Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 5/2011

01.10.2011 | Original Research

Unpacking the Blockers: Understanding Perceptions and Social Constraints of Health Communication in Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) Susceptibility Families

verfasst von: June A. Peters, Regina Kenen, Lindsey M. Hoskins, Laura M. Koehly, Barry Graubard, Jennifer T. Loud, Mark H. Greene

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Family communication is essential for accurate cancer risk assessment and counseling; family blockers play a role in this communication process. This qualitative analysis of social exchanges is an extension of earlier work characterizing those who are perceived by study participants as health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) susceptibility. Eighty-nine women, ages 23–56 years, enrolled in a Breast Imaging Study (BIS) and participated in a sub-study utilizing a social assessment tool known as the Colored Ecological Genetic Relational Map (CEGRM). Purposive sampling ensured that participants varied according to numbers of participating family members e.g., ranging from 1 to 6. Eighty-nine women from 42 families (1–8 relatives/family) participated. They collectively designated 65 blockers, both male and female. Situational factors, beliefs, attitudes and cultural traditions, privacy and protectiveness comprised perceived reasons for blocking intra-family health communications. Longitudinal data collected over 4 years showed families where blocking behavior was universally recognized and stable over time, as well as other families where blocking was less consistent. Self-blocking was observed among a significant minority of participating women. Blocking of health communications among family members with HBOC was variable, complex, and multifaceted. The reasons for blocking were heterogeneous; duration of the blocking appeared to depend on the reasons for blocking. Blocking often seemed to involve bi-directional feedback loops, in keeping with Lepore’s Social Constraints and Modulation Theory. Privacy and protectiveness predominated as explanations for long-term blocking.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Back, A. L., Arnold, A., & Tulsky, J. (2009). Mastering communication with seriously Ill patients. New York: Cambridge University Press. Back, A. L., Arnold, A., & Tulsky, J. (2009). Mastering communication with seriously Ill patients. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey, C. A. (2007). A guide to qualitative field research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press. Bailey, C. A. (2007). A guide to qualitative field research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckman, R. (1992). How to break bad news:A guide for healthcare professionals. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Buckman, R. (1992). How to break bad news:A guide for healthcare professionals. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Chivers Seymour, K., Addington-Hall, J., Lucassen, A. M., & Foster, C. L. (2010). What Facilitates or Impedes Family Communication Following Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk? A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Primary Qualitative Research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–13. Chivers Seymour, K., Addington-Hall, J., Lucassen, A. M., & Foster, C. L. (2010). What Facilitates or Impedes Family Communication Following Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk? A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Primary Qualitative Research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, H., & LaRose, R. (1999). Privacy issues in internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17(4), 421–434.CrossRef Cho, H., & LaRose, R. (1999). Privacy issues in internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17(4), 421–434.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Claes, E., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Boogaerts, A., Decruyenaere, M., Denayer, L., & Legius, E. (2003). Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 116A(1), 11–19.PubMedCrossRef Claes, E., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Boogaerts, A., Decruyenaere, M., Denayer, L., & Legius, E. (2003). Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 116A(1), 11–19.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Costalas, J. W., Itzen, M., Malick, J., Babb, J. S., Bove, B., Godwin, A. K., et al. (2003). Communication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 results to at-risk relatives: A cancer risk assessment program’s experience. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 119C(1), 11–18.CrossRef Costalas, J. W., Itzen, M., Malick, J., Babb, J. S., Bove, B., Godwin, A. K., et al. (2003). Communication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 results to at-risk relatives: A cancer risk assessment program’s experience. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 119C(1), 11–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat d’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2001). Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. Bioethics, 15(3), 231–247.PubMedCrossRef d’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2001). Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. Bioethics, 15(3), 231–247.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Daly, M. (2009). The impact of social roles on the experience of men in BRCA1/2 families: Implications for counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(1), 42–48.PubMedCrossRef Daly, M. (2009). The impact of social roles on the experience of men in BRCA1/2 families: Implications for counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(1), 42–48.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Daly, M. B., Barsevick, A., Miller, S. M., Buckman, R., Costalas, J., Montgomery, S., et al. (2001). Communicating genetic test results to the family: A six-step, skills-building strategy. Family & Community Health, 24(3), 13–26. Daly, M. B., Barsevick, A., Miller, S. M., Buckman, R., Costalas, J., Montgomery, S., et al. (2001). Communicating genetic test results to the family: A six-step, skills-building strategy. Family & Community Health, 24(3), 13–26.
