16.10.2018 | Original Article
Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT texture analysis to diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 6/2019
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
18F-fluorodeoxyglocose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) plays a significant role in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Texture analysis is a group of computational methods for evaluating the inhomogeneity among adjacent pixels or voxels. We investigated whether texture analysis applied to myocardial FDG uptake has diagnostic value in patients with CS.
Methods
Thirty-seven CS patients (CS group), and 52 patients who underwent FDG PET/CT to detect malignant tumors with any FDG cardiac uptake (non-CS group) were studied. A total of 36 texture features from the histogram, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM), gray-level zone size matrix (GLZSM) and neighborhood gray-level difference matrix (NGLDM), were computed using polar map images. First, the inter-operator and inter-scan reproducibility of the texture features of the CS group were evaluated. Then, texture features of the patients with CS were compared to those without CS lesions.
Results
Twenty-eight of the 36 texture features showed high inter-operator reproducibility with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) over 0.80. In addition, 17 of the 36 showed high inter-scan reproducibility with ICCs over 0.80. The SUVmax showed no difference between the CS and non-CS group [7.36 ± 2.77 vs. 8.78 ± 4.65, p = 0.45, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.60]. By contrast, 16 of the 36 texture features could distinguish CS from non-CS grsoup with AUC > 0.80. Multivariate logistic regression analysis after hierarchical clustering concluded that long-run emphasis (LRE; P = 0.0004) and short-run low gray-level emphasis (SRLGE; P = 0.016) were significant independent factors that could distinguish between the CS and non-CS groups. Specifically, LRE was significantly higher in CS than in non-CS (30.1 ± 25.4 vs. 11.4 ± 4.6, P < 0.0001), with high diagnostic ability (AUC = 0.91), and had high inter-operator reproducibility (ICC = 0.98).
Conclusions
The texture analysis had high inter-operator and high inter-scan reproducibility. Some of texture features showed higher diagnostic value than SUVmax for CS diagnosis. Therefore, texture analysis may have a role in semi-automated systems for diagnosing CS.
Anzeige