Background
Malaria continues to be a major cause of death and disability [
1] and contributes to economic weaknesses in poor countries [
2] despite increased international support for, and coordination of, research and control efforts [
3,
4]. Insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) and intermittent presumptive treatment of malaria in pregnant women and infants have been shown to be successful control measures, and research on malaria vaccines holds promise for the future [
4‐
7]. However, the availability of prompt effective treatment of clinical malaria will remain a fundamental control mechanism either alone or alongside additional measures, where these can be effectively implemented [
4]. There are macroeconomic and political challenges in ensuring that effective antimalarial medicines are available through the public sector at country level [
8‐
10]. In Kenya, for example, implementation of antimalarial drug policy changes in 2005 occurred more than 32 months after the initial decision, as a result of complex financing and procurement systems and prolonged negotiations with the pharmaceutical industry [
11]. Socio-economic and geographic barriers to treatment through government clinics and hospitals has led to a proliferation of untrained private medicine sellers in many settings [
12]. In recognition of the latter phenomenon and the problems associated with practices in this sector, international and national malaria control strategies have identified private medicine sellers as an important target to promote appropriate home treatment [
13,
14].
Since 2001, the Kenya National Malaria Strategy (KNMS) has supported the implementation of programmes targeting private sellers of OTC medicines and their clients within district malaria control activities [
14]. Thirty-three districts have obtained support to implement educational programmes for medicine sellers and communities on the use of antimalarial medicines in the home from the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM). In April 2004, Kenya changed the first-line recommended antimalarial drug policy from Sulphadoxine/Sulphalene-pyrimethamine medicines (SP) to the artemesinin-based combination therapies (ACT), with a phased introduction through the formal government and mission sectors, to be followed by the private formal sector. The policy proposed ultimate inclusion of private medicine sellers, depending on early experiences with the change [
15].
In this paper, we present data from household surveys of treatment seeking behaviour for recent childhood fevers and adult illnesses, and on malaria prevalence in well children under five years, in rural areas of three districts in Kenya. The data were collected during surveys conducted collaboratively by the Kenyan Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Programme and the Division of Malaria Control (DOMC) in the Kenyan Ministry of Health (MOH) in 2002 and 2003 in districts with varying malaria transmission. The surveys aimed to inform the planning and evaluation of district-led training programmes for private medicine retailers and communities on malaria and its treatment. Data from the malaria parasite prevalence surveys are presented in this paper as markers for transmission pressure in the study sites, and for comparison with treatment-seeking behavior patterns. The findings are discussed with particular emphasis on adult OTC antimalarial use as an emerging challenge to programmes addressing this sector.
Results
12,445 households were visited to interview 11,505 caregivers of children under five years and 19,914 adults across all the districts. Table
2 summarizes the number of households visited, interviews held, the prevalence of recent fevers in children or acute illnesses in adults, patterns of OTC medicines use in children and adults and parasite prevalence in each district. Parasite prevalence in Makueni was compatible with a hypoendemic pattern of malaria transmission, in contrast to the hyperendemic patterns seen in Kwale and Busia [
19]. OTC medicines provided the commonest first treatment for fevers in children and acute illness episodes in adults. In general, children with fever treated through private retailers were more likely to be given an antipyretic than an antimalarial treatment, especially in Kwale and Makueni. Adults were more likely to buy antimalarials to treat their own illnesses than children were to receive these for febrile illnesses. The two most commonly used types of OTC antimalarials were the MOH first and second line recommended medicines at that time, SP and AQ, respectively, together accounting for 80.1% (95% CI 76.4, 83.3%) and 86.4% (95% CI 83.9, 83.3%) of all OTC antimalarials used in children and adults respectively. The remaining 19.9% of antimalarials used in children included chloroquine (16.6%), combinations of AQ and SP (2.1%) and others (1.3%). Among adults the remaining 13.6% of antimalarials included chloroquine (10.0%), combinations of AQ and SP (2.8%), and others (0.6%). The first line recommended medicine, SP, was more commonly used than AQ in one district for children (Busia, where 46.0% children using OTC AMs received SP) but in all other areas and age groups, AQ was either more likely or equally likely to be used. The adequacy of treatment was gauged in comparison to the national malaria guidelines on AM medicine use, shown in tables
3 and
4. Across all districts, single dose SP was used adequately by the majority (83.8%; 95% CI 78.7, 86.6) of adults and by nearly half (46.4%; 95% CI 39.5, 53.4) of children. Multiple dose AQ medicines were generally used inappropriately; 12.1% children (95% CI 16.3, 34.2) and 1.9% adults (95% CI 0.8, 4.2) took adequate amounts of AQ for their illness. The common pattern reported for AQ was single dose treatment.