Zurück zum Zitat Driessnack, M. (2009). Using the colored eco-genetic relationship map with children. Nursing Research, 58(5), 304–311.PubMedCrossRef Driessnack, M. (2009). Using the colored eco-genetic relationship map with children. Nursing Research, 58(5), 304–311.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, B. J., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., et al. (2003). To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64(4), 317–326.PubMedCrossRef Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, B. J., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., et al. (2003). To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64(4), 317–326.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Forrest, L. E., Delatycki, M. B., Skene, L., & Aitken, M. (2007). Communicating genetic information in families–a review of guidelines and position papers. European Journal of Human Genetics, 15(6), 612–618.PubMedCrossRef Forrest, L. E., Delatycki, M. B., Skene, L., & Aitken, M. (2007). Communicating genetic information in families–a review of guidelines and position papers. European Journal of Human Genetics, 15(6), 612–618.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Forrest, L., Delatycki, M., Curnow, L., Skene, L., & Aitken, M. (2010). Genetic health professionals and the communication of genetic information in families: practice during and after a genetic consultation. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 152A(6), 1458–1466.PubMed Forrest, L., Delatycki, M., Curnow, L., Skene, L., & Aitken, M. (2010). Genetic health professionals and the communication of genetic information in families: practice during and after a genetic consultation. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 152A(6), 1458–1466.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, L. (2006). The development of social network analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press. Freeman, L. (2006). The development of social network analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaff, C. L., & Bylund, C. L. (2010). Principles of family communication. In C. L. Gaff & C. L. Bylund (Eds.), Family communication about genetics: Theory and practice (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gaff, C. L., & Bylund, C. L. (2010). Principles of family communication. In C. L. Gaff & C. L. Bylund (Eds.), Family communication about genetics: Theory and practice (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaff, C. L., Cowan, R., Meiser, B., & Lindeman, G. (2006). Genetic services for men: the preferences of men with a family history of prostate cancer. [Article]. Genetics in Medicine, 8(12), 771–778.PubMedCrossRef Gaff, C. L., Cowan, R., Meiser, B., & Lindeman, G. (2006). Genetic services for men: the preferences of men with a family history of prostate cancer. [Article]. Genetics in Medicine, 8(12), 771–778.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gaff, C., Aitken, M., Flouris, A., & Metcalfe, S. (2007). A model for the development of genetics education programs for health professionals. Genetics in Medicine, 9(7), 451–457.PubMedCrossRef Gaff, C., Aitken, M., Flouris, A., & Metcalfe, S. (2007). A model for the development of genetics education programs for health professionals. Genetics in Medicine, 9(7), 451–457.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., et al. (2005). Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: patterns, priorities and problems. Clinical Genetics, 67(6), 492–502.PubMedCrossRef Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., et al. (2005). Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: patterns, priorities and problems. Clinical Genetics, 67(6), 492–502.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hallowell, N., Arden-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., et al. (2006). Guilt, blame and responsibility: men’s understanding of their role in the transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations within their family. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(7), 969–988.CrossRef Hallowell, N., Arden-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., et al. (2006). Guilt, blame and responsibility: men’s understanding of their role in the transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations within their family. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(7), 969–988.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton, R. J., Bowers, B. J., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Disclosing genetic test results to family members. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(1), 18–24.PubMedCrossRef Hamilton, R. J., Bowers, B. J., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Disclosing genetic test results to family members. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(1), 18–24.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kenen, R., & Peters, J. (2001). The colored, eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM): a conceptual approach and tool for genetic counseling research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(4), 289–309.CrossRef Kenen, R., & Peters, J. (2001). The colored, eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM): a conceptual approach and tool for genetic counseling research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(4), 289–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kenen, R., Eeles, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Mitchell. (2001). Communication patterns and the use of heuristics in familial breast/ovarian cancer families: an exploratory, qualitative study. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29(2), 60–60. Kenen, R., Eeles, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Mitchell. (2001). Communication patterns and the use of heuristics in familial breast/ovarian cancer families: an exploratory, qualitative study. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29(2), 60–60.
