, Black PC (2013) A prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine prophylactic cleansing of the rectum before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 189(4):1326–1331CrossRefPubMed Abughosh Z, Margolick J, Goldenberg SL, Taylor SA, Afshar K, Bell R, Lange D, Bowie WR, Roscoe D, Machan L, Black PC (2013) A prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine prophylactic cleansing of the rectum before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 189(4):1326–1331CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryu JW, Jung SI, Ahn JH, Hwang EC, Yu HS, Kang TW, Kwon DD, Park K, Kim JW (2016) Povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Int Urol Nephrol 48(11):1763–1770CrossRefPubMed Ryu JW, Jung SI, Ahn JH, Hwang EC, Yu HS, Kang TW, Kwon DD, Park K, Kim JW (2016) Povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Int Urol Nephrol 48(11):1763–1770CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang XH, Jia Y, Guo WH, Ma YR, Yang J, Zhang Y, Hou SC, Zhang CC (2017) Clinical comparison of the efficacy of three different bowel preparation methods on the infectious complications following transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in nursing practice. J Clin Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13854 (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed Zhang XH, Jia Y, Guo WH, Ma YR, Yang J, Zhang Y, Hou SC, Zhang CC (2017) Clinical comparison of the efficacy of three different bowel preparation methods on the infectious complications following transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in nursing practice. J Clin Nurs. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jocn.​13854 (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pu C, Bai Y, Yuan H, Li J, Tang Y, Wang J, Wei Q, Han P (2014) Reducing the risk of infection for transrectal prostate biopsy with povidone-iodine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 46(9):1691–1698CrossRefPubMed Pu C, Bai Y, Yuan H, Li J, Tang Y, Wang J, Wei Q, Han P (2014) Reducing the risk of infection for transrectal prostate biopsy with povidone-iodine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 46(9):1691–1698CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai JC, Lin YK, Huang YJ, Loh EW, Wen HY, Wang CH, Tsai YT, Hsieh WS, Tam KW (2017) Antiseptic effect of conventional povidone-iodine scrub, chlorhexidine scrub, and waterless hand rub in a surgical room: a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 38(4):417–422CrossRefPubMed Tsai JC, Lin YK, Huang YJ, Loh EW, Wen HY, Wang CH, Tsai YT, Hsieh WS, Tam KW (2017) Antiseptic effect of conventional povidone-iodine scrub, chlorhexidine scrub, and waterless hand rub in a surgical room: a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 38(4):417–422CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Uppal S, Bazzi A, Reynolds RK, Harris J, Pearlman MD, Campbell DA, Morgan DM (2017) Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine for preoperative topical antisepsis for abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 130(2):319–327CrossRefPubMed Uppal S, Bazzi A, Reynolds RK, Harris J, Pearlman MD, Campbell DA, Morgan DM (2017) Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine for preoperative topical antisepsis for abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 130(2):319–327CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Tignanelli CJ, Embree GGR, Barzin A (2017) House staff-led interdisciplinary morbidity and mortality conference promotes systematic improvement. J Surg Res 214:124–130CrossRefPubMed Tignanelli CJ, Embree GGR, Barzin A (2017) House staff-led interdisciplinary morbidity and mortality conference promotes systematic improvement. J Surg Res 214:124–130CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Topical rectal antiseptic at time of prostate biopsy: how a resident patient safety project has evolved into institutional practice
verfasst von
Rosa Park
Justin Gyorfi
Kalyan Dewan
Girish Kirimanjeswara
Joseph Y. Clark
Matthew G. Kaag
Kathleen Lehman
Jay D. Raman
Publikationsdatum
17.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Urology and Nephrology / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1937-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

International Urology and Nephrology 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.