Table 2
Number of households visited, prevalence of illnesses, use of OTC antimalarials and malaria parasite prevalence (%: 95% CI)
Households visited | 4017 | 4174 | 4254 | 12 445 | - |
Children under 5 years
|
Number interviewed | 3451 | 4081 | 3973 | 11 505 | - |
Recent fever | 1437/3451 (41.7: 39.5, 43.9) | 1770/4081 (43.3: 41.5, 45.2) | 1216/3973 (30.8: 28.7, 33.0) | 4423/11 505 (29.0: 28.1, 29.8) | <0.001 |
Fevers first treated with OTC medicines† | 540/1437 (37.6: 35.1, 40.1) | 898/1770 (50.7: 48.3, 53.1) | 641/1216 (52.7: 49.8, 55.5) | 2079/4423 (47.0: 45.5, 48.5) | <0.001 |
OTC users taking an AM‡ | 237/519 (45.7: 41.3, 50.1) | 147/898 (16.3: 13.9, 18.9) | 83/638 (13.3: 9.5, 17.9) | 467/2057 (22.7: 20.9, 24.6) | <0.001 |
OTC SP users taking adequate dose§ | 68/141 (48.3: 37.9, 58.8) | 19/39 (48.6: 32.5, 64.9) | 11/31 (40.4: 19.0, 66.3) | 98/211 (46.4: 39.5, 53.4) | 0.415 |
OTC AQ users taking adequate dose | 16/112 (14.2: 8.7, 22.2) | 5/56 (9.1: 4.0, 19.5) | 3/31 (10.7: 3.4, 28.9) | 24/98 (12.1: 16.3, 34.2) | 0.547 |
Rapid malaria test positive | 805/971 (82.8: 79.0, 86.1) | 695/963 (71.1: 64.4, 76.9) | 34/980 (3.2: 2.1, 4.8) | 1534/2914 (52.6: 50.8, 54.4) | <0.001 |
Adults
|
Number Interviewed∥ | 6198 | 6750 | 6966 | 19 914 | - |
Recent illness** | 1027/6198 (16.6: 14.4, 19.0) | 1805/6750 (26.7: 24.9, 28.6) | 1268/6966 (18.2: 17.1, 19.4) | 4098/19 914 (20.6: 20.0, 21.1) | <0.001 |
First treated with OTC medicines | 472/1027 (46.0: 42.8, 49.1) | 1103/1805 (61.1: 58.8, 63.3) | 753/126510 (59.5: 56.7, 62.2) | 2328/4097 (56.8: 55.2, 58.3) | <0.001 |
OTC users taking an AM | Not collected†† | 291/1081 (26.9: 21.3, 33.5) | 384/745 (53.3: 48.6, 57.9) | 675/1826 (36.9: 34.7, 39.2) | <0.001 |
OTC SP users taking adequate dose | 80/102 (78.3: 68.4, 85.8) | 75/95 (79.4: 68.3, 87.3) | 157/179 (87.7: 81.5, 92.0) | 312/376 (83.8: 78.7, 86.6) | 0.07 |
OTC AQ users taking adequate dose | 2/44 (4.4: 1.1, 16.6) | 0/148 | 5/174 (2.4: 0.9, 6.0) | 7/336 (1.9: 0.8, 4.2) | 0.07 |
Table 3
National guidelines on dosage by age for SP medicines. [1 tab = 500 mg sulphadoxine, 25 mg pyrimethamine; 5 ml = 250 mg sulphadoxine, 12.5 mg pyrimethamine]
<11 months | 1 | 1/2 – 3/4 | 250 – 375 | 1 – 1 1/2 | 1/2 – 3/4 |
12 – 59 months | 1 | 1 – 1 1/4 | 500 – 625 | 2 – 2 1/2 | 1 – 1 1/4 |
5–8 years | 1 | 1 1/2 – 1 3/4 | 750–875 | | |
9–14 years | 1 | 2–2 3/4 | 1000–1375 | | |
15+ years | 1 | 3 | 1500 | - | - |
Table 4
National guidelines on dosage by age for AQ medicines. [1 tab = 200 mg AQ base; 5 ml = 50 mg AQ base]
< 6 months | 3 | 3/4 – 1 | 150 – 200 | 3 – 4 1/2 | 1 1/2 – 2 |
6 – 11 months | 3 | 1 1/4 – 1 3/4 | 250 – 350 | 5 – 7 1/2 | 2 1/2 – 3 1/2 |
12 – 47 months | 3 | 2 – 2 1/4 | 400 – 450 | 7 1/2 – 9 1/2 | 4 – 5 |
48 – 71 months | 3 | 2 1/2 – 3 1/2 | 500 – 700 | 10 – 14 1/2 | 5 – 7 |
15 – 16 years | 3 | 4–6 1/4 | 800–1250 | - | - |
16 + years | 3 | 6 1/2–7 1/2 - | 1300–1500 | - | - |
Table