Zurück zum Zitat Kenen, R., Arden-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2004a). Healthy women from suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: the significant others in their lives. European Journal of Cancer Care, 13(2), 169–179.PubMedCrossRef Kenen, R., Arden-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2004a). Healthy women from suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: the significant others in their lives. European Journal of Cancer Care, 13(2), 169–179.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2004b). We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/Ovarian cancer (HBOC). Psycho-Oncology, 13, 335–345.PubMedCrossRef Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2004b). We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/Ovarian cancer (HBOC). Psycho-Oncology, 13, 335–345.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koehly, L. M., Peters, J. A., Kuhn, N., Hoskins, L., Letocha, A., Kenen, R., et al. (2008). Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being. Psycho-Oncology, 17(8), 812–821.PubMedCrossRef Koehly, L. M., Peters, J. A., Kuhn, N., Hoskins, L., Letocha, A., Kenen, R., et al. (2008). Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being. Psycho-Oncology, 17(8), 812–821.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koehly, L. M., Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Hoskins, L. M., Ersig, A. L., Kuhn, N. R., et al. (2009). Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: implications for family health communication interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2203–2209.PubMedCrossRef Koehly, L. M., Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Hoskins, L. M., Ersig, A. L., Kuhn, N. R., et al. (2009). Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: implications for family health communication interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2203–2209.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lepore, S. J. (2001). A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In A. Baum & B. Andersen (Eds.), Psychosocial interventions for cancer (pp. 99–118). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Lepore, S. J. (2001). A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In A. Baum & B. Andersen (Eds.), Psychosocial interventions for cancer (pp. 99–118). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lepore, S. J., & Helgeson, V. S. (1998). Social constraints, intrusive thoughts, and mental health after prostate cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(1), 89–106.CrossRef Lepore, S. J., & Helgeson, V. S. (1998). Social constraints, intrusive thoughts, and mental health after prostate cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(1), 89–106.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lepore, S. J., & Revenson, T. A. (2007). Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 1–21.CrossRef Lepore, S. J., & Revenson, T. A. (2007). Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 1–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman, C., Hughes, C., Lemon, S. J., Main, D., Snyder, C., Durham, C., et al. (1998). What you don’t know can hurt you: adverse psychologic effects in members of BRCA1-linked and BRCA2-linked families who decline genetic testing [see comments]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(5), 1650–1654.PubMed Lerman, C., Hughes, C., Lemon, S. J., Main, D., Snyder, C., Durham, C., et al. (1998). What you don’t know can hurt you: adverse psychologic effects in members of BRCA1-linked and BRCA2-linked families who decline genetic testing [see comments]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(5), 1650–1654.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Liede, A., Metcalfe, K., Hanna, D., Hoodfar, E., Snyder, C., Durham, C., et al. (2000). Evaluation of the needs of male carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who have undergone genetic counseling. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67(6), 1494–1504.PubMedCrossRef Liede, A., Metcalfe, K., Hanna, D., Hoodfar, E., Snyder, C., Durham, C., et al. (2000). Evaluation of the needs of male carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who have undergone genetic counseling. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67(6), 1494–1504.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lodder, L., Frets, P. G., Trijsburg, R. W., Tibben, A., Meijers-Heijboer, E. J., Duivenvoorden, H. J., et al. (2001). Men at risk of being a mutation carrier for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer: an exploration of attitudes and psychological functioning during genetic testing. European Journal of Human Genetics, 9(7), 492–500.PubMedCrossRef Lodder, L., Frets, P. G., Trijsburg, R. W., Tibben, A., Meijers-Heijboer, E. J., Duivenvoorden, H. J., et al. (2001). Men at risk of being a mutation carrier for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer: an exploration of attitudes and psychological functioning during genetic testing. European Journal of Human Genetics, 9(7), 492–500.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loud, J. T., Weissman, N. E., Peters, J. A., Giusti, R. M., Wilfond, B. S., Burke, W., et al. (2006). Deliberate deceit of family members: a challenge to providers of clinical genetics services. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(10), 1643–1646.PubMedCrossRef Loud, J. T., Weissman, N. E., Peters, J. A., Giusti, R. M., Wilfond, B. S., Burke, W., et al. (2006). Deliberate deceit of family members: a challenge to providers of clinical genetics services. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(10), 1643–1646.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loud, J. T., Thiébaut, A. C. M., Abati, A. D., Filie, A. C., Nichols, K., Danforth, D., et al. (2009). Ductal lavage in women from BRCA1/2 families: is there a future for ductal lavage in women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer? Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 18(4), 1243–1251.CrossRef Loud, J. T., Thiébaut, A. C. M., Abati, A. D., Filie, A. C., Nichols, K., Danforth, D., et al. (2009). Ductal lavage in women from BRCA1/2 families: is there a future for ductal lavage in women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer? Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 18(4), 1243–1251.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat MacDonald, D. J., Sarna, L., Van Servellen, G., Bastani, R., Giger, J. N., & Weitzel, J. N. (2007). Selection of family members for communication of cancer risk and barriers to this communication before and after genetic cancer risk assessment. Genetics in Medicine, 9(5), 275–282.PubMedCrossRef MacDonald, D. J., Sarna, L., Van Servellen, G., Bastani, R., Giger, J. N., & Weitzel, J. N. (2007). Selection of family members for communication of cancer risk and barriers to this communication before and after genetic cancer risk assessment. Genetics in Medicine, 9(5), 275–282.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manne, S., & Badr, H. (2008). Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer, 112(11 SUPPL.), 2541–2555.PubMedCrossRef Manne, S., & Badr, H. (2008). Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer, 112(11 SUPPL.), 2541–2555.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moynihan, C. (2002). Men, women, gender and cancer. [Article]. European Journal of Cancer Care, 11(3), 166–172.PubMedCrossRef Moynihan, C. (2002). Men, women, gender and cancer. [Article]. European Journal of Cancer Care, 11(3), 166–172.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moynihan, C., Burton, S., Huddart, R., Dearnaley, D., & Horwich, A. (2003). Men’s understanding of genetic cancer with special reference to prostate and testicular disease: an exploratory study. [Meeting Abstract]. Psycho-Oncology, 12(4), S164–S164. Moynihan, C., Burton, S., Huddart, R., Dearnaley, D., & Horwich, A. (2003). Men’s understanding of genetic cancer with special reference to prostate and testicular disease: an exploratory study. [Meeting Abstract]. Psycho-Oncology, 12(4), S164–S164.