5 presents data on the second actions taken by those who used OTC medicines as a first step. For this analysis, users who purchased medicines more than once from a shop before moving to a second resort to treatment were grouped as single action. 82.9% children and 88.9% adults using OTC medicines as a first measure took no further action. Amongst the group taking no further action, 9.7% children (133/1377) and 13.5% adults (209/1547) reported remaining unwell, while the remainder reported full or almost complete recovery (where the latter was defined as having no intention to seek further treatment). For the minority that took further action, most subsequently visited a formal provider but this action was generally not taken within 48 hours of onset of illness. However, by 72 hours, 66.9% (95% CI 61.1, 72.3) of children in this group of self-referrals reported consultation at a government or private clinic.
Table 5
Actions following first use of OTC medicines (%: 95% CI)
Children
|
No further action after OTC | 511/540 (94.6) (92.3, 96.6) | 657/837 (77.9) (73.3, 82.0) | 469/598 (78.3) (73.4, 82.6) | 1637/1975 (82.9) (81.1, 84.5) | <0.001 |
2nd action is use of clinic | 24/540 (4.4) (2.8, 6.5) | 153/837 (18.3) (15.7, 21.1) | 107/598 (17.9) (14.9, 21.2) | 284/1975 (14.4) (12.8, 16.0) | <0.001 |
Visits clinic within 48 h* | 8/24 (33.3) (15.6, 55.3) | 37/153 (24.2) (17.6, 31.7) | 41/107 (38.3) (29.1, 48.2) | 86/284 (30.3) (24.9, 35.9) | 0.05 |
Adults
|
No further action after OTC | : 427/453 (94.3) (91.7, 96.2) | 923/1065 (86.4) (83.1, 89.0) | 637/717 (88.6) (85.6, 91.0) | 1987/2235 (88.9) (87.5, 90.1) | <0.001 |
2nd action is use of clinic | : 4/453 (0.9) (0.2, 2.2) | 104/1065 (9.8) (8.0, 11.7) | 63/717 (8.8) (6.8, 11.1) | 171/2235 (7.7) (6.5, 8.8) | <0.001 |
Visits clinic within 48 h | 3/4 (75.0) (19.4,99.3) | 32/104 (30.1) (22.1, 40.6) | 11/63 (17.5) (9.0, 29.1) | 46/171 (26.9) (20.4, 34.2 | 0.015 |
Discussion
Given the high global burden of young childhood disease and deaths attributed to malaria [
1,
2], early effective treatment of childhood fevers has become a main focus within global and national malaria control strategies [
3,
13,
14]. Such strategies highlight the role of private medicine retailers to promote early effective home treatment of childhood malaria in endemic settings [
13]. More recently, the introduction of ACTs as first line treatment for malaria in many countries in sub Saharan Africa has led to debate on the role of community-based mechanisms for delivery of malaria treatments [
20‐
23]. Understanding patterns of OTC medicine use is important to assess the opportunities and challenges of programmes for private medicine retailers, but there is limited detailed data on adult OTC antimalarial use in the literature [
23‐
26]. This study reports on patterns of OTC medicines use from large-scale surveys including child and adult populations across three districts in Kenya with varying malaria endemicity.