Zurück zum Zitat Narod, S. A., & Boyd, J. (2002). Current understanding of them epidemiology and clinical implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for ovarian cancer. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 14(1), 19–26.CrossRef Narod, S. A., & Boyd, J. (2002). Current understanding of them epidemiology and clinical implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for ovarian cancer. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 14(1), 19–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patenaude, A. F., Dorval, M., DiGianni, L. S., Schneider, K. A., Chittenden, A., & Garber, J. E. (2006). Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell. [Article]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(4), 700–706.PubMedCrossRef Patenaude, A. F., Dorval, M., DiGianni, L. S., Schneider, K. A., Chittenden, A., & Garber, J. E. (2006). Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell. [Article]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(4), 700–706.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Giusti, R., Loud, J., Weissman, N., & Greene, M. H. (2004). Exploratory study of the feasibility and utility of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) in women at high genetic risk of developing breast cancer. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 130A(3), 258–264.PubMedCrossRef Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Giusti, R., Loud, J., Weissman, N., & Greene, M. H. (2004). Exploratory study of the feasibility and utility of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) in women at high genetic risk of developing breast cancer. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 130A(3), 258–264.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peters, J., Hoskins, L., Prindiville, S., Kenen, R., & Greene, M. (2006). Evolution of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) for assessing social functioning in women in hereditary breast-ovarian (HBOC) families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(6), 477–489.PubMedCrossRef Peters, J., Hoskins, L., Prindiville, S., Kenen, R., & Greene, M. (2006). Evolution of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) for assessing social functioning in women in hereditary breast-ovarian (HBOC) families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(6), 477–489.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Koehly, L. M., Vernon, S. W., Baile, W. F., Kohlmann, W. K., et al. (2003). How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 119C(1), 78–86.PubMedCrossRef Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Koehly, L. M., Vernon, S. W., Baile, W. F., Kohlmann, W. K., et al. (2003). How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 119C(1), 78–86.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richards, M. P. M., Marteau, T., & Richards, M. P. M. (1996). Families, kinship and genetics the troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (pp. 249–273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Richards, M. P. M., Marteau, T., & Richards, M. P. M. (1996). Families, kinship and genetics the troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (pp. 249–273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, J. A., Dancyger, C., Wallace, M., Jacobs, C., & Michie, S. (2010). The development of a methodology for examining the process of family communication of genetic test results. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19(5):1–12. Smith, J. A., Dancyger, C., Wallace, M., Jacobs, C., & Michie, S. (2010). The development of a methodology for examining the process of family communication of genetic test results. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19(5):1–12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stratton, M. R., & Rahman, N. (2008). The emerging landscape of breast cancer susceptibility. Nature Genetics, 40(1), 17–22.PubMedCrossRef Stratton, M. R., & Rahman, N. (2008). The emerging landscape of breast cancer susceptibility. Nature Genetics, 40(1), 17–22.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Strømsvik, N., Råheim, M., Øyen, N., Engebretsen, L. F., & Gjengedal, E. (2010). Stigmatization and male identity: norwegian males' experience after identification as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–11. Strømsvik, N., Råheim, M., Øyen, N., Engebretsen, L. F., & Gjengedal, E. (2010). Stigmatization and male identity: norwegian males' experience after identification as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–11.
Zurück zum Zitat Strømsvik, N., Raheim, M., Yen, N., & Gjengedal, E. (2009). Men in the women’s world of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer-a systematic review. Familial Cancer, 8(3), 221–229.PubMedCrossRef Strømsvik, N., Raheim, M., Yen, N., & Gjengedal, E. (2009). Men in the women’s world of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer-a systematic review. Familial Cancer, 8(3), 221–229.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suthers, G. K., Armstrong, J., McCormack, J., & Trott, D. (2006). Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder. [Article]. Journal of Medical Genetics, 43(8). Suthers, G. K., Armstrong, J., McCormack, J., & Trott, D. (2006). Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder. [Article]. Journal of Medical Genetics, 43(8).
Zurück zum Zitat Tercyak, K. P., Peshkin, B. N., DeMarco, T. A., Brogan, B. M., & Lerman, C. (2002). Parent-child factors and their effect on communicating BRCA1/2 test results to children. Patient Education and Counseling, 47(2), 145–153.PubMedCrossRef Tercyak, K. P., Peshkin, B. N., DeMarco, T. A., Brogan, B. M., & Lerman, C. (2002). Parent-child factors and their effect on communicating BRCA1/2 test results to children. Patient Education and Counseling, 47(2), 145–153.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tercyak, K. P., Peshkin, B. N., Demarco, T. A., Farkas Patenaude, A., Schneider, K. A., Garber, J. E., et al. (2007). Information needs of mothers regarding communicating BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results to their children. Genetic Testing, 11(3), 249–255.PubMedCrossRef Tercyak, K. P., Peshkin, B. N., Demarco, T. A., Farkas Patenaude, A., Schneider, K. A., Garber, J. E., et al. (2007). Information needs of mothers regarding communicating BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results to their children. Genetic Testing, 11(3), 249–255.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, D., & Easton, D. (2001). Variation in cancer risks, by mutation position, in BRCA2 mutation carriers. American Journal of Human Genetics, 68(2), 410–419.PubMedCrossRef Thompson, D., & Easton, D. (2001). Variation in cancer risks, by mutation position, in BRCA2 mutation carriers. American Journal of Human Genetics, 68(2), 410–419.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, D., & Easton, D. F. (2002). Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(18), 1358–1365.PubMed Thompson, D., & Easton, D. F. (2002). Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(18), 1358–1365.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Brocker-Vriends, A. H., van Asperen, C. J., Sijmons, R. H., et al. (2007). Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study. Clinical Genetics, 71(1), 35–42.PubMedCrossRef van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Brocker-Vriends, A. H., van Asperen, C. J., Sijmons, R. H., et al. (2007). Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study. Clinical Genetics, 71(1), 35–42.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Riper, M. (2005). Genetic testing and the family. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 50(3), 227–233.CrossRef Van Riper, M. (2005). Genetic testing and the family. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 50(3), 227–233.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Watson, M., Foster, C., Eeles, R., Eccles, D., Ashley, S., Davidson, R., et al. (2004). Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA 1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort. British Journal of Cancer, 91(10), 1787–1794.PubMedCrossRef Watson, M., Foster, C., Eeles, R., Eccles, D., Ashley, S., Davidson, R., et al. (2004). Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA 1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort. British Journal of Cancer, 91(10), 1787–1794.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weil, J. (2010). Resistance and adherence: Understanding the patient’s perspective. In B. S. LeRoy, P. McCarthy Veach, & D. M. Bartels (Eds.), Genetic counseling practice: Advanced concepts and skills (pp. 155–174). New York: Wiley-Blackwell. Weil, J. (2010). Resistance and adherence: Understanding the patient’s perspective. In B. S. LeRoy, P. McCarthy Veach, & D. M. Bartels (Eds.), Genetic counseling practice: Advanced concepts and skills (pp. 155–174). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, B. J., Forrest, K., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., Matthews, E., et al. (2004). Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known. Community Genetics, 7(1), 15–24.PubMedCrossRef Wilson, B. J., Forrest, K., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., Matthews, E., et al. (2004). Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known. Community Genetics, 7(1), 15–24.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Unpacking the Blockers: Understanding Perceptions and Social Constraints of Health Communication in Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) Susceptibility Families
verfasst von
June A. Peters
Regina Kenen
Lindsey M. Hoskins
Laura M. Koehly
Barry Graubard
Jennifer T. Loud
Mark H. Greene
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2011
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9370-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Journal of Genetic Counseling 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Ambulantisierung: Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Hybrid-DRG

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Hybrid-DRG-Verordnung soll dazu führen, dass mehr chirurgische Eingriffe ambulant durchgeführt werden, wie es in anderen Ländern schon länger üblich ist. Die gleiche Vergütung im ambulanten und stationären Sektor hatten Niedergelassene schon lange gefordert. Aber die Umsetzung bereitet ihnen doch Kopfzerbrechen.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Harninkontinenz: Netz-Op. erfordert über lange Zeit intensive Nachsorge

30.04.2024 Harninkontinenz Nachrichten

Frauen mit Belastungsinkontinenz oder Organprolaps sind nach einer Netz-Operation keineswegs beschwerdefrei. Vielmehr scheint die Krankheitslast weiterhin hoch zu sein, sogar höher als von harninkontinenten Frauen, die sich nicht haben operieren lassen.

Welche Übungen helfen gegen Diastase recti abdominis?

30.04.2024 Schwangerenvorsorge Nachrichten

Die Autorinnen und Autoren einer aktuellen Studie aus Griechenland sind sich einig, dass Bewegungstherapie, einschließlich Übungen zur Stärkung der Bauchmuskulatur und zur Stabilisierung des Rumpfes, eine Diastase recti abdominis postpartum wirksam reduzieren kann. Doch vieles ist noch nicht eindeutig belegt.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.