In interpreting these results, it is important to consider limitations of the study methods. The data on treatment seeking behaviour were collected from reports concerning recent illness episodes. While standard practices were used to ensure that these were as accurate as possible (careful training and supervision of interviewers, internal validity checks in questionnaires, use of locally constructed drug charts with packaging and logo visuals to aid recognition, and inspection of left-over tablets), this type of data is always open to recall and reporting biases. In the household survey, for pragmatic reasons, histories were elicited for all children within a household who met inclusion criteria for age, including siblings. Theoretically, this may lead to clustering of data within households for which no allowance has been made in the analysis. Confidence intervals could therefore be wider than those stated here, although these are generally small given the size of these surveys. There is some evidence that intra-household clustering would have a negligible effect; a study in rural Tanzania found no difference in the outcome of an analysis of treatment seeking behaviour for all young children and for only one randomly selected child within that household [
27]. Finally, these data were collected from surveys conducted in 2002 and 2003, at a time when the recommended first line antimalarial medicine in Kenya was SP. Practices of drug use may have changed over time, and care should be taken in extrapolating these results to understand use of other antimalarial medicines. However, the pattern of poor adherence with multidose medicines is not a new or isolated phenomenon [
28,
29] and many factors underlying medicine use for acute illnesses (cost, complexity of regimen and rate of response) are likely to be generalisable.
The data presented here concur with earlier descriptions of the popularity of private medicine sellers as an early treatment option for childhood fevers, and the inappropriate ways in which OTC antimalarial medicines are generally used in young children [
17,
23,
30‐
33]. The study further illustrates that adults with a recent acute illness were more likely to use an antimalarial medicine than were young children to receive them for a febrile illness, even in hypoendemic districts. These findings reinforce the need to intervene in a sector that is chaotic but potentially offers an opportunity to improve early fever treatment practices in children. They also point to shortcomings in applying current global home malaria management strategies that focus primarily on young children to private retail sector interventions. While the under five age group experiences the greatest burden of malaria disease in endemic settings, adult use of OTC antimalarials may represent a greater challenge to strategies to optimise their use [
34].
There is limited information on adult use of OTC antimalarial medicines. Several studies have addressed the frequency of OTC antimalarial use in adult populations in specific settings, but there is less information on the way that these medicines are used, or from large-scale surveys in areas of varying malaria endemicity. A study of OTC antimalarial use in a highland area of low seasonal malaria transmission in Kenya described a similar excess of adult over paediatric use (24% of adult and 14% of child OTC users purchased an antimalarial) [
24]. High use of OTC antimalarials has been described for older school children in Kenya [
26], as have similarities between adult and child use of OTC antipyretic and antimalarial medicines in a qualitative study in Ghana [
25].
Adult over-use of antimalarials is an important phenomenon because of the potential for wastage of resources where adults have a lower risk of malaria than children. The extent of over-use is highlighted by the popularity of these medicines even in areas with low and seasonal malaria transmission. Adult over-use affects estimations of the volume of malaria medicines used in the private retail sector and therefore has an economic implication for governments and households, particularly in anticipation of, or following, the introduction of ACTs [
24]. There may be an impact of under dosing on the development of drug resistance. Although the relationship between these is not straightforward, resistance is likely to be selected for where partially effective treatments result in recrudescence of infection [
35]. If under dosing contributes to increased resistance of malaria parasites to antimalarial medicines, the widespread existence of such practices amongst adults as well as children can only increase this effect.
For both adults and children, there are clear differences in adherence to SP and AQ medicines, with adherence to SP being much higher than AQ. This finding is likely to be a result of the different regimes for administration, with SP medicines being given in a single dose in contrast to the 3-day AQ regimen. There is evidence that other multiple dose medicines, such as chloroquine, have commonly been used as single doses in the past, including in Kenya [
36]. Adherence to multidose ACTs may present a similar problem, particularly given the speed of response of symptoms, such as fever, to this group of medicines. Although high adherence to ACTs has been documented in the formal sector [
37,
38], under-dosing is often a cost-saving strategy [
32,
39] and is, therefore, particularly likely to affect private retail sector treatments where the costs are directly related to the quantity of medicine obtained. This incentive to cut down on full courses of medicines may plausibly be greater for adults than for young children in keeping with the larger amounts of medication that they require. In this survey, adult AQ adherence is considerably worse than that reported for children.
A further pattern of interest emerging from the study concerns movement between private medicine sellers and trained health workers. Amongst the minority (14.4%), who sought further treatment after using OTC medicines, most carers (approximately 84%) chose to visit a trained health worker. Self referral to such a facility did not generally occur within 24 hours of onset of illness, as recommended by the Roll Back Malaria initiative [
13], but the majority did seek further assistance by 72 hours. Kemble et al studied this pattern of self referral in an urban population in Kampala, finding a much higher proportion (42%) of child OTC users were subsequently taken to a formal provider, although with similar timing [
23]. In an epidemic area in Uganda, health facilities were reported as the commonest first line treatment for both adults and children with suspected malaria [
40]. More research on these patterns, and the factors underlying self-referral behaviour would help to elucidate opportunities for optimising these practices.
Programmes for private medicine retailers in malaria control have been based on pragmatic principles, and these still obtain. The challenges of working with informal private providers have been well articulated at the policy level, including the size of the sector in many countries, lack of regulatory mechanisms and capacity, lack of organizational structures, multiplicity of brands, inadequate quality of OTC medicines, difficulties in diagnosing malaria clinically and commercial interests of retailers [
5,
12,
20,
41,
42]. However, unit dose pre-packaging interventions have already been shown to improve adherence with multidose medicines, and may prove effective for antimalarial medicines in the private retail sector (10, 41). The opportunities provided by this sector have also proved compelling, including sustainability, cost and coverage [
31,
36,
43,
44], particularly given the shortcomings reported in the public sector, reviewed recently by Zurovac and Rowe [
45]. Mills et al illustrate this pragmatism writing that "...training and investment in formal sector providers (public and private) and restructuring of the market so as to strengthen the purchasing and regulation functions of government, may displace the informal sector, but this is likely to be a very long term process" [
12]. The data presented in this paper show that the group of mothers who visit a health facility as a second option is a minority, but that this self-referral occurs relatively quickly, even in rural settings. Kemble suggests that faster movement to a health centre may be achievable with the provision of adequate, acceptable and affordable services and a better public understanding of the need for rapid treatment of childhood fevers [
23]. This data also indicate that interventions directed at increasing usage of health facilities may be feasible and play an important part in improving early effective malaria treatment. With recent increased investment in malaria control activities, further research is needed to establish the extent to which the introduction of free, effective antimalarial treatment in government health facilities, and the wider availability of free or affordable ITNs can influence the balance of choice for users between trained public and untrained commercial providers in the future, taking account of socio-economic and geographic differences. Where OTC antimalarial use remains a popular option, greater targeting of antimalarial medicines to high risk populations, and away from the current predominantly adult market, will be an important challenge for private medicine retailer programmes in the future [
12,
23,
24].
Authors' contributions
Timothy Abuya was involved in the design of the research, was primary supervisor of the survey work, analysed the data and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. Wilfred Mutemi was involved in the design of the research, supported the survey work and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Karisa Baya was involved in the design of the research, was a major contributor to the survey work and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Sam Ochola was involved in the design of the research, supported the survey work and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Greg Fegan was involved in the design of the research, supervised the analysis of data and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Vicki Marsh was responsible for the design of the research, planning and supervising survey work and